This article examines the political perspective of corporate social responsibility from the standpoint of normative Islam. We argue that large firms within Muslim majority countries have the moral obligation to assist governments in addressing challenges related to sustainable socioeconomic development and in advancing human rights. In substantiating our argument, we draw upon the Islamic business ethics, stakeholder theory, and corporate governance literatures, as well as the concepts of Maqasid al Shariah (the objectives of Islamic law) and fard al ‘ayn (obligation upon all individuals within society) versus fard al kifayah (obligation upon some individuals within society) to introduce a normative model elucidating critical Islamic precepts. Finally, we propose an Islamic “political” corporate governance framework, which democratizes firm decision making by embedding “core” stakeholders, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and Shariah scholars in the corporate board, thereby enhancing the ability of businesses to respond to stakeholder concerns and priorities, while mitigating interstakeholder and intraboard power asymmetries.
AbdallahA.HassanM.McClellandP. (2015). Islamic financial institutions, corporate governance and corporate risk disclosure in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 31, 63-82.
2.
Abu-TapanjehA. (2009). Corporate governance from an Islamic perspective: A comparative analysis with OECD principles. Critical Perspective of Accounting, 20, 556-567.
3.
Al-FaruqiI. R. (1992). Al Tawhid: Its implications for thought and life. Herndon, VA: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
4.
AliA. J. (1992). The Islamic work ethic in Arabia. Journal of Psychology, 126, 507-519.
5.
AliA. J. (2001). Scaling and Islamic work ethic. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 575-583.
6.
AliA. J. (2011). Islamic ethics and marketing. In SandikciO.RiceG. (Eds.), Handbook of Islamic marketing (pp. 17-34). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
7.
AliA. J.Al-AaliA. (2015). Marketing and ethics: What Islamic ethics have contributed and the challenges ahead. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 833-845.
8.
AliA. J.Al-AaliA.Al-OwaihanA. (2013). Islamic perspectives on profit maximization. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 467-475.
9.
Al-RamahiA. (2008). Sulh: A crucial part of Islamic arbitration (Law, Society, and Economy Working Papers, December2008). London, England: Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.
10.
Al-SuhaibaniM.NaifarN. (2014). Islamic corporate governance: Risk-sharing and Islamic preference shares. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 623-632.
11.
AyubM. (2007). Understanding Islamic finance. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
BeekunR. I.BadawiJ. A. (2005). Balancing ethical responsibility among multiple organizational stakeholders: The Islamic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 131-145.
13.
Bloomberg Businessweek Middle East. (2016, January). A Malaysian standards body spreads the word, 29-30.
14.
CarrollA. B. (1979). A three-dimensional model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
15.
CarrollA. B. (1998). The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100, 1-7.
16.
Chan-SerafinS.BriefA. P.GeorgeJ. M. (2013.). Perspective—How does religion matter and why? Religion and the organizational sciences. Organization Science, 24, 1585-1600.
17.
ChinM. K.HambrickD. C.TreviñoL. K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 197-232.
18.
ChoudhuryM.HoqueM. (2006). Corporate governance: An Islamic perspective. Corporate Governance International Journal of Business in Society, 6, 116-128.
19.
ClarksonM. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.
20.
CraneA.MattenD. (2008). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
CraneA.MattenD.MoonJ. (2008). Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
DarusF.YusoffH.NaimD. M. A.ZainM. M.AmranA.FauziH.PurwantoY. (2013). Islamic corporate social responsibility (i-CSR) framework from the perspective of Maqasid al-Syariah and maslahah. Issues in Social & Environmental Accounting, 7, 102-112.
23.
DawkinsC. (2015). Agonistic pluralism and stakeholder engagement. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25, 1-28.
24.
den HondF.RehbeinK. A.de BakkerF. G. A.Kooijmans-van LankveldH. (2014). Playing on two chessboards: Reputation effects between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate political activity (CPA). Journal of Management Studies, 51, 790-813.
25.
DuX.JianW.ZengQ.DuY. (2014). Corporate environmental responsibility in polluting industries: Does religion matter?Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 485-507.
26.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
27.
FreemanR. E.WicksA. C.ParmarB. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited.”Organization Science, 15, 364-369.
GriesseM. A. (2007). The geographic, political, and economic context for corporate social responsibility in Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 21-37.
30.
HamidA.HaniffM.OthmanM.SalinA. (2011). The comparison of the characteristics of the Anglo-Saxon governance model and the lslamic governance of IFIS. Malaysian Accounting Review, 10(2), 1-12.
31.
HenryC.WilsonR. (Eds.). (2004). The politics of Islamic finance. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
32.
HertogS. (2010). Princes, brokers, and bureaucrats: Oil and the state in Saudi Arabia. London, England: Cornell University Press.
33.
HillmanA.KeimG. (1995). International variation in the business-government interface: Institutional and organizational considerations. Academy of Management Review, 20, 193-214.
34.
IqbalZ.MirakhorA. (2004). Stakeholders model of governance in Islamic economic system. Islamic Economic Studies, 11(2), 43-64.
35.
Islamic Development Bank. (2011, June). The challenge of achieving the millennium development goals in IDB member countries in the post-crisis world. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: Islamic Development Bank. Occasional Paper No. 16.
36.
IteU. E. (2005). Poverty reduction in resource-rich developing countries: What have multinational corporations got to do with it?Journal of International Development, 17, 913-929.
37.
JamaliD. (2010). The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: Global, local, substantive or diluted?Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 181-200.
38.
JensenC. M.MecklingW. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost, and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
39.
KaramC. M.JamaliD. (2013). Gendering CSR in the Arab Middle East: An institutional perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23, 31-68.
40.
La PortaR.Lopez-de- SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 3-27.
41.
LiW.ZhangR. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 631-645.
42.
LouvenC.BrockhausenG. (2010). The importance of governance. International Financial Law Review, 29, 78-81.
43.
MattenD.CraneA. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166-179.
44.
MayerE. A. (2006). Clashing human rights priorities: How the United States and Muslim countries selectively use provisions of International Human Rights Law. Chennai Journal of Intercultural Philosophy, 44, 44-77.
45.
MitraR. (2012). “My country’s future”: A culture-centered interrogation of corporate social responsibility in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 131-147.
46.
MollahS.ZamanM. (2015). Shari’ah supervision, corporate governance and performance: Conventional vs. Islamic banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 58, 414-435.
47.
MoonJ.CraneA.MattenD. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, 429-453.
48.
MorsingM.RoepstorffA. (2015). CSR as political activity: Observations on IKEA’s CSR identity-image dynamics. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 395-409.
49.
MuellerD. C. (2006). The Anglo-Saxon approach to corporate governance and its applicability to emerging markets. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14, 207-219.
50.
MuhamadR.SukorM. E. A.RizalM. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: An Islamic perspective. Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 1, 43-56.
51.
MurphyM. J.MacDonaldJ. B.AntoineG. A.SmolarskiJ. (2016). Exploring Muslim attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: Are Saudi business students different?Journal of Business Ethics, 1-16.
52.
MuthuriJ. N.ChappleW.MoonJ. (2009). An integrated approach to implementing “community participation” in corporate community involvement: Lessons from Magadi Soda Company in Kenya. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 431-444.
53.
NallaZ. (2011). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Malaysia with reference to the Maqasid. Islam and Civilization Renewal, 2, 384-387.
54.
NasrV. (2005). The rise of “Muslim democracy.”Journal of Democracy, 16(2), 13-27.
55.
NéronP. Y.NormanW. (2008). Citizenship, Inc. Do we really want businesses to be good corporate citizens?Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 1-26.
56.
NtimC. G.SoobaroyenT. (2013). Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations: New empirical insights from a neo-institutional framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21, 468-494.
57.
Organization of Islamic Cooperation. (2014). The 1st OIC international forum on Islamic tourism (concept paper). Jakarta, Indonesia: Organization of Islamic Cooperation.
58.
RehbeinK.SchulerD. (2015). Linking corporate community programs and political strategies: A resource-based view. Business & Society, 54, 794-821.
59.
RehmanS. S.AskariH. (2010). How Islamic are Islamic countries?Global Economy Journal, 10(2), 1-30.
60.
RiceG. (1999). Islamic ethics and the implications for business. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 345-358.
61.
SafieddineA. (2009). Islamic financial institutions and corporate governance: New insight for agency theory, corporate governance. An International Review, 17, 142-158.
62.
SchererA. G.PalazzoG. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate social responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096-1120.
63.
SidaniY. (2005). Women, work, and Islam in Arab societies. Women in Management Review, 20, 498-512.
64.
SidaniY.Al-ArissA. (2015). New conceptual foundations for Islamic business ethics: The contribution of Abu-Hamid Al-Ghazali. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 847-857.
65.
SiepelJ.NightingaleP. (2014). Anglo-Saxon governance: Similarities, differences and outcomes in a financialised world. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25, 27-35.
66.
SingerA. (2013). Corporate political activity, social responsibility, and competitive strategy: An integrative model. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22, 308-324.
67.
SwansonD. L. (1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20, 43-64.
68.
SyedJ.Van BurenH. J.III. (2014). Global business norms and Islamic views of women’s employment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24, 251-276.
TraceyP. (2012). Religion and organization: A critical review of current trends and future directions. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 87-134.
71.
UllahS.JamaliD.HarwoodI. A. (2014). Socially responsible investment: Insights from Shari’a departments in Islamic financial institutions. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23, 218-233.
72.
United Nations. (2015). The Millennium Development Goals Report.
73.
Van CranenburghK.ArenasD.GoodmanJ.LoucheC. (2014). Religious organisations as investors: A Christian perspective on shareholder engagement. Society and Business Review, 9, 195-213.
74.
WartickS. L.CochranP. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758-769.
75.
WeberM. (2002). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism and other writings. New York, NY: Penguin Classics.
76.
Westermann-BehayloM. K.RehbeinK.FortT. (2015). Enhancing the concept of corporate diplomacy: Encompassing political corporate social responsibility, international relations, and peace through commerce. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29, 387-404.
77.
WhelanG. (2012). The political perspective of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 709-737.
78.
WilliamsG.ZinkinJ. (2010). Islam and CSR: A study of the compatibility between the tenets of Islam and the UN global compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 519-533.
79.
WilsonR. (2009, May). The development of Islamic finance in the GCC (Kuwait Programme on Development, Governance and Globalization in the Gulf States, Working paper). London: Centre for the Study of Global Governance.
80.
WoodD. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.
81.
ZhaoM. (2012). CSR-based political legitimacy strategy: Managing the state by doing good in China and Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 439-460.
