The effects of home reading activities during preschool and Grade 4 on children’s reading performance in Chinese and English in Hong Kong

Abstract

The English and Chinese reading proficiency of 1376 Grade 4 students in 24 Hong Kong primary schools were assessed using measures developed for the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study. Students’ parents provided information about home reading activities (HRA) aimed at supporting their children’s reading prior to them entering school (“early home reading activities”, EHRA) and during Grade 4 (“home reading activities”). Results indicated that EHRA was a stronger predictor of reading performance in both Chinese and English than HRA. Moreover, ‘typical’ HRA such as reading books, telling stories and singing songs were found to be predictive of reading performance in both Chinese and English. In English, in addition, playing word games or character puzzles were also activities beneficial to reading performance. Together, these results provide evidence for the beneficial effects of traditional early childhood activities at home such as book reading, telling stories and singing songs for reading performance in later primary school in children’s first as well as second language.

Keywords

English Chinese parent involvement early childhood reading achievement primary school students

Introduction

Hong Kong particularly attracted the attention of educators internationally due to the outstanding reading performance of its primary school pupils in the 2011 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) undertaken by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). In the 2011 PIRLS survey, Hong Kong primary students ranked first of 48 education systems or countries in terms of reading achievement, an exceptional outcome given the very diverse multilingual profile of Hong Kong’s citizens and school population.

Large-scale assessments such as PIRLS, PISA and TIMSS provide reliable and objective data on children’s performance in reading, mathematics and science education across different stages of schooling (Breakspear, 2012; Robitaille, Beaton, & Plomp, 2000; Schwippert, 2007; Schwippert & Lenkeit, 2012; Tobin, Lietz, Nugroho, Vivekanandan, & Nyamkhuu, 2015; Topping, 2006). Along with other governments in the Asia-Pacific region, the government of Hong Kong has been using these international assessments to evaluate the quality of its education system as well as to identify factors contributing to literacy development, including the assistance provided by parents in support of their children’s reading development.

As is the case in other societies, school starters bring with them varying degrees of literacy experience in Hong Kong. Many early-years teachers deliberately address this diversity, aware that the preschool communicative competence of school entrants in the 21st century varies enormously from child to child and from educational system to educational system (McBride-Chang, 2004). In this context, it is noteworthy that few large-scale literacy studies have involved learners required to learn a first (L1) and a second language (L2) simultaneously, as is the case in Hong Kong. Although studies focusing on fostering children’s L2 ability vary in their findings, almost all conclude that the earlier that children begin to learn the L2, the better their learning of both languages (Birdsong, 2004; DeKeyser & Larson-Hall, 2005; Flege, Yeni-Komshian, & Liu, 1999).

Parents in countries all over the world have long been actively involved in promoting their children’s spoken language and reading skills before they begin formal schooling (Emerson, Fear, Fox, & Sanders, 2012; Landry, 2008; Central Advisory Council for Education (England), 1967; Sénéchal & LeFevre, 2002). Desforges and Abouchaar (2003) suggest a range of home activities for parents to help their children learn how to read to give them a head-start in learning how to read independently and cope with the literacy demands in the classroom.

Griva and Chouvarda (2012) emphasise the importance of parental involvement in advancing the children’s mother tongue and second language acquisition in countries where more than one language is commonly spoken. Their recommendations suggest that the L2 be taught in a playful way and that parental involvement is vital for their children’s L2 learning.

This certainly applies in Hong Kong where all secondary school graduates are expected to be proficient in both Chinese and English. Hence, it is of particular interest to examine whether there is evidence to support the hypothesis that these early reading activities at preschool ages at home positively relate to subsequent performance in reading.

The present study purposefully investigated the impact of parental involvement on the bilingual reading proficiency of Grade 4 students in Hong Kong both prior to children starting school (‘early home reading activities’ EHRA) as well as in Grade 4 (‘home reading activities’ HRA) while taking into account parental socio-economic status (SES) in terms of education, occupation and income.

Parental involvement in literacy development

Parents are children’s first teachers, providing an important language environment as they talk to children and answer their questions. Darling and Westberg (2004) as well as Griva and Chouvarda (2012) have confirmed that parental involvement has a positive effect on children’s reading acquisition. Consistent with Scarborough and Dobrich’s (1994) conclusions, Sonnenschein and Munsterman (2002) found that the frequency and incidence of storybook reading with children was the strongest correlate with young reader’s subsequent literacy-related skills. Similarly, according to Sénéchal (2006), early assistance from parents is a particularly strong predictor of vocabulary knowledge in children in kindergartens (age 3 to 5) and nursery schools (age 2 to 3) and a highly statistically significant predictor of children’s reading attainment at Grade 4 (age 9).

Parent SES and home support

A number of studies show that parents consider assisting their children with academic work as very important regardless of their financial background (Bradley & Corwyn, 2002; Calvo & Bialystok, 2014; Hoff-Ginsberg, 1991). In addition, parents on low incomes perceive helping their children with reading as more important than helping them with mathematics (Drummond & Stipek, 2004).

Zhan (2006) examined the relationship between parental assets, their expectations for their children’s future and their active involvement in their children’s literacy learning outside school and found that all these characteristics predicted their offspring’s literacy attainment two years later. Butler (2014) investigated the parental factors affecting children’s English language learning in China and found that Chinese parents’ SES had a significant impact on their children’s English speaking abilities at Grade 4.

Early years of parental involvement in literacy development

Park (2008) investigated the effect of early home literacy activities on children’s school performance from a cross-country perspective. An examination of PIRLS data from 25 countries revealed that early home literacy activities were significantly associated with children’s reading performance in all countries in the analysis. Thus, the more the parents engaged with the children in literacy activities, the greater was their influence on children’s reading progress, regardless of parental education background.

Lawson (2012) suggested parental involvement in reading aloud as a predictor of children’s academic achievement in later years. Children’s auditory awareness and prosodic sensitivity, both associated with academic success, can also be cultivated by listening to being read to aloud by parents. During their preschool years, many children learn how to identify print that they frequently encounter in their environment: for example, `stop’ and `exit’ signs, labels on food and magazines, and the names of frequently visited shops and restaurants. This acquisition of print-meaning connections represents an opportunity to learn graphic systems and develop an awareness of how to differentiate print and non-print cues. In fact, the reading aloud of labels and signs is instrumental in helping children develop print awareness. There is also evidence that preschool children who regularly see print in signs and advertisements spontaneously notice a relationship between the words they see in print and the words they speak and hear (Armbruster, Lehr, & Osborn, 2003; Ehri, 1987; Goodman & Altwerger, 1981; Goodman & Goodman, 1979).

Crook (1997) investigated cultural practices which affect Australian adolescents’ and adults’ outcomes in terms of social status. Crook reported that children whose parents read more frequently and provided a more nurturing home environment had a more successful education path than that of their peers. Such parental practices clearly seemed to enhance children’s linguistic and reading skills, which, in turn, helped them to excel significantly during their senior school years.

Based on a literature review Buckingham, Wheldall, and Beamen-Wheldall’s (2013) concluded that, in English-speaking countries such as the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia, the impact of SES on children’s later reading outcomes was most pertinent in determining their literacy proficiency before the start of formal schooling. Other studies have found that the various elements of SES, including family income, parents’ education level and parents’ occupation, are significant predictors of children’s reading performance (Bowey, 1995; Davis-Kean, 2005).

Much research has examined the relationship between parental involvement and children’s later reading achievement in western countries. In fact, the aforementioned researchers identify a list of reading practices which have been found to enhance students’ reading literacy. Others suggest that such a list should be passed on to parents by schools and teachers to facilitate parental involvement in home-reading tuition (Hoffman & McCarthey, 2000; Pang, Muaka, Bernhardt, & Kamil, 2003; Pressley, 2002; Teale & Yokata, 2000).

However, relatively less is known about whether the aforementioned relationships apply in equal strength in countries with a population and language environment other than English. A key purpose of the present research was to examine the relationship between different components of parental support and reading attainment in the bilingual context of Hong Kong.

In Hong Kong, a former British colony, most people speak Chinese as the mother tongue and English as their second language. Reading proficiency in both languages is very important in Hong Kong as a global centre of commerce and finance. Therefore, parents and education authorities expect teachers to ensure that school leavers are well versed in both Chinese and English in order to meet the demands of the 21st Century community (Koo, Kam, & Choi, 2003; Pierson, 1991, 1998; Tung, 1997). In fact, the Hong Kong Government and public alike take a very keen interest in students’ bilingual reading performance (Education Bureau, 2012).

In 2001, the IEA conducted the PIRLS in 35 countries and regions, including Hong Kong, to assess relative levels of attainment and the factors affecting reading proficiency. Hong Kong students’ performance was found to be “average”. They performed quite well in terms of comprehending informational articles but were relatively weak on understanding literary texts (Mullis, Martin, Gonzalez, & Kennedy, 2003). In the next iteration of the assessment, PIRLS 2006, the reading attainment of Hong Kong students was ranked second in the 46 participating countries (Mullis, Martin, Kennedy, & Foy, 2007).

The PIRLS reading literacy surveys provide quality instruments with both English and Chinese-translated versions to examine reading performance in Chinese and English as well as the relationship between parental factors and children’s bilingual literacy achievement. The study reported in this article adopted the conceptual framework and instruments used in PIRLS.

The authors of the present article are aware that many Hong Kong parents will do whatever they can to assist teachers. However, in the present climate where the number of immigrants from the Chinese Mainland is rising continuously, increasing numbers of parents will leave it to schools to advance children’s literacy standards, especially their reading attainment (Cheng, 1995; Dimmock & Walker, 2000; Wan, 1992).

This situation has been noted in many other countries (Cummins, 1984; Dufva & Voeten, 1999; Hdstijn & Bossers, 1992; Olshtain, Shohamy, Kemp, & Chatow, 1990). In fact, regardless of their own educational level, most Hong Kong parents are fairly confident about helping their children with reading in Chinese. They are less confident in helping their children to speak, read and write in English. However, knowing that English is a second language in Hong Kong, many parents are willing to spend money on help their children learn English by buying supplementary exercises, arranging private tutoring or asking their children to attend reinforcement courses (HSBC, 2015).

Recognising the somewhat conflicting findings of some previous studies of bilingual attainment and parental involvement in encouraging literacy, and Hong Kong parents’ less confident in engaging in their children’s L2 learning, the writers assessed the reading performance of Grade 4 students in Hong Kong and investigated what HRA that had been or were currently being carried out by parents to promote their children’s reading literacy attainment in both Chinese and English. Correlations were expected between students’ reading attainment and the degree and type of literacy support by their parents prior to starting school as well as at their current level of schooling (i.e., Grade 4).

In summary, this study set out to address the following questions:

What are the relative effects of EHRA and current HRA on the reading performance in Chinese and English of students in Grade 4?

Which reading activities at home and out of school best predict Hong Kong Grade 4 students’ reading attainment in the primary school?

Are these relationships affected by parental socioeconomic factors (i.e. level of education, family income)?

Method

Sample

The study adopted the sampling procedure used in PIRLS 2006, namely a two-stage stratified cluster approach (Foy & Joncas, 2003). In the first stage, 150 primary schools were randomly selected using `probability proportional to size’ sampling procedures (Rosén, 1997), with school type¹ (government, aided and direct subsidy scheme schools) and student gender (boys, girls and co-educational) used as broad stratification variables. At the second stage, one Grade 4 class was selected at random from each school. Out of the 150 schools, 24 of them were randomly selected to form the final sample.

The final sample consisted of 1,376 children in Grade 4 in 24 primary schools, 674 girls and 702 boys, on average aged 9.69 years. The medium of instruction in these 24 schools was Chinese (Cantonese, or Putonghua, or mixed mode) except for the English language classes.

Reading comprehension tests in Chinese and English

All students were given reading comprehension tests based on PIRLS materials in Chinese and in English. All students were asked to take two reading comprehension tests from a core collection of matched and standardized passages. The PIRLS reading achievement scale provides a common reference on which educators can compare their fourth graders’ progress in reading over time from assessment to assessment (Mullis, Martin, Kennedy, Trong, & Sainsbury, 2009). As in the PIRLS surveys, narrative and transactional text types were used to assess reading performance. Eight reading passages were selected, four for each text type. Students’ comprehension was assessed by a set of questions designed specifically for each type of text. The original texts in English were translated into Chinese for the Hong Kong element of PIRLS, and verified by language experts in the IEA to ensure that the translated texts matched the level of difficulty of original texts. All of the measures used in this study were derived from modified PIRLS instruments and translated into Chinese. A back-translation procedure was conducted to confirm the accuracy of the translation (Johansone, 2012) and comparability of instruments (Loh & Tse, 2009; Tse, Lam, Lam, Chan, & Loh, 2006).

Scoring procedures

The attainment scores were calculated using “plausible value” procedures suggested by Gonzalez and Kennedy (2003). Plausible values are estimates of how individuals would have performed on a test if it had included all possible items in the assessment battery. In line with PIRLS scaling procedures, the Chinese and English reading scores were standardized to a mean of 500 points and a standard deviation of 100 points. The mean reading comprehension score of the students on the Chinese test was 564.06 (SD = 69.21) and on the English test was 423.14 (SD = 95.53).

All participating students also completed a background questionnaire gathering pertinent demographic, home and school background data and their perception of influences that may have impacted on their literacy capability in both Chinese and English languages.

Early home reading activities

The measure of students’ pre-school home literacy activities is a modification of the PIRLS’s Index of Early Home Literacy Activities (Mullis et al., 2007) and has been validated in previous studies in Hong Kong (Tse et al., 2010; Tse, Lam, Loh, Hui, & Ng, 2013). The measure is based on parents’ responses to the frequency of the following activities they engage in with their child prior to entry into primary school: read books, tell stories, sing songs, read on computer, play with alphabet toys (e.g., blocks with letters of the alphabet), play word games, write words, watch TV programme about reading, watch TV programme or video with subtitles, read aloud signs and labels and play with compound character puzzle. Average is computed across all items based on a 3-point scale: Never or almost never = 1, Sometimes = 2, and Often = 3. An average score of 2.33 to 3 indicates a high level of EHRA, an average score of 1.67 to 2.33 indicates a medium level and a score of between 1 and 1.67 indicates a low level of EHRA.

Home reading activities

To obtain information regarding current literacy experiences of 4th graders’ at home, the researchers adopted PIRLS’s items to ask if parents engaged presently in a range of activities with their child (Mullis et al., 2007). The measure consisted of eight of these activities, namely reading aloud to child, listening to child reading aloud, talking with child about things his/her has done, talking with child about what he/she is reading on his/her own, discussing the child’s classroom reading work with him/her, going to the library or a bookstore with the child, playing or working on a computer with the child, and encouraging the child to write. An average was computed across the eight items which were measured on a 4-point scale: Never or almost never = 1, Once or twice a month = 2, Once or twice a week = 3, and Every day or almost every day = 4. An average score of 2.99 to 4 indicated a high level of home HRA, a score of 2 to less than 2.99 a medium level and an average score of 1 to less than 2 a low level of HRA.

Reading undertaken as part of students’ homework was not treated as a HRA in this study as it was not related specifically to parents.

Parental time

The measure of interaction time between parents and their child was based on parents’ responses to the following two items: the time the father (or male caregiver) spent with the child in a typical week and the time that the mother (or female caregiver) spent in a typical week. An average was calculated based on responses to the two items which had a 4-point response scale: Less than 7 hours = 1, 7 to less than 15 hours = 2, 15 to less than 21 hours = 3, and More than 21 hours = 4. The higher the average score, the more time parents spent with their child.

Parents’ education level, occupation category and family income

To obtain information on their SES, parents were asked to indicate their education level, their occupation and family income category in a separate questionnaire. For all scales used in this study, internal consistency checks were undertaken by calculating Cronbach’s alpha. Values ranged from 0.73 to 0.89, indicating satisfactory internal consistency of the attainment tests scales and questionnaires scales used in the study.

Analyses

Three types of analyses were conducted for this study, namely correlation analyses, simple linear regression analyses and multiple linear regression analyses. First, bivariate correlations were calculated between EHRA/HRA and students’ reading performance in Chinese and English to see whether there were significant associations between those variables. Second, simple linear regressions were calculated to examine whether EHRA and HRA were significant predictors of reading performance in Chinese and English. Third, multiple linear regression analyses using the stepwise method were conducted. These analyses were aimed at predicting reading performance in Chinese and English by subgroups of EHRA or HRA. If certain subgroups of EHRA or HRA were found valid predictors of reading scores, then perhaps parents as well as educational practitioners could direct more attention and resources to these predictors to enhance the efficacy of (early) HRA.

To identify subgroups of EHRA and HRA for these multiple regression analyses, principal component analyses (with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization) were conducted on the item batteries used to measure EHRA and HRA. Results of these analyses showed that Chinese EHRA could be grouped into three broad categories (see Table 1), namely `typical reading’ (reading books, telling stories, and singing songs), `e-reading’ (reading on a computer, writing letters or words, watching television tutorial programme about reading, watching television programme with subtitles, and watching audio-visual materials with subtitles), and `reading games’ (playing word games, reading aloud signs and labels, and playing character puzzle games). In the principal component analysis of the Chinese HRA, all items were loaded on a single common factor.

Table 1.

Chinese early home reading activities: rotated component matrix.^a

Chinese early home reading activities component
	1	2	3
Reading on computer		.519
Writing letters or words		.409
Watching TV: tutorial programme about reading		.608
Watching TV with subtitles		.799
Watching AV with subtitles		.658
Reading books	.785
Telling stories	.809
Singing songs	.498
Playing word games			.758
Reading aloud signs and labels			.416
Playing Chinese compound character puzzle games			.819

Rotation converged in five iterations.

From the principal component analysis of the English EHRA two factors emerged (see Table 2). These were labelled “typical reading” (reading books, telling stories, singing songs, playing word games, writing letters or words, and reading aloud signs and labels) and “e-reading” activities (i.e., watching TV: tutorial programme about reading, watching TV with subtitles, and watching AV with subtitles). Principal component analysis of the English HRA revealed only one single underlying factor.

Table 2.

English early home reading activities: rotated component matrix.^a

English early home reading activities component
	1	2
Reading books	.724
Telling stories	.743
Singing songs	.654
Playing word games	.731
Writing letters or words	.582
Reading aloud signs and labels	.515
Watching TV: tutorial programme about reading		.659
Watching TV with subtitles		.860
Watching AV with subtitles		.726

Rotation converged in three iterations.

Results

Below, frequencies of parents’ EHRA before their children’s school entry and HRA at students’ Grade 4 are reported first, followed by the results of the bivariate correlations. Results of the simple regression analyses and the multiple regression analyses are provided in the last part of this results section.

Frequency of parents’ EHRA and HRA

It can be seen from Tables 3 and 4 that, in general, parents of Hong Kong students were frequently involved in both Chinese and English EHRA and HRA. More specifically, for Chinese EHRA and HRA, most parents reported “medium” or “high” levels of involvement. Although many of the Hong Kong parents were in the “medium” to “high” frequency groups of EHRA and HRA in terms of carrying out English activities with the children at home, a sizeable number of them indicated that they “never or almost never” conducted English EHRA and HRA.

Table 3.

Frequency of Chinese/English early home reading activities (EHRA).

Items	N	Low	Medium	High
EHRA in Chinese	1346	4	738	604
EHRA in English	1331	56	924	351

Note: Early home reading activities score is an average computed across the 3-point scale items in the questionnaire. Grouping is based on the following criteria: low = 1 to 1.66, medium = 1.67 to 2.33, high = 2.34 to 3.

Table 4.

Frequency of Chinese/English Grade 4 home reading activities (HRA).

Items	N	Low	Medium	High
HRA in Chinese	1338	404	700	234
HRA in English	1328	631	540	157

Note: Grade 4 home reading activities score is an average computed across the eight 4-point scale items in the questionnaire. Grouping is based on the following criteria: low = 1 to 1.99, medium = 2 to 2.99, high = 3 to 4.

Results of the bivariate correlations

In terms of the relationship between parents’ education level, occupation, family income, parental time, and student’s Chinese and English reading attainment, Table 5 shows small associations, although some of them reached statistical significance (i.e., p < 0.05).

Table 5.

Correlation between students’ reading achievement and parents’ education level, occupation type, family income and parental time.

		Father’s education	Mother’s education	Father’s occupation	Mother’s occupation	Family income	Parental time
Chinese reading score	Pearson correlation	−.032	−.080**	−.079**	−.027	−.022	.109**
	Sig. (2-tailed)	.262	.005	.009	.397	.440	.000
English reading score	Pearson correlation	.077**	.115**	.005	.043	.190**	.177**
	Sig. (2-tailed)	.006	.000	.873	.169	.000	.000

Indicates that correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

The time parents reported to spend with their children each week and reading performance was found to be correlated significantly (0.11 for Chinese and 0.18 for English).

Results of simple regression analyses

As can be seen in Table 6, the effect of Chinese EHRA on performance is positive, indicating that the more the parents had conducted Chinese EHRA with their children prior to school entry, the better the children’s Chinese reading performance at Grade 4 (t = 2.93, p = 0.004, see Table 6).

Table 6.

Simple regression: Chinese early home reading activities on Grade 4 Chinese reading.

Variable	B	SE (B)	β	t	p
Constant	518.343	15.897
Chinese EHRA	2.040	.697	.107	2.927**	0.004

Note: The regression coefficients (B), standardized coefficients (β) and standard errors are in Fisher Z metric.

p < 0.01; effect size (r) = 0.107.

The effect of Chinese HRA in Grade 4 on children’s Chinese reading performance failed to reach significance (t = 0.6, p = 0.55, see Table 7). Hence, it appears that while there is an effect on Chinese reading performance of parents’ reading activities prior to starting school no such effect can be ascertained for activities conducted once the students have reached Grade 4.

Table 7.

Simple regression: Chinese home reading activities on Grade 4 Chinese reading.

Variable	B	SE (B)	β	t	p
Constant	557.576	11.315
Chinese HRA	.379	.629	.022	.603	0.547

Note: The regression coefficients (B), standardized coefficients (β) and standard errors are in Fisher Z metric.

Results of the regression analysis suggested that the more the parents conducted EHRA in English with their children, the better their children’s English reading performance in Grade 4 (t = 1.99, p = 0.047, see Table 8).

Table 8.

Simple regression: English early home reading activities on Grade 4 English reading.

Variable	B	SE (B)	β	t	p
Constant	392.519	16.183	.074	1.986*	.047
English EHRA	1.628	.820

Note: The regression coefficients (B), standardized coefficients (β) and standard errors are in Fisher Z metric.

p < 0.05.

However, the effect of the HRA on students’ reading attainment in English did not reach statistical significance (see Table 9). As was the case for Chinese, the activities that parents conducted very early in their children’s lives to support and develop reading comprehension in English seemed to have had a positive effect on performance whereas the current activities in Grade 4 did not have such an effect.

Table 9.

Simple regression: English home reading activities on Grade 4 English reading.

Variable	B	SE (B)	β	t	p
Constant	416.720	11.927	.020	.547	0.584
English HRA	.399	.729

Note: The regression coefficients (B), standardized coefficients (β) and standard errors are in Fisher Z metric.

Results of multiple regression analyses

Stepwise regression analyses revealed that typical reading activities (including “reading Chinese books”, “singing Chinese songs” and “telling Chinese stories”) were found to be an effective predictor of children’s Chinese reading attainment (t = 3.55, p < 0.000, see Table 10). Thus, the more frequently the parents in the study read Chinese books with their children before they entered primary schools, told them Chinese stories and sung Chinese songs, the better their Chinese reading attainment in Grade 4. The Chinese HRA currently being carried out had a smaller and non-statistically significant effect, as indicated in Table 7.

Table 10.

Effect of ‘typical early home reading activities’ on Grade 4 reading in Chinese: Stepwise regression.

Variable	B	SE (B)	β	T	p
Constant	521.976	12.177	.130	3.552***	0.000
Typical reading activities (=Factor 1 of Chinese EHRA)	6.408	1.804

Note: The regression coefficients (B), standardized coefficients (β), and standard errors are in Fisher Z metric. ***p < 0.001.

In terms of the students’ English reading attainment, the activities categorized as typical reading, which are fairly common EHRA, were found to be positively correlated with the English reading performance of the children (t = 2.38, p = 0.018, see Table 11). The more parents participated in these activities with their children prior to primary school, the better their children’s English reading attainment in Grade 4. Any English HRA currently being carried out had a much smaller and non-statistically significant effect on the English reading attainment of the 4th Graders (see Table 9).

Table 11.

Effect of ‘typical early home reading activities’ on Grade 4 reading in English: stepwise regression.

Variable	B	SE (B)	β	t	p
Constant	391.250	14.192	.088	2.378*	0.018
Typical reading activities (=Factor 1 of English EHRA)	3.072	1.292

Note: The regression coefficients (B), standardized coefficients, and standard errors are in Fisher Z metric. *p < 0.05.

Discussion and conclusions

Prior research on the impact of parental involvement on the early literacy development of pre-school children has found positive effects on the reading attainment outcomes and benefits for primary school-age children (Baker, 2003; Burchinal et al, 2000; Law, 2008). However, most of these studies have been conducted in monolingual rather than bilingual contexts. The present study sought to provide insights into bilingual contexts by examining the effects of a range of HRA on the L1 and L2 language reading attainment of Grade 4 primary students in Hong Kong.

Consistent with Australian and international findings in PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 (Thomson et al., 2012), results of the analyses reported here showed the long-term impact of EHRA on students’ later reading attainment in the Hong Kong bilingual context. Parental involvement in EHRA clearly enhanced their children’s later reading attainment in both Chinese and English.

However, parental involvement once the child had entered school seemed to have a lesser effect on reading performance. This finding is partly in line with Park’s (2008) cross-country research into the effects of early home literacy activities and later attainment at primary school. Park found a positive correlation between the reading performance of Grade 4 children and the extent of parental involvement in literacy activities before the entered formal schooling but not after the children had settled into school.

In terms of bilingual reading performance, the present study found that the impact of EHRA on Chinese language reading attainment was greater than the effect on English language reading. Although many Hong Kong parents claimed to have supported the bilingual literacy development of their children, in reality, they habitually and almost exclusively tended to use a monolingual approach to communicate with their children at home and during HRA. In other words, evidence of the impact of coaching and tutoring at home aimed at boosting the children’s English language was by-and-large negligible.

Regarding the impact of different EHRA, analyses showed that a combination of reading books, singing songs and telling stories had a positive effect on Chinese reading attainment in Grade 4. In English, in addition, playing word games, writing letters and words, reading aloud signs and labels, and playing compound word puzzle games were also found to be beneficial, which is consistent with many findings reported in western countries (Lawson, 2012; Malkina, 1995; Scarborough & Dobrich, 1994; Sonnenschein & Munsterman, 2002). It is clearly apparent from the present results that reading books, telling stories and singing songs in the mother language are important activities to promote students’ mother-tongue language growth. Whereas young native readers of alphabetic English can correctly read English words they have never read or encountered before and the meaning of which they do not understand, the Chinese language is tonal and ideographic in nature, and learners have to learn both the spoken and written forms of Chinese when developing literacy prowess (Tse & Cheung, 2010).

Where parents provide EHRA in their L1, children have a chance to link spontaneously the new learning to previous knowledge (Malkina, 1995). When parents read Chinese books aloud to their children, they often rephrase stories to take account of their children’s comprehension level (Li & Fleer, 2015). Parents may embellish the story with vocal inflection and tone, point out illustrations, and invite their child to participate in the storytelling (Stanley & Dillingham, 2013). From looking at the book being read, their children have the opportunity to get a first impression of the written form of the Chinese language and lexical, phonological, orthographic and syntactic elements in new words (Feng, Miller, Shu, & Zhang, 2009). With such basic competency, they are expected to learn more easily when they enter primary school.

In contrast, EHRA conducted by parents to support reading development in English are quite different from those activities parents use when reading and teaching the Chinese language. Results of the present study show that, in addition to book reading, storytelling, and singing songs, other activities such as playing word games, writing letters to match sounds or words, using reading aloud signs and labels and playing puzzle compound word games, contributed to children’s English literacy development, although a sizeable number of parents indicated that they “never or almost never” conducted English EHRA and HRA (see Table 3 and Table 4). The significance of writing letters or words to match sounds aligned with results reported by Chua, Liow, and Yeong (2016), which suggest that writing letters and words can successfully predict English reading proficiency of bilingual kindergarten children in Australia. Playing word games may enhance motivation in vocabulary learning which is crucial for young learners of a second language (Moon & Reifel, 2008). These joint parent–child activities can evoke more utterances in English and native language, and may have positive effect on language use (Mushi, 2002). This particularly applies where the vocabulary threshold for being a proficient reader in the L2 is much higher than that in the L1, as is the case in Hong Kong.²

Unlike previous studies in many western countries (Blanden & Gregg, 2004; Hartas, 2011; Melhuish et al., 2008; Myrberg & Rosén 2009; Pancsofar & Vernon-Feagans, 2006), the present study found no or weak correlations between Hong Kong young children’s reading attainment in Chinese and such SES factors as parental education and family income. For English, in contrast, these correlations were somewhat higher. This difference supports findings from numerous studies pointing out the influence SES has on foreign or second language acquisition (Kahn-Horwitz, Shimron, & Sparks; 2006, Olshtain et al., 1990; Skehan, 1986). Children from more advantaged backgrounds tend to have a stronger sense of the importance of English as a key language in society for international business and travel, and as a gate-opener to higher education and high-ranking jobs. In contrast, parents from lower socioeconomic backgrounds may not convey these values and expectations to their children and English may not be perceived as important as Chinese by those parents.

Hong Kong is a cosmopolitan city and the bilingual competence of its citizens is one of the most important contributors to a well-paid future life (Standing Committee on Language Education and Research (SCOLAR), 2003). Parents will deliberately seek to prepare their children for their schooling as early as possible (Epstein, 2002; Hoover-Dempsey et al., 2001). Furthermore, those who possess little English competence may also need to be shown how to assist their children constructively. However, society needs first to find ways to reach such parents and to make them comfortable in assisting schools to educate their offspring.

Publicity campaigns need to be mounted and schools and teachers might be recruited to help with this task. The present study revealed that some EHRA can have a profound impact on children’s learning of both Chinese and English. More research needs to be carried out in order to help parents and schools to apply the findings of studies in daily situations. Equally important, parent–teacher collaboration might be explored in later phases of education given the fact that “e-reading”, an important channel of learning in modern society, was not found to be a significant factor affecting reading proficiency in both Chinese and English. One possible reason is that e-reading is still not the dominant approach to reading for young children. Parents might need guidance from teachers and teachers could take advantage of collaborating with parents to make a much greater use of innovative electronic learning aids that can assist students to learn at home as they grow older.

In conclusion, findings of the current study emphasise the importance of parental involvement in their children’s home-reading prior to starting school for Hong Kong children’s reading attainment in both Chinese and English. Moreover, among the most common Chinese and English reading activities in the home, typical ones such as reading books, telling stories and singing songs were found to be most effective in predicting Hong Kong young readers’ reading attainment. In terms of learning to comprehend English text, playing word games, writing letters or words, reading aloud signs and labels, and playing compound word puzzle games were also found to be useful activities for nurturing students reading ability. The fact that Hong Kong students were ranked second in PIRLS 2006 and first in PIRLS 2011 among 46 countries is strong evidence that schools and parents in Hong Kong are effective in developing their children’s reading competence. Still, in the quest for continuous improvement, the current study has shown the importance of EHRA for reading performance in students’ first as well as second language.

Footnotes

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the children, their parents, teachers and school principals in the 66 primary schools in Hong Kong for their participation in the project. The authors would like to thank Dr Terry Dolan for his invaluable input into this paper.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: the General Research Fund grant numbers HKU 744906 & HKU 752209 of the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong SAR.

Notes

References

Armbruster

B. B.

Lehr

Osborn

J. M.

(2003) A child becomes a reader: Birth through preschool. Proven ideas from research for parents, Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Baker

(2003) The role of parents in motivating struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly 19(1): 87–106.

Beijing Language College (1986) A dictionary of word frequency in modern Chinese, Beijing: The Beijing Language College Press.

Birdsong

(2004) Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In: Davies

Elder

(eds) The handbook of applied linguistics, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 82–105.

Blanden

Gregg

(2004) Family income and educational attainment: A review of approaches and evidence for Britain. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20: 245–263.

Bowey

J. A.

(1995) Socioeconomic status differences in preschool phonological sensitivity and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 87(3): 476–487.

Bradley

R. H.

Corwyn

R. F.

(2002) Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology 53: 371–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233.

Breakspear

(2012) The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 71, OECD Publishing.

Buckingham

Wheldall

Beaman-Wheldall

(2013) Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: The school years. Australian Journal of Education 57: 190–213. doi: 10.1177/0004944113495500.

10.

Burchinal, M., Roberts, J., Riggins, R., Zeisel, S., Neebe, E., & Bryant, D. (2000). Relating Quality of Center-Based Child Care to Early Cognitive and Language Development Longitudinally. Child Development, 71(2), 339–357. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00149.

11.

Butler

Y. G.

(2014) Parental factors and early English education as a foreign language: A case study in Mainland China. Research Papers in Education 29(4): 410–437. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2013.776625.

12.

Calvo

Bialystok

(2014) Independent effects of bilingualism and socioeconomic status on language ability and executive functioning. Cognition 130(3): 278–288. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.015.

13.

Central Advisory Council for Education (England) (1967) Children and their primary schools. [Plowden Report]. London: HMSO.

14.

Cheng

K. M.

(1995) The neglected dimension: Cultural comparison in Educational Administration. In: Wong

K. C.

Cheng

K. M.

(eds) Educational leadership and change: An international perspective, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp. 87–102.

15.

Chua

S. M.

Liow

S. J. R.

Yeong

S. H. M.

(2016) Using spelling to screen bilingual kindergarteners at risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities 49(3): 227–239.

16.

Crook

C. J.

(1997) Cultural practices and socioeconomic attainment: The Australian experience, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

17.

Cummins

(1984) Wanted: A theoretical framework for relating language proficiency to academic achievement among bilingual students. In: Rivera

(ed.) Language proficiency and academic achievement, Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 2–19.

18.

Darling

Westberg

(2004) Parent involvement in children’s acquisition of reading. The Reading Teacher 57(8): 774–776.

19.

Davis-Kean

P. E.

(2005) The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology 19(2): 294–304.

20.

DeKeyser

Larson-Hall

(2005) What does the critical period really mean? In: Kroll

J. F.

de Groot

A. M. B.

(eds) Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–108.

21.

Desforges

Abouchaar

(2003) The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: A literature review, London: Department for Education and Skills.

22.

Dimmock

C. A. J.

Walker

(2000) Future school administration: Western and Asian perspectives, Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

23.

Drummond

K. V.

Stipek

(2004) Low-income parents’ beliefs about their role in children’s academic learning. The Elementary School Journal 104(3): 197–213.

24.

Dufva

Voeten

(1999) NL literacy and phonological memory as prerequisites for learning English as a foreign language. Applied Psycholinguistics 20: 329–348.

25.

Education Bureau. (2012). International study shows Hong Kong students’ outstanding performance in reading literacy, mathematics and science [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201212/12/P201212120332.htm.

26.

Ehri

L. C.

(1987) Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Literacy Research 19(1): 5–31.

27.

Emerson, L., Fear, J., Fox, D. S., & Sanders, E. (2012). Parental engagement in learning and schooling: Lessons from research. A report by the Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY) for the Family-School and Community Partnerships Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.aracy.org.au/publications-resources/command/download_file/id/7/filename/Parental_engagement_in_learning_and_schooling_Lessons_from_research_BUREAU_ARACY_August_2012.pdf.

28.

Epstein

J. L.

(2002) School, family, and community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. In: Epstein

J. L.

Sanders

M. G.

Simon

B. S.

Salinas

K. C.

Jansorn

N. R.

Van Voorhis

F. L.

(eds) School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, pp. 7–29.

29.

Feng

Miller

Shu

Zhang

(2009) Orthography and the development of reading processes: An eye-movement study of Chinese and English. Child Development 80(3): 720–735.

30.

Flege

J. E.

Yeni-Komshian

G. H.

Liu

(1999) Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41: 78–104.

31.

Foy

Joncas

(2003) PIRLS sampling design. In: Martin

M. O.

Mullis

I. V. S.

Kennedy

A. M.

(eds) PIRLS 2001 technical report, Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, pp. 53–65.

32.

Gonzalez

E. J.

Kennedy

A. M.

(2003) PIRLS 2001 user guide for the international database. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2001i/PIRLS2001_Pubs_UG.html (accessed 5 May 5 2014).

33.

Goodman

K. S.

Goodman

Y. M.

(1979) Learning to read is natural. In: Resnick

L. B.

Weaver

P. A.

(eds) Theory and practice of early reading Vol. l. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 137–154.

34.

Goodman

Y. M.

Altwerger

(1981) Print awareness in preschool children: A working paper. A study of the development of literacy in preschool children. Occasional papers No. 4, program in language and literacy, University of Arizona.

35.

Griva

Chouvarda

(2012) Developing plurilingual children: Parents’ beliefs and attitudes towards English language learning and multilingual learning. World Journal of English Language 2(3): 1–13.

36.

Hartas

(2011) Families’ social backgrounds matter: Socio-economic factors, home learning and young children’s language, literacy and social outcomes. British Educational Research Journal 37(6): 893–914. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.506945.

37.

Hdstijn

J. H.

Bossers

(1992) Individual differences in L2 proficiency as a function of L1 proficiency. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 4(4): 341–353.

38.

Hoff-Ginsberg

(1991) Mother–child conversation in different social classes and communicative settings. Child Development 62(4): 782–796.

39.

Hoffman

J. V.

McCarthey

S. J.

(2000) Our principles and our practices. In: Hoffman

J. V.

Baumann

Afflerbach

(eds) Balancing principles for teaching elementary reading, Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.

40.

Hoover-Dempsey

K. V.

Battiato

A. C.

Walker

J. M.

Reed

R. P.

DeJong

J. M.

Jones

K. P.

(2001) Parental involvement in homework. Educational Psychologist 36(3): 195–209.

41.

HSBC. (2015). Hong Kong parents keen to boost their children’s opportunities for success [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.about.hsbc.com.hk/∼/media/hong-kong/en/news-and-media/16-july-2015.pdf.

42.

Johansone

(2012) Operations and quality assurance. In: Martin

M. O.

Mullis

I. V. S.

(eds) Methods and procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011, Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston CollegeRetrieved from http://timss.bc.edu/methods/pdf/TP_Operations_Quality_Assurance.pdf.

43.

Kahn-Horwitz

Shimron

Sparks

R. L.

(2006) Weak and strong novice readers of English as a foreign language: Effects of first language and socioeconomic status. Annals of Dyslexia 56(1): 161–185.

44.

Koo

R. D.

Kam

M. C. K.

Choi

B. C.

(2003) Education and schooling in Hong Kong: Under one country, two systems. Childhood Education 79(3): 137–144.

45.

Landry

S. H.

(2008) The role of parents in early childhood learning. In: Tremblay

R. E.

Barr

R. G.

RDeV Peters

Boivin (eds) Encyclopedia on early childhood development, Montreal, Quebec: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development, pp. 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.child-encyclopedia.com/parenting-skills/according-experts/role-parents-early-childhood-learning.

46.

Law

Y. K.

(2008) The relationship between extrinsic motivation, home literacy, classroom instructional practices, and reading proficiency in second-grade Chinese children. Research in Education 80(1): 37–51.

47.

Lawson

(2012) The real power of parental reading aloud: Exploring the affective and attentional dimensions. Australian Journal of Education 56(3): 257–272. doi: 10.1002/0470018860.

48.

Fleer

(2015) Family pedagogy: Parent–child interaction in shared book reading. Early Child Development and Care 185(11–12): 1944–1960.

49.

Loh

E. K. Y.

Tse

S. K.

(2009) The relationship between motivation to read Chinese and English and its impact on the Chinese and English reading performance of Chinese students. Chinese Education and Society 42(3): 66–90.

50.

Malkina

(1995) Storytelling in early language teaching. English Teaching Forum 33(1): 38–44.

51.

McBride-Chang

(2004) Children’s literacy development, London: Arnold.

52.

Melhuish

E. C.

Phan

M. B.

Sylva

Sammons

Siraj-Blatchford

Taggart

(2008) Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00550.x.

53.

Moon

Reifel

(2008) Play and literacy learning in a diverse language pre-kindergarten classroom. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 9(1): 49–65.

54.

Mullis

I. V. S.

Martin

M. O.

Gonzalez

E. J.

Kennedy

A. M.

(2003) PIRLS 2001 international report: IEA’s study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools, Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

55.

Mullis

I. V. S.

Martin

M. O.

Kennedy

A. M.

Foy

(2007) IEA’s progress in international reading literacy study in primary school in 40 countries, Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

56.

Mullis

I. V. S.

Martin

M. O.

Kennedy

A. M.

Trong

K. L.

Sainsbury

(2009) PIRLS 2011 assessment framework, Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

57.

Mushi

(2002) Acquisition of multiple languages among children of immigrant families: Parents’ role in the home–school language pendulum. Early Child Development and Care 172(5): 517–530. doi: 10.1080/03004430214546.

58.

Myrberg

Rosén

(2009) Direct and indirect effects of parents’ education on reading achievement among third graders in Sweden. British Journal of Educational Psychology 79(4): 695–711.

59.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

60.

Olshtain

Shohamy

Kemp

Chatow

(1990) Factors predicting success in EFL among culturally different learners. Language Learning 40: 23–44.

61.

Pancsofar

Vernon-Feagans

(2006) Mother and father language input to young children: Contributions to later language development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 27(6): 571–587.

62.

Pang

E. S.

Muaka

Bernhardt

Kamil

M. L.

(2003) Teaching reading, Brussels: International Academy of Education.

63.

Park

(2008) Home literacy environments and children’s reading performance: A comparative study of 25 countries. Educational Research and Evaluation 14(6): 489–505.

64.

Pierson

H. D.

(1991) Cantonese, English, or Putonghua – Unresolved communicative issue in HK’s future. In: Postiglione

G. A.

(ed.) Education and society in HK: Toward one country and two systems, Hong Kong: HKU Press, pp. 183–202.

65.

Pierson

H. D.

(1998) Societal accommodation to English and Putonghua in Cantonese-speaking HK. In: Pennington

M. C.

(ed.) Language in HK at century’s end, Hong Kong: HKU Press, pp. 91–111.

66.

Pressley

(2002) Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

67.

Robitaille

D. F.

Beaton

A. E.

Plomp

(2000) Concluding comments. In: Robitaille

D. F.

Beaton

A. E.

Plomp

(eds) The Impact of TIMSS on the teaching and learning of mathematics and science, Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press, pp. 168–169.

68.

Rosén

(1997) On sampling with probability proportional to size. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 62: 159–191.

69.

Scarborough

H. S.

Dobrich

(1994) On the efficacy of reading to preschoolers. Developmental Review 14(3): 245–302.

70.

Schwippert

(2007) Progress in reading literacy: The impact of PIRLS 2001 in 13 countries, Münster: Waxmann Publishing Co.

71.

Schwippert

Lenkeit

(2012) Progress in reading literacy in national and national and international context: The impact of PIRLS 2006 in 12 countries, Münster: Waxmann Publishing Co.

72.

Sénéchal

(2006) Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to Grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading 10(1): 59–87.

73.

Sénéchal

LeFevre

J. A.

(2002) Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development 73(2): 445–460.

74.

Skehan

(1986) The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning. Language Testing 3(2): 188–221.

75.

Sonnenschein, S., & Munsterman, K. (2002). The influence of home-based reading interactions on 5-year-olds’ reading motivations and early literacy development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(3), 318–337. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00167-9.

76.

Standing Committee on Language Education and Research (SCOLAR) (2003) Action plan to raise language standards in Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Standing Committee on Language Education and ResearchRetrieved from http://www.language-education.com/eng/doc/Download_ActionPlan-Final_Report%28E%29.pdf.

77.

Stanley

Dillingham

(2013) Family storytelling. Language Magazine. Retrieved from http://languagemagazine.com/?page_id=6133 (accessed 10 June 2016).

78.

Teale

Yokata

(2000) Beginning reading and writing: Perspectives on instruction. In: Strickland

D. S.

Morrow

L. M.

(eds) Beginning reading and writing, New York, NY: Teachers College Press, pp. 3–21.

79.

Thomson

Hillman

Wernert

Schmid

Buckley

Munene

(2012) Monitoring Australian year 4 student achievement internationally: TIMSS and PIRLS 2011, Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).

80.

Tobin

Lietz

Nugroho

Vivekanandan

Nyamkhuu

(2015) Using large-scale assessments of students’ learning to inform education policy: Insights from the Asia-Pacific region, Melbourne: ACER and Bangkok: UNESCO.

81.

Topping

(2006) PISA/PIRLS data on reading achievement: Transfer into international policy and practice. The Reading Teacher 59: 588–590.

82.

Tse

S. K.

Cheung

W. M.

(2010) Chinese and the learning of Chinese. In: Marton

Tse

S. K.

Cheung

W. M.

(eds) On the learning of Chinese, Rotterdam: The Sense Publishers, pp. 1–8.

83.

Tse

S. K.

Lam

J. W. I.

Loh

E. K. Y.

Hui

S. Y.

H. W.

(2013) A comparison of Hong Kong primary 4 students’ progress in Chinese and English reading attainments. Quarterly Journal of Chinese Studies 1(4): 1–16.

84.

Tse

S. K.

Lam

R. Y. H.

O. K. M.

Lam

J. W. I.

Loh

E. K. Y.

Tso

A. S. F.

(2010) Family resources and students’ reading attainment: Capitalising on home factors. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature 10(3): 27–54.

85.

Tse

S. K.

Lam

R. Y. J.

Lam

J. W. I.

Chan

Y. M.

Loh

E. K. Y.

(2006) Attitudes and attainment: A comparison of Hong Kong, Singaporean and English students’ reading. Research in Education 76: 74–87.

86.

Tung

C. H.

(1997) Building HK for a new era: Policy address. Retrieved from http://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/pa97/english/paindex.htm (accessed 15 August 2013).

87.

Wan

P. T.

(1992) Parental involvement in secondary school management: A case study in Shatin. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Hong Kong.

88.

Zhan, M. (2006). Assets, parental expectations and involvement, and children's educational performance. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(8), 961–975. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.10.008.