The purpose of this study was to examine how leaders foster school renewal by facilitating and participating in the types of teacher professional learning and development that improve student academic and non-academic outcomes. The methodology involved a backward mapping strategy that takes as its starting point, not theories of leadership, but professional development initiatives that have made a demonstrable impact on the students of the teachers involved. Seventeen studies with evidence of such impact were analysed for descriptions of the leadership practices involved in each initiative. Through an iterative process of review and critique, these descriptions were categorised into the leadership dimensions associated with teacher professional learning that resulted in improved student outcomes. The analysis revealed five leadership dimensions that were critical in fostering teacher and student learning: providing educational direction; ensuring strategic alignment; creating a community that learns how to improve student success; engaging in constructive problem talk; and selecting and developing smart tools. The analysis showed that leadership of the improvement of learning and teaching is highly distributed in terms of both who leads and how it is enacted. Such leadership is embedded in school routines that are aligned to improvement goals, and involves the use of smart tools that are designed to assist teachers' learning of more effective pedagogical practices.
AnandV.BennieN. (2005). Annual monitoring of reading recovery: The data for 2003. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
2.
AndrewsR.SoderR. (1987). Principal leadership and student achievement. Educational Leadership, 44(6), 9–11.
3.
ArgyrisC.SchönD.A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BamburgJ.D.AndrewsR.L. (1991). School goals, principals and achievement. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 2(3), 175–191.
5.
BishopR.BerrymanM.CavanaghT.TeddyL.ClaphamS. (2006). Te Kotahitanga phase 3: Whanaungatanga: Establishing a culturally responsive pedagogy of relations in mainstream secondary school classrooms. Wellington: Ministry of Education Research Division, Maori Education Research Institute (MERI), and Poutama Pounamu Research and Development Centre.
BrykA.S.SebringP.B.KerbowD.RollowS.EastonJ.Q. (1998) Charting Chicago school reform: Democratic localism as a lever for change. Boulder: Westview Press.
8.
ButlerD.L.WinneP.H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–274.
9.
CuttanceP. (1998). Quality assurance reviews as a catalyst for school improvement in Australia. In HargreavesA.LiebermanA.FullanM.HopkinsD. (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Change (Part Two; pp. 1135–1162). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Publishers.
10.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved May 30, 2007 at: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1.
11.
HallingerP.HeckR.H. (2002). What do you call people with visions? The role of vision, mission, and goals in school leadership and improvement. In LeithwoodK.HallingerP. (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 9–40). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
12.
HeckR.H.LarsenT.J.MarcoulidesG.A. (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 94–125.
13.
HeckR.H.MarcoulidesG.A.LangP. (1991). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: The application of discriminant techniques. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(2), 115–135.
14.
HigginsJ. (2004). An evaluation of the Advanced Numeracy Project 2003. Wellington: Learning Media.
15.
HillP.W.RoweK.J. (1996). Multilevel modelling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(1), 1–34.
KruseS.LouisK.S.BrykA. (1994). Building professional communities in schools. InIssues in restructuring schools issue report no. 6. Wisconsin-Madison: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
18.
LathamG.P.LockeE.A. (2006). Enhancing the benefits and overcoming the pitfalls of goal setting. Organizational Dynamics, 35(4), 332–340.
19.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199.
20.
LeithwoodK.MascallB.StraussT.SacksR.MemonN.YashkinaA. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37–67.
21.
LittleJ.W. (2003). Constructions of teacher leadership in three periods of policy and reform activism. School Leadership & Management, 23, 401–419.
22.
McNaughtonS.LaiM.MacDonaldS.FarryS. (2004). Designing more effective teaching of comprehension in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(3), 184–197.
23.
MarzanoR.J.WatersT.McNultyB. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Auroroa, CO: ASCD and McREL.
24.
MayerR. (1993). Illustrations that instruct. In GlaserR. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp 253–284). Hillside, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
25.
MayerR.MorenoR. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
26.
MuijsD.ReynoldsD. (2001). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
27.
NewmannF. (1994). School-wide professional community: Issues in restructuring schools (Issue Report No. 6). Madison, WI: Center on Organisation and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin.
28.
NyeB.KonstantanopoulosS.HedgesL.V. (2004). How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257.
29.
ParrJ.TimperleyH.ReddishP.JessonR.AdamsR. (2006). Literacy professional development project: Identifying effective teaching and professional development practices for enhanced student learning. Wellington: Learning Media Ltd.
30.
PhillipsJ. (2003). Powerful learning: Creating learning communities in urban school reform. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(3), 240–258.
31.
PhillipsG.McNaughtonS.MacDonaldS. (2002). Picking up the pace: Effective literacy interventions for accelerated progress over the transition into decile 1 schools. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
32.
RobinsonV.M. J. (2001). Embedding leadership in task performance. In WongK.EversC. (Eds.), Leadership for quality schooling: International perspectives (pp. 90–102). London: Falmer Press.
33.
RobinsonV.M. (2006). Putting education back into educational leadership. Leading & Managing, 12(1), 62–75.
34.
RobinsonV.M. J.LaiM.K. (2006). Practitioner research for educators: A guide to improving classrooms and schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
35.
RoweK.J.HillP.W. (1998). Modelling educational effectiveness in classrooms: The use of multilevel structural equations to model students' progress. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4(4), 307–347.
36.
ScherL.S.O'ReillyF.E. (2007). Understanding professional development for K-12 teachers of math and science: A meta-analysis. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago.
37.
SpillaneJ.P. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
SpillaneJ.P.CamburnE.M.ParejaA.S. (2007). Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal's workday. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 103–125.
39.
SpillaneJ.P.ReiserB.J.ReimerT. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387–431.
40.
TimperleyH.S. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395–420.
41.
TimperleyH.S.ParrJ.M. (2005). Theory competition and the process of change. Journal of Educational Change, 6(3), 227–251.
42.
TimperleyH.S.PhillipsG. (2003). Changing and sustaining teachers' expectations through professional development in literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 627–641.
43.
TimperleyH.S.RobinsonV.M. J. (1998). Collegiality in schools: Its nature and implications for problem solving. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(Supplemental), 608–629.
44.
TimperleyH.WilsonA.BarrarH.FungI. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington: Ministry of Education www.minedu.govt.nz/goto/bestevidencesynthesis
45.
TimperleyH.WisemanJ. (2003). The Sustainability of professional development in literacy. Part 2: School-based factors associated with high student achievement. Wellington, New Zealand, Ministry of Education. Available at: http://www.minedu.govt.nz/index.cfm?layout=document&documentid=8638&data=l.
46.
WitziersB.BoskerR.J.KrügerM.L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398–425.
