Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Previous studies characterizing the tensile strength of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have disregarded the post-failure phase during which rupture propagates.

Objective

To identify aneurysm-induced changes in the post-failure phase of the intact infra-renal aortic wall, examining its three layers.

Methods

We analyzed ex vivo tensile tests on tissues from 27 AAA patients and 27 age-matched autopsy subjects.

Results

The failure stress of the intact wall circumferentially and the intimal failure stress in both circumferential and longitudinal directions were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in AAAs than in non-aneurysmal aortas (NAAs). Failure stretch showed no significant changes. However, the pre-failure stretches of the intact wall and media circumferentially were higher (p < 0.05) in AAAs, as were the post-failure stretches of the intact wall and media in both directions and the adventitia circumferentially. The pre-extensions of the media and adventitia were also higher (p < 0.05) when coupled to the intact wall.

Conclusions

The study demonstrates an earlier onset of damage in AAAs and a strength decrease, indicating weakening. The medial and adventitial layers contribute more in determining AAA intact-wall properties. Their greater capacity for post-failure stretch may delay rupture progression outward, preserving the integrity of the entire aortic thickness despite initiation in the weakened intima.

Keywords

Infra-renal aorta post-failure stretch layers residual stretch fracture toughness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sakalihasan

Michel

Katsargyris

, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018; 4: 34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0030-7

Schmitz-Rixen

Keese

Hakimi

, et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm-epidemiology, predisposing factors, and biology. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2016; 401: 275–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1401-8

Wanhainen

Verzini

Van Herzeele

, et al. Editor’s choice – european society for vascular surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 57: 8–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020

Nicholls

Gardner

Meissner

, et al. Rupture in small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28: 884–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70065-5

Powell

Brown

Greenhalgh

, et al.

The rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms: is this modified by anatomical suitability for endovascular repair?

Ann Surg 2008; 247: 173–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181557d2a

Humphrey

. Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.

Vorp

. Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech 2007; 40: 1887–902. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.09.003

Humphrey

Holzapfel

. Mechanics, mechanobiology, and modeling of human abdominal aorta and aneurysms. J Biomech 2012; 45: 805–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.021

Wang

Carpenter

Ghayesh

, et al. A review of the biomechanical behaviour of the aorta. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2023; 144: 105992. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105922

10.

Raghavan

Webster

Vorp

. Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: assessment using a new mathematical model. Ann Biomed Eng 1996; 24: 573–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684226

11.

Fortunato

Robertson

Sang

, et al. Computational modeling reveals the relationship between intrinsic failure properties and uniaxial biomechanical behavior of arterial tissue. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2019; 18: 1791–807. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01177-7

12.

Sokolis

. Layer-specific properties of the human infra-renal aorta during aging considering pre/post-failure damage. J Biomech Eng 2024; 146: 021003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064146

13.

Kefalidi

Angouras

Sokolis

. Regional and directional variations in the layer-specific resistance to tear propagation in ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Biomech 2022; 138: 111133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111133

14.

Niestrawska

Viertler

Regitnig

, et al. Microstructure and mechanics of healthy and aneurysmatic abdominal aortas: experimental analysis and modelling. J R Soc Interface 2016; 13: 20160620. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0620

15.

Sassani

Kakisis

Tsangaris

, et al. Layer-dependent wall properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms: experimental study and material characterization. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015; 49: 141–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.04.027

16.

Sumner

Hokanson

Strandness

Jr . Stress-strain characteristics and collagen-elastin content of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970; 130: 459–66.

17.

Drangova

Holdsworth

Boyd

, et al. Elasticity and geometry measurements of vascular specimens using a high-resolution laboratory CT scanner. Physiol Meas 1993; 14: 277–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/14/3/006

18.

Roach

. The composition and mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1994; 20: 6–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(94)90169-4

19.

Vallabhanemi

Gilling-Smith

How

, et al. Heterogeneity of tensile strength and matrix metalloproteinase activity in the wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther 2004; 11: 494–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.1583/04-1239.1

20.

Xiong

Wang

Zhou

, et al. Measurement and analysis of ultimate mechanical properties, stress-strain curve fit, and elastic modulus formula of human abdominal aortic aneurysm and nonaneurysmal abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48: 189–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.053

21.

Polzer

Man

Vlachovský

, et al. Failure properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm tissue are orientation dependent. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2021; 114: 104181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104181

22.

Di Martino

Bohra

Vande Geest

, et al. Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43: 570–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.072

23.

Raghavan

Hanaoka

Kratzberg

, et al. Biomechanical failure properties and microstructural content of ruptured and unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech 2011; 44: 2501–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.004

24.

Teng

Feng

Zhang

, et al. Layer- and direction-specific material properties, extreme extensibility and ultimate material strength of human abdominal aorta and aneurysm: a uniaxial extension study. Ann Biomed Eng 2015; 43: 2745–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1323-6

25.

Sokolis

Savva

Papadodima

, et al. Regional distribution of circumferential residual strains in the human aorta according to age and gender. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017; 67: 87–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.12.003

26.

Sokolis

Gouskou

Papadodima

, et al. Layer-specific residual deformations and their variation along the human aorta. J Biomech Eng 2021; 143: 094504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050913

27.

Giudici

Khir

Szafron

, et al. From uniaxial testing of isolated layers to a tri-layered arterial wall: a novel constitutive modelling framework. Ann Biomed Eng 2021; 49: 2454–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02775-2

28.

Reeps

Maier

Pelisek

, et al. Measuring and modeling patient-specific distributions of material properties in abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2013; 12: 717–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-012-0436-1

29.

Martufi

Satriano

Moore

, et al. Local quantification of wall thickness and intraluminal thrombus offer insight into the mechanical properties of the aneurysmal aorta. Ann Biomed Eng 2015; 43: 1759–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1222-2

30.

Tavares Monteiro

da Silva

Raghavan

, et al. Histologic, histochemical, and biomechanical properties of fragments isolated from the anterior wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59: 1393–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.04.064

31.

O’Leary

Mulvihill

Barrett

, et al. Determining the influence of calcification on the failure properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) tissue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015; 42: 154–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.11.005

32.

Haslach

Jr Riley

Molotsky

. The influence of medial substructures on rupture in bovine aortas. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2011; 2: 372–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-011-0056-4

33.

Gasser

Gallinetti

Xing

, et al. Spatial orientation of collagen fibers in the abdominal aortic aneurysm’s wall and its relation to wall mechanics. Acta Biomater 2012; 8: 3091–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.044

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB

Biomechanical changes in abdominal aortic aneurysms involve a prolonged post-failure phase

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material