Although there is a general consensus that teachers are important for student learning, there is little discussion of the process by which teachers are employed by schools: the teacher labour market. We argue, based on a mix of a priori and inductive reasoning, that inflexible attitudes about comparative wages have contributed toward chronic shortages of qualified teachers in specialised teacher labour markets and poor incentives for excellent teachers to remain teaching. Overseas studies indicate that chronic shortages occur because fewer science and mathematics graduates, compared to humanities and social science graduates, are attracted to teaching. Higher wage rates for teachers with scarce skills will alleviate shortages and reduce attrition of the most able teachers.
Auditor General Victoria (2001). Teacher work force planning. Melbourne: Victorian Auditor-General's office.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2002). Schools, Australia: Cat. 4221.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (1997). Survey of Education and Training Experience: Cat. 6278.0. Unpublished data.
4.
BallouD.PodgurskyM. (1997). Teacher pay and teacher quality. Kalamazoo, Mich: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
5.
BallouD.PodgurskyM. (1998). Teacher recruitment and retention in public and private schools. Economics of Education, 17(3), 393–417.
6.
BempahE. (1994). An empirical analysis of teacher mobility. Economics of Education Review, 13(1), 69–77.
7.
BurgessS.CroxsonB.GreggP.PropperC. (2001). The intricacies of the relationship between pay and performance for teachers: Do teachers respond to performance related pay schemes?CMPO Working paper series. Bristol: University of Bristol.
8.
BurkeG. (1994). Teachers: Employment in the 1980s and 1990s. In CrowtherF.CaldwellB.ChapmanJ.LakomskiG.OlgilvieD. (Eds.) The Workplace in Education: Australian Perspectives. Sydney: Australian Council for Educational Administrators.
9.
BurtlessG. (Ed.). (1996) Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
10.
Committee of Inquiry into Education and Training (Williams) (1979). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Education and Training. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
11.
CrawleyJ.HeckmanJ.VytlacilE. (1999) On policies to reward the value added by educators. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(4), 720–727.
12.
Committee for the Review of Teaching and Teacher Education (CRTTE) (2003). Australia's Teachers: Australia's Future: Advancing Innovation, Science Technology and Mathematics. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
13.
DeereD.StrayerW. (2001). Improving TAAS scores result of better accountability for Texas schools. Texas: Office of University Relations, Texas A&M University.
14.
Department of Education, Employment and Training, Victoria (2000). Forecasting Teacher Demand by Subject. Melbourne: Department of Employment, Education and Training.
15.
DoltonP. (1990). The economics of UK teacher supply: The graduate's decision. Economic Journal, 100(400), 91–104.
16.
DoltonP.MakepeaceG.H. (1993). Female labour force participation and the choice of occupation: The supply of teachers, European Economic Review, 37(7), 1393–411.
17.
DoltonP.MavromarasK.G. (1994). Intergenerational occupational choice comparisons: the case of teachers in the UK, Economic Journal, 104, 841–863.
18.
DoltonP.van der KlaauwW. (1995). Leaving teaching in the UK: A duration analysis, Economic Journal, 105(429), 431–44.
19.
DoltonP.van der KlaauwW. (1999). The turnover of teachers: A competing risks explanation, Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 543–50.
20.
DoltonP.TremayneA.ChungT.-P. (2003). The economic cycle and teacher supply. InAttracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris: OECD.
21.
FrijtersP.ShieldsM.A.Wheatley-PriceS. (2004). To teach or not to teach? Panel data evidence on the quitting decision. IZA Discussion paper series. Bonn: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit.
22.
GoldhaberD.LuiA. (2003). Occupational choices and the academic proficiency of the teacher workforce. In FowlerW. (Ed). Development in School Finance 2000–01 (pp. 53–75). Washington DC: NCES.
23.
GoldhaberD.PlayerD. (2003). What different benchmarks suggest about how financially attractive it is to teach in public schools. Madison: University of Wisconsin—Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
24.
Graduate Careers Council of Australia (2000). Graduate Starting Salaries. Parkville: Graduate Careers Council of Australia.
25.
GritzR.M.TheobaldN.D. (1996). The effects of school district spending priorities on length of stay in teaching. Journal of Human Resources, 31(3), 477–512.
26.
HanushekE.A.JorgensonD.W. (Eds.). (1996). Improving America's schools: The role of incentives. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
27.
HanushekE.A.PaceR.R. (1995). Who chooses to teach (and why)?Economics and Education Review, 14(2), 101–17.
28.
HanushekE.A.KainJ.F.RivkinS.G. (1998). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement: Working Paper No. 6691. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
29.
HanushekE.A.KainJ.F.RivkinS.G. (1999). Do higher salaries buy better teachers?: Working Paper No. 7082. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
30.
HenkeR.R.ChenX.GeisS. (2000). Progress through the teacher pipeline: 1992–93 college graduates and elementary/secondary school teaching as of 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
31.
IngersollR.M. (1999). Teacher turnover, teacher shortages, and the organization of schools. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
32.
JacobB.A. (2002). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago public schools: Working Paper No. 8968. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
33.
JacobB.A.LefgrenL. (2002). The Impact of teacher Training on Student Achievement: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from School Reform Efforts in Chicago: Working Paper No. 8916. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
34.
JacobB.A.LevittS.D. (2003). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating: Working Paper No. 9413. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
35.
KleinS.P.HamiltonL.S.McCaffreyD.F.StecherB.M. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(49).
36.
LaddH.F. (1999). The Dallas school accountability and inventive program: An evaluation of its impact on student outcomes, Economics and Education Review, 18, 1–16.
37.
LambS.DwyerP.WynJ. (2000). Non-completion of school in Australia: The changing patterns of participation and outcomes (Longitudinal Studies of Australian Youth Research Report No. 16). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
38.
LandonS. (1997). High school enrolment, minimum wages and education spending. Canadian Public Policy, 23(2), 141–63.
39.
LeeJ.-W.BarroR.J. (2001). Schooling quality in a cross-section of countries. Economica, 68, 465–488.
40.
LoebS.PageM.E. (2000). Examining the link between teacher wages and student outcomes: The importance of alternative labor market opportunities and non-pecuniary variation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(3), 393–408.
41.
ManskiC.F. (1987). Academic ability, earnings and the decision to become a teacher: evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of the High School Class of 1972. In WiseD. (Ed.). Public Sector Payrolls. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (2003). Demand and Supply of Primary and Secondary School Teachers in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
43.
MilanowskiA. (2003). An exploration of the pay levels need to attract student with mathematics, science and technology skills to a career in K-12 teaching. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11.
44.
MurnaneR.J.OlsenR.J. (1990). The effects of salaries and opportunity costs on length of stay in teaching: Evidence from North Carolina, Journal of Human Resources, 25(1), 106–24.
45.
MurnaneR.SingerJ.WillettJ.KempleJ.OlsenR. (1991). Who will teach? Policies that matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
PrestonB. (2000). Teacher supply and demand to 2005: projections and context. Canberra: Australian Council of Deans of Education.
47.
SchlectyP.VanceV. (1981). Do academically able teachers leave education? The North Carolina case, Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 106–112.
48.
StecherB.M. (2002). Consequences of large-scale, high-stakes testing on school and classroom practices. In HamiltonL.S.StecherB.M.KleinS.P. (Eds.). Making sense of test-based accountability in education (pp. 79–100). Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
49.
StinebricknerT. (2001). A dynamic model of teacher labor supply. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(1), 197–230.
50.
ThomasC. (1988). Separation from Professions and Para-professions: An analysis of the 1981 Census data for selected professions and para-professions. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
51.
WayneA.J.YoungsP. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review, Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89–122.
52.
WeaverT. (1983). America's teacher quality problem: Alternatives for reform. New York: Praeger Publishers.
53.
YoungB.J. (1995). Career plans and work perceptions or pre-service teachers, Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 281–292.
54.
ZabalzaA.TurnbullP.WilliamsG. (1979). The Economics of Teacher Supply. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
