The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of voice disorders in college students and their effect on the students as shown by quality-of-life indicators.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey was completed by 545 college students in 2012. The survey included 10 questions from the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL), selected voice symptoms, and quality-of-life indicators of functional health and well-being based on the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36).
Results:
Twenty-nine percent of the college students (mean age, 22.7 years) reported a history of a voice disorder. Hoarseness was the most prevalent voice symptom, but was not correlated with V-RQOL scores. A wobbly or shaky voice, throat dryness, vocal fatigue, and vocal effort explained a significant amount of variance on the social-emotional and physical domains of the V-RQOL index (p < 0.05). Voice symptoms limited emotional and physical functioning as indicated by SF-36 scores.
Conclusions:
Voice disorders significantly influence psychosocial and physical functioning in college students. These findings have important implications for voice-care services in this population.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1993. Definitions of communication disorders and variations. Available from http://www.asha.org/docs/html/RP1993-00208.html. Accessed Oct 11, 2012.
2.
RoyNMerrillRMGraySDSmithEM. Voice disorders in the general population: Prevalence, risk factors, and occupational impact. Laryngoscope2005;115:1988–95.
3.
CohenSMDupontWDCoureyMS. Quality-of-life impact of non-neoplastic voice disorders: A meta-analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2006;115:128–34.
4.
BenningerMSAhujaASGardnerGGrywalskiC. Assessing outcomes for dysphonic patients. J Voice1998;12:540–50.
5.
MerrillRMAndersonAESloanA. Quality of life indicators according to voice disorders and voice-related conditions. Laryngoscope2011;121:2004–10.
6.
RoyNStempleJMerrillRMThomasL. Epidemiology of voice disorders in the elderly: Preliminary findings. Laryngoscope2007;117:628–33.
7.
KrischkeSWeigeltSHoppeU. Quality of life in dysphonic patients. J Voice2005;19:132–7.
8.
RoyNMerrillRMThibeaultSGraySDSmithEM. Voice disorders in teachers and the general population: Effects on work performance, attendance, and future career choices. J Speech Lang Hear Res2004;47:542–51.
9.
HogikyanNDSethuramanG. Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL). J Voice1999;13:557–69.
10.
Ware JE Jr, Gandek B, and the IQOLA Project Group. The SF-36 Health Survey: Development and use in mental health research and the IQOLA Project. Int J Ment Health1994;23:49–73.
11.
WareJEJrSnokKKKosinskiM. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston, Mass: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.
12.
McHorneyCAWareJEJrLuJFRSherbourneCD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care1994;32:40–66.
GeorgeDMalleryP. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update. 4th ed.Boston, Mass: Allyn & Bacon, 2003.
15.
KlineP. The handbook of psychological testing. 2nd ed.London, England: Routledge, 1999.
16.
RoyNMerrillRMThibeaultSParsaRAGraySDSmithEM. Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. J Speech Lang Hear Res2004;47:281–93.
17.
AngelilloMDi MaioGCostaGAngelilloNBarillariU. Prevalence of occupational voice disorders in teachers. J Prev Med Hyg2009;50:26–32.
18.
HapnerEGilmanM. The vocal load of Reform Jewish cantors in the USA. J Voice2012;26:201–4.
19.
PiwowarczykTCOliveiraGLourençoLBehlauM. Vocal symptoms, voice activity, and participation profile and professional performance of call center operators. J Voice2012;26:194–200.
20.
SchwartzSRCohenSMDaileySH. Clinical practice guideline: Hoarseness (dysphonia). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2009;141 (suppl 2):S1–S31.
21.
EadieTLKapsnerMRosenzweigJWaughPHillelAMeratiA. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia. J Voice2010;24:564–73.
22.
EadieTLNicoliciCBaylorCAlmandKWaughPMaronianN. Effect of experience on judgments of adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2007;116:695–701.
23.
LeeMDrinnanMCardingP, The reliability and validity of patient self-rating of their own voice quality. Clin Otolaryngol2005;30:357–61.
24.
LenderkingWRHillsonECrawleyJAMooreDBerzonRPashosCL. The clinical characteristics and impact of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease on health-related quality of life. Value Health2003;6:560–5.
25.
BehlauMHogikyanNDGaspariniG. Quality of life and voice: Study of a Brazilian population using the voice-related quality of life measure. Folia Phoniatr Logop2007;59:286–96.
26.
MurryTRosenCA. Outcome measurements and quality of life in voice disorders. Otolaryngol Clin North Am2000;33:905–16.
27.
RamigLOVerdoliniK. Treatment efficacy: Voice disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res1998;41:S101–S116.
28.
SivasankarMFisherKV. Oral breathing increases Pth and vocal effort by superficial drying of the vocal fold mucosa. J Voice2002;16:172–81.
29.
SolomonNPDiMattiaMS. Effects of a vocally fatiguing task and systemic hydration on phonation threshold pressure. J Voice2000;14:341–62.
30.
VerdoliniKTitzeIRFennellA. Dependence of phonatory effort on hydration level. J Speech Hear Res1994;37:1001–7.
31.
HamdanALSibaiARamehC. Effect of fasting on voice in women. J Voice2007;21:495–501.
32.
NicholKLTummersKHoyer-LeitzelAMarshJMoynihanMMcKelveyS. Modeling seasonal influenza outbreak in a closed college campus: Impact of pre-season vaccination, in-season vaccination and holidays/breaks. PLoS One2010;5:e9548.
