The current generation of young children has been described as ‘digital natives’, having been born into a ubiquitous digital media environment. They are envisaged as educationally independent of the guided interaction provided by ‘digital immigrants’: parents and teachers. This article uses data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) to study the development of vocabulary and traditional literacy in children aged from 0 to 8 years; their access to digital devices; parental mediation practices; children's use of digital devices as recorded in time-diaries; and, finally, the association between patterns of media use and family contexts on children's learning. The analysis shows the importance of the parental context in framing media use for acquiring vocabulary, and suggests that computer (but not games) use is associated with more developed language skills. Independently of these factors, raw exposure to television is not harmful to learning.
AndersonD.HansonK. (2010) From blooming, buzzing confusion to media literacy: The early development of television viewing. Developmental Review, 30, 239–255.
3.
AndersonD.HustonA.SchmittK.LinebargerD.WrightJ. (2001). Early childhood television viewing and adolescent behavior. The recontact study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 66(1, Serial No. 264), 1–143.
4.
AndersonD.PempekT, (2005). Television and very young children. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(5), 505–522.
5.
AndersonR.WilsonP.FieldingL. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(3), 285–303.
6.
BaxterJ.HayesA. (2007). How four-year-olds spend their days: Insights into the caring context of young children. Family Matters, 76, 34–43.
7.
BennettS.MatonK.KervinL. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
8.
BianchiS.RobinsonJ. (1997). What did you do today? Children's use of time, family composition, and the acquisition of social capital. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(2), 332–344.
9.
BickhamD.WrightJ.HustonC. (2001). Attention, comprehension and the educational influences of television. In SingerD.SingerJ. (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 101–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ.G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
11.
BuckinghamD. (2006). Is there a digital generation? In BuckinghamD.WillettR. (Eds.), Digital generations: Children, young people and new media (pp. 1–13). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
CoiroJ.KnobelM.LankshearC.LeuD. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
CopeB.KalantzisM. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
DedeC. (2005). Planning for neomillennial learning styles: Implications for investments in faculty and technology. In OblingerD.OblingerJ. (Eds.), Educating the net generation. Retrieved 13 September 2011 from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
15.
DuncanG.J.Brooks-GunnJ. (Eds.). (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
16.
FoehrU. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
17.
GarrettP.Ng'anduN.FerronJ. (1994). Poverty experiences of young children and the quality of their home environments. Child Development, 65(2), 331–345.
18.
GeeJ.P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy?London, UK: Palgrave/Macmillan.
HancoxR.J.MilneB.J.PoultonR. (2005). Association of television viewing during childhood with poor educational achievement. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159(7), 614–618.
21.
HelsperE.EynonJ. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence?British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520.
22.
HofferthS.SandbergJ. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 295–308.
23.
HoweN.StraussW. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage.
24.
JacksonL.Von EyeA.BioccaF.BarbatsisG.ZhaoY.FitzgeraldH. (2006). Children's home internet use: Antecedents and psychological, social and academic consequences. In KrautR.BryninM.KieslerS. (Eds.), Computers, phones, and the internet: Domesticating information technology (pp. 145–67). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
JenkinsH. (2006) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.
KirkorianH.WurtullaE.AndersonD. (2008). Media and young children's learning. The Future of Children, 18(1), 39–61.
28.
KressG. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
LenhartA.MaddenM.HitlinP. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
30.
LinebargerD.VaalaS. (2010). Screen media and language development in infants and toddlers: An ecological perspective. Developmental Review, 30, 176–202.
31.
LivingstoneS. (2002). Young people and new media. London, UK: Sage.
32.
MartinA.MadiganD. (Eds.) (2006). Digital literacies for learning. London, UK: Facet.
33.
HargraveA. MillwoodLivingstoneS. (2006). Harm and offence in media content: A review of the evidence. Bristol, UK: Intellect.
34.
MorenoR.MayerR.E. (2005). Role of guidance, reflection and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 117–128.
35.
NewmanT. (2008). A review of digital literacy in 3–16 year olds: Evidence, developmental models, and recommendations. London, UK: Timmus.
36.
PaavonenE.PennonM.RoaneM.ValkonenS.LahikainenA. (2006). TV exposure associated with sleep disturbances in 5-to 6-year-old children. Journal of Sleep Research, 15(2), 154–161.
37.
PlowmanL.McPakeJ.StephenC. (2008). Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 303–319.
38.
PrenskyM. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
39.
RideoutV.HamelE. (2006). The media family: Electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers, preschoolers and their parents. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
40.
RobertsD.FoehrU. (2008). Trends in media use. The Future of Children, 18(1), 11–37.
41.
RobertsD.FoehrU.RideoutV. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–18 year olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
42.
RobinsonJ.MartinS. (2010). IT use and declining social capital?: More cold water from the General Social Survey (GSS) and the American Time-Use Survey (ATUS). Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 45–63.
43.
RoweM.L.PanB.A.AyoubC. (2005). Predictors of variation in maternal talk to children: A longitudinal study of low-income families. Parenting: Science and Practice, 5(3), 259–283.
44.
RubinsteinJ.MeyerD.E.EvansJ.E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 763–797.
45.
SaxtonM. (2010). Child language: Acquisition and development. London, UK: Sage.
46.
SchmidtM.AndersonD. (2007). The impact of television on cognitive development and educational achievement. In PecoraN.MurrayJ.WartellaE. (Eds.), Children and Television: Fifty Years of Research (pp. 65–84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
SchmidtM.RichM.Rifas-ShimanS.OkenE.TaverasE. (2009). Television viewing in infancy and child cognition at 3 years of age in a US cohort. Pediatrics, 123(3), e370–e375.
48.
SchmidtM.VandewaterE. (2008). Media and attention, cognition, and school achievement. The Future of Children, 18(1), 63–85.
49.
SharifI.SargeantJ. (2006). Association between television, movie, and video game exposure and school performance. Pediatrics, 118(4), e1061–1070.
50.
SilverstoneR. (1999). New media, new audiences?New Media & Society, 1(1), 10–12.
51.
SipthorpM.MissonS. (2009). Wave 3 weighting and non-response. LSAC technical paper no. 6. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
52.
SoloffC.LawrenceD.JohnstoneR. (2005). Sample design. Growing up in Australia: The longitudinal study of Australian children. LSAC technical paper no. 1. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
53.
SoloffC.LawrenceD.MissonS.JohnstoneR. (2006). Wave 1 weighting and non-response. LSAC technical paper no. 3. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
54.
SpigelL.OlssonJ. (Eds.). (2004). Television after TV: Essays on a medium in transition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
55.
TapscottD. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
56.
VandewaterE.A.BickhamD.S.LeeJ.H.CummingsH.M.WartellaE.A.RideoutV.J. (2005). When the television is always on: Heavy television exposure and young children's development. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(5), 562–577.
57.
VygotskyL.S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In RieberR.CartonA. (Eds.), L. S. Vygotsky, Collected Works (N. Minick, trans., Vol. 1, pp. 39–285). New York, NY: Plenum.
58.
WiechaJ.L.SobolA.M.PetersonK.E.GortmakerS.L. (2001). Household television access: Associations with screen time, reading, and homework among youth. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 1(5), 244–251.
59.
WrightJ.C.HustonA.C.MurphyK.C.St. PetersM.PiñonM.ScantinR.KotlerJ. (2001). The relations of early television viewing to school readiness and vocabulary of children from low-income families: The early window project. Child Development, 72(5), 1347–1366.
