Income Inequality,Entrepreneurial Activity,and National Business Systems: A Configurational Analysis

Abstract

This article explores how and why high levels of income inequality result from configurations of different types of entrepreneurial activities and elements of the institutional context in a multicountry sample. A configurational approach is used to unpack the complexities associated with how income inequality arises from different types of entrepreneurial activities embedded in different institutional contexts associated with Whitley’s national business systems dimensions. The findings from fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis reveal that high levels of both high-growth and necessity entrepreneurial activity are associated with income inequality in certain contexts that are characterized by distinct institutional complementarities.

Keywords

entrepreneurial activity fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)income inequality national business systems

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acemoglu

Johnson

(2005). Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy, 113, 949-995.

Anokhin

Wincent

(2012). Start-up rates and innovation: A cross-country examination. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 41-60.

Autio

(2007). 2007 global report on high-growth entrepreneurship (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor). Wellesley, MA: Babson College. Retrieved from http://www.babson.edu/Academics/centers/blank-center/global-research/gem/Documents/gem-2007-global-high-growth-entrepreneurship.pdf

Bapuji

(2015). Individuals, interactions and institutions: How economic inequality affects organizations. Human Relations, 68, 1059-1083.

Bapuji

Neville

(2015). Income inequality ignored? An agenda for business and strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 13, 233-246.

Beck

Demirguc-Kunt

Levine

(2005). SMEs, growth, and poverty: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Economic Growth, 10, 199-229.

Beramendi

Rueda

(2014). Inequality and institutions: The case of economic coordination. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 251-271.

Blanchflower

D. G.

Shadforth

(2007). Entrepreneurship in the UK. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 3, 257-264.

Bosma

Coduras

Litovsky

Seaman

(2012). GEM manual: A report on the design, data and quality control of the global entrepreneurship monitor (Technical report). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.espae.espol.edu.ec/images/stories/GEM_Manual_Quality_Control.pdf

10.

Bosma

Harding

(2006). Global entrepreneurship monitor: GEM 2006 summary results. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

11.

Bowen

H. P.

De Clercq

(2008). Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 747-767.

12.

Cagetti

De Nardi

(2006). Entrepreneurship, frictions, and wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 835-870.

13.

Carree

M. A.

Thurik

A. R.

(2010). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In Acs

Z. J.

Audretsch

D. B.

(Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 437-471). New York, NY: Springer.

14.

Carter

(2011). The rewards of entrepreneurship: Exploring the incomes, wealth, and economic well-being of entrepreneurial households. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 39-55.

15.

Casson

M. C.

Pavelin

(2016). The social performance and responsibilities of entrepreneurship. Business & Society, 55, 11-13.

16.

Cowell

(2011). Measuring inequality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

17.

Crilly

(2013). Corporate social responsibility: A multilevel explanation of why managers do good. Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research, 38, 181-204.

18.

Crouch

(2005). Models of capitalism. New Political Economy, 10, 439-456.

19.

Filion

(2004). Two types of self-employed in Canada. In Dana

(Ed.), Handbook of research on international entrepreneurship (pp. 308-329). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

20.

Fiss

P. C.

(2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393-420.

21.

Fiss

P. C.

Sharapov

Cronqvist

(2013). Opposites attract? Opportunities and challenges for integrating large-N QCA and econometric analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 66, 191-197.

22.

Fritsch

Mueller

(2008). The effect of new business formation on regional development over time: The case of Germany. Small Business Economics, 30, 15-29.

23.

García-Castro

Aguilera

R. V.

Ariño

M. A.

(2013). Bundles of firm corporate governance practices: A fuzzy set analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21, 390-407.

24.

García-Castro

Francoeur

(2016). When more is not better: Complementarities, costs and contingencies in stakeholder management. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 406-424. doi:10.1002/smj.2341

25.

Gentry

W. M.

Hubbard

R. G.

(2004). Entrepreneurship and household saving. Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 4, 1053. doi:10.2202/1538-0637.1053

26.

Goedhuys

Sleuwaegen

(2010). High-growth entrepreneurial firms in Africa: A quantile regression approach. Small Business Economics, 34, 31-51.

27.

Hamilton

B. H.

(2000). Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self employment. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 604-631.

28.

Höpner

(2005). What connects industrial relations and corporate governance? Explaining institutional complementarity. Socio-Economic Review, 3, 331-358.

29.

Hotho

(2014). From typology to taxonomy: A configurational analysis of national business systems and their explanatory power. Organization Studies, 35, 671-702.

30.

International Institute for Management Development. (2011). IMD world competitiveness yearbook 2011. Lausanne, Switzerland: Author.

31.

Jaumotte

Lall

Papageorgiou

(2013). Rising income inequality: Technology, or trade and financial globalization. IMF Economic Review, 61, 271-309.

32.

Judge

W. Q.

Fainshmidt

Brown

J. L.

III . (2014). Which model of capitalism best delivers both wealth and equality? Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 363-386.

33.

Kautonen

Down

Welter

Vainio

Palmroos

Althoff

Kolb

(2010). “Involuntary self-employment” as a public policy issue: A cross-country European review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 16, 112-129.

34.

Kautonen

Palmroos

(2010). The impact of a necessity-based start-up on subsequent entrepreneurial satisfaction. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6, 285-300.

35.

Kelley

Bosma

Amorós

J. E.

(2010). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2010 global report. Wellesley, MA: Babson College and Universidad del Desarrollo. Retrieved from http://entreprenorskapsforum.se/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/GEM-2010-Global-Report.pdf

36.

Khoury

Prasad

(2016). entrepreneurship amid concurrent institutional constraints in less developed countries. Business & Society, 55, 934-969.

37.

Kimhi

(2010). Entrepreneurship and income inequality in southern Ethiopia. Small Business Economics, 34, 81-91.

38.

Klapper

Amit

Guillén

Quesada

J. M.

(2007). Entrepreneurship and firm formation across countries (World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 4313). Retrieved from http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-4313

39.

Koveos

Zhang

(2012). Regional inequality and poverty in pre- and post-reform China: Can entrepreneurship make a difference? Thunderbird International Business Review, 54, 59-72.

40.

Kritikos

A. S.

(2014). Greece needs a strategy for its transition to an innovation economy. DIW Economic Bulletin, 4(10), 3-10.

41.

Lacey

Fiss

(2009). Comparative organizational analysis across multiple levels: A set-theoretic approach. In King

B. G.

Felin

Whetten

D. A.

(Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 26: Studying differences between organizations: Comparative approaches to organizational research (pp. 91-116). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

42.

Lane

Wood

(2009). Capitalist diversity and diversity within capitalism. Economy and Society, 38, 531-551.

43.

Lewellyn

K. B.

Muller-Kahle

(2016). A configurational approach to understanding gender differences in entrepreneurial activity: A fuzzy set analysis of 40 countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12, 765-790.

44.

Lippmann

Davis

Aldrich

H. E.

(2005). Entrepreneurship and inequality. In Keister

L. A.

(Ed.), Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 15: Entrepreneurship (pp. 3-31). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

45.

Maggetti

(2014). Promoting corporate responsibility in private banking necessary and sufficient conditions for joining the Wolfsberg initiative against money laundering. Business & Society, 53, 787-819.

46.

Makino

Isobe

Chan

C. M.

(2004). Does country matter? Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1027-1043.

47.

Marcus

A. A.

Anderson

M. H.

(2013). Commitment to an emerging organizational field: An enactment theory. Business & Society, 52, 181-212.

48.

Morgan

(2007). National business systems research: Progress and prospects. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23, 127-145.

49.

Neckerman

K. M.

Torche

(2007). Inequality: Causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 335-357.

50.

North

(1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

51.

Ortigueira

(2013). The rise and fall of centralized wage bargaining. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115, 825-855.

52.

Park

El Sawy

(2013). The value of configurational approaches for studying digital business strategy. In Cambre

Fiss

Marx

(Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations: Configurational theory and methods in organizational research (pp. 205-224). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

53.

Piketty

Saez

(2006). The evolution of top incomes: A historical and international perspective. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 96, 200-205.

54.

Quadrini

(1997). Entrepreneurship, saving and social mobility (Discussion Paper No. 116). Minneapolis, MN: Institute of Empirical Macroeconomics, Federal Reserve Bank.

55.

Quadrini

(1999). The importance of entrepreneurship for wealth concentration and mobility. Review of Income and Wealth, 45, 1-19.

56.

Ragin

(2000). Fuzzy set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

57.

Ragin

(2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

58.

Rapoport

(2002). Migration, credit constraints and self-employment: A simple model of occupational choice, inequality and growth. Economics Bulletin, 15(7), 1-5.

59.

Reynolds

Bosma

Autio

(2005). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24, 205-231.

60.

Rihoux

Ragin

(2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis and related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

61.

Roland

(2004). Understanding institutional change: Fast-moving and slow-moving institutions. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38, 109-131.

62.

Schneider

Wagemann

(2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

63.

Scott

(2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

64.

Seery

Arendar

(2014). Even it up: Time to end extreme inequality. Oxford, UK: Oxfam International.

65.

Shane

(2008). The illusions of entrepreneurship: The costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors and policymakers live by. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

66.

Stangler

Litan

(2009). Where will the jobs come from? Kansas City, MO: Ewing Marion Kauffman.

67.

Stinchfield

B. T.

Silverberg

R. T.

(2016). Empirical evidence that high levels of entrepreneurial attitudes dampen the level of civil disorder. Business & Society, 55, 676-705.

68.

Uslaner

E. M.

(2004). Trust and corruption. In Lambsdorff

J. G.

Taube

Schramm

(Eds.), The new institutional economics of corruption (pp. 76-86). New York, NY: Routledge.

69.

Van Roekel

. (2012, April 5). The JOBS Act: Encouraging startups, supporting small businesses. The White House. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2012/04/05/jobs-act-encouraging-startups-supporting-small-businesses

70.

Wang

Zhao

Thornhill

(2015). Pay dispersion and organizational innovation: The mediation effects of employee participation and voluntary turnover. Human Relations, 68, 1155-1181.

71.

Whitley

(1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

72.

Whitley

(2000). The institutional structuring of innovation strategies: Business systems, firm types and patterns of technical change in different market economies. Organization Studies, 21, 855-887.

73.

Whitley

(2003, May 8-11). How national are business systems? The role of different state types and complementary institutions in constructing homogenous systems of economic coordination and control. Proceedings of the Workshop on National Business Systems in the New Global Context, Oslo, Norway.

74.

Whitley

(2006). Understanding differences: Searching for the social processes that construct and reproduce variety in science and economic organization. Organization Studies, 27, 1153-1177.

75.

Wiklund

Shepherd

(2003). Aspiring for, and achieving growth: The moderating role of resources and opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1919-1941.

76.

Witt

Redding

(2013). Asian business systems: Institutional comparison, clusters and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems theory. Socio-Economic Review, 11, 265-300.

77.

Wong

P. K.

Y. P.

Autio

(2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24, 335-350.

78.

Wood

Frynas

J. G.

(2006). The institutional basis of economic failure: Anatomy of the segmented business system. Socio-Economic Review, 4, 239-277.

79.

World Bank. (2011). Retrieved from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&series=SI.POV.GINI&country=

80.

World Bank. (2015). Measuring inequality. Retrieved from http://go.worldbank.org/3SLYUTVY00

81.

Xavier-Oliveira

Laplume

A. O.

Pathak

(2015). What motivates entrepreneurial entry under economic inequality? The role of human and financial capital. Human Relations, 68, 1183-1207.

82.

Yanya

Abdul-Hakim

Abdul-Razak

(2011). Does higher entrepreneurial activity correlate with higher level of growth? Evidence from Thailand. Paper presented at Society of Interdisciplinary Business Research (SIPR) 2011 Conference on Interdisciplinary Business Research. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1869352##