In K–12 education, formative assessment is a pedagogical process gathering momentum among researchers and practitioners. It has become a common theme at educational conferences, a key Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) research theme since 2002 and the subject of increasingly frequent requests for government funding in various nations around the world. A school that implements formative assessment reform is engaged in a dynamic process that links instruction and curriculum with assessment in order to support individual learning in the social setting of the classroom. Formative assessment is described, with the elements and principles that direct the assessment process delineated. The importance of high-quality interactions to formative assessment is considered, as well as an evaluation of the theories that form the basis for the formative assessment process.
AskewS. (2000). Feedback for learning. London: Routledge/Falmer.
2.
Assessment Action Group/AiFL Programme Management Group. (2002–2008). AifL—Assessment is for learning. Retrieved 5 July, 2006, from http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/assess
3.
Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University, School of Education.
4.
AzmitiaM. (1988). Peer interaction and problem solving: When are two heads better than one?Child Development, 59, 87–96.
5.
BainesE.BlatchfordP.ChowneA. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of collaborative group work in primary schools: Effects on science attainment. British Educational Research Journal,33(5), 663–680.
6.
BalcazarF.HopkinsB.L.SuarezY. (1986). A critical objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7(3/4), 65–89.
7.
BarronB.J. (2000). Achieving co-ordination in collaborative problem solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436.
8.
BlackP. (2005). Formative assessment: Views through different lenses. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 133–135.
9.
BlackP.WiliamD. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–73.
10.
BlackP.WiliamD. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: School of Education King's College.
11.
BlackP.WiliamD. (2006a). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In GardnerJ. (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (pp. 9–25). London: Sage.
12.
BlackP.WiliamD. (2006b). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In GardnerJ. (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (pp. 81–100). London: Sage.
13.
BlackP.WiliamD. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
14.
BlatchfordP.BainesE.Rubie-DaviesC.BassettP.ChowneA. (2006). The effect of a new approach to group-work on pupil—pupil and teacher—pupil interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 750–765.
15.
BloomB.S.HastingsJ.T.MadausG.F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of pupil learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
16.
BrookhartS.M. (2007). Expanding views about formative assessment: A review of the literature. In McMillanH. (Ed.), Formative assessment classroom: Theory into practice (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
17.
ChaseP.N.WatsonA.C. (2004). Unconscious cognition and behaviorism. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 25(2), 145–160.
18.
CronbachL. (1963). Course improvement through evaluation. Teacher College Record, 64, 672–683.
19.
CrooksT.J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438–48.
20.
DamonW. (1984). Peer education the untapped potential. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5, 331–343.
21.
DunnK.E.MulvenonS.W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessments: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(7). Retrieved 16 August 2010 from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=14&n=7
22.
EdwardsR.UsherR. (2001). Lifelong learning: A postmodern condition of education?Adult Education Quarterly, 51(4), 273–287.
GaltonM.J.HargreavesL.ComberC.WallD.PellA. (1999). Inside the primary classroom: 20 years on. London: Routledge.
25.
GilliesR. (2003). Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 35–49.
26.
GoosM.GalbraithP.RenshawP. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 192–223.
HattieJ.TimperleyH. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
29.
HinchliffeG. (2006). Re-thinking lifelong learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 25(1/2), 93–109.
30.
KantorJ.R. (1982). Cultural psychology. Chicago, IL: Principia Press.
31.
KutnickP.MansonI. (1998). Social life in the classroom: Toward a relational concept of social skills for use in the classroom. In CampbellA.MuncerS. (Eds.), The social child (pp. 165–182). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
35.
McCroskeyC.RichmondV. (1992). Communication, control and concern. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Retrieved 16 August 2010 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/34/63/33989414.pdf
37.
PellegrinoJ.W.ChudowskyN.GlaserR. (Eds.) (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38.
PiagetJ. (1965). The moral judgement of the child. New York, NY: Free Press.
39.
ScrivenM. (1967). The methodology of evaluation, In TylerR.W.GagneR.M.ScrivenM. (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
40.
ShepardL. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
41.
SkinnerB.F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, Spring, 86–97.
42.
StigginsR. (2007). Conquering the formative assessment frontier. In McMillanH. (Ed.), Formative assessment classroom: Theory into practice (pp. 8–28). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
43.
SullivanH.S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.
44.
TownsendT. (1997). What makes schools effective? A comparison between school communities in Australia and the USA. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8(3), 311–326.
45.
VygotskyL. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In ColeM.JohnSteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE. (Eds.), Mind in society (pp. 79–81). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
WebbN.M.PalincsarA.S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In BerlinerD.CalfeeR. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York, NY: Macmillan.
47.
WengerE. (2006). Communities of practice. A brief introduction. Communities of practice. Retrieved 16 August 2010 from http://www.ewenger.com/theory/
48.
WertschJ.V. (1988). L. S. Vygotsky's ‘New’ theory of mind. American Scholar, 57, 81–90.
49.
WiliamD.LeahyS. (2007). A theoretical foundation for formative assessment. In McMillanH. (Ed.), Formative assessment classroom: Theory into practice (pp. 29–42). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
50.
WiliamD.LeeC.HarrisonC.BlackP. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11(1), 49–63.
