Food safety problems in China, such as deadly tainted milk, have attracted growing attention from a corporate social responsibility (CSR) perspective. To examine the forces that potentially drive CSR behavior within the Chinese food industry, our study is organized as follows. First, a review is conducted on the unique history of CSR in China as well as some of the major Chinese food scandals that have taken place. The primary drivers of CSR in China that have been suggested in the literature are then summarized. Next, new institutional theory perspectives are drawn upon to analyze three forces that potentially affect the behavior of Chinese firms: (a) coercive isomorphism, (b) mimetic processes, and (c) normative pressures. Based on a questionnaire survey of 164 Chinese managers and employees, the CSR behavior of firms operating in the Chinese food industry is found to only be significantly affected by the institutional factor of normative pressures. The study concludes with its limitations as well as the implications of the findings.
BurtonB.GoldsbyM. (2009). Corporate social responsibility orientation, goals, and behavior: A study of small business owners. Business & Society, 20, 88-104.
9.
CampbellJ. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in social responsibility in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946-967.
10.
CarrollA. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
DahlsrudA. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1-13.
16.
DavisK.BlomstromR. L. (1975). Business and society (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
17.
DelliosR.YangX.YilmazN. K. (2009). Food safety and the role of the government: Implications for CSR policies in China. iBusiness, 1, 75-84.
18.
DiMaggioP. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In ZuckerL. G. (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
19.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
20.
FriedmanM. (1970, September13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 32-33, 122, 124, 126.
21.
Haski-LeventhalD. (2013). Employee engagement in CSR: The case of payroll giving in Australia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 113-128.
KohliA. K.JaworskiB. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18.
31.
KongD. (2012). Does corporate social responsibility matter in the food industry? Evidence from a nature experiment in China. Food Policy, 37, 323-334.
LiW.ZhangR. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 631-645.
36.
LinL.ZhouD.MaC. (2010). Green food industry in China: Development, problems and policies. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 25, 69-80.
LiuX.JiaS.LiF. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as a legitimate concern for Chinese enterprises: An analysis of media depictions. Public Relations Review, 37, 207-216.
40.
MartinsonsM. G. (2008). Relationship-based e-commerce: Theory and evidence from China. Information Systems Journal, 18, 331-356.
41.
MattenD.MoonJ. (2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404-424.
42.
McGuireJ. W. (1963). Business and society. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
43.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. S.WrightP. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1-18.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. (2008). Premier Wen Jiabao answered the questions at the opening ceremony of summer Davos and at the meeting with entrepreneurs. Retrieved from http://www.chinaconsulatesf.org/eng/xw/t516628.htm
46.
MoonJ.ShenX. (2010). CSR in China research: Salience, focus and nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 613-629.
47.
NarverC. J.SlaterS. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 20-35.
48.
NathD.GrucaT. (1997). Convergence across alternative methods for forming strategic groups. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 745-760.
49.
NunallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
50.
OliverC. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179.
51.
QuR. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in China: Impact of regulations, market orientation and ownership structure. Chinese Management Studies, 1, 198-207.
52.
RamasamyB.YeungM. (2009). Chinese consumers’ perception of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 119-132.
53.
ScottW. R. (2004). Institutional theory. In RitzerG. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory (pp. 408-414). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
54.
SeeG. (2009). Harmonious society and Chinese CSR: Is there really a link?Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 1-22.
SibaoS.HuaerC. (2009). Economic globalization and the construction of China’s corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Law and Management, 51, 134-138.
57.
TanJ. (2002). Impact of ownership type on environment–strategy linkage and performance: Evidence from a transitional economy. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 333-355.
58.
TanJ.LitsschertR. (1994). Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implications: An empirical study of Chinese electronics industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 1-20.
59.
TeoH. H.WeiK. K.BenbasatI. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27, 1-31.
60.
TianZ.WangR.YangW. (2011). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 197-212.
61.
VisserW.TolhurstN. (Eds.). (2010). The world guide to CSR: A country-by-country analysis of corporate sustainability and responsibility. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
62.
WangJ.QinS.CuiY. (2010). Problems and prospects of CSR system development in China. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 128-134.
63.
WangL.JuslinH. (2009). The impact of Chinese culture on corporate social responsibility: The harmony approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 433-451.
64.
WongL. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in China: Between the market and the search for a sustainable growth development. Asian Business & Management, 8, 129-148.
ZhaoS. R.RuanR. X. (2011). Study on the prevention of food safety crisis in China from perspective of the relationships among government, industry association and enterprise. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (pp. 1319-1324). New York, NY: IEEE.
69.
ZhenF. (2010). Paths that affect the behavior of corporate social responsibility—Based on the study of senior managers (Doctoral dissertation). Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
