Abstract

In a recent issue of ANZJP, Demesmaeker and associates report what they assert to be ‘the first meta-analysis on suicide mortality after a nonfatal [suicide attempt] SA’ (Demesmaeker et al., 2022, p. 613). By meta-analysing a sample of 41 primary studies, they reported cumulative suicide proportions of suicides after suicide attempts of 2.8%, 5.6% and 7.4% after 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. In the introduction to their paper, they wrongly assert that an earlier meta-analysis of suicide mortality after discharge from emergency departments and medical settings by Wang and associates ‘excluded a lot of studies consulting for suicidal acts’ (p. 604). In fact, by meta-analysing suicide rates using the conventional mortality units of deaths per 100,000 patient years, rather than percentage mortality at arbitrary fixed intervals (of 1, 5 and 10 years as reported by Demesmaeker and associates), the Wang meta-analysis was able to include more than twice the number (n=88) of relevant primary studies reporting on suicides after suicide attempts (Wang et al., 2019). Using this larger database Wang and associates found a lower estimate of suicide mortality after a suicide attempt of 647 per 100,000 patient years. Meta-analysis is more reliable when it relies on a larger number of valid studies and authors of future meta-analysis need not needlessly criticise earlier research or claim priority for questions that have been reported on by others.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
