A reliable diagnosis of laxative abuse can only be reached by chemical analysis. We report a modified thin layer chromatography approach for the detection and confirmation of over-the-counter colonic stimulant laxatives. Potential interference by dietary and drug components chemically similar to anthraquinones was investigated and the method was found to be specific in this respect. The diagnosis of magnesium laxative abuse is more difficult since magnesium is a component of body fluids. By inducing diarrhoea with magnesium salts in volunteers we have established that the diagnosis can be made by measuring magnesium concentrations in stool water, with 30 mmol/L being an appropriate cut-off concentration.
DuncanAMorrisAJCameronAStewartMJBrydonWGRussellRI. Laxative induced diarrhoea—a neglected diagnosis. J R Soc Med1991: In press.
2.
NelsonLMJankowskiJ. Laxative use and abuse in gastroenterology patients. In: MartinSMHalloranSP eds. Proceedings of the Association of Clinical Biochemists National Meeting: 1991 May 13–17. Glasgow. London: RSM, 1991: 92.
3.
BytzerPStokholmMAndersenIKlitgaardNAde MuckadellOB SchaffalitzkyPrevalence of surreptitious laxative abuse in patients with diarrhoea of uncertain origin: A cost benefit analysis of a screening procedure. Gut1989; 30: 1379–84.
SluggPHCareyWD. Clinical features and follow-up of surreptitious laxative users. Cleve Clin Q1984; 51: 167–71.
6.
LadefogedKde MuckadellOB SchaffalitzkyJarnumS. Faecal osmolality and electrolyte concentrations in chronic diarrhoea: Do they provide diagnostic clues?Scand J Gastroenterol1987; 22: 813–20.
7.
TarlowMJThomH. A comparison of stool fluid and stool dialysate obtained in vivo. Gut1974; 15: 608–13.
8.
de WolffFAde HasEJMVerweijM. A screening method for establishing laxative abuse. Clin Chem1981; 27: 914–17.
9.
MortonJ. The detection of laxative abuse. Ann Clin Biochem1987; 24: 107–8.
10.
ReynoldsJEF, ed. Martindale: The Extra Pharmacopoeia. 29th edn.London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1989: 622, 623, 918.
