This paper presents a procedure for identifying performance indicators of research attainment and highlights some definitional issues of the chosen performance indicators. Both the procedure for identification and the definition of performance indicators need to be reconciled prior to the implementation of models of performance indicators, if the model is to have a high probability of becoming accepted within a university context.
BourkeP. (1991a). A bibliometric profile of research in the Institute of Advanced Studies, ANU, 1976–1988. In LinkeR.Performance indicators in higher education (Vol. 2, pp. 86–124). Canberra: AGPS
2.
BourkeP. (1991b). Intellectual work in Australia. Humanities Research Centre Bulletin, 64, 1–4
3.
BroadusR.N. (1971). The literature of the social sciences: A survey of citation studies. International Journal of Social Sciences, 23, 236–243
4.
CarpenterM.P.GibbF.HarrisM.IrvineJ.MartinB.R.NarinF. (1988). Bibliometric profiles for British academic institutions: An experiment to develop research output indicators. Scientometrics, 14, 213–233
5.
CronbachL.J. (1992). Four Psychological Bulletin articles in perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 389–392
6.
DawkinsJ. (1988). Higher education: A policy statement. Canberra: AGPS
7.
DometruisN.C. (1989). Subjective and objective measures of journal stature. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 197–203
8.
GarfieldE. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471–479
9.
GarfieldE. (1988). The impact of citation counts. Current Contents, 20, 3–5
10.
GillettR. (1989). Serious anomalies in the UGC comparative evaluation of the performance of psychology departments. Leicester: University of Leicester, Department of Psychology
11.
GriggL.SheehanP. (1989). Evaluating research: The role of performance indicators. St Lucia: University of Queensland
12.
HarmanG.WoodF. (1990). Academics and their work under Dawkins: A study of five NSW universities. Australian Educational Researcher, 17, 53–74
13.
HattieJ.A. (1990). Performance indicators in education. Australian Journal of Education, 34, 249–276
14.
HattieJ. A.TognoliniJ.AdamsK.CurtisP. (1991). An evaluation of a model for allocating research funds across departments within a university using selected indicators of performance. Canberra: AGPS
15.
HeinzkillR. (1980). Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literacy journals. Library Quarterly, 50, 352–365
16.
LinkeR. (1991). Performance indicators in higher education (Vol.1). Canberra: AGPS
17.
NederhofA.J.ZwaanR.A.De BruinR.E.DekkerP.J. (1989). Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and behavioural sciences: A comparative study. Scientometrics, 15, 423–435
18.
PetersD.P.CeciS.J. (1982). Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 187–255
19.
PinskiG.NarinF. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12, 297–312
20.
ScrivenM. (1989). Performance indicators. Submission to the a-factor working party, University of Western Australia, Perth
21.
SizerJ. (1989). Performance indicators and quality control and the maintenance of standards in higher education. Paper presented at a Conference on Performance Indicators and Quality Control in Higher Education, London
22.
SmithR.FiedlerF.G. (1971). Measurement of scholarly work in academic institutions: A review of the literature. Educational Record, 52, 225–232
23.
ZuckermanH.MertonR.K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalism, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva, 9, 66–100
