Why and how have supply chain codes of conduct diffused among lead firms around the globe? Prior research has drawn on both institutional and stakeholder theories to explain the adoption of codes, but no study has modeled adoption as a temporally dynamic process of diffusion. We propose that the drivers of adoption shift over time, from exclusively nonmarket to eventually market-based mechanisms as well. In an analysis of an original data set of more than 1,800 firms between the years 2006 and 2015, we find that strong nonmarket labor institutions in a firm’s home country are critical to initiating and sustaining the diffusion process. Market mechanisms, such as investor scrutiny and brand risk, emerge as important later. Contrary to prior research, we did not find a significant effect from nongovernmental organization (NGO) pressure. We conclude that markets for corporate social responsibility can and do arise, but only after they are effectuated by nonmarket institutions.
AguileraR. V.RuppD. E.WilliamsC. A.GanapathiJ. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836-863.
2.
AmaeshiK.AmaoO. O. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in transnational spaces: Exploring influences of varieties of capitalism on expressions of corporate codes of conduct in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 225-239.
3.
AndersenM.Skjoett-LarsenT. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 75-86.
4.
AppolloniA.RissoM.ZhangT. (2013). Collaborative approach for sustainable auditing of global supply chains. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 2, 19-31.
5.
AugerP.BurkeP.DevinneyT. M.LouviereJ. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features?Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 281-304.
6.
BairJ.PalpacuerF. (2015a). CSR beyond the corporation: Contested governance in global value chains. Global Networks, 15(Suppl. 1), S1-S19.
7.
BairJ.PalpacuerF. (2015b). The institutionalization of supply chain corporate social responsibility: Field formation in comparative context. In TsutsuiK.LimA. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in a globalizing world (pp. 181-217). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BartleyT. (2005). Corporate accountability and the privatization of labor standards: Struggles over codes of conduct in the apparel industry. Research in Political Sociology, 14, 211-244.
9.
BartleyT. (2007). Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 297-351.
10.
BelalA.OwenD. L. (2015). The rise and fall of stand-alone social reporting in a multinational subsidiary in Bangladesh: A case study. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28, 1160-1192.
11.
BernsteinS.CashoreB. (2007). Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation & Governance, 1, 347-371.
12.
BitektineA. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36, 151-179.
13.
BitektineA.HaackP. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40, 49-75.
14.
BoströmM.JönssonA. M.LockieS.MolA. P.OosterveerP. (2015). Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 1-7.
15.
BrammerS.HoejmoseS.MillingtonA. (2011). Managing sustainable global supply chain: Framework and best practices. London, Ontario, Canada: Network for Business Sustainability.
16.
BrammerS.JacksonG.MattenD. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 3-28.
17.
BrennanM. J.SubrahmanyamA. (1995). Investment analysis and price formation in securities markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 361-381.
18.
BruderlJ.SchusslerR. (1990). Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 530-547.
19.
CampbellJ. L. (1997). Mechanisms of evolutionary change in economic governance: Interaction, interpretation and bricolage. Evolutionary Economics and Path Dependence, 1, 10-31.
20.
CarboneV.MoattiV.VinziV. E. (2012). Mapping corporate responsibility and sustainable supply chains: An exploratory perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21, 475-494.
ClevesM.GouldW. W.MarchenkoY. (2016). An introduction to survival analysis using Stata (3rd Rev. ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
24.
CoxD. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34, 187-202.
25.
DeegR.JacksonG. (2007). Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socio-Economic Review, 5, 149-179.
26.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
27.
FligsteinN. (1996). Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61, 656-673.
28.
FombrunC. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
29.
FreemanR. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
FreemanR. E.HarrisonJ. S.WicksA. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
GilbertD.RascheA. (2008). Opportunities and problems of standardized ethics initiatives—A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 755-773.
33.
GilbertD.RascheA.WaddockS. (2011). Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 23-44.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
38.
HallP. A.SoskiceD. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
HarjotoM. A.JoH. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 45-67.
40.
HavemanH. A.RaoH.ParuchuriS. (2007). The winds of change: The progressive movement and the bureaucratization of thrift. American Sociological Review, 72, 117-142.
41.
HeJ. J.TianX. (2013). The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 109, 856-878.
42.
HirschmanA. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
IoannouI.SerafeimG. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 834-864.
44.
IoannouI.SerafeimG. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1053-1081.
45.
JacksonG.ApostolakouA. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute?Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 371-394.
46.
JacksonG.PetrakiA. (2011). Understanding short-termism: The role of corporate governance. Stockholm, Sweden: Glasshouse Forum.
47.
JacobyS. M. (2004). The embedded corporation: Corporate governance and employment relations in Japan and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
JenkinsR. (2011). Corporate codes of conduct: Self-regulation in a global economy. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
49.
JoH.HarjotoM. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 351-383.
50.
KellyE. (2003). The strange history of employer sponsored child care: Interested actors, uncertainty, and the transformation of law in organizational fields. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 606-649.
51.
KenworthyL. (2001a). Wage-setting coordination scores (Dataset). Atlanta, GA: Department of Sociology, Emory University.
52.
KenworthyL. (2001b). Wage-setting measures: A survey and assessment. World Politics, 54, 57-98.
53.
KleinJ.DawarN. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 203-217.
54.
KurtzL. (2008). Socially responsible investment and shareholder activism. In CraneA.McWilliamsA.MattenD.MoonJ.SiegelD. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 249-280). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55.
KytleB.RuggieJ. G. (2005). Corporate social responsibility as risk management: A model for multinationals. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
56.
LaminA.ZaheerS. (2012). Wall street vs. main street: Firm strategies for defending legitimacy and their impact on different stakeholders. Organization Science, 23, 47-66.
57.
LamradN. (2013). Manufacturing governance: Global norms and policy diffusion—The case of the Chinese apparel industry. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 6, 147-162.
58.
LawrenceA. T. (2007). Hewlett-Packard and a common supplier code of conduct. Case Research Journal, 27(1), 1-7.
59.
LeeH.O’MarahK.GeraintJ.BlakeB. (2013). The chief supply chain officer report 2013: Pulse of the profession. London, England: SCM World.
60.
LeeJ.GereffiG. (2015). Global value chains, rising power firms and economic and social upgrading. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 11, 319-339.
61.
LimA.TsutsuiK. (2012). Globalization and commitment in corporate social responsibility: Cross-national analyses of institutional and political-economy effects. American Sociological Review, 77, 69-98.
62.
LockeR. M. (2013). The promise and limits of private power: Promoting labor standards in a global economy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
63.
LogsdonJ. M.WoodD. J. (2002). Reputation as an emerging construct in the business and society field: An introduction. Business & Society, 41, 365-370.
64.
Lund-ThomsenP.LindgreenA. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: Where are we now and where are we going?Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 11-22.
65.
Lund-ThomsenP.NadviK.ChanA.KharaN.XueH. (2012). Labour in global value chains: Work conditions in football manufacturing in China, India and Pakistan. Development and Change, 43, 1211-1237.
66.
LuoX.WangH.RaithelS.ZhengQ. (2015). Corporate social performance, analyst stock recommendations, and firm future returns. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 123-136.
67.
MaddenT. J.FehleF.FournierS. (2006). Brands matter: An empirical demonstration of the creation of shareholder value through branding. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 224-235.
68.
MarxA. (2008). Limits to non-state market regulation: A qualitative comparative analysis of the international sport footwear industry and the Fair Labor Association. Regulation & Governance, 2, 253-273.
69.
MayerF.GereffiG. (2010). Regulation and economic globalization: Prospects and limits of private governance. Business and Politics, 12(3), 1-25.
70.
MenaS.PalazzoG. (2012). Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 527-5566.
71.
MeyerJ. W.PopeS. M.IsaacsonA. (2015). Legitimating the transnational corporation in a stateless world society. In LimA.TsutsuiK. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in a globalizing world (pp. 27-72). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
73.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.WoodD. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
74.
MuellerM.dos SantosV.SeuringS. (2009). The contribution of environmental and social standards towards ensuring legitimacy in supply chain governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 509-523.
75.
MyersD. J. (2000). The diffusion of collective violence: Infectiousness, susceptibility, and mass media networks. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 173-208.
76.
NewellP. (2001). Managing multinationals: The governance of investment for the environment. Journal of International Development, 13, 907-919.
77.
PopeS. M. (2015). Why firms participate in the global corporate governance social responsibility initiatives, 2000-2010. In TsutsuiK.LimA. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in a globalizing world (pp. 251-285). Oxford, UK: Cambridge University Press.
78.
PostJ. E. (1978). Corporate behavior and social change. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing.
79.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
80.
Raj-ReichertG. (2011). The electronic industry code of conduct: Private governance in a competitive and contested global production network. Competition & Change, 15, 221-238.
81.
RaoH.GreveH. R.DavisG. F. (2001). Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 502-526.
82.
RascheA. (2012). Global policies and local practice: Loose and tight couplings in multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 679-708.
83.
RivoliP.WaddockS. (2011). “First they ignore you . . .”: The time-context dynamic and corporate responsibility. California Management Review, 53, 87-104.
84.
RoehrichJ. K.GrosvoldJ.HoejmoseS. U. (2014). Reputational risks and sustainable supply chain management: Decision making under bounded rationality. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34, 695-719.
85.
RogersE. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
86.
RuggieJ. G. (2007). Business and human rights: The evolving international agenda. American Journal of International Law, 101, 819-840.
87.
SandersW. G.TuschkeA. (2007). The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 33-56.
88.
SchleiferP.BloomfieldM. J. (2015). When institutions fail: Legitimacy, (de)legitimation, and the failure of private governance systems (Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2015/36). Fiesole, Italy: European University Institute.
89.
SchneibergM.BartleyT. (2001). Regulating American industries: Markets, politics, and the institutional determinants of fire insurance regulation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 101-146.
90.
SchneiderM. R.PaunescuM. (2012). Changing varieties of capitalism and revealed comparative advantages from 1990 to 2005: A test of the Hall and Soskice claims. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 731-753.
91.
Schrempf-StirlingJ.PalazzoG. (2016). Upstream corporate responsibility: The evolution from contract responsibility to full producer responsibility. Business & Society, 55, 491-527.
92.
SchulerD. A.CordingM. (2006). A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31, 540-558.
93.
SethiS. P. (2011). Self-regulation through voluntary codes of conduct. In SethiS. P. (Ed.), Globalization and self-regulation: The crucial role that corporate codes of conduct play in global business (pp. 3-14). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
94.
SethiS. P.VeralE. A.ShapiroH. J.EmelianovaO. (2011). Mattel, Inc.: Global manufacturing principles (GMP)—A life-cycle analysis of a company-based code of conduct in the toy industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 483-517.
95.
SineW. D.HavemanH. A.TolbertP. S. (2005). Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 200-232.
96.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
97.
SmithN. C. (1989). Morality and the market: Consumer pressure for corporate accountability. London, England: Routledge.
98.
SobczakA. (2006). Are codes of conduct in global supply chains really voluntary? From soft law regulation of labour relations to consumer law. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 167-184.
99.
SoundararajanV.BrownJ. (2016). Voluntary governance mechanisms in global supply chains: Beyond CSR to a stakeholder utility perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 83-102.
100.
SoundararajanV.SpenceL. J.ReesC. (2018). Small business and social irresponsibility in developing countries: Working conditions and “evasion” institutional work. Business & Society, 57, 1301-1336.
101.
StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software: Release 15. College Station, TX: Author.
102.
StrangD.SouleS. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265-290.
103.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
104.
ThelenK. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
105.
ThorneD. M.QuinnF. F. (2016). Private governance in the supply chain. Journal of Marketing Channels, 23, 11-21.
106.
TolbertP. S.ZuckerL. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22-39.
107.
TolbertP. S.ZuckerL. G. (1999). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In CleggS. R.HardyC. (Eds.), Studying organization: Theory & method (pp. 169-184). London, England: Sage.
108.
United Nations Global Compact. (2015). Impact: Transforming business, changing the world United Nations Global Compact. Retrieved from https://www.unglobalcompact.org/library/1331
109.
UttingP. (2015). CSR and the evolving standards regime: Regulatory and political dynamics. In TsutsuiK.LimA. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in a globalizing world (pp. 73-106). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
110.
van TulderR.KolkA. (2001). Multinationality and corporate ethics: Codes of conduct in the sporting goods industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 267-283.
111.
VisserJ. (2015). ICTWSS data base (version 5.0). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies AIAS.
112.
VogelD. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
113.
VogelD. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business & Society, 49, 68-87.
114.
WashingtonM.VentrescaM. J. (2004). How organizations change: The role of institutional support mechanisms in the incorporation of higher education visibility strategies, 1874–1995. Organization Science, 15, 82-97.
115.
WiersemaM. F.ZhangY. (2011). CEO dismissal: The role of investment analysts. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1161-1182.
116.
YoungS.ThyilV. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: Role of context in international settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 1-24.
117.
YoungS. L.MakhijaM. V. (2014). Firms’ corporate social responsibility behavior: An integration of institutional and profit maximization approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 670-698.
118.
ZajacE. J.WestphalJ. D. (2004). The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. American Sociological Review, 69, 433-457.
119.
ZuckermanE. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1398-1438.
