Critical educational commentary on the problem of assessment has attempted to apply political and philosophical coherence to a dispersed collection of problems, by representing the field as polarised by absolute oppositions of principle. This paper attempts to set aside these global formulations, arguing that they bear little relation to the more piecemeal elements of the problems endemic to the modern apparatus of assessment. Drawing on recent Foucaultian work on Australian education, it explores these arguments via a case study of debates on the Australian Scholastic Aptitude Test and gender equity in the Australian Capital Territory. The conundrums arising from this example are treated as suggestive of some limitations of current forms of educational critique.
AdamsR.J. (1984). Sex bias in ASAT?Hawthorn, Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research
2.
AdamsR.J. (1985). Sex and background factors: Effect on ASAT scores. Australian Journal of Education, 29, 221–230
3.
AdamsR.J. (1986). Some contributions to sex differences in scholastic aptitude test scores. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 12, 267–274
4.
ArmstrongZ. (1982, November 4). Lower scores by girls in aptitude tests concern schools. Canberra Times, p. 3
5.
ArnoldM. (1985, S). Goal-free learning. Victorian Teacher, pp. 9–10
6.
AshendenD.HannanB.JunorA.McRaeD.MonastiriotisM.PoulosJ.SmithG.TomasielloM. (1983). Key words in the curriculum debate. Australian Teacher, 5, 10–22
7.
Australian Council for Educational Research. (1986). Australian Scholastic Aptitude Test—Writing test. Hawthorn, Vic: Author
8.
BatesR. (1984). Educational vs. managerial evaluation in schools. In BroadfootP. (Ed.), Selection, certification and control. London: Falmer Press
9.
BlackmoreJ. (1988). Assessment and accountability. Geelong: Deakin University Press
10.
BlumJ. (1978). Pseudoscience and mental ability. New York: Monthly Review Press
11.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage
12.
Boys school attacks test help for girls. (1984, August 6). Canberra Times, p. 3
13.
BroadfootP. (1984). Profiles and records of achievement: A review of issues and practices. London: Holt Rinehart & Winston
14.
BroadfootP. (1986a). Alternatives to public examinations. In NuttallD.L. (Ed.), Assessing educational achievement (pp. 54–77). London: Falmer Press
15.
BroadfootP. (1986b). Records of achievement: achieving a record?Studies in Educational Evaluation, 12, 313–323
16.
CanguilhemG. (1966). On the normal and the pathological. Dortrecht: S. Reidel Publishing Co.
17.
Committee to Review Education in ACT Government High Schools (J.R. Steinle, Chair). (1983). The challenge of change: A review of high schools in the ACT: Report. Canberra: ACT Schools Authority
18.
Committee to Review Tertiary Entrance Score Caalculations in the ACT (B. McGaw, Chair). (1986). Making admission to higher education fairer: Report. Canberra: AGPS
19.
ConkeyH. (1984a, June 15). ASAT report splits educationists. Canberra Times, p. 3
20.
ConkeyH. (1984b, June 14). No sex bias in schools test: Report. Canberra Times, p. 1
21.
ConnellR.AshendenD.J.KesslerS.DowsettG. (1983). Making the difference: Schools, families and social divisions. Sydney: Allen & Unwin
22.
ConnellW.F. (1980). The Australian Council for Educational Research, 1930-80. Hawthorn, Vic: ACER
23.
DaleyD.J. (1986). Standardization by bivariate adjustment of internal asssessments: Sex bias and other statistical matters. Australian Journal of Education, 29, 231–247
24.
DavidsonG. (1985a, November 6). Assessing students: Still the quest for equity goes on. Canberra Times, p. 2
25.
DavidsonG. (1985b, July 17). Canberra's ASAT system adjusted to cut the misunderstanding. Canberra Times, p. 1
26.
EdwardsB. (1989). Technical adviser's report on tertiary entrance scores. Unpublished paper, ACT Department of Education, Canberra
27.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin
28.
FoucaultM. (1979). On governmentality. I&C, 6, 5–22
29.
HackingI. (1982). Biopower and the avalanche of printed numbers. Humanities in Society, 3–4, 279–295
30.
HannanB. (1985). Certificates are changing all around Australia. Curriculum Development in Australian Schools, 1, 14–21
31.
HannanB. (1985b). Democratic curriculum. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin
32.
HenryM. (1988). ASAT and the TE score: A critique of ‘objective testing’. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 24, 289–311
33.
HenryM.KnightJ.LingardR.TaylorS. (1988). Understanding schooling: An introductory sociology of Australian education. London: Routledge
34.
HindessB. (1987). Freedom, equality and the market. London: Tavistock
35.
HirstP.WoolleyP. (1982). Social relations and human attributes. London: Tavistock
36.
HunterI. (1988a). Culture and government: The emergence of literary education. Houndsmills: Macmillan
37.
HunterI. (1988b). Culture, bureaucracy and the history of popular education. Paper delivered at 1988 annual conference, Australian and New Zealand History of Education Society
38.
HunterI. (1992a). The humanities without humanism. Paper delivered to the Reforming the Humanities Conference, University of New South Wales, February 1992
39.
HunterI. (1992b, February). Progressive failure. Australian Left Review. pp. 24–30
40.
HunterI. (1993). The pastoral bureaucracy: Towards a less principled understanding of state schooling. In MeredythD.L.TylerD., (Eds.), Child, citizen and culture: Genealogies of Australian educational problems. Brisbane: Institute for Cultural Policy Studies
41.
HunterI.MeredythD.SmithB.StokesG. (1991). Accounting for the humanities: The language ofculture and the logic of government. Brisbane: Institute for Cultural Policy Studies
42.
JonesK.WilliamsonK. (1978). The birth of the schoolroom. I&C, 3, 59–111
43.
KingN. (1987). The teacher must exist before the pupil. Literature and History, 3, 1
44.
MarginsonS. (1989). Back to first principles. Education Links, 35, 24–26
45.
MarginsonS. (1992, F). On our selection. Australian Left Review, pp. 30–33
46.
MastersG.N.BeswickD.G. (1986). The construction of tertiary entrance scores: Principles and issues. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education
47.
McBrydeB.Van der HydeG. (1989). Student assessment project in secondary colleges of the Australian Capital Territory: A research report. Canberra: ACT Department of Education
48.
McCallumD. (1982/83). Eugenics, psychology and education in Australia. Melbourne Working Papers, 4, 17–33
49.
McCallumD. (1985). The theory of educational inequality in Australia, 1900-1950. Ph.D. thesis, University of Melbourne
50.
McCallumD. (1986). Passing through the eye of an HSC needle. Education Links, 29, 5–7
51.
McCallumD. (1990). The social production of merit: Education, psychology and politics in Australia, 1900-1950. Basingstoke: Falmer Press
52.
McCurryD. (1990). ASAT writing test: Report on series R. Canberra: ACT Schools Authority Accrediting Agency
53.
McGawB. (1987). Selection of students for higher education. Unicorn, 13 (1), 4–9
54.
McIntyreS. (1985). Winners and losers. Sydney: Allen & Unwin
55.
MeadmoreD. (1989). The ideology of assessment: Its origins and effects. Education Links, 35, 9–12
56.
MeredythD.L. (1989). Anxiety over assessment: A history of the complaint. Brisbane: Institute for Cultural Policy Studies
57.
MeredythD.L. (1993) Marking the immeasurable: The problem of assessment. In MeredythD.L.TylerD. (Eds.), Child, citizen and culture: Genealogies of Australian educational problems. Brisbane: Institute for Cultural Policy Studies
58.
MeredythD.L.TylerD. (Eds.), (1993). Child, citizen and culture: Genealogies of Australian education. Brisbane: Institute for Cultural Policy Studies
59.
MillerP.RoseN. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19, 1–31
60.
New ASAT test ‘fairer’ for females. (1988, April 11). Courier Mail, p.23
61.
NuyenN.A. (1986). Equating achievement across subjects: Is it possible? The Queensland experience. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 12, 245–250
62.
OwenD. (1985). None of the above: Behind the myth of scholastic aptitude. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
63.
OzolinsU. (1981). Victorian HSC examiners' reports: A study in cultural capital. Melbourne Working Papers, pp. 142–183
64.
Principals reject ASAT scale demand. (1984, February 18). Canberra Times, p. 7
65.
ReadM. (1984). Spell them out: The objectivity of descriptive assessment. Australian Teacher, 9, 8–11
66.
ReadM. (1987, April 1). The injustice of grading. Victorian Teacher, pp. 13–17
67.
RoseN. (1985). The psychological complex: Psychology, politics and society in England 1869-1939. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
68.
RoseN. (1989). Social psychology as a science of democracy. Paper presented to the eighth annual conference of Cheron-Europe, Gotenborg, Sweden, September 1989
69.
RoseN. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge
70.
RoseN.MillerP. (1989). Rethinking the state: Governing economic, social and personal life. Unpublished working paper
71.
RowntreeD. (1977). Assessing students: How shall we know them?London: Harper & Row
72.
School certificate caned. (1986, March 15). Canberra Times, p. 9
73.
School test decision questioned. (1983, December 3). Canberra Times, p. 3
74.
ScottK. (1986a, August 5). Changes to ASAT test agreed. Canberra Times, p. 3
75.
ScottK. (1986b, May 1). Methods of scoring students attacked. Canberra Times, p. 11
76.
Sex bias hits schoolboys. (1983, October 2). Sunday Telegraph, p. 5
77.
SmithB. (1986). The rise and fall of the Australian monitorialism. Paper presented to the Annual Conference, Australian and New Zealand History of Education Society, Adelaide, August 1986
78.
SmithB. (1991). Governing classrooms: Privatisation and discipline in Australian schooling. Ph.D. thesis, Griffith University, Brisbane
79.
SutherlandG. (1984). Ability, merit and measurement: Mental testing and English education, 1880-1940. Oxford: Clarendon Press
80.
SymesC. (1989). More crosses than ticks. Education Links, 35, 5–9
81.
TaylorS.HenryM. (1988). (Eds.). Battlers and bluestockings: Women's place in Australian education. Canberra: Australian College of Education
82.
TeeseR. (1981). The social function of private schools. Melbourne Working Papers, pp. 94–141
83.
TylerD. (1984). For the good of all students. In JohnsonL.TylerD., (Eds.), Cultural politics: Papers in contemporary Australian education, culture and politics (pp. 171–219). Parkville: Melbourne University, Department of Education, Sociology Research Group in Culture and Education Studies
84.
TylerD.JohnsonL. (1991). Helpful histories?History of Education Review, 20 (2), 1–8
85.
WisemanS. (1961). Examinations and English education. Manchester: Manchester University Press
86.
WithersG. (1987). From marking strategy to assessment procedure: A review of recent Australian practices. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 13, 7–19
87.
Working Committee on College Proposals for the Australian Capital Territory (R.J. Campbell, Chair). (1973). Secondary education for Canberra: Report. Canberra: Department of Education
