Arguments presented in this paper and the evidence from the Tasmanian Successful School Principals Project support broadening what counts for successful schools and school leadership. This broadening needs to embrace student outcomes, including non-cognitive social outcomes such as student empowerment. In examining who should provide the evidence for successful school leadership the need for triangulation, that is, multiple sources of evidence, became clear. Research employing only principal perceptions of success, especially on the importance of and improvement in student outcomes, should be examined much more critically than has occurred in the past.
Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI). (2007). Skills for a nation: A blueprint for improving education and training 2007–2017. Melbourne: Author.
2.
AndersonM.KleinhenzE. (2007). Professional learning of school leaders in Australia. Chapter 6 in AndersonM.GronnP.IngvarsonL.JacksonA.KleinhenzE.McKenzieP.MulfordB.ThorntonN.. (Eds.), OECD Improving School Leadership Activity: Australia Country Background Report. Canberra: Department of Education, Science & Training.
3.
BellL.BolamR.CubilloL. (2003). A systematic review of the impact of school head-teachers and principals on student outcomes. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Unit, Institute of Education.
4.
CarneiroP.CrawfordC.GoodmanA. (2006, July). Which skills matter? London: Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics. Retrieved September 3, 2007, from http://cee.lse.ac.uk/cee20dps/ceedp59.pdf
5.
DayC.LeithwoodK. (Eds). (2007). Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective. London: Springer.
EarleyP. (Ed.). (1998). School improvement after inspection? School and LEA responses. London: Paul Chapman.
8.
Federalist Paper 2. (2007, April). The Future of Schooling in Australia: Report by the States and Territories. Melbourne: Department of Premier and Cabinet.
HoganD.DonovanC. (2005). The social outcomes of schooling: Subjective agency among Tasmanian adolescents. Leading and Managing, 11(2), 84–102.
11.
JenningsJ.RentnerD. (2006). Ten big effects of the No Child Left Behind Act on public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(2), 110–113.
12.
LeithwoodK.DayC.SammonsP.HarrisA.HopkinsD. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.
13.
LeithwoodK.LouisK. SeashoreAndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York: Wallace Foundation.
14.
LoganL.SachsJ.DempsterN. (Eds). (1996). Planning for better primary schools. Canberra: Australian College of Education.
15.
MarzanoR.WatersT.McNultyB. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Auroroa, CO: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
16.
McCallJ.SmithI.StollL.ThomasS.SammonsP.SmeesR.MacBeathJ.BoydB.MacGilchristB. (2001). Views of Pupils, Parents and Teachers: Vital Indicators of Effectiveness and for Improvement. In MacBeathJ.MortimoreP.. (Eds.). Improving School Effectiveness (pp. 74–101). Buckingham: Open University Press.
17.
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (1999). Adelaide Declaration on National Goals for Schooling in the Twenty-First Century. Retrieved January 16, 2007, http://www.mceetya.edu.au/mceetya/nationalgoals/index.htm
MulfordB. (2003b). School leaders: Changing roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness: A paper commissioned by the Education and Training Policy Division, OECD, for the Activity Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved January 16, 2007, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/61/2635399.pdf
20.
MulfordB.HoganD. (1999). Local school management: The views of Tasmanian principals and teachers. Leading and Managing, 5(2), 139–160.
21.
MulfordB.SilinsH.LeithwoodK. (2004). Leadership for organisational learning and student outcomes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2006). Personalising learning. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Schooling for Tomorrow Activity, OECD.
23.
RobinsonV.LloydC.HohepaM.RoweK. (2007, April). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of effects from international research. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
24.
RothsteinR.JacobsenR. (2006). The goals of Education, Phi Delta Kappan, 88(4), 264–272.
25.
SilinsH.MulfordB. (2002a). Leadership and school results. In LeithwoodK.HallingerP.. (Eds). Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration (pp. 561–612). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26.
SilinsH.MulfordB. (2002b). Schools as learning organisations: The case for system, teacher and student learning. The Journal of Educational Administration.40(5), 425–446.
27.
SilinsH.MulfordB. (2007). Leadership and school effectiveness and improvement. In TownsendT.. (Ed.). International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement. Dorchrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
28.
StollL.BolamR.McMahonA.ThomasS.WallaceM.GreenwoodA.HawkeyK. (2006). Professional learning communities: Source materials for school leaders and other leaders of professional learning. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership, Department for Education and Skills Innovation Unit, General Teaching Council and Effective Professional Learning Communities at Bristol University.
29.
ThomasA.R. (Ed.). (2005). Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6).
30.
VannB. (2005). The effectiveness of the Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) inspection process in England as an accountability mechanism and its influence upon whole school improvement in English maintained schools. Unpublished PHD dissertation, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania.
31.
WitziersB.BoskerR.KrugerM. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398–425.
