Philosophy and the Study of Education: A Critique of the Common Sense Consensus

Abstract

That education is an interdisciplinary study, in which distinct disciplines or forms of knowledge are or should be brought together focusing on educational problems, is so widespread and apparently so intuitively plausible a view that it might be called the ‘common sense consensus’. A problem for this view is to explain how conceptually distinct elements from contributing disciplines can be brought together, or integrated. Recent discussion in the Australian Journal of Education both illuminates the problem and illustrates the misleading and unproductive features of the commonsense consensus. An alternative, pragmatist view of education as a set of competing and/or complementary theories, or ‘rationally analyzable considerations’, transcends and even discredits conventional disciplinary boundaries, especially between philosophy and empirical research, and offers a practical basis for theory and research.

Keywords

educational philosophy epistemology research methodology educational theories holistic approach curriculum research

References

Crittenden

B. S.

Educational theory: Seeking its own voice. The Australian Journal of Education, 1983, 27(3), 224–8.

Edel

Analytic philosophy of education at the crossroads. Educational Theory, 1972, 22(2), 131–52.

Evers

C. W.

Analytic philosophy of education: From a logical point of view. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1979, 11(2), 1–15.

Evers

C. W.

Walker

J. C.

The unity of knowledge. Access: Contemporary Themes in Educational Inquiry, 1982, 1(2), 32–47.

Evers

C. W.

Walker

J. C.

Knowledge, partitioned sets and extensionality: a refutation of the forms of knowledge thesis. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 1983, 17(2), 155–70.

Evers

C. W.

Walker

J. C.

Epistemology, Semantics and Educational Theory (Occasional Papers, No. 16). Sydney: Department of Education, The University of Sydney, 1984.

Hirst

P. H.

Educational theory. In Tibble

J. W.

(Ed.) The Study of Education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.

Hirst

P. H.

Knowledge and the Curriculum. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.

Hirst

P. H.

Peters

R. S.

The Logic of Education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.

10.

Lakatos

Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Lakatos

Musgrave

(Eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

11.

Musgrave

P. W.

Rigour, relevance and responsibility. The Australian Journal of Education, 1983, 27(3), 229–33.

12.

Quine

W. V.

From a Logical Point of View. New York: Harper, 1953.

13.

Quine

W. V.

The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. New York: Random House, 1966.

14.

Walker

J. C.

Some New Perspectives in Philosophy of Education (Occasional Papers, No. 14). Sydney: Department of Education, The University of Sydney, 1983.

15.

Walker

J. C.

Commonsense, ordinary language and ‘necessity’ in liberal rationalist philosophy of education. In C. W. Evers and J. C. Walker, op. cit. 1984a.

16.

Walker

J. C.

Dusting off educational studies: A methodology for implementing certain proposals made by John Wilson. Journal of Philosophy of Education 1984b, 18(1), 3–16.

17.

Walker

J. C.

The evolution of the APE. Access, 1984c, 3(1), 1–16.

18.

Walker

J. C.

Evers

C. W.

Towards a Materialist Pragmatist philosophy of education. Education Research and Perspectives, 1984, 11(1), 23–33.

19.

Wilson

Cowell

Philosophy and making the study of education respectable. The Australian Journal of Education, 1983, 27(3), 211–23.