Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examined current academic achievement test use and assessment practices in the United States. Special education administrators from 725 US school districts were surveyed using an online platform to determine current trends in the use of norm-referenced academic achievement tests (NRTs) and curriculum-based measures (CBMs). Administrators reported that school psychologists most commonly administered the NRTs used to help determine special education eligibility, although special education teachers also fill this role frequently, particularly in Western states. General and special educators are the most likely staff to administer CBMs. A detailed accounting of academic achievement assessment practices is discussed including which tests are used and the differences in assessment roles by region and district locale. Implications of these findings for the training of educators and for research are considered.

Keywords

academic achievement testing assessment roles eligibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association for Employment in Education (AAEE). (2016). Educator supply and demand report 2015–2016: Executive summary. AAEE.

Americans with Disabilities Act . (1990). Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328. https://www.ada.gov/pubs/ada.htm

Atkinson

Delamont

(2010). Sage qualitative research methods. Sage.

Bellamy

Iwaszuk

(2017). Responding to the need for new local special education administrators: A case study. University of Washington. https://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Case-Study-SPED-Admin-DRAFT.pdf

Benson

N. F.

Floyd

R. G.

Kranzler

J. H.

Eckert

T. L.

Fefer

S. A.

Morgan

G. B.

(2019). Test use and assessment practices of school psychologists in the United States: Findings from the 2017 national survey. Journal of School Psychology, 72, 29-48. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.004

Boccio

D. E.

Weisz

Lefkowitz

(2016). Administrative pressure to practice unethically and burnout within the profession of school psychology. Psychology in the Schools, 53(6), 659-672. doi:10.1002/pits.21931

Breaux

K. C.

Lichtenberger

E. O.

(2016). Essentials of KTEA-3 and WIAT-III assessment. John Wiley & Sons.

Burns

M. K.

Riley-Tillman

T. C.

Rathvon

(2017). Effective school interventions: Evidence-based strategies for improving student outcomes. Guilford Publications.

Clemens

N. H.

Keller-Margulis

M. A.

Scholten

Yoon

(2016). Screening assessment within a multi-tiered system of support: Current practices, advances, and next steps. In Jimerson

Burns

VanDerHeyden

(Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention (pp. 187-213). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_12

10.

Connolly

A. J.

(2007). Keymath-3 diagnostic assessment. Upper Saddle Creek, NJ: Pearson.

11.

Dillman

D. A.

Smyth

J. D.

Christian

L. M.

(2014). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley & Sons.

12.

Eysenbach

(2004). Improving the quality of web surveys: The checklist for reporting results of internet esurveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(3), e34. doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34

13.

García-pérez

M. A.

Núñez-antón

(2003). Cellwise residual analysis in two-way contingency tables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(5), 825-839. doi:10.1177/0013164403251280

14.

Goh

D. S.

Teslow

Fuller

G. B.

(1981). The practice of psychological assessment among school psychologists. Professional Psychology, 12(6), 696. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.12.6.696

15.

Guerra

M. G.

Kupczynski

L. P.

Mundy

M. A.

Garza

(2017). The diagnostic competencies: Perceptions of educational diagnosticians, administrators, and classroom teachers. International Journal of Special Education, 32(4), 708-722. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1184166.pdf

16.

Guerriero

T. S.

Houser

M. A.

McGinley

V. A.

(2020). The special educators guide to assessment. Sage.

17.

Harrison

G. L.

Goegan

L. D.

Macoun

S. J.

(2018). Common examiner scoring errors on academic achievement measures. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 34(2), 98-112. doi:10.1177/0829573518763484

18.

Heward

W. L.

Alber-Morgan

S. R.

Konrad

(2017). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (11th ed.). Pearson.

19.

Hutton

J. B.

Dubes

Muir

(1992). Assessment practices of school psychologists: Ten years later. School Psychology Review, 21, 271-284.

20.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) . (2004). Pub. L. No. 108-446,1118Stat. 2647; 2004 enacted H. R. 1350; 108 enacted H. R. 1350.

21.

Jenkins

J. R.

Schiller

Blackorby

Thayer

S. K.

Tilly

W. D.

(2013). Responsiveness to intervention in reading: Architecture and practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(1), 36-46. doi:10.1177/0731948712464963

22.

Kaufman

A. S.

Kaufman

N. L.

(2014). Kaufman test of educational achievement (3rd ed.). NCS Pearson.

23.

Levenson

(2012). Boosting the quality and efficiency of special education. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

24.

Lockwood

Farmer

(2020). The course on cognitive assessment: Two decades later. Psychology in the Schools, 57(2), 265-283. doi:10.1002/pits.22298

25.

Lockwood

Sealander

Gross

T. J.

Lanterman

(2019). Teacher trainees’ administration and scoring errors on the Kaufman test of educational achievement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38, 551-563. doi:10.1177/0734282919871144

26.

Mahdavi

J. N.

Beebe-Frankenberger

M. E.

(2009). Pioneering RTI systems that work: Social validity, collaboration, and context. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(2), 64-72. doi:10.1177/2F004005990904200208

27.

Mather

Urso

(2011). Assessment of academic achievement. In Learning and Attention Disorders in Adolescence and Adulthood. John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781118093085.ch7

28.

McElhinny

E. T.

Pellegrin

R. D.

(2014). The principal’s role with IEP Teams. National Association of Elementary School Principals. https://www.naesp.org/communicator-october-2014/principal-s-role-iep-teams

29.

McLeskey

(2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children.

30.

Mellard

D. F.

McKnight

Woods

(2009). Response to intervention screening and progress-monitoring practices in 41 local schools. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(4), 186-195. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00292.x

31.

Moore

D. S.

McCabe

G. P.

Yates

(1999). The practice of statistics: Advanced placement. W.H. Freeman & Co.

32.

Moote

Archer

(2018). Failing to deliver? Exploring the current status of career education provision in England. Research Papers in Education, 33(2), 187-215. doi:10.1080/02671522.2016.1271005

33.

National Association of School Psychologists (NASP). (2017). Shortages in school psychology: Challenges to meeting the growing needs of US students and schools. NASP.

34.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). The condition of education at a glance. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgg.asp

35.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). National assessment of educational progress. Interpreting NAEP geography results. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/geography/interpret_results.aspx

36.

Olsen

R. B.

Orr

L. L.

Bell

S. H.

Stuart

E. A.

(2013). External validity in policy evaluations that choose sites purposively. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(1), 107-121. doi:10.1002/pam.21660

37.

Pallant

(2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). McGraw Hill.

38.

Pazzaglia

A. M.

Stafford

E. T.

Rodriguez

S. M.

(2016). Survey methods for educators: Analysis and reporting of survey data (part 3 of 3) (REL 2016–164). Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

39.

Qualifications Policy . (n.d.). https://www.pearsonassessments.com/professional-assessments/ordering/how-to-order/qualifications/qualifications-policy.html

40.

Rodl

J. E.

Bonifay

Cruz

R. A.

Manchanda

(2018). A survey of school administrators’ training and support related to evaluating special education teachers. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 3(1), 19-31. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1190961

41.

Schrank

F. A.

McGrew

K. S.

Mather

(2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of cognitive abilities. Riverside.

42.

Shinn

M. R.

(2008). Best practices in using curriculum-based measurement in a problem-solving model. In Thomas

Grimes

(Eds). Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 243-261). National Association of School Psychologists.

43.

Silva

M. R.

Collier-Meek

M. A.

Codding

R. S.

Kleinert

W. L.

Feinberg

(2020). Data collection and analysis in response-to-intervention: A survey of school psychologists. Contemporary School Psychology, 1-18. doi:10.1007/s40688-020-00280-2

44.

Spectrum K-12, American Association of School Administrators, Council of Administrators of Special Education, National Association of State Directors of Special Education, & State Title 1 Directors. (2010). Response to intervention (RTI) adoption survey. http://sss.usf.edu/resources/presentations/2010/fasp_summer_inst2010/Resource_SLD/RTI/2010RTIAdoptionSurveyReport.pdf

45.

Stinnett

T. A.

Havey

J. M.

Oehler-Stinnett

(1994). Current test usage by practicing school psychologists: A national survey. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 331–350. doi:10.1177/073428299401200403

46.

Styck

K. M.

Walsh

S. M.

(2016). Evaluating the prevalence and impact of examiner errors on the Wechsler scales of intelligence: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 28(1), 3-17. doi:10.1037/pas0000157

47.

Sutton

J. P.

Frye

E. M.

Frawley

P. A.

(2009). Nationally certified educational diagnostician (NCED). Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(1), 17-23. doi:10.1177/1534508408325579

48.

Sutton

J. P.

Montani

T. O.

Frawley

P. A.

McElroy

P. A.

(2014). Nationally certified educational diagnostician: A credential with value-added potential. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(4), 208-218. doi:10.1177/1534508413494407

49.

Tackett

K. K.

Roberts

Baker

Scammacca

(2009). Implementing response to intervention: Practices and perspectives from five schools--frequently asked questions. Center on Instruction. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED521572.pdf

50.

Walcott

C. M.

Hyson

(2018). Results from the NASP 2015 membership survey, part one: Demographics and employment conditions. National Association of School Psychologists.

51.

Waugh

K.C.

Gronlund

N. E.

(2013). Assessment of student achievement (10th ed.). Allyn & Bacon Publishing.

52.

Wechsler

(2009). Wechsler individual achievement test (3rd ed.). Pearson.

53.

Wilkinson

G. S.

Robertson

G. J.

(2017). Wide range achievement test—Fifth edition (WRAT-5). Pearson.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Academic Achievement Test Use and Assessment Practices: A National Survey of Special Education Administrators

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material