This study draws on a survey of 800 upper primary school students concerning their knowledge of certain ‘new media’ applications. The findings concur with other studies in suggesting that students’ relationship with technology is more complex and nuanced than is conveyed by a simple branding of ‘digital native’. Some differential experiences between classes and genders are identified, along with an important minority of students who have much more out-of-school experience with new media than others. The role of the school and teacher in inducting students to new media is presented as central, with important implications for curriculum leadership and teacher professional development.
ApperleyT.BeavisC. (2011) Literacy into action: Digital games as action and text in the English and literacy classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal6: 130–143.
BainbridgeW. S. (2010) Introduction. In: BainbridgeW. S. (eds) Online Worlds: Convergence of the real and virtual, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 1–6.
5.
BarabS. A.PettyjohnP.GresalfiK.VolkC.SolomouM. (2012) Game-based curriculum and transformational play: Designing to meaningfully positioning person, content, and context. Computers and Education5: 518–533.
6.
BeavisC. (2010) English in the digital age: Making English digital. English in Australia45: 21–30.
7.
BennettS.MatonK.KervinL. (2008) The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology39: 775–786.
8.
ChandlerP.O’BrienA.UnsworthL. (2010) Towards a 3D digital multimodal curriculum for the upper primary school. Australian Educational Computing25: 34–40.
9.
CopeB.KalantzisM. (2009) “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal4: 164–195.
GeeJ. P. (2007) Good video games and good learning: Collected essays on video games, learning, and literacy, New York: Peter Lang.
12.
GrossP.KelleherC. (2010) Non-programmers identifying functionality in unfamiliar code: Strategies and barriers. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing21: 263–276.
KnobelM.LankshearC. (2006) Weblog worlds and constructions of effective and powerful writing: Cross with care, and only where signs permit. In: PahlK.RowsellJ. (eds) Travel notes from the New Literacy Studies, Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 73–92.
18.
KvavikR. B. (2005) Convenience, communication, and control: How students use technology. In: OblingerD. G.OblingerJ. L. (eds) Educating the net generation, Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE, pp. 7.1–7.20. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen.
19.
LankshearC.KnobelM. (2006) New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
20.
ListerM.DoveyJ.GiddingsS.GrantI.KellyK. (2003) New media: A critical introduction, New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
MaggsP. (2008) Kahootz 3.0: Developing software for the classroom. Teacher, March28–31.
OwenD. B. (1962) Handbook of statistical tables, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
PrenskyM. (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon9: 1–6.
28.
R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org.
29.
RutherfordL.BittmanM.BrownJ.UnsworthL. (2011) Digital natives: New and old media and children’s outcomes. Australian Journal of Education55: 73–87.
30.
SmithJ.SkrbisZ.WesternM. (2012) Beneath the “Digital Native” myth: Understanding young Australians’ online time use. Journal of Sociology49: 97–118.
ThomasM. K.BarabS. A.TuzunH. (2009) Developing critical implementations of technology-rich innovations: A cross-case study of the implementation of Quest Atlantis. Journal of Educational Computing Research41: 125–153.
