Garry David, the Victorian gunman who required special legislation to detain him indefinitely because of his ‘dangerousness’ has become a classic Australian case example of ‘law and order’ politics. This paper uses a post-Structuralist approach to argue that the core dynamic in the case is the production of representations of the uncontrollable and incomprehensible. Politicians have been drawn to ever more dramatic display of the need for law and order. Inflated images of violence become the dominant public discourse and are used to legitimate increasingly punitive measures directed against representations of the Other.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BloomJDRogersJL (1987) ‘The Legal Basis of Forensic Psychiatry Statutorily Mandated Psychiatric Diagnoses’, American Journal of Psychiatry, vol 144, no 7, pp 847–53.
2.
CohenS (1972) Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers, Blackwell, Oxford.
3.
EssesVMWebsterCD (1988) ‘Physical Attractiveness, Dangerousness, and the Canadian Criminal Code’, Journal of Applied Psychology vol 18, pp 1017–31. vol 18, pp 1017–1031.
4.
FranklinRK (1988) ‘Deliberate Self Harm, Self-Injurious Behaviour within a Correctional Mental Health Population’, Criminal Justice and Behaviour, vol. 15, pp. 2–9.
5.
FreibergA (February1990) Submission to the Social Development Committee, Inquiry into Mental Disturbance and Community Safety.
6.
GreenlandC (1978) ‘The Prediction and Management of Dangerous Behaviour: Social Policy Issues’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, vol 1, pp 205–22.
7.
HediganJ (15November1991) Reasons for Judgementin the matter of an Application under s 4 of the Community Protection Act 1990 between JH Kennan, Attorney-General for the State of Victoria and GI David, Court Recording Services, Melbourne.
8.
HoffBH (1977) Patuxent and Discretion in the Criminal Justice System, Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law vol 5, pp 144–60.
9.
JonesA (1986) ‘Self Mutilation in Prison, A Comparison of Mutilators and Non-Mutilators’, Criminal Justice and Behaviour vol 13, pp 3–10.
10.
Keon-CohenB (1991) ‘Can the Victorian Parliament Abolish Fundamental Rights?’ Conference Proceedings: Serious Violent Offenders: Sentencing, Psychiatry and Law Reform, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
11.
VictoriaLaw Institute of (February1990) Submission to the Social Development Committee, Inquiry into Mental Disturbance and Community Safety.
12.
Law Reform Commission Victoria (LRCV) (1990) The Concept of ‘Mental Illness’ in the Mental Health Act 1986 Report No 31, LRCV, Melbourne.
13.
Mental Health Review Board (MHRB) (1990) Statement of Reasons, in the appeal of Garry Ian Patrick David, a security patient at Aradale Hospital, MHRB, Melbourne.
14.
MerkelR (1991) ‘Dangerous Persons: to be jailed for what they are, or what they may do, not for what they have done’, Conference Proceedings Serious Violent Offenders, Sentencing, Psychiatry, and Law Reform, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
15.
MillerM (1987) ‘Legal and Ethical Limits on the Use of Predictions of Dangerousness in Criminal Law’, inDutileFNFoustCHDutileFNFoustCH(eds), Prediction of Criminal Violence, CC Thomas, Springfield, Illinios.
16.
MonahanJCummingsL (1975) Social Policy Implication of the Inability to Predict Dangerousness, Journal of Social Issues, vol 31, pp 153–63.
17.
NealD (1992) ‘The Community Protection (Violent Offenders) Bill'’, Paper presented at a public forum convened by the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 6 February 1992 in Parliament of Victoria Social Development Committee (1992)Second Report of the Inquiry into Mental Disturbance and Community Safety: Incorporating a Range of Views on the Draft Community Protection (Violent Offenders) Bill, Government Printer, Melbourne, pp 273–78.
18.
Parliament of Victoria Social Development Committee (1992) Third Report of the Inquiry into Mental Disturbance and Community Safety: Response to the Community Protection Violent Offenders Bill 1991, Government Printer, Melbourne.
19.
Parliament of Victoria Social Development Committee (SDC) (1990) Interim Report of the Inquiry into Mental Disturbance and Community Safety Strategies to deal with offenders with severe ersonalit disorder, Government Printer, Melbourne.
20.
ReadMB (1991) Chopper from the Inside, Floradale Publications and Sly Inc, Melbourne.
21.
ReadMB (1992) Chopper 2: Hits and Memories, Floradale Publications and Sly Inc, Melbourne.
22.
WilliamsRWilliamsR (199) ‘Coping With the Highly Dangerous: Issues of principle raised by preventive detention’, Conference Proceedings: Serious Violent Offenders: Sentencing, Psychiatry and Law Reform, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
