We report a meta-analysis of a series of studies in which 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring was performed in 1) normal subjects, 2) the normal control subjects in studies of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), and 3) the patients with LPR in these controlled studies. The statistical analysis utilized the fixed-effects model by Mantel-Haenszel and the random-effects mixed model. There were 16 studies from the past 12 years that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They involved 793 subjects (264 normal and 529 with LPR). The numbers of positive pharyngeal reflux events for normal subjects and for patients with LPR differed with a p value of <.0001. There was also a significant difference in the mean percentage of acid exposure times between normal subjects and patients with LPR (p = .003). We conclude that the upper probe gives accurate and consistent information in normal subjects and patients with LPR. The numbers of reflux events and acid exposure times are most important in distinguishing normal subjects from patients with LPR. The technology and methodology of probe testing is quite reliable and is consistent on a worldwide basis.
DobhanRCastellDO. Normal and abnormal proximal esophageal acid exposure: Results of ambulatory dual-probe pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol1993; 88: 25–9.
3.
KamelPLHansonDKahrilasPJ. Omeprazole for the treatment of posterior laryngitis. Am J Med1994; 96: 321–6.
4.
VaeziMFSchroederPLRichterJE. Reproducibility of proximal probe pH parameters in 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol1997; 92: 825–9.
5.
SmitCFTanJDevriesePPMathus-VliegenLMHBrandsenMSchouwenburgPF. Ambulatory pH measurements at the upper esophageal sphincter. Laryngoscope1998; 108: 299–302.
6.
VincentDAJrGarrettJDRadionoffSLReussnerLAStasneyCR. The proximal probe in esophageal pH monitoring: Development of a normative database. J Voice2000; 14: 247–54.
7.
BoveMRuthMCangeLManssonI. 24-H pharyngeal pH monitoring in healthy volunteers: A normative study. Scand J Gastroenterol2000; 35: 234–41.
8.
MaldonadoADiederichLCastellDOGideonRMKatzPO. Laryngopharyngeal reflux identified using a new catheter design: Defining normal values and excluding artifacts. Laryngoscope2003; 113: 349–55.
9.
KoufmanJA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): A clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope1991; 101(suppl 53).
10.
ShakerRMilbrathMRenJ. Esophagopharyngeal distribution of refluxed gastric acid in patients with reflux laryngitis. Gastroenterology1995; 109: 1575–82.
11.
ToohillRJUlualpSOShakerR. Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with laryngotracheal stenosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1998; 107: 1010–4.
12.
KuhnJToohillRJUlualpSO. Pharyngeal acid reflux events in patients with vocal cord nodules. Laryngoscope1998; 108: 1146–9.
13.
UlualpSOToohillRJHoffmannRShakerR. Pharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with posterior laryngitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1999; 120: 672–7.
14.
UlualpSOToohillRJHoffmannRShakerR. Possible relationship of gastroesophagopharyngeal acid reflux with pathogenesis of chronic sinusitis. Am J Rhinol1999; 13: 197–202.
15.
UlualpSOToohillRJShakerR. Pharyngeal acid reflux in patients with single and multiple otolaryngologic disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1999; 121: 725–30.
16.
YlitaloRLindestadPARamelS. Symptoms, laryngeal findings, and 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with suspected gastroesophago-pharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope2001; 111: 1735–41.
17.
EubanksTROmelanczukPEMaronianNHillelAPopeCEIIPellegriniCA. Pharyngeal pH monitoring in 222 patients with suspected laryngeal reflux. J Gastrointest Surg2001; 5: 183–91.
18.
OelschlagerBKEubanksTRMaronianN. Laryngoscopy and pharyngeal pH are complementary in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal-laryngeal reflux. J Gastrointest Surg2002; 6: 189–94.
19.
LoehrlTASmithTLDarlingRJ. Autonomic dysfunction, vasomotor rhinitis, and extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2002; 126: 382–7.
20.
PowitzkyESKhaitanLGarrettCGRichardsWOCoureyM. Symptoms, quality of life, videolaryngoscopy, and twenty-four-hour triple-probe pH monitoring in patients with typical and extraesophageal reflux. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2003; 112: 859–65.
21.
SharpSJThompsonSGAltmanDG. The relation between treatment benefit and underlying risk in meta-analysis. BMJ1996; 313: 735–8.
22.
CookDJSackettDLSpitzerWO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol1995; 48: 167–71.
23.
Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy — I: Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. BMJ1994; 308: 81–106. [Erratum in BMJ 1994; 308:1540.]
BrownHPrescottR. Applied mixed models in medicine. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
26.
LittellRCMillikenGAStroupWWWolfingerRD. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1996.
27.
SmitCFMathus-VliegenLMDeVriesePPvan LeeuwenJASeminA. Monitoring of laryngopharyngeal reflux: Influence of meals and beverages. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2003; 112: 109–12.
28.
JamiesonJRSteinHJDeMeesterTR. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: Normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol1992; 87: 1102–11.
29.
WienerGJMorganTMCopperJB. Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters. Dig Dis Sci1988; 33: 1127–33.
30.
DuaKBardanERenJSuiZShakerR. Effect of chronic and acute cigarette smoking on the pharyngo-upper oesophageal sphincter contractile reflex and reflexive pharyngeal swallow. Gut1998; 43: 539–41.
31.
DuaKBardanERenJSuiZShakerR. Effect of chronic and acute cigarette smoking on the pharyngoglottal closure reflex. Gut2002; 51: 771–5.
