Abstract
The analytical performance of four commercially available infrared attenuated total reflection (IR-ATR) accessories with various ATR waveguide materials has been analyzed and evaluated using acetate, CO2, and CO32− solutions. Calibration functions have been established to determine and compare analytically relevant parameters such as sensitivity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and efficiency. The obtained parameters were further analyzed to support conclusions on the differences in performance of the individual IR-ATR accessories.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
