The Unites States aspires to a fair criminal justice system with a focus on minimizing the disparate impact of discretionary decision making at all stages of the justice system. Judges consider a variety of factors in making their sentencing decisions, like responsibility of the defendant and how best to protect the community. However, the use of discretion can contribute to unwarranted disparities. The current study sought to examine the influence of both legal and extralegal factors on both the incarceration and sentence length decisions. Using focal concerns perspective as a theoretical underpinning, this study determined that legal factors were more influential in sentencing outcomes than extralegal factors. Policy implications and future research are discussed throughout the paper.
AlbonettiC. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas and departures on sentencing outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31(4), 789–822.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (1998). Level of service inventory–revised: Screening version. Multi-Health Systems.
BazelonE. (2020). Charged: The new movement to transform American prosecution and end mass incarceration. Random House Trade Paperbacks.
5.
BenforadoA. (2016). Unfair: The new science of criminal injustice. Crown.
6.
BijleveldC. C. J. H.AugustinisJ.LimD. S.ElbersN.ApostolouP.AvramenkoA.BayramoğluC.CebaksE.van DouwenK.GjaltemaN.KargT.KlonowskaK.LauwersA.MirzaN.RanzijnN.StefanovićD.ThalerJ.TosunS.TruijensA.WennekesL. (2021). Sentencing matters–Factors determining sentence type and length: An exploratory vignette study. Amsterdam Law Forum, 13(1), 57–66.
7.
BlochK. R.EngenR. L.ParrottaK. L. (2014). The intersection of race and gender: An examination of sentencing outcomes in North Carolina. Criminal Justice Studies, 27(4), 419–438.
8.
BrennanP. K.SpohnC. (2008). Race/ethnicity and sentencing outcomes among drug offenders in North Carolina. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(4), 371–398.
9.
BridgesG. S.SteenS. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63(4), 554–70.
10.
BurtonA.CullenF.BurtonV.Jr.GrahamA.ButlerL.ThieloA. (2020). Belief in redeemability and punitive public opinion: “Once a criminal, always a criminal” revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 712–732.
11.
BushwayS. D.PiehlA. M. (2001). Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law & Society Review, 35, 733–764.
12.
BushwayS. D.PiehlA. M. (2007). The inextricable link between age and criminal history in sentencing. Crime & Delinquency, 53(1), 156–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128706294444
13.
ChiricosT. G.CrawfordC. (1995). Race and imprisonment: A contextual assessment of the evidence. In HawkinsD. (Ed.), Ethnicity, race, and crime: Perspectives across time and place (pp. 281–309). State University of New York Press.
14.
CrewB. K. (1991). Sex differences in criminal sentences: Chivalry or patriarchy?Justice Quarterly, 8, 59–83.
15.
DoernerJ. K.DemuthS. (2010). The independent and joint effects of race, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 1–27.
16.
DoernerJ. K.DemuthS. (2014). Gender and sentencing in the federal courts: Are women treated more leniently. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 242–269.
17.
FarnworthM.TeskeR. H. C.Jr. (1995). Gender differences in felony court processing: Three hypothesis of disparity. Women & Criminal Justice, 6, 23–44.
18.
FeldmeyerB.UlmerJ. T. (2011). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 238–270.
19.
FreiburgerT. L. (2010). The effects of gender, family status, and race on sentencing decisions. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 378–395.
20.
FreiburgerT. L.HilinskiC. M. (2013). An examination of the interactions of race and gender on sentencing decisions using a trichotomous dependent variable. Crime and Delinquency, 59, 59–86.
21.
FreiburgerT. L.SheeranA. M. (2017). The joint effects of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on the incarceration and sentence length decisions. Race and Justice, 10(2), 203–222.
22.
GalvinM. A.UlmerJ. T. (2022). Gatekeeping treatment: Alternative sentences, race, and “salvageability”. Justice Quarterly, 39(6), 1332–1353.
23.
HarringtonM. P.SpohnC. (2007). Defining sentence type: Further evidence against use of the total incarceration variable. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 36–63.
24.
HawkinsD. F. (1981). Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior, 2, 207–230.
25.
HolleranD.SpohnC. (2004). On the use of the total incarceration variable in sentencing research. Criminology, 42, 211–240.
26.
HuangW. S.FinnM. A.RubackR. B.FriedmannR. R. (1996). Individual and contextual influences on sentence lengths: Examining political conservatism. The Prison Journal, 76, 398–419.
27.
JeffriesS.FletcherG. J. O.NewboldG. (2003). Pathways to sex-based differentiation in criminal court sentencing. Criminology, 41, 329–353.
28.
JohnsonB. D. (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge and county level influences in the study of courtroom decision making. Criminology, 44, 259–298.
29.
JohnsonB. D.BetsingerS. (2009). Punishing the “model minority”: Asian-American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts. Criminology, 47, 1045–1090.
30.
KramerJ.SteffensmeierD. (1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. The Sociological Quarterly, 34, 357–376.
31.
KutateladzeB. L.AndiloroN. R.JohnsonB. D.SpohnC. C. (2014). Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology, 52, 514–551.
32.
LevineM. V. (2019). Milwaukee 53206: The anatomy of concentrated disadvantage in an inner city neighborhood, 2000-2017. Center for Economic Development Publications.
33.
LynchD. (1994). The impropriety of plea agreements: A tale of two counties. Law and Social Inquiry, 19, 115–133.
34.
MarunaS.KingA. (2009). Once a criminal, always a criminal? “Redeemability” and the psychology of public punitive attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(1–2), 7–24.
35.
MellowJ.MukamalD. A.LoBuglioS. F.SolomonA. L.OsborneJ. W. L. (2008). The jail administrator’s toolkit for reentry. The Urban Institute.
36.
MitchellO. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 439–466.
37.
MustardD. B. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 285–313.
38.
NoblingT.SpohnC.DeLoneM. (1998). A tale of two counties: Unemployment and sentence severity. Justice Quarterly, 15, 459–486.
39.
NowackiJ. S. (2015). Race, ethnicity, and judicial discretion: The influence of the United States v. Booker decision. Crime & Delinquency, 61(10), 1360–1385.
OrsaghT. (1985). The judicial response to crime and the criminal: A utilitarian perspective. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1, 369–386.
42.
Painter-DavisN.UlmerJ. T. (2020). Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines revisited: The interrelationship between structured sentencing alternatives and guideline decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 57(3), 263–293.
43.
PetlakhK.LeeJ. (2023). Independent and joint effects of race, gender, and age on federal sentencing outcomes: Analysis of the 2018-209 United States federal sentencing data. International Journal of Criminal Justice Studies, 18(1), 412–425.
44.
RiosV. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of black and Latino boys. New York University Press.
45.
RodriguezS. F.CurryT. R.LeeG. (2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses?Social Science Quarterly, 87, 318–339.
SolomonA. L.OsborneJ. W. L.LoBuglioS. F.MellowJ.MukamalD. A. (2008). Life after lockup: Improving reentry from jail to the community. Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
48.
SpohnC. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice, 3, 427–501.
49.
SpohnC.BeichnerD. (2000). Is preferential treatment of felony offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149–184.
50.
SpohnC.HolleranD. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281–306.
51.
SteenS.EngenR.GaineyR. (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435–68.
52.
SteffensmeierD. (1980). Assessing the impact of the women’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult criminal defendants. Crime & Delinquency, 26, 344–357.
53.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is punished more harshly?American Sociological Review, 65, 705–729.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2006). Does gender modify the effects of race—ethnicity on criminal sanctions? Sentences for male and female, white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241–261.
56.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ.StreifelC. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411–446.
SteffensmeierD.Painter-DavisN.UlmerJ. (2017). Intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on criminal punishment. Race, Ethnicity, and Social Policy, 60(4), 810–833.
59.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–798.
60.
StemenD.RengifoA. F.AmidonE. (2015). The focal concerns of sentencing and mandatory sentencing laws: Circumvention in the context of mandatory probation and treatment. Journal of Crime and Justice, 38(2), 183–203.
61.
UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparities. Criminology, 34, 383–407.
62.
UlmerJ. T.SilverE.HanrathL. S. (2022). Back to basics: A critical examination of the focal concerns framework from the perspectives of judges. Justice Quarterly, 40(6), 813–836.
WangX.MearsD. P.SpohnC. (2013). Assessing the differential effects of race and ethnicity on sentencing under different sentencing systems. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 87–114.
65.
Wisconsin Court System. (2012). Wisconsin circuit court access. Retrieved April 22, 2019, from https://wcca.wicourts.gov/
66.
WooldredgeJ. (2007). Neighborhood effects on felony sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 238–263.
67.
ZatzM. S. (2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. In HorneyJ. (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000, volume 3: Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 503–552). U.S. Department of Justice.
