Orocutaneous fistula (OCF) after reconstruction for oral cavity resection can lead to prolonged hospitalization and adjuvant treatment delay. Few studies have examined factors leading to OCF after oral cavity resection. Primary objective: evaluate overall incidence and factors associated with OCF after oral cavity reconstruction.
Data Sources:
Scopus 1960—database was searched for terms: “orocutaneous fistula,” “oro cutaneous fistula,” “oral cutaneous fistula,” “orocervical fistula,” “oral cavity salivary fistula.”
Review Methods:
English language studies with >5 patients undergoing reconstruction after oral cavity cancer resection were included. About 1057 records initially screened; 214 full texts assessed; 78 full-texts included. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and MINORS criteria used to assess risk of bias. Data were pooled using random-effects model. Primary outcome was OCF incidence. Meta-analysis to determine the effect of preoperative radiation on OCF conducted on 12 eligible studies. Pre-collection hypothesis was that prior radiation therapy is associated with increased OCF incidence. Post-collection analyses: free versus pedicled flaps; mandible-sparing versus segmental mandibulectomy.
Results:
Seventy-eight studies were included in meta-analysis of overall OCF incidence. Pooled effect size showed overall incidence of OCF to be 7.71% (95% CI, 6.28%-9.13%) among 5400 patients. Meta-analysis of preoperative radiation therapy on OCF showed a pooled odds ratio of 1.68 (95% CI, 0.93-3.06). OCF incidence was similar between patients undergoing free versus pedicled reconstruction, or segmental mandibulectomy versus mandible-sparing resection.
Conclusion:
Orocutaneous fistula after oral cavity resection has significant incidence and clinical impact. Risk of OCF persists despite advances in reconstructive options; there is a trend toward higher risk after prior radiation.
SiegelRLMillerKDJemalA.Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7-30.
2.
CheraghlouSSchettinoAZoggCKJudsonBL.Changing prognosis of oral cancer: an analysis of survival and treatment between 1973 and 2014. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(12):2762-2769.
3.
MurphyCTGallowayTJHandorfEA, et al. Survival impact of increasing time to treatment initiation for patients with head and neck cancer in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(2):169-178.
4.
WangMXunYWangK, et al. Risk factors of pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(2):585-599.
5.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
6.
SlimKNiniEForestierDKwiatkowskiFPanisYChipponiJ.Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(9):712-716.
7.
TierneyJFStewartLAGhersiDBurdettSSydesMR.Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8(1):16.
8.
CorradinoBDi LorenzoSMoschellaF.Botulinum toxin a for oral cavity cancer patients: in microsurgical patients BTX injections in major salivary glands temporarily reduce salivary production and the risk of local complications related to saliva stagnation. Toxins. 2012;4(11):956-961.
9.
RoofSAPerezERVillavisanisDF, et al. 2-Octyl cyanoacrylate to prevent salivary fistula formation following oral cavity microvascular reconstruction: a prospective trial. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020;41(5):102552.
10.
SagayarajADeoRPAzeem MohiyuddinSMOommen ModayilG.Island pectoralis major myocutaneous flap: an Indian perspective. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;64(3):270-274.
11.
KrauseCJSmitsRGMcCabeBF.Complications associated with combined therapy of oral and pharyngeal neoplasms. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1972;81(4):496-500.
12.
FlynnMBMooreC.Marginal resection of the mandible in the management of squamous cancer of the floor of the mouth. Am J Surg. 1974;128(4):490-493.
13.
TerzJJBearESKingRELawrenceWJr.Primary reconstruction of the mandible with a wire mesh prosthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;139(2):198-200.
14.
SessionsDGDedoDDOguraJH.Tongue flap reconstruction in cancer of the oral cavity. Arch Otolaryngol. 1975;101(3):166-169.
15.
FlynnMB.Morbidity and mortality of mandibular resection for malignant disease. Am J Surg. 1977;134(4):510-516.
16.
LashHMaserMRApfelbergDB.Deltopectoral flap with a segmental dermal pedicle in head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59(2):235-240.
17.
FriessCCFontaineDJKornblutAD.Complications of therapy for oral malignant disease. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1979;12(1):175-181.
18.
SchrammVLJrMyersEN.Skin grafts in oral cavity reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol. 1980;106(9):528-532.
19.
UedaMToriiSNagayamaMKanedaTOkaT.The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for intraoral reconstruction: surgical complications and their treatment. J Maxillofac Surg. 1985;13(1):9-13.
20.
ColemanJJIIIWoodenWA.Mandibular reconstruction with composite microvascular tissue transfer. Am J Surg. 1990;160(4):390-395.
21.
KrollSSGoepfertHJonesMGuillamondeguiOSchustermanM.Analysis of complications in 168 pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps used for head and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1990;25(2):93-97.
22.
MidisGPFeuerABergmanSAEliasEGLeforATDidolkarMS.Immediate mandibular stabilization following resection of advanced oral cavity carcinoma using the Joe Hall Morris external fixation device. J Surg Oncol. 1992;50(1):22-26.
23.
NakatsukaTHariiKYamadaAUedaKEbiharaS.Dual free flap transfer using forearm flap for mandibular reconstruction. Head Neck. 1992;14(6):452-458.
24.
CheemaMA.Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of defects following resections in head and neck area. J Pak Med Assoc. 1993;43(4):73-76.
25.
MehtaSSarkarSKavaranaNBhathenaHMehtaA.Complications of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in the oral cavity: a prospective evaluation of 220 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(1):31-37.
26.
OrdRA.The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of 50 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54(11):1292-1295; discussion 1295-1296.
27.
AlviAMyersEN.Skin graft reconstruction of the composite resection defect. Head Neck. 1996;18(6):538-543; discussion 543-544.
28.
AnthonyJPFosterRDKaplanMJSingerMIPogrelMA.Fibular free flap reconstruction of the “true” lateral mandibular defect. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38(2):137-146.
29.
BlackwellKEBuchbinderDBillerHFUrkenML.Reconstruction of massive defects in the head and neck: the role of simultaneous distant and regional flaps. Head Neck. 1997;19(7):620-628.
30.
MurakamiRTanakaKKobayashiK, et al. Free groin flap for reconstruction of the tongue and oral floor. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1998;14(1):49-55.
31.
DulguerovPKernerMMMarchalFLehmannW.Palatal mucoperiosteal free graft: another reconstruction option for oral defects. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1998; 60(3):153-158.
32.
VerschuurHPDassonvilleOSantiniJ, et al. Complications of the myocutaneous platysma flap in intraoral reconstruction. Head Neck. 1998;20(7):623-629.
33.
DeutschMKrollSSAinsleNWangB.Influence of radiation on late complications in patients with free fibular flaps for mandibular reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42(6):662-664.
34.
GellrichNCKwonTGLauerG, et al. The lateral upper arm free flap for intraoral reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;29(2):104-111.
35.
DeschlerDGHaydenRE.The optimum method for reconstruction of complex lateral oromandibular-cutaneous defects. Head Neck. 2000;22(7):674-679.
36.
KimataYUchiyamaKEbiharaS, et al. Postoperative complications and functional results after total glossectomy with microvascular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(5):1028-1035.
37.
de MeloGMRibeiroKCKowalskiLPDeheinzelinD.Risk factors for postoperative complications in oral cancer and their prognostic implications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):828-833.
38.
JengSFKuoYRWeiFCAnPCSuCYChienCY.Free radial forearm flap with adipofascial tissue extension for reconstruction of oral cancer defect. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49(2):151-155.
39.
JonesNFVögelinEMarkowitzBLWatsonJP.Reconstruction of composite through-and-through mandibular defects with a double-skin paddle fibular osteocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(3):758-765.
40.
GabrEMKobayashiMRSalibianAH, et al. Oromandibular reconstruction with vascularized free flaps: a review of 50 cases. Microsurgery. 2004;24(5):374-377.
41.
ObernaFTakácsi-NagyZRéthyAPólusKKáslerM.Buccal mucosal transposition flap for reconstruction of oropharyngeal-oral cavity defects: an analysis of six cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99(5):550-553.
42.
SmithGIO’BrienCJChoyETAndruchowJLGaoK.Clinical outcome and technical aspects of 263 radial forearm free flaps used in reconstruction of the oral cavity. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;43(3):199-204.
43.
DenewerATSteetAEMohamedOHAlyOF.Locally advanced cheek carcinoma; radical surgery and reconstruction of though and through defects. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2006;18(2):141-146.
44.
MultinuAFerrariSBianchiB, et al. The submental island flap in head and neck reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(8):716-720.
DeganelloAMancioccoVDolivetGLeemansCRSprianoG.Infrahyoid fascio-myocutaneous flap as an alternative to free radial forearm flap in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck. 2007;29(3):285-291.
47.
CilentoBWIzzardMWeymullerEAFutranN.Comparison of approaches for oral cavity cancer resection: lip-split versus visor flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(3):428-432.
48.
DeleyiannisFWRogersCFerrisRLLaiSYKimSJohnsonJ.Reconstruction of the through-and-through anterior mandibulectomy defect: indications and limitations of the double-skin paddle fibular free flap. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(8):1329-1334.
49.
TaghiniaAHMovassaghiKWangAXPribazJJ.Reconstruction of the upper aerodigestive tract with the submental artery flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(2):562-570.
50.
ChaineAPitak-ArnnopPHivelinMDhanuthaiKBertrandJCBertolusC.Postoperative complications of fibular free flaps in mandibular reconstruction: an analysis of 25 consecutive cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(4):488-495.
51.
El-ZohairyMAMostafaAAminAAbd El-FattahHKhalifaS.Mandibular reconstruction using pectoralis major myocutaneous flap and titanium plates after ablative surgery for locally advanced tumors of the oral cavity. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2009;21(4):299-307.
52.
MalletYEl BedouiSPenelNTon VanJFournierCLefebvreJL.The free vascularized flap and the pectoralis major pedicled flap options: comparative results of reconstruction of the tongue. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(12):1028-1031.
53.
KuoYRShihHSChenCC, et al. Free fibula osteocutaneous flap with soleus muscle as a chimeric flap for reconstructing mandibular segmental defect after oral cancer ablation. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(6):738-742.
54.
MyersLLSumerBDTruelsonJMAhnCLeachJL.Resection and free tissue reconstruction of locally advanced oral cancer: avoidance of lip split. Microsurgery. 2011;31(5):347-352.
55.
CappielloJPiazzaCTagliettiVNicolaiP.Deep inferior epigastric artery perforated rectus abdominis free flap for head and neck reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(4):1219-1224.
56.
KochMKünzelJMantsopoulosKZenkJIroH.Defect closure after oral and pharyngeal tumor resection with the superiorly pedicled myocutaneous platysma flap: indications, technique, and complications. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(9):2111-2119.
57.
MiyamotoSSakurabaMNagamatsuSKamizonoKHayashiR.Comparison of reconstruction plate and double flap for reconstruction of an extensive mandibular defect. Microsurgery. 2012;32(6):452-457.
SinghSSinghRKPandeyM.Nasolabial flap reconstruction in oral cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:227.
60.
SharmaRGBangBVermaHMehtaJM.Profile of oral squamous cell cancer in a tertiary level medical college hospital: a 10 yr study. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2012;3(3):250-254.
61.
GuideraAKKellyBNRigbyPMacKinnonCATanST.Early oral intake after reconstruction with a free flap for cancer of the oral cavity. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51(3):224-227.
62.
JenaAPatnayakRSharanRReddySKManilalBRaoLM.Outcomes of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in female patients for oral cavity defect reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(1):222-231.
63.
ChenWYangZZhangDWangYFanSHuangZ.Second salvage surgery with extended vertical lower trapezius island myocutaneous flap reconstruction for advanced re-recurrent oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43(5):531-538.
64.
CordovaAD’ArpaSDi LorenzoSToiaFCampisiGMoschellaF.Prophylactic chimera anterolateral thigh/vastus lateralis flap: preventing complications in high-risk head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(5): 1013-1022.
65.
Alonso-RodríguezECebrián-CarreteroJLMorán-SotoMJBurgueño-GarcíaM.Versatility of nasolabial flaps in oral cavity reconstructions. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19(5):e525-e530.
66.
LeiteAKde MatosLLBelliM, et al. Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for head and neck reconstruction: risk factors for fistula formation. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014;34(6):389-393.
67.
ZhangXLiuFLanXLuoKLiS.Combined submandibular gland flap and sternocleidomastoid musculocutaneous flap for postoperative reconstruction in older aged patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:259.
68.
ZhangSChenWCaoGDongZ.Pedicled supraclavicular artery island flap versus free radial forearm flap for tongue reconstruction following hemiglossectomy. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(6):e527-e530.
69.
BhanjaAD’SouzaDSRoyCPoddarRN.Reliability of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in reconstructive oral cancer surgery in developing countries: our experience. Med J Armed Forces India. 2016;72(suppl 1):S1-S7.
70.
DawsonCGadiwallaYMartinTPraveenPParmarS.Factors affecting orocutaneous fistula formation following head and neck reconstructive surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55(2):132-135.
71.
SittitraiPSrivanitchapoomCReunmakkaewDYataK.Submental Island flap reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients with level I lymph node metastasis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55(3):251-255.
72.
NairDSinghviHMairM, et al. Outcomes of surgically treated oral cancer patients at a tertiary cancer center in India. Indian J Cancer. 2017;54(4):616-620.
73.
KadakiaSAgarwalJMouradMAshaiSLeeTDucicY.Supraclavicular flap reconstruction of cutaneous defects has lower complication rate than mucosal defects. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33(4):275-280.
74.
WuWYangYZhangPSunM.The “flap suture anchoring” technique for safe oral floor reconstruction with preservation of alveolar process. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(5):1300-1304.
75.
PradhanPSamalSPreetamCSamalDKParidaPK.Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction for the mandibular defects in advanced oral cavity malignancies: a retrospective study of 30 cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;70(3):415-420.
76.
KumarVMukharjeeSAkhtarN, et al. Tongue flap reconstruction in carcinoma of oral cavity: an institutional experience. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019;18(3):428-431.
77.
RenZHWuKWangYTianZWHuJZ.Role of a two-step suture in the prevention of postoperative transoral salivary fistulas during reconstruction of the oral cavity. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;57(2):164-168.
78.
QuinsanICMCostaGCPrianteAVMCardosoCANunesCLS. Functional outcomes and survival of patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer after total glossectomy. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;86(5):545-551.
79.
GirkarFThiagarajanSMalikA, et al. Factors predisposing to the development of orocutaneous fistula following surgery for oral cancer: experience from a tertiary cancer center. Head Neck. 2019;41(12):4121-4127.
80.
KallappaSShahN.Outcome of nasolabial flap in the reconstruction of head and neck defects. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019;10(4):577-581.
81.
JainPVBangBManikantanKSinhaTBiswasGArunP.Factors affecting postoperative complications after reconstructive surgery in oral carcinoma patients: a prospective study of 100 patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(suppl 1):341-347.
82.
VenkatasubramaniyanMRajappaSKAgarwalMChopraASinghAPaulR.Infrahyoid flap revisited – a head and neck surgical perspective in the Indian setting. Indian J Cancer. 2020;57(1):62-69.
83.
AnehosurVDikhitPSNagrajNJayadeBKumarN.PMMC flap revisited and its clinical outcome in 150 patients. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020;19(1):26-31.
84.
ChakrabartiSGuptaDKGuptaM, et al. Versatility and reliability of Islanded pedicled nasolabial flap in head and neck cancer reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(8):1967-1972.
85.
JanikSEljazzarRFaisalM, et al. Outcome in patients with partial and full-thickness cheek defects following free flap reconstruction-a multicentric analysis of 47 cases. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1740-1749.
86.
BlackwellKEBuchbinderDUrkenML.Lateral mandibular reconstruction using soft-tissue free flaps and plates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(6):672-678.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
