This article presents perspectives on how principals in schools in northern Norway value the school reform ‘The Knowledge Promotion’ and the new National Curriculum (LK06). It is based on a survey of all primary schools in the region of Finnmark and interviews with five of these principals one year later. The region of Finnmark in Norway is in the Arctic zone, with small towns and rural districts. The schools in Finnmark are relatively small, and are both multilingual and multicultural. The new school reform puts a strong emphasis on the quality of the owners of the schools, often the mayor on behalf of the municipality. In spite of this, the principals of the schools, both in the survey and in the interviews, are adamant that they alone make all the decisions in implementing the new curriculum.
AlvessonM.SchölbergK. (2009). Tolkning och reflection [Interpretations and reflections] (2nd ed.). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
2.
BachmannK.HaugP. (2006). Forskning om tilpasset opplœring [Research in accommodated learning]. Rapport 2006:62. Volda, Norway: Volda University College/Møre Institute of Research.
3.
BongoM.EriksenL.GermetenS. (2010). Kunnskapsløftet Samisk: Feltarbeid på fem skoler i nordsamisk område [The Knowledge Promotion and the Sámi curriculum: Case studies and field work in five schools in North Sámi language region]. Rapport 2010. Alta, Norway: Finnmark University College.
4.
EngelsenB.U. (2008). Kunnskapsløftet sentrale stringsdokumenter og locale strategidokumenter [The Knowledge Promotion: Central administrational documents and local strategies]. First report in the evaluation of the Knowledge Promotion project. Oslo, Norway: Oslo University, PFI.
5.
GermetenS. (2008). Kunnskapsløftet rektorer ved innføring av en ny lœreplan. [The Knowledge Promotion reform: Principals about implementation of the new national curriculum]. Rapport 2008:3. Alta, Norway: Finnmark University College.
6.
GermetenS. (2009). Rektor mellom barken og veden ved innføring av en ny læreplan? [The principals: A position ‘in between’ when implementing a new curriculum?]. In GermetenS. (Ed.), Kunnskapsløftet fra lœreplantekst til lœreres praksis. [The Knowledge Promotion reform: The curriculum from text to teachers'work]. Rapport. 2009:7. Tromsø, Norway: Eureka Forlag, Forskningsserien.
7.
GermetenS. (2010). Kunnskapsløftet i Finnmark: Feltarbeid på fem skoler [The Knowledge Promotion reform in Finnmark: Case studies and field work in five schools]. Rapport 2010:6. Alta, Norway: Finnmark University College.
8.
GoodladJ.I. (1986). The scope of the curriculum field. In GundemB.B. (Ed.), Om lœreplanpraksis og lœreplanteori [About curriculum theory and curriculum practice]. Oslo, Norway: Oslo University, PFI.
9.
HaugP. (1992). Et felles løft for bedre vurderingspraksis—en veiledning [Educational reform by experiment] (Doctoral dissertation). Stockholm, Sweden: HLS Förlag.
10.
HovdelienO. (2011). Den multikulturelle skolen—hva mener rektorene? [The multicultural school: What are the opinions of the principals?] (Doctoral Dissertation). Faculty of Humanity and Educational Studies, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
11.
Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research]. (1998). Opplœringslova [The Act of Primary and Secondary Education]. LOV-1998-07-17-61. Olso, Norway: Author.
12.
Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research]. (2006a). Lœreplaner for Kunnskapsløftet. [The Knowledge Promotion reform: The national curriculum]. Oslo, Norway: Author.
13.
Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research]. (2006b). Prinsipp for opplœringa [Principles for quality framework]. Oslo, Norway: Author.
14.
LundgrenU.P. (1979). Att organisera omvärdlen [Organising the world]. Stockholm, Sweden: Liber Förlag.
15.
Utdanningsdirektoratet [National Board of Education]. (2007). Bedre vurderingspraksis—et veiledningshefte [Guidelines for better practice in assessments and evaluation]. Retrieved 2 February 2011 from http://www.udir.no/upload/Vurdering_veiledningshefte_2.pdf
