The goal of this article is to better understand the diffusion of environmentally preferable manufacturing technology (as distinct from pollution control technology) in small-and medium-sized firms (SMEs) and the influence of technical assistance programs on the diffusion of these technologies. The authors draw their insights from the printing industry, a sector where small firms predominate. They find that smaller firms lag slightly in the adoption of environmental technologies. With regard to technical assistance, they find that printers identify suppliers and other industry sources as more useful than government in providing information that leads to active exploration of new environmental technologies. In addition, in comparison to larger firms, smaller firms reported to be less familiar with government-sponsored programs and perceived some of the programs to be less useful. They point to several ways in which regulatory agencies are experimenting to make government sponsored programs more effective.
Adler, P. (2002). Market, hierarchy and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12(2), 215-234.
2.
Adler, P. S.,& Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
3.
Adler, P., Kwon, S.-W.,& Signer, J. M. K. (2001). The six west problem: An essay on the role of professionals in knowledge management, with particular reference to the case of hospitals. Unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California, Marshall School of Business.
4.
Banks, D. R.,& Heaton, G. R. J. (1995). Aninnovation driven environmental policy. Issues in Science and Technology, 12(1), 43-43.
5.
Becker, M., Green, N.,& Fister, D. (2002). Optimizing the remanufacturing cleaning process for economy, energy, and the environment. Pollution Prevention Review, 12(1), 105-109.
6.
Bierma, T., & Waterstraat, F. (1995). Overcoming barriers to pollution prevention in small businesses(Waste Management and Research Center Report No. RR-E075). Champaign: Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
7.
Blondi, V., Frey, M., & Iraldo, F. (2000). Environmental management systems and SMEs. Greener Management International, 29, 55-70.
8.
Cook, R. G., & Barry, D. (1995). Shaping the external environment: A study of small firms’ attempts to influence public policy. Business & Society, 34(3), 317-344.
9.
Crain, M. W.,& Hopkins, T. D. (2000). The impact of regulatory costs on small firms. Washington, DC: Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration.
10.
Dean, T. J., Brown, R. L., & Bamford, C. E. (1998). Differences in large and small firm responses to environmental context: Strategic implications from a comparative analysis of business formations. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 709-728.
11.
Dean, T. J., Brown, R. L., & Stango, V. (2000). Environmental regulation as a barrier to the formation of small manufacturing establishments: A longitudinal examination. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40(1), 56-75.
12.
Dijken, K., Prince Y., Wolters, T., Frey, M., Mussati, G., Kalff, P., et al. (1999). Adoption of environmental innovations: The dynamics of innovation as interplay between business competence, environmental orientation and network involvement. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
13.
Dupuy, D. (1997). Technological change and environmental policy: The diffusion of environmental technology. Growth and Change, 28, 49-66.
14.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2002). Protecting the environment and helping small businesses. The Massachusetts Environmental Results Program Executive Summary. Retrieved July 29, 2004 from http://www.epa.gov/permits/02summary.pdf
15.
Ettlie, J. E.,& Rubenstein, A. H. (1981). Stimulating the flowof innovations to the U.S. automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 19, 33-55.
16.
Fountain, J. E. (1998). Social capital: A key enabler of innovation in science and technology. In L. M. Branscomb & J. Keller (Eds.), Investing in innovation: Toward a consensus strategy for federal technology policy(pp. 84-111). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
17.
Geroski, P. A. (2000). Models of technology diffusion. Research Policy29, 4-5,603-625.
18.
Golledge, R., Hughes, J., Pruit, M., Reitsma, J., & Struhs, D. (2003, Fall). Regulating small business facilities—the Environmental Results Program. ECOStates, 5-7, 37-40.
19.
Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable. (2004). Technology diffusion: Background and overview. Retrieved July 29, 2004 from http://www.glrppr.org/hubs/subsection.cfm?hub=504&subsec=10&nav=10
20.
Hillary, R. (2000). Introduction. In R. Hillary (Ed.), Small and medium-sized enterprises and the environment: Business imperatives(pp. 11-19). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
21.
Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Sciences Inc. and the Printing Industries Association of Southern Ohio. (1997). Improve efficiency and reduce waste through process control in the lithographic printing industry. Retrieved July 29, 2004 from http://www.techsolve.org/pollution_prev/printweb.htm
22.
Leblebici, H., Salancik, G., Copay, A.,& King, T. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 333-363.
23.
Lindsey, T. C. (1998). Diffusion of P2 innovations. Pollution Prevention Review, 8(1), 1-14.
24.
Logsdon, J. (1994). Environmental regulation and small business. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, 466-471.
25.
McCoid, J. (1995). EPA rulemaking under the Regulatory Flexibility Act: The need for reform. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 23(1), 203-249.
26.
Miles, M. B.,& Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Nasi, J., Nasi, S., Phillips, N.,& Zyglidopoulos, S. (1997). The evolution of corporate social responsiveness: An exploratory study of Finnish and Canadian forestry companies. Business & Society, 36(3), 296-321.
28.
Nooteboom, B. (1994). Innovation and diffusion in small firms: Theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 6, 327-347.
29.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (1997). Pollution prevention in the printing industry: A manual for pollution prevention technical assistance providers. Retrieved July 29, 2004 from http://www.p2pays.org/ref/03/02453/
30.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Rickson, R. E. (1976). Knowledge management in industrial society and environmental quality. Human Organization, 35(3), 239-251.
32.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
33.
Rothenberg, S. (2003). Knowledge content and worker participation in environmental management at NUMMI. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 1777-1796.
34.
Rothwell, R. (1989). SMFs, inter-firm relationships and technological change. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1275-291.
35.
Sanchez, C. M. (1997). Environmental regulation and firm level innovation: The moderating effects of organizational and individual level variables. Business & Society, 36(2), 140-168.
36.
Schaper, M. (2002). The challenge of environmental responsibility and sustainable development: Implications for SME and entrepreneurship academics. In U. Füglistaller, H. J. Pleitner, T. Volery,& W. Weber (Eds.), Radical changes in the world: Will SMEs soar or crash?(pp. 525-534). St. Gallen, Switzerland: Rencontres de St. Gallen.
37.
Schmidt, K.-H. (1990). The innovative attitude of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 28(1), 68-69.
38.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16(2), 183-200.
39.
Stanley, M.,& Helper, S. (2003, September). Industrial clusters, social capital, and international competition in the U.S. component manufacturing industry. Paper presented at the Clusters, Industrial Districts and Firms: The Challenge of Globalization conference, Modena, Italy.
40.
Swinth, R. L., & Vinton, K. L. (1992). Strategies for environmental performance in small organizations. Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, 70-74.
41.
Thiruchelvam, M., Kumar, S., & Visanathan, C. (2003). Policy options to promote energy efficient and environmentally sound technologies in small-and medium-scale industries. Energy Policy, 31, 977-987.
42.
Thompson, J. K., Wartick, S. L., & Smith, H. L. (1991). Integrating corporate social performance and stakeholder management: Implications for a research agenda in small business. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12, 207-230.
43.
United States Government Accounting Office. (2001). EPS should strengthen its efforts to measure and encourage pollution prevention(Report to Congressional Requesters No. GAO-01-283). Washington, DC: Author.
44.
White, A. L., Becker, M.,& Goldstein, J. (1991). Why corporations chronically under-invest in pollution prevention. On Principle, 2(1), 25-35.
45.
White, A. L., Becker, M.,& Savage, D. E. (1993). Environmentally smart accounting: Using total cost assessment to advance pollution prevention. Pollution Prevention Review, 3(3), 247-259.
46.
Yeager, P. C. (1987). Structural bias in regulatory law enforcement: The case of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Social Problems, 34(4), 330-344.
