GalenRSPetersTAnalytical goals and clinical relevance of laboratory procedures. In: TietzNW, ed. Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1986: 387–409
7.
BoldAMTimmsPEvaluation and introduction of new tests. In: WilliamsDLMarksV, eds. Principles of Clinical Biochemistry: Scientific Foundations, 2nd edn.Oxford: Heinemann Medical Books, 1988: 13–21
HowanitzJHHowanitzPJPrinciples of laboratory medicine. In: HowanitzJHHowanitzPJ, eds. Laboratory Medicine: Test Selection and Interpretation. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1991: 1–10
11.
FeinsteinARClinical Biostatistics. St Louis: The CV Mosby Company, 1977: 1–468
12.
FeinsteinARClinical Epidemiology: The Architecture of Clinical Research. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1985: 1–812
13.
LeeTHGoldmanLSerum enzyme assays in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: recommendations based on a quantitative analysis [Review]. In: SoxHC, ed. Common Diagnostic Tests: Use and Interpretation, 2nd edn.Philadelphia: American College of Physicians, 1990: 35–66
14.
GerhardtWKatusHRavkildeJHammCJørgensenPJPeheimES-troponin T in suspected ischemic myocardial injury compared with mass and catalytic concentrations of S-creatine kinase isoenzyme MB. Clin Chem1991; 37: 1405–11
15.
SackettDLHaynesRBGuyattGHTugwellPClinical Epidemiology. A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine, 2nd edn.Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1991: 1–441
16.
RiegelmanRKHirschRPStudying a Study and Testing a Test: How to Read the Medical Literature, 2nd edn.Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1989: 1–349
17.
MoossaARDiagnostic tests and procedures in acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med1984; 311: 639–43
18.
ClavienP-ABurganSMoossaARSerum enzymes and other laboratory tests in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg1989; 76: 1234–43
19.
ClavienP-ARobertJMeyerPBorstFHauserHHerrmannFAcute pancreatitis and normoamylasemia: not an uncommon combination. Ann Surg1989; 210: 614–20
20.
SherlockSDiseases of the Liver and Biliary System, 8th edn.Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1989: 1–749
21.
MaharajBMaharajRJLearyWPCooppanRMNaranADPirieDSampling variability and its influence on the diagnostic yield of percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver. Lancet1986; i: 523–5
22.
GoldmanLCookEFBrandDALeeTHRouanGWWeisbergMCA computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain. N Engl J Med1988; 318: 797–803
23.
KassirerJPKopelmanRILearning Clinical Reasoning. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1991: 1–332
24.
YerushalmyJStatistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis, with special reference to X-ray techniques. Pub Health Rep1947; 62: 1432–49
25.
GalenRSGambinoSRBeyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1975: 1–237
SimelDLFeussnerJRDelongERMatcharDBIntermediate, indeterminate, and uninterpretable diagnostic test results. Med Dec Making1987; 7: 107–14
28.
ArmitagePBerryGStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1987: 115–20
29.
GardnerMJAltmanDGCalculating confidence intervals for proportions and their differences. In: GardnerMJAltmanDG, eds. Statistics with Confidence—Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines. London: British Medical Journal, 1989: 28–33
GardnerMJGardnerSBWinterPDConfidence Interval Analysis Microcomputer Program. London: British Medical Journal, 1989: 1–77
32.
PuleoPRGuadagnoPARobertsRScheelMVMarianAJChurchillDPerrymanMBEarly diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction based on assay for subforms of creatine kinase-MB. Circulation1990; 82: 759–64
33.
GerhardtWThe Bayes approach: systematic graphic evaluation of diagnostic tests. In: KellerHTrendelenburgC, eds. Data Presentation/Interpretation. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1989: 161–204
34.
PellarTGGalbraithLVLeungFYHendersonARA computer program to determine diagnostic decision thresholds and likelihood ratios illustrated with aspartate aminotransferase activities after a myocardial infarction. Ann Clin Biochem1989; 26: 533–7
35.
RansohoffDFFeinsteinARProblems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med1978; 299: 926–30
36.
HendersonARMcQueenMJPattenRLKrishnanSWoodDEWebbSTesting for creatine kinase and creatine kinase-2 in Ontario: reference ranges and assay types. Clin Chem1992; 38: 1365–70
37.
DiamondGAClinical epidemiology of sensitivity and specificity. J Clin Epidemiol1992; 45: 9–13
38.
HlatkyMAMarkDBHarrellFELeeKLCaliffRMPryorDBRethinking sensitivity and specificity. Am J Cardiol1987; 59: 1195–8
39.
LofgrenRPThe dynamic nature of sensitivity and specificity [Editorial]. J Gen Intern Med1987; 2: 452–3
40.
GodynJJTomaszewskiJEZmijewskiCMSpecificity of a reproducible qualitative urine examination is not a constant test characteristic [Letter]. Am J Clin Pathol1991; 95: 265–6
41.
GodynJJZmijewskiCMTomaszewskiJEReference value changes and improvement of test performance. Lab Med1991; 22: 411–14
42.
LachsMSNachamkinIEdelsteinPHGoldmanJFeinsteinARSchwartzJSSpectrum bias in the evaluation of diagnostic tests: lessons from the rapid dipstick test for urinary tract infection. Ann Intern Med1992; 117: 135–40
43.
HlatkyMAPryorDBHarrellFECaliffRMMarkDBRosatiRAFactors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography. Multivariate analysis. Am J Med1984; 77: 64–71
44.
FletcherRHCarcinoembryonic antigen. Ann Intern Med1986; 104: 66–73
45.
LevyDLabibSBAndersonKMChristiansenJCKannellWBCastelliWPDeterminants of sensitivity and specificity of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation1990; 81: 815–20
46.
DetranoRJanosiALyonsKPMarcondesGAbbassiNFroelicherVFFactors affecting sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test: the exercise thallium scintogram [Review]. Am J Med1988; 84: 699–710
47.
LeungFYGalbraithLVJablonskyGHendersonARRe-evaluation of the diagnostic utility of serum total creatine kinase and creatine kinase-2 in myocardial infarction. Clin Chem1989; 35: 1435–40
48.
PetersTWestgardJOEvaluation of methods. In: TietzNW, ed. Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1986: 410–23
49.
United Kingdom Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer Group. Specificity of screening in United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer. BMJ1992; 304: 346–9
50.
Anonymous. The value of diagnostic tests [Editorial]. Lancet1979: i: 809–10
51.
AltmanDGGoreSMGardnerMJPocockSJStatistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals. In: GardnerMJAltmanDG, eds. Statistics with Confidence—Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines. London: British Medical Journal, 1989: 83–100
52.
FeinsteinARClinical biostatistics—XXXI: On the sensitivity, specificity, and discrimination of diagnostic tests. Clin Pharmacol Ther1975; 17: 104–16
53.
YoudenWJIndex for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer1950; 3: 32–5
54.
ZweigMHInefficiency of diagnostic efficiency. Clin Chem1992; 38: 163–4
55.
VecchioTJPredictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations. N Engl J Med1966; 274: 1171–3
56.
SackettDLRennieDThe science of the art of the clinical examination [Editorial]. JAMA1992; 267: 2650–2
57.
SackettDLA primer on the precision and accuracy of the clinical examination. JAMA1992; 267: 2638–44
58.
EganJPSignal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1975: 1–277
59.
SwetsJAPickettRMEvaluation of Diagnostic Systems: Methods from Signal Detection Theory. New York: Academic Press, 1982: 1–253
60.
WuAHBGornetTGWuVHBrockieRENishikawaAEarly diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by rapid analysis of creatine kinase isoenzyme-3 (CK-MM) sub-types. Clin Chem1987; 33: 358–62
61.
PellarTGLeungFYHendersonARA computer program for rapid generation of receiver operating characteristic curves and likelihood ratios in the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Ann Clin Biochem1988; 25: 411–16
62.
ZweigMHCampbellGReceiver operating curve (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine [Review]. Clin Chem1993; 39: 561–77
63.
HanleyJAMcNeilBJThe meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology1982; 143: 29–36
64.
BamberDThe area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating graph. J Math Psych1975; 12: 387–415
65.
BhayanaVCohoeSLeungFYJablonskyGHendersonARDiagnostic evaluation of the assays for creatine kinase-2 mass and creatine kinase-3 and -2 isoform ratios in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chem1993; 39: 488–95
66.
HanleyJAMcNeilBJA method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology1983; 148: 839–43
67.
McNeilBJHanleyJAStatistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Dec Making1984; 4: 137–50
68.
AlbertAOn the use and computation of likelihood ratios in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem1982; 28: 1113–19
69.
MiettinenOSEstimability and estimation in case-referent studies. Am J Epidemiol1976; 103: 226–35
70.
BeckJRLikelihood ratios: another enhancement of sensitivity and specificity [Editorial]. Arch Pathol Lab Med1986; 110: 685–6
71.
van SteirteghemACZweigMHRobertsonEABernardRMPutzeysGABievaCJComparison of the effectiveness of four clinical chemical assays in classifying patients with chest pain. Clin Chem1982; 28: 1319–24
72.
WernerMBrooksSHMohrbacherRJWassermanAGDiagnostic performance of enzymes in the discrimination of myocardial infarction. Clin Chem1982; 28: 1297–302
73.
BayesTAn essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Phil Trans Roy Soc1763; 53: 370–418. (Reprinted with a biographical note by G. A. Barnard In: Biometrika, 1958; 45: 293–315)
74.
HowsonCUrbachPScientific Reasoning. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company, 1989: 1–312
75.
HallGHThe clinical application of Bayes' theorem. Lancet1967; ii: 555–7
76.
LindleyDVMaking Decisions, 2nd edn.London: John Wiley & Sons, 1985: 1–207