Pitch Deviation Analysis of Pathological Voice in Connected Speech

Abstract

Objectives

This study compares normal and pathologic voices using a novel voice analysis algorithm that examines pitch deviation during connected speech. The study evaluates the clinical potential of the algorithm as a mechanism to distinguish between normal and pathologic voices using connected speech.

Methods

Adult vocalizations from normal subjects and patients with known benign free-edge vocal fold lesions were analyzed. Recordings had been previously obtained in quiet under controlled conditions. Two phrases and sustained /a/ were recorded per subject. The subject populations consisted of 10 normal and 31 abnormal subjects. The voice analysis algorithm generated 2-dimensional patterns that represent pitch deviation in time and under variable window widths. Measures were collected from these patterns for window widths between 10 and 250 ms. For comparison, jitter and shimmer measures were collected from sustained /a/ by means of the Computerized Speech Lab (CSL). A t-test and tests of sensitivity and specificity assessed discrimination between normal and abnormal populations.

Results

More than 58% of the measures collected from connected speech outperformed the CSL jitter and shimmer measures in population discrimination. Twenty-five percent of the experimental measures (including /a/) indicated significantly different populations (p < .01%).

Conclusions

The results demonstrate that the algorithm distinguishes between normal and abnormal populations by use of samples of connected speech.

Keywords

jitter perturbation analysis pitch speech voice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Webb

, Carding

, Deary

, MacKenzie

, Steen

, Wilson

. The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 261: 42934.

Muñoz

, Mendoza

, Fresneda

, Carballo

, Lopez

. Acoustic and perceptual indicators of normal and pathological voice. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2003; 55: 10214.

Awan

, Roy

. Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: a four-factor acoustic model. Clin Linguist Phon 2006; 20: 3549.

Halberstam

. Acoustic and perceptual parameters relating to connected speech are more reliable measures of hoarseness than parameters relating to sustained vowels. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2004; 66: 703.

Eadie

, Doyle

. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures. J Voice 2005; 19: 114.

Laflen

, Lazarus

, Amin

. Using windowed relative deviation to detect possible voice pathology. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, New York, NY, 2006: 37558.

Baken

, Orlikoff

. Clinical measurement of speech and voice. 2nd ed. San Diego. Calif: Singular Publishing Group, 2000: 145223.

Schoentgen

. Jitter in sustained vowels and isolated sentences produced by dysphonic speakers. Speech Commun 1989; 8: 6179.

Eskanazi

, Childers

, Hicks

. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 298306.

10.

Wolfe

, Martin

. Acoustic correlates of dysphonia: type and severity. J Commun Disord 1997; 30: 40316.

11.

Zhang

, Jiang

. Acoustic analyses of sustained and running voices from patients with laryngeal pathologies. J Voice 2008; 22: 19.

12.

Rabinov

, Kreiman

, Gerratt

, Bielamowicz

. Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of roughness and acoustic measure of jitter. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 2632.

13.

Gold

, Rabiner

. Parallel processing techniques for estimating pitch periods of speech in the time domain. J Acoust Soc Am 1969; 46: 4428.

14.

Kedem

. Spectral analysis and discrimination by zero-crossings. Proc IEEE 1986; 74: 147793.

15.

Boersma

. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. IFAProc 1993; 17: 97110.

16.

de Cheveigné

, Kawahara

. YIN, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111: 191730.

17.

Marchand

. An efficient pitch-tracking algorithm using a combination of Fourier transforms. In: Proceedings of the COST G-6 Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFX-01), Limerick, Ireland, December 6-8, 2001.

18.

Rabiner

. On the use of autocorrelation analysis for pitch detection. IEEE Trans Acoustics Speech Signal Processing 1977; 25: 2433.

19.

Brown

, Puckette

. A high resolution fundamental frequency determination based on phase changes of the Fourier transform. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 6627.

20.

Lane

. Pitch detection using a tunable IIR filter. Computer Music J 1990; 14: 4659.

21.

Cooper

, Ng

. A monophonic pitch-tracking algorithm based on waveform periodicity determinations using landmark points. Computer Music J 1996; 20: 708.

22.

Choi

. Real-time fundamental frequency estimation by least-square fitting. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Processing 1997; 5: 2015.

23.

Brown

. Musical fundamental frequency tracking using a pattern recognition method. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 1394402.

24.

Sano

, Jenkins

. A neural network model for pitch perception. Computer Music J 1989; 13: 418.

25.

Arfib

, Delprat

. Alteration of the vibrato of a recorded voice. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC), Beijing, China. International Computer Music Association (ICMA), 1999: 1869.

26.

Roark

. Frequency and voice: perspectives in the time domain. J Voice 2006; 20: 332554.