The view that the 1990s have seen a sharp shift to a market approach in Australian school education is challenged. In reality, governments have moved within a relatively narrow range in public policy over the last quarter of the 20th century. A framework for the first decade of the 21st century to achieve a better balance of enduring values such as liberty (choice), equality (equity), fraternity (access), efficiency (resources) and economic growth (adequacy) will require a new settlement on the concept of ‘public good’. The notion of a ‘third way’, or even a ‘fourth way’, is canvassed, with New Labour in England providing the marker for what may unfold.
BishopP.MulfordB. (1999). When will they ever learn? Another failure of centrally imposed change. School Leadership and Management, 19 (2), 179–187.
2.
BishopP. W.MulfordW. R. (1996). Empowerment in four Australian primary schools: ‘They don't really care …’. International Journal of Educational Reform, 5 (2), 193–204.
3.
BlackmoreJ. (1999). ‘Privatising the public’: The shifts in priorities in self-managing schools away from public education and social justice. Curriculum Perspectives, 19 (1), 68–75.
4.
BlackmoreJ.BigumC.HodgensJ.LaskeyL. (1996). Managed change and self-management in Schools of the Future. Leading and Managing, 2 (3), 195–220.
5.
BradleyS.JohnesG.MillingtonJ. (1999). School choice, competition and the efficiency of secondary schools in England. Unpublished paper, Centre for Research in the Economics of Education, Department of Economics, Management School, Lancaster University.
6.
BradleyS.TaylorJ. (1998). The effect of school size on exam performance in secondary schools. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60 (3), 291–322.
7.
BrownD. (1990). Decentralisation and school-based management. London: Farmer Press.
8.
BrykA. S. (1998). Chicago school reform: Linkages between local control, educational supports and student achievement. Presentation with colleagues in the Consortium on Chicago School Research in a symposium at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April.
9.
BudgeD. (1999, April 23). OU study scotches myth of excellence. Times Educational Supplement, p. 26.
10.
BullockA.ThomasH. (1994). The impact of local management in schools: Final report. Birmingham: University of Birmingham & National Association of Head Teachers.
11.
BullockA.ThomasH. (1997). Schools at the centre? A study of decentralisation. London: Routledge.
12.
CaldwellB.J. (1986). Effective resource allocation in schools: A summary of studies in Tasmania and South Australia. A report of the Effective Resource Allocation in Schools Project. Hobart: University of Tasmania, Centre for Education.
13.
CaldwellB.J. (1999a, April 14). Challenge and change in education. Occasional address at a graduation ceremony at the University of Melbourne, 14 April. (Available from the author).
14.
CaldwellB. J. (1999b, June 11). The world is watching, Tony. Times Educational Supplement, p. 15.
15.
CaldwellB. J.HaywardD. K. (1998). The future of schools: Lessons from the reform of public education. London: Farmer Press.
16.
CaldwellB.J.SpinksJ.M. (1988). The self-managing school. London: Falmer Press.
17.
CaldwellB.J.SpinksJ.M. (1998). Beyond the self-managing school. London: Falmer Press.
18.
ChengY.C. (1996). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for development. London: Falmer Press.
19.
ColemanJ.S.HofferT. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact on communities. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Commonwealth Grants Commission. (1993). Report on general revenue grant relativities, Volume 1, Main report. Canberra: AGPS.
21.
Cooperative Research Project. (1994). Base-line survey. Report of the Cooperative Research Project on ‘Leading Victoria's Schools of the Future’, Directorate of School Education, Victorian Association of State Secondary Principals, Victorian Primary Principals Association, The University of Melbourne (Fay Thomas, Chair). [Available from the Department of Education, Employment and Training, Victoria].
22.
Cooperative Research Project. (1995a). One year later. Report of the Cooperative Research Project on ‘Leading Victoria's Schools of the Future’, Directorate of School Education, Victorian Association of State Secondary Principals, Victorian Primary Principals Association, The University of Melbourne (Fay Thomas, Chair). [Available from the Department of Education, Employment and Training, Victoria].
23.
Cooperative Research Project. (1995b). Taking stock. Report of the Cooperative Research Project on ‘Leading Victoria's Schools of the Future’, Directorate of School Education, Victorian Association of State Secondary Principals, Victorian Primary Principals Association, The University of Melbourne (Fay Thomas, Chair). [Available from the Department of Education, Employment and Training, Victoria].
24.
Cooperative Research Project. (1996). Three year report card. Report of the Cooperative Research Project on ‘Leading Victoria's Schools of the Future’, Directorate of School Education, Victorian Association of State Secondary Principals, Victorian Primary Principals Association, The University of Melbourne (Fay Thomas, Chair). [Available from the Department of Education, Employment and Training, Victoria].
25.
Cooperative Research Project. (1997a). Assessing the outcomes. Report of the Cooperative Research Project on ‘Leading Victoria's Schools of the Future’, Department of School Education, Victorian Association of State Secondary Principals, Victorian Primary Principals Association, The University of Melbourne (Fay Thomas, Chair). [Available from the Department of Education, Employment and Training, Victoria].
26.
Cooperative Research Project. (1997b). Still more work to be done but no turning back. Report of the Cooperative Research Project on ‘Leading Victoria's Schools of the Future’, Department of School Education, Victorian Association of State Secondary Principals, Victorian Primary Principals Association, The University of Melbourne (Fay Thomas, Chair). [Available from the Department of Education, Employment and Training, Victoria].
27.
DennisonB.FitzJ.LauderH.WalfordG.WestA. (1999). Review Symposium: Individual reviews of Woods, Bagley, and Glatter (1998), Educational Management and Administration, 27 (2), 193–203.
28.
DoeB. (1998, January 9). Tory competition fails to raise standards. Times Educational Supplement, p. 1.
29.
Education Committee (Brian Caldwell, Chair). (1994). The school global budget in Victoria: Matching resources to student learning needs: Report. Melbourne: Directorate of School Education.
30.
Education Committee (CaldwellBrian, Chair). (1995). The school global budget in Victoria: Matching resources to student learning needs: Interim report. Melbourne: Directorate of School Education.
31.
Education Committee (CaldwellBrian, Chair): (1996). The school global budget in Victoria: Matching resources to student learning needs: Final report. Melbourne: Department of School Education.
32.
HillierN. (1999). Educational reform and school improvement in Victorian primary schools 1993–1999. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Melbourne.
33.
LauderH.HughesD. (1999). Trading in futures: Why markets in education don't work. Buckingham: Open University Press.
34.
LeadbeaterC. (1999, July 12). Towards the knowledge society. New Statesman, pp. 25–27.
35.
LevacicR. (1995). Local management of schools: Analysis and practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
36.
LevacicR.HardmanJ. (in press). The performance of grant-maintained schools in England: An experiment in school autonomy. Journal of Educational Policy.
37.
LevacicR.HardmanJ.WoodsP. (1998). Competition as a spur to improvement? Differential improvement in GCSE results. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Manchester, January.
38.
MarginsonS. (1997). Markets in education. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
39.
MidgleyS. (1998, June 26). Third way: A challenge for all in education. Times Educational Supplement, pp. 44–45.
40.
MilesM. (1987). Practical guidelines for school administrators: How to get there. Paper presented in a symposium on ‘Effective schools programs and the urban high school’, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, April.
41.
RossK. N.LevacicR. (Eds.). (1999). Needs-based resource allocation in education via formula funding of schools. Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.
42.
SmythJ. (Ed.). (1993). A socially-critical review of the self managing school. London: Falmer Press.
43.
SpaullA. (1999). The end of the state school system: Education and the Kennett Government. In CostarB.EconomouN. (Eds.), The Kennett revolution: Victorian politics in the 1990s. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
44.
SummersA. A.JohnsonA. W. (1996). The effects of school-based management plans. In HanushekE. A.JorgensonD. W. (Eds.), Improving America's schools: The role of incentives (pp. 75–96). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45.
SwansonA. D.KingR. A. (1997). School finance: Its economics and politics (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
46.
TaylorJ.BradleyS. (1999). Resource utilisation and economies of scale in secondary schools. Unpublished paper based on research funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, Department of Economics, Management School, Lancaster University.
47.
TownsendT. (1996). The self-managing school: Miracle or myth?Leading & Managing, 2 (3), 171–194.
48.
VuykE.J. (1994). Netherlands: System of education. In HusénT.PostlethwaiteN. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7, pp. 4067–4077). London: Pergamon Press.
49.
WeeJ. (1999). Improved student learning and leadership in self-managed schools. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Melbourne.
50.
WhittyG.PowerS.HalpinD. (1998). Devolution and choice in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
51.
WoodsP. A.BagleyC.GlatterR. (1998). School choice and competition: Markets in the public interest?London: Routledge.
