PhanTQNguyenLHNguyenLVet al.Imaging characteristics of mismatch lesions: an angiographic and intravascular ultrasound analysis of 1369 coronary artery lesions. Angiology. 2019;70(8):756–64.
2.
NakamuraMYamagishiMUenoTet al.Prevalence of visual-functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CVIT-DEFER registry. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2014;29(4):300–308.
3.
LeeJMKooBKShinESet al.Clinical outcomes of deferred lesions with angiographically insignificant stenosis but low fractional flow reserve. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(8):pii. e006071.
4.
YonetsuTMuraiTKanajiYet al.Significance of microvascular function in visual-functional mismatch between invasive coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(6):pii: e005916.
5.
ArashiHYamaguchiJNakazawaMet al.Lesion characteristics of coronary arteries associated with a mismatch between angiographic severity of stenosis and fractional flow reserve. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32(2):120–126.
6.
ChoHONamCWChoYKet al.Characteristics of function-anatomy mismatch in patients with coronary artery disease. Korean Circ J. 2014;44(6):394–399.
7.
OsawaKMiyoshiTMikiTet al.Coronary lesion characteristics with mismatch between fractional flow reserve derived from CT and invasive catheterization in clinical practice. Heart Vessels. 2017;32(4):390–398.
8.
WhiteAJDuffySJWaltonASet al.Compliance mismatch between stenotic and distal reference segment is associated with coronary artery disease instability. Atherosclerosis. 2009;206(1):179–185.
9.
KangDYAhnJMKimYWet al.Impact of coronary lesion geometry on fractional flow reserve: Data from interventional cardiology research in-cooperation society-fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound registry. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(6):e007087.
10.
HaeHKangSJKimWJet al.Machine learning assessment of myocardial ischemia using angiography: Development and retrospective validation. PLoS Med. 2018;15(11):e1002693.
