Using administrative data from the higher and lower courts of New South Wales, this study examines whether Indigeneity: (a) exerts a direct effect on length of imprisonment term once other relevant sentencing variables are taken into account; (b) interacts with other relevant sentencing variables to influence prison length. Results show that being Indigenous significantly reduces the length of sentenced prison term in the lower courts but has no significant effect at the higher court level. Further, evidence of interactive effects by Indigenous status was scant. Only age differed significantly between Indigenous and non-Indigenous offenders at both court levels. In this case age had no effect on the length of sentence imposed on Indigenous defendants in the lower courts or higher courts but increased sentence length for non-Indigenous offenders at both court levels.
AlvarezABachmanRD (1996) American Indians and sentencing disparity: An Arizona test. Journal of Criminal Justice24(6): 549–561.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1997) Australian Standard Offence Classification System. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006) Population Distribution Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009) Prisoners in Australia, 2009. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
5.
Australian Institute of Criminology (2007) Australian Crime: Facts and Figures. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
6.
BakerJ (2001) The Scope for Reducing Indigenous Imprisonment RatesSydney: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
7.
BensonMLWalkerE (1988) Sentencing the white collar offender. American Sociological Review53: 294–302.
8.
BushwaySJohnsonBDSlocumLA (2007) Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology23: 151–178.
9.
CastleCBarnettA (2000) Aboriginal People and the Criminal Justice SystemAdelaide: Government of South Australia.
10.
DanneferDSchuttRK (1982) Race and juvenile processing in court and police agencies. American Journal of Sociology87(5): 1113–1132.
11.
DemuthSSteffensmeierD (2004) Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: Comparisons among White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly85(4): 994–1011.
12.
EdneyR (2003) The stolen generation and sentencing of indigenous offenders. Indigenous Law Bulletin5(23Available at www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ILB/2003.
13.
EdneyRBargaricM (2007) Australian Sentencing: Principles and PracticeMelbourne: Cambridge University Press.
14.
EverettRSWojtkiewiczRA (2002) Difference, disparity, and race/ethnic bias in federal sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology18(2): 189–211.
15.
JeffriesS (2002a) Does gender really matter? Criminal court decision making in New Zealand. New Zealand Sociology17(1): 135–149.
16.
JeffriesS (2002b) Just or unjust? Problematising the gendered nature of criminal justice. Women’s Studies Journal18(1): 24–41.
17.
JeffriesSBondC (2009) ‘Does indigeneity matter?: sentencing indigenous offenders in South Australia’s higher courts’. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology42(1): 47–71.
18.
JeffriesSBondC (2010) Narratives of mitigation: Sentencing indigenous criminal defendants in South Australia’s higher courts. Journal of Sociology46(3): 219–237.
19.
JeffriesSFletcherGNewboldG (2003) Pathways to sex-based differentiation in criminal court sentencing. Criminology41(2): 329–353.
20.
JohnsonBD (2003) Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction. Criminology41(2): 449–489.
21.
JohnsonBDUlmerJTKramerJH (2008) The social context of guidelines circumvention: the case of federal district courts. Criminology46(3): 737–783.
22.
LohNFerranteA (2003) Aboriginal Involvement in the Western Australian Criminal Justice System: A Statistical Review, 2001Perth: University of Western Australia, Crime Research Centre.
23.
MietheTMooreC (1986) Racial differences in criminal processing: The consequences of model selection on conclusions about differential treatment. Sociological Quarterly27(2): 217–237.
24.
MitchellO (2005) A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology21(4): 439–466.
25.
MunozEMcMorrisB (2002) Misdemeanor sentencing decisions: The cost of being Native American. The Justice Professional15(3): 239–259.
26.
NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (2009) Criminal Courts Statistics 2008. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
27.
PrattTC (1998) Race and sentencing: A meta-analysis of conflicting empirical research results. Journal of Criminal Justice26(6): 513–523.
28.
Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (1991) National Report. Canberra: Federal Government.
29.
SampsonRJLauritsenJL (1997) Racial and ethnic disparities and criminal justice in the United States. Crime and Justice21: 311–374.
30.
SnowballLWeatherburnD (2006) Indigenous over-representation in prison: The role of offender characteristics. Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, 99Sydney: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
31.
SnowballLWeatherburnD (2007) Does racial bias in sentencing contribute to indigenous overrepresentation in prison?Australian and New Journal of Criminology40(3): 272–290.
32.
SpohnCC (2000) Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Policies, Processes, and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System, 3Washington: Department of Justice.
33.
SpohnCCHolleranD (2000) The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology38(1): 281–306.
34.
SteenSEngenRGaineyR (2005) Images of danger and culpability: racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology43(2): 435–468.
35.
SteffensmeierDDemuthS (2000) Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly?American Sociological Review65(5): 705–729.
SteffensmeierDKramerJStreifelC (1993) Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology31(3): 411–446.
38.
SteffensmeierDUlmerJKramerJ (1998) The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology36(3): 763–797.
39.
UlmerJTJohnsonB (2004) Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology42(1): 137–177.
40.
UlmerJTKurlychekMCKramerJH (2007) Prosecutorial discreation and the imposition of minimum sentences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency44(4): 427–458.
41.
Von HirschARobertsJ (1997) Racial disparity in sentencing: reflections on the Hood study. The Howard Journal36(6): 227–236.
42.
WeinrathM (2007) Sentencing disparity: Aboriginal Canadians, drink driving and age. Western Criminology Review8(2): 16–28.
43.
WelchSSpohnC (1986) Evaluating the impact of prior record on judges’ sentencing decisions: A seven-city comparison. Justice Quarterly3(4): 389–407.
44.
WhiteRPerroneS (2005) Crime and Social Control2nd edn. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
45.
WuJSpohnC (2009) Does an offender’s age have an effect on sentence length? A meta-analytic review. Criminal Justice Policy Review20(4): 379–413.
46.
ZatzM (1984) Race, ethnicity, and determinate sentencing. Criminology22(2): 147–171.
47.
ZatzM (1985) Pleas, priors, and prison: Racial/ethnic differences in sentencing. Social Science Research14(2): 169–183.
48.
ZatzM (1987) The changing forms of racial/ethnic bias in sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency24: 69–92.
49.
ZatzM (2000) The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender and class on court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. Criminal Justice: The National Institute of Justice Journal3: 763–798.
