Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Surface-Enhanced Raman and Two-Dimensional Correlation Spectroscopy for In-Depth Analysis of Solid–Liquid Interface Interactions of Compounds Relevant to Cancer Therapy
This work presents a systematic analysis of solid–liquid interface interactions of cancer-relevant compounds using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) combined with two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy (2D-COS). Experimental SERS data and 2D-COS maps for (diphenylphosphoryl)(pyridin-4-yl)methanol adsorbed on copper oxide (CuO) nanostructures (CuONSs) are reported for the first time, while previously published spectra of neurotensin (NT) and neuromedin C (NMC) were re-analyzed to construct corresponding 2D-COS maps. A novel approach was adopted, involving a generalized 2D-COS methodology, in which all data sets were processed using the same preprocessing steps and 2D-COS parameters. This strategy departs from conventional, case-dependent 2D-COS analyses and enables direct comparability across different molecular systems, even for complex spectra characterized by relatively low signal-to-noise ratios. As a result, the proposed workflow provides a reproducible, transferable, and broadly applicable analytical framework rather than system-specific analyses. Analysis of intensity variations, as well as synchronous and asynchronous correlations, allowed the identification of subtle spectral changes related to adsorption geometry and molecular orientation. Observed trends in band intensities provide a consistent and cross-system basis for assigning molecular interactions and surface orientations, demonstrating that 2D-COS can yield robust and mechanistically interpretable insights beyond what is accessible from conventional SERS spectra. These findings underscore the power of combining SERS and a standardized 2D-COS analysis to reveal dynamic molecular behavior at interfaces, offering a general framework for future studies on biologically and chemically relevant systems.
BizuayehuH.M.AhmedK.Y.KibretG.D.DadiA.F., et al. “Global Disparities of Cancer and Its Projected Burden in 2050”. JAMA Netw. Open. 2024. 7(11): e2443198. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43198
YuX.ZhaoH.WangR.ChenY., et al. “Cancer Epigenetics: From Laboratory Studies and Clinical Trials to Precision Medicine”. Cell Death Discov. 2024. 10: 28. 10.1038/s41420-024-01803-z
4.
YangJ.WuY.LvX.LiuS., et al. “Neurotransmitters: An Emerging Target for Therapeutic Resistance to Tumor Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors”. Mol. Cancer. 2025. 24(1): 216. 10.1186/s12943-025-02413-8
5.
PuT.SunJ.RenG.LiH.. “Neuro-Immune Crosstalk in Cancer: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications”. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2025. 10(1): 176. 10.1038/s41392-025-02241-8
6.
YangY.SunL.LiuX.LiuW., et al. “Neurotransmitters: Impressive Regulators of Tumor Progression”. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024. 176: 116844. 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116844
7.
HanahanD.MonjeM.. “Cancer Hallmarks Intersect with Neuroscience in the Tumor Microenvironment”. Cancer Cell. 2023. 41(3): 573–580. 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.012
8.
WangX.ShiM.TianJ.YuW.. “Cancer and Neurotransmitter Receptors”. Chin. Med. J. 2025. 138(13): 1540–1558. 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003656
9.
SunC.ShenY.WangF.LuT., et al. “Sympathetic Nervous System in Tumor Progression and Metabolic Regulation: Mechanisms and Clinical Potential”. J. Transl. Med. 2025. 23(1): 836. 10.1186/s12967-025-06657-2
10.
MoodyT.W.JensenR.T.. “VIP and PACAP as Autocrine Growth Factors in Breast and Lung Cancer”. In: KastinA.J., editor. Handbook of Biologically Active Peptides. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 2006. Chap. 68, Pp. 473–477. 10.1016/B978-012369442-3/50071-4
11.
KhanM.HuangT.LinC.-Y.WuJ., et al. “Exploiting Cancer’s Phenotypic Guise Against Itself: Targeting Ectopically Expressed Peptide G-Protein Coupled Receptors for Lung Cancer Therapy”. Oncotarget. 2017. 8(61): 104615–104637. 10.18632/oncotarget.18403
12.
MariniM.TitizM., D.S. Monteiro De Araújo, P. Geppetti, et al. “TRP Channels in Cancer: Signaling Mechanisms and Translational Approaches”. Biomolecules. 2023. 13(10): 1557. 10.3390/biom13101557
13.
HosotaniR.InoueK.KogireM.SuzukiT., et al. “Synthetic Neuromedin C Stimulates Exocrine Pancreatic Secretion in Dogs and Rats”. Pancreas. 1987. 2(4): 414–421. 10.1097/00006676-198707000-00008
14.
HosotaniR.InoueK.FujiiN.YajimaH., et al. “Effect of Synthetic Neuromedin C, a Decapeptide of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide (GRP [18–27]), on Blood Flow and Exocrine Secretion of the Pancreas in Dogs”. Life Sci. 1985. 36(25): 2429–2434. 10.1016/0024-3205(85)90347-9
St-GelaisF.JompheC.TrudeauL.-É.. “The Role of Neurotensin in Central Nervous System Pathophysiology: What is the Evidence?”. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2006. 31(4): 229–245. 10.1139/jpn.0627
17.
QiuS.NikolaouS.ZhuJ.JefferyP., et al. “Characterization of the Expression of Neurotensin and Its Receptors in Human Colorectal Cancer and Its Clinical Implications”. Biomolecules. 2020. 10(8): 1145. 10.3390/biom10081145
18.
KimJ.T.WeissH.L.EversB.M.. “Diverse Expression Patterns and Tumorigenic Role of Neurotensin Signaling Components in Colorectal Cancer Cells”. Int. J. Oncol. 2017. 50(6): 2200–2206. 10.3892/ijo.2017.3990
19.
ProniewiczE.BurnatG.DominH.IłowskaE., et al. “Spectroscopic Characterization and In Vitro Studies of Biological Activity of Bradykinin Derivatives”. Sci. Rep. 2022. 12(1): 19015. 10.1038/s41598-022-23448-7
20.
SchindlerL.WohlfahrtK., L. Gluhacevic Von Krüchten, O. Prante, et al. “Neurotensin Analogs by Fluoroglycosylation at Nω-Carbamoylated Arginines for PET Imaging of NTS1-Positive Tumors”. Sci. Rep. 2022. 12: 15028. 10. 1038/s41598-022-19296-0
21.
NikolaouS.QiuS.FiorentinoF.SimillisC., et al. “The Role of Neurotensin and Its Receptors in Non-Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Review”. Cell Commun. Signal. 2020. 18(1): 68. 10.1186/s12964-020-00569-y
22.
MoodyT.W.Ramos-AlvarezI.JensenR.T.. “Neuropeptide G Protein-Coupled Receptors as Oncotargets”. Front. Endocrinol. 2018. 9(9): 345. 10.3389/fendo.2018.00345
23.
MohanC.BabuB.H.Naga RajuC.Usha NagalakshmiR.. “A Convenient Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of Novel α-Aminophosphonic Acid Esters from Amino Acids/Esters (Kabachnik–Fields Reaction)”. J. Chem. 2008. 5(4): 679–687. 10.1155/2008/573561
24.
Viveros-CeballosJ.L.OrdóñezM.SayagoF.J.CativielaC.. “Stereoselective Synthesis of α-Amino-C-Phosphinic Acids and Derivatives”. Molecules. 2016. 21(9): 1141. 10.3390/molecules21091141
25.
VargaP.R.SzabóR.O.DormánG.BöszeS., et al. “Cytotoxic Activity of α-Aminophosphonic Derivatives Coming from the Tandem Kabachnik–Fields Reaction and Acylation”. Pharmaceut. 2023. 16(4): 506. 10.3390/ph16040506
26.
AbdouM.M.O’NeillP.M.AmiguesE.MatziariM.. “Phosphinic Acids: Current Status and Potential for Drug Discovery”. Drug Discov. Today. 2019. 24(3): 916–929. 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.11.016
27.
KappenJ.SkorupaM.KrukiewiczK.. “Conducting Polymers as Versatile Tools for the Electrochemical Detection of Cancer Biomarkers”. Biosensors. 2023. 13(1): 31. 10.3390/bios13010031
28.
ChangH.HurW.KangH.JunB.-H.. “In Vivo Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Techniques: Nanoprobes, Instrumentation, and Applications”. Light Sci. Appl. 2025. 14(1): 79. 10.1038/s41377-024-01718-5
29.
Cialla-MayD.DwivediA.BonifacioA.DibT., et al. “Recent Advances of Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) in Optical Biosensing”. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2024. 181(Part A): 117990. 10.1016/j.trac.2024.117990
30.
Vázquez-IglesiasL.CasagrandeG.M.S.García-LojoD.LealL.F., et al. “SERS Sensing for Cancer Biomarker: Approaches and Directions”. Bioact. Mater. 2024. 34: 248–268. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.12.018
MesiasV.S.D.ZhangJ.FuW.DaiX., et al. “Enhanced Characterization of Protein Secondary Structure Transitions Using Raman and SERS Measurements Combined with 2D Correlation Spectroscopy and Principal Component Analysis”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A. 2025. 343: 126607. 10.1016/j.saa.2025.126607
33.
LaschP.NodaI.. “Two-Dimensional Correlation Spectroscopy (2D-COS) for Analysis of Spatially Resolved Vibrational Spectra”. Appl. Spectrosc. 2019. 73(4): 359–379. 10.1177/0003702818819880
34.
ParkY.ChenL.LeeS.NodaI., et al. “Investigation of Selective SERS Enhancement Mechanism of Au Nanospheres and Au Nanorods Based on 2T2D-SERS Correlation Spectroscopy”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A. 2024. 310: 123947. 10.1016/j.saa.2024.123947
CreightonJ.A.. “Surface Raman Electromagnetic Enhancement Factors for Molecules at the Surface of Small Isolated Metal Spheres: The Determination of Adsorbate Orientation from SERS Relative Intensities”. Surf. Sci. 1983. 124(1): 209–219. 10.1016/0039-6028(83)90345-X
37.
GaoP.WeaverM.J.. “Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy as a Probe of Adsorbate–Surface Bonding: Benzene and Monosubstituted Benzenes Adsorbed at Gold Electrodes”. J. Phys. Chem. 1985. 89(23): 5040–5046. 10.1021/j100269a031
38.
MoskovitsM.DiLellaD.P.MaynardK.J.. “Surface Raman Spectroscopy of a Number of Cyclic Aromatic Molecules Adsorbed on Silver: Selection Rules and Molecular Reorientation”. Langmuir. 1988. 4(1): 67–76. 10.1021/la00079a012
39.
CarterD.A.PembertonJ.E.. “Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering of the Acid–Base Forms of Imidazole on Ag”. Langmuir. 1992. 8(4): 1218–1225. 10.1021/la00040a033
40.
PodstawkaE.BorszowskaR.GrabowskaM.DrągM., et al. “Investigation of Molecular Structures and Adsorption Mechanisms of Phosphonodipeptides by Surface-Enhanced Raman, Raman, and Infrared Spectroscopies”. Surf. Sci. 2005. 599(1–3): 207–220. 10.1016/j.susc.2005.09.048
41.
PodstawkaE.OzakiY.ProniewiczL.M.. “Structures and Bonding on a Colloidal Silver Surface of the Various Length Carboxyl Terminal Fragments of Bombesin”. Langmuir. 2008. 24(19): 10807–10816. 10.1021/la8012415
42.
PodstawkaE.KudelskiA.OlszewskiT.K.BoduszekB.. “Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Studies on the Interaction of Phosphonate Derivatives of Imidazole, Thiazole, and Pyridine with a Silver Electrode in Aqueous Solution”. J. Phys. Chem. 2009. 113(29): 10035–10042. 10.1021/jp902328j
43.
PembertonJ.E.BryantM.A.SobocinskiR.L.JoaS.L.. “A Simple Method for Determination of Orientation of Adsorbed Organics of Low Symmetry Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering”. J. Phys. Chem. 1992. 96(9): 3776–3782. 10.1021/j100188a039
44.
PodstawkaE.KudelskiA.ProniewiczL.M.. “Adsorption Mechanism of Physiologically Active L-Phenylalanine Phosphonodipeptide Analogues: Comparison of Colloidal Silver and Macroscopic Silver Substrates”. Surf. Sci. 2007. 601(21): 4971–4983. 10.1016/j.susc.2007.08.012
45.
PodstawkaE.NiauraG.ProniewiczL.M.. “Neuromedin C: Potential-Dependent Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectra in the Far-Red Spectral Region on Silver, Gold, and Copper Surfaces”. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2010. 114(15): 5117–5124. 10.1021/jp910575f
46.
NguyenA.H.PetersE.A.SchultzZ.D.. “Bioanalytical Applications of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: De Novo Molecular Identification”. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2017. 36(4): 20160037. 10.1515/revac-2016-0037
47.
Podstawka-ProniewiczE.KudelskiA.KimY.ProniewiczL.M.. “Structure of Monolayers Formed from Neurotensin and Its Single-Site Mutants: Vibrational Spectroscopic Studies”. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2011. 115(20): 6709–6721. 10.1021/jp200805f
48.
ProniewiczE.VantasinS.OlszewskiT.K.BoduszekB., et al. “Biological Application of Water-Based Electrochemically Synthesized CuO Leaf-Like Arrays: SERS Response Modulated by the Positional Isomerism and Interface Type”. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017. 19(47): 31842–31855. 10.1039/c7cp06001g
