This dissertation abstract and commentary present the work of Dr. Andrea Prado. The dissertation explores the dynamics and consequences of the competition among self-regulatory institutions within an industry and how firms choose among the multiple environmental and labor certifications available. The dissertation abstract explains the research questions, setting, and methods. The commentary discusses the author’s views on conducting research as a junior scholar.
AbrahamsonE.RosenkopfL. (1993). Institutional and competitive bandwagons. Academy of Management Review, 18, 487-517.
2.
ArthurW. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99, 116-131.
3.
BarnettM. L.KingA. A. (2008). Good fences make good neighbors: A longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1150-1170.
4.
BartleyT. (2007). Institutional emergence in the era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 297-351.
ChristmannP.TaylorG. (2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 439-458.
7.
CorbettC. J. (2006). Global diffusion of ISO 9000 certification through supply chains. MSOM -Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 8, 330-350.
8.
CorbettC. J.KirschD. A. (2001). International diffusion of ISO 14000 certification. Production and Operations Management, 10, 327-342.
9.
CorbettC. J.Montes-SanchoM. J.KirschD. A. (2005). The financial impact of ISO 9000 certification in the United States: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 51, 1046-1059.
10.
DarnallN.CarminJ. (2005). Greener and cleaner? The signaling accuracy of U.S. voluntary environmental programs. Policy Sciences, 38, 71-90.
11.
DurandR.McGuireJ. (2005). Legitimating agencies in the face of selection: The case of AACSB. Organization Studies, 26, 165-196.
12.
ElliottK. A.FreemanR. B. (2003). Can labor standards improve under globalization?Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
13.
FarrellJ.SalonerG. (1985). Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 16, 70-83.
14.
GladwellT. (2000). Tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
15.
GowrisankanranG.StavinsJ. (2004). Network externalities and technology adoption: Lessons from electronic payments. RAND Journal of Economics, 35, 260-276.
16.
GulerI.GuillenM.MacPhersonJ. M. (2002). Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of the ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 207-232.
17.
GuthrieD.DurandR. (2008). Social issues in the study of management. European Management Review, 5(3), 137-149.
18.
HarbaughR.MaxwellJ.RoussillonB. (2011). Label confusion: The Groucho effect of uncertain standards. Management Science, 57, 1512-1527.
19.
HiscoxM. J.SmythF. B. (2008). Is there consumer demand for improved labor standards? Evidence from field experiments in social product labeling. (Working paper). Cambridge, MA: Department of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved from http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~hiscox/SocialLabeling.pdf.
20.
International Association of Horticultural Producers. (AIPH, 2009). International statistics flowers and plants. International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH) Volume 57. Hannover, Germany: Institut für Entwicklungs- und Agrarokonomik [Institute of Development and Agricultural Economics}, Leibniz Universität.
21.
KatzM.ShapiroC. (1986). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 822-841.
22.
KingA. A.LenoxM. J.BarnettM. (2002). Strategic responses to the reputation commons problem. In HoffmanA. J.VentrescaM. J. (Eds.), Organizations, policy and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives (pp. 393-406). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
KingA. ALenoxM. J.TerlaakA. (2005). The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1091-1106.
24.
KingA. A.PradoA.RiveraJ. (2012). Industry self-regulation and environmental protection. In HoffmanA.BansalP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the environment (pp. 103-131). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
KingA. A.ToffelM. (2007). Self-regulatory institutions for solving environmental problems: Perspectives and contributions from the management literature. In DelmasM. A.YoungO. R. (Eds.), Governance for the environment: New perspectives (pp. 98-118). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
KirmaniA.RaoA. (2000). No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality, Journal of Marketing, 64, 66-79.
27.
LenoxM.NashJ. (2003). Industry self-regulation and adverse selection: A comparison across four trade association programs. Business Strategy and Environment, 12, 343-356.
28.
LyonT. P.MaxwellJ. W. (2002). Voluntary approaches to environmental regulation: A survey. In FranziniM.NicitaA. (Eds.), Economic institutions and environmental policy (pp. 75-120). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
29.
MaxwellJ. W.LyonT. P.HackettS. C. (2000). Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. Journal of Law and Economics, 43, 583-617.
30.
Nagard-AssayagE. L.ManceauD. (2001). Modeling the impact of product preannouncements in the context of indirect network externalities. Research in Marketing, 18, 203-219.
31.
O’RourkeD. (2002). Monitoring the monitors: A critique of corporate third-party labor monitoring. In JenkinsR.PearsonR.SeyfangG. (Eds.), Corporate responsibility and ethical trade: Codes of conduct in the global economy (pp. 196-208). London, UK: Earthscan.
PotoskiM.PrakashA. (2004) Regulatory convergence in nongovernmental regimes? Cross-national adoption of ISO 14001 certifications. Journal of Politics, 66, 885-905.
34.
PotoskiM.PrakashA. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 745-769.
35.
ReesJ. (1997). Development of communitarian regulation in the chemical industry. Law and Policy, 19, 477-528.
36.
ReineckeJ.ManningS.von HagenO. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33, 789-812.
37.
RiveraJ. (2002). Assessing a voluntary environmental initiative in the developing world: The Costa Rican certification for sustainable tourism. Policy Sciences, 35, 333-360.
38.
RiveraJ.DeLeonP. (2005). Chief cxecutive officers and voluntary environmental performance: Costa Rica’s certification for sustainable tourism. Policy Sciences, 38(2), 107-127.
39.
RogersE. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
40.
SasserE. N.PrakashA.CashoreB.AuldG. (2006). Direct targeting as an NGO political strategy: Examining private authority regimes in the forestry sector. Business and Politics, 8(3), 1-32.
41.
SchillingM. A. (1999). Winning the standards race: Building installed base and the availability of complementary goods. European Management Journal, 17, 265-274.
42.
SchillingM. A. (2002). Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: Testing a model of technological lock out. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 387-398.
43.
SchillingM. A. (2003). Technological leapfrogging: Lessons from the U.S. video game console industry. California Management Review, 45(3), 6-32.
44.
SineW. D.DavidR. J.MitsuhashiH. (2007). From plan to plant: Effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector. Organization Science, 18, 578-594.
45.
SmithT. M.FischleinM. (2010). Rival private governance networks: Competing to define the rules of sustainability performance. Global Environmental Change, 20, 511-522.
46.
SorensonO.AudiaP.G. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940-1989. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 424-461.
47.
SwiftT. A.HumphreyC.GorV. (2000). Great expectations: The dubious financial legacy of quality audits. British Journal of Management, 11, 31-45.
48.
TerlaakA.KingA. A. (2006), The effect of certification with the ISO 9000 quality management standard: A signaling approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 60, 579-602.
49.
ToffelM. W. (2006). Resolving information asymmetries in markets: The role of certified management programs. (Working Paper 07-23). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School. Retrieved from http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/07-023.pdf.
50.
WadeJ. (1995). Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 111-134.
51.
WittU. (1997). “Lock-in” vs. “critical masses” industrial change under network externalities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 753-773.
