There have been relatively few studies that have gauged the thoughts, reactions and expectations held by those working in schools towards decentralisation and restructuring of school systems. This study investigates the views held by a sample of principals and teachers in Western Australia of the likely effects of restructuring on changing roles and responsibilities, actual and desired outcomes, changing power and influence relations, personal values, and difficulties in meeting new expectations. Both principals and teachers predicted that decentralisation and devolution would increase their workloads and broaden their roles. Principals would require more human and technical management competencies; teachers would assume more non-teaching duties. Notwithstanding difficulties and drawbacks, principals and teachers believed that restructuring would lead to better, more effective, and more efficient schools.
AltshulerA.A. (1970). Community control. Indianapolis: Pegasus
2.
BacharachS.B.LawlerE.J. (1980). Power and politics in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass
3.
BeareH. (1983). The structural reform movement in Australian education during the 1980s and its effect on schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 22, 149–168
4.
BrownD.J. (1990). Decentralization and school-based management. London: Falmer
5.
ButtsR.F. (1955). Assumptions underlying Australian education. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research
6.
CaldwellB.J.HodgsonE. (1978). Implementation of school based budgeting. Canadian Administrator, 17 (4), 1–5
7.
CaldwellB.J.SpinksJ.M. (1988). The self-managing school. London: Falmer
8.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. New York: Author
9.
ChapmanJ. (1986). The Victorian primary school principal: The way forward. Melbourne: Victorian Primary Principals Association
10.
ChapmanJ. (1987a). Decentralization, devolution and the administration of schools. Education Research and Perspectives, 14 (2), 62–75
11.
ChapmanJ. (1987b). The principal in a new network of human relationships. In SimpkinsW.S.ThomasA.R.ThomasE.B., (Eds.), Principal and change: The Australian experience (pp. 125–147). Armidale, NSW: University of New England
12.
ChapmanJ.D. (1990). School-based decision-making and management: Implications for school personnel. In ChapmanJ.D. (Ed.), School-based decision-making and management (pp. 221–244). Lewes: Falmer Press
13.
ChapmanJ.D. (1991). The role of leadership in enhancing the change. Paper presented to OECD, Paris, July 1991
14.
Committee of Inquiry into Education in Western Australia (K.E. Beazley, Chair). (1984). Education in Western Australia: Report. Perth: Govt Pr
15.
CookT.D.CampbellD.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally
16.
DahlR.A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201–218
17.
DimmockC. (1990). Managing for quality and accountability in Western Australian education. Educational Review, 42, 197–206
18.
DuignanP.A. (1990). School-based decision-making and management: Retrospect and prospect. In ChapmanJ. (Ed.), School-based decision-making and management (pp. 327–345). London: Falmer
19.
GagnonJ.RothJ.M.CarrollM.HofmanR.HaycockK.A.PlamondonJ.FeldmanD.S.SimpsonJ. (1989). Superanova: Accessible general linear modeling. Berkeley, CA: Abacus Concepts
20.
GarmsW.I.GuthrieJ.W.PierceL.C. (1978). School finance: The economics and finance of public education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
21.
GoodladJ.I. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill
22.
GuthrieJ.W. (1986). School-based management: The next needed education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, 305–309
Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MT: Author
25.
HunterE. (1989, S). The role of teachers in educational reform. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, pp. 61–63
26.
IannacconeL.LutzF. (Eds.). (1978). Public participation in school decision making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Press
27.
Interim Committee for the Australian Schools Commission (P.H. Karmel, Chair). (1973). Schools in Australia: Report. Canberra: AGPS
28.
KandelJ.L. (1938). Types of administration. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research
29.
KnightP. (1984). The practice of school-based curriculum development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1, 37–48
30.
KowalskiT.J. (1980). Attitudes of school principals toward decentralized budgeting. Journal of Education Finance, 6, 68–76
31.
LeithwoodK.A.BegleyP.T.CousinsJ.B. (1990). The nature, causes and consequences of principals' practices: An agenda for future research. Journal of Educational Administration, 28 (4), 5–31
32.
MaddickH. (1974). Education and training of local government administrators in Australia. Canberra: AGPS
33.
McGinnN.StreetN. (1986). Educational decentralization: Weak state or strong state?Comparative Educational Review, 30, 471–490
34.
MortimoreP.SammonsP.EcobR.StollL. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Salisbury: Open Books
35.
PerrowC. (1970). Organizational analysis: A sociological view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
36.
PetersT.J.WatermanR.H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row
37.
PurkeyS.C.SmithM.S. (1985). School reform: The district policy implications of the effective schools literature. Elementary School Journal, 85, 353–389
38.
PuseyM. (1991). Economic rationalism in Canberra: A nation building state changes its mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
39.
Quality of Education Review Committee (P.H. Karmel, Chair). (1985). Quality of education in Australia. Canberra: AGPS
RenihanF.RenihanP. (1984). Effective schools, effective administration and institutional image. Canadian Administrator, 24 (3), 1–6
42.
SmartD. (1988). Reversing patterns of control in Australia: Can schools be self-governing?Education Research and Perspectives, 15 (2), 16–24
43.
SmartD.AldersonA. (1980). The politics of education in Western Australia: An exploratory study of state education department policy making (Monograph No. 6 in the Education Policy Process at State Level: An Australian-United States Comparative Study). Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education
44.
SmithB.C. (1979). The measurement of decentralization. International Review of Administrative Science, 45, 214–222
45.
Western Australia. Functional Review Committee. (1986). A review of the education portfolio. Perth: Government Printer
46.
Western Australia. Ministry of Education. (1987). Better schools in Western Australia: A programme for improvement. Perth: Govt Pr
47.
Western Australia. Parliament. (1986). Managing change in the public sector: A statement of the Government's position (White Paper). Perth: Govt Pr
48.
WhiteP.A. (1989, S). An overview of school-based management: What does the research say?National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, pp. 1–8
49.
WilenskiP. (1986). Public power and public administration. Sydney: Hale & Iremonger
50.
WirtF. (1991). Policy origins and policy games: Site-based management in the United States and the United Kingdom. In HarmanG.BeareH.BerkeleyG. (Eds.), Restructuring school management (pp. 27–45). Canberra: Australian College of Education
51.
WirtF.KirstM. (1989). Schools in conflict(2nd ed.).Berkeley, CA: McCutchan
