The objective of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) for patients with a nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement and adhered to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Both low- and high surgical risk patients treated with EVAR showed decreased 30-day mortality, but the low-risk group had no differences in 4-year mortality. Compared with friendly anatomy, patients with hostile anatomy had an increased risk of type I endoleak. Young patients may prefer OSR. Endovascular aneurysm repair was not cost-effective in Europe. Four conditional recommendations were formulated: (1) OSR for low-risk patients up to 80 years old, (2) EVAR for low-risk patients older than 80 years, (3) EVAR for high-risk patients as long as is anatomically feasible, and (4) OSR in patients in whom it is not anatomically feasible to perform EVAR. Based on GRADE criteria, either OSR or EVAR can be suggested to patients with nonruptured AAA taking into account their surgical risk, hostile anatomy, and age. Given the weakness of the recommendations, personal preferences are determinant.
Guirguis-BlakeJMBeilTLSengerCAWhitlockEP. Ultrasonography screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):321–9.
2.
ReimerinkJJvan der LaanMJKoelemayMJBalmRLegemateDA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2013;100(11):1405–13.
3.
ChaikofELDalmanRLEskandariMKet al.The Society For Vascular Surgery Practice Guidelines on the Care of Patients With an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(1):2–77.
4.
MollFLPowellJTFraedrichGet al.Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(S1):S1–58.
5.
DuffyJMNRolphRWalthamM. Stent graft types for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;360(9):CD008447.
6.
BeckAWSedrakyanAMaoJet al.Variations in abdominal aortic aneurysm care: a report from the International Consortium of Vascular Registries. Circulation. 2016;134(24):1948–58.
7.
GuyattGOxmanADAklEAet al.GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–94.
8.
HigginsJPTGreenS, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. www.handbook.cochrane.org. Updated March 2011.
9.
MoherDShamseerLClarkeMet al.Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.
10.
Martínez GarcíaLSanabriaAJArayaIet al.Efficiency of pragmatic search strategies to update clinical guidelines recommendations. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:57.
11.
Martínez GarcíaLPardo-HernándezHSanabriaAJAlonso-CoelloP; Pregnancy Clinical Guideline Updating Working Group. Continuous surveillance of a pregnancy clinical guideline: an early experience. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):143.
12.
Martínez GarcíaLSanabriaAJGarcía AlvarezEet al.The validity of recommendations from clinical guidelines: a survival analysis. CMAJ. 2014;186(16):1211–19.
AntoniouGAGeorgiadisGSAntoniouSAKuhanGMurrayD. A meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile and friendly neck anatomy. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(2):527–38.
15.
BiancariFCataniaAD’AndreaV. Elective endovascular vs. open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients aged 80 years and older: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(5):571–76.
16.
van BochoveCABurgersLTVahlACBirnieEvan SchothorstMGRedekopWK. Cost-effectiveness of open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(3):827–8.
17.
MalasMArhuideseIQaziUBlackJPerlerBFreischlagJA. Perioperative mortality following repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(12):1260–66.
18.
De BlicRAlsacJ-MJuliaPet al.Elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm is reasonable in patients >85 years of age. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(1):209–216.
19.
HughesKAbdulrahmanHPrendergastTet al.Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in nonagenarians. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29(2):183–8.
20.
BahiaSSKarthikesalingamAThompsonMM. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: endovascular options and outcomes — proliferating therapy, but effective?. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;56(1):19–25.
21.
HanYZhangSZhangJJiCEcksteinHH. Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians: meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54(4):454–63.
22.
EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9478):2179–86.
23.
De BruinJLBaasAFButhJet al.Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(20):1881–1889.
24.
LederleFAFreischlagJAKyriakidesTCet al.Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1535–42.
25.
BecqueminJ-PPilletJ-CLescalieFet al.A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(5):1167–73.
26.
De DonatoGSetacciCChisciEet al.Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians: myth or reality?J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2007;48(6):697–703.
27.
RavalMVEskandariMK. Outcomes of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair among the elderly: endovascular versus open repair. Surgery. 2012;151(2):245–60.
28.
SicardGARubinBGSanchezLAet al.Endoluminal graft repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients and octogenarians: is it better than open repair?Ann Surg. 2001;234(4):427–35.
29.
SchermerhornMLO’MalleyAJJhaveriACotterillPPomposelliFLandonBE. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(5):464–74.
30.
PaoliniDChahwanSWojnarowskiDPigottJPLaPorteFComerotaAJ. Elective endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(5):924–27.
31.
LeonLRLabropoulosNLaredoJRodríguezHEKalmanPG. To what extent has endovascular aneurysm repair influenced abdominal aortic aneurysm management in the state of Illinois?J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(4):568–74.
32.
WinterbornRJAminILyratzopoulosGWalkerNVartyKCampbellWB. Preferences for endovascular (EVAR) or open surgical repair among patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms under surveillance. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(3):576–81.
33.
ReiseJASheldonHEarnshawJet al.Patient preference for surgical method of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: postal survey. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(1):55–61.
34.
EpsteinDSculpherMJPowellJTThompsonSGBrownLCGreenhalghRM. Long-term cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on four randomized clinical trials. Br J Surg. 2014;101(6):623–31.
35.
NevidomskyteDShalhubSSinghNFarokhiEMeissnerMH. Influence of gender on abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the community. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;39:128–136.
36.
PatelRSweetingMJPowellJTet al.EVAR trial investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10058):2366–74.
37.
HynesCFEndicottKMIranmaneshSAmdurRLMacsataR. Reoperation rates after open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(5):1323–8.
38.
PowellJTSweetingMJUlugPet al.Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years. Br J Surg. 2017;104(3):166–178.
39.
TakagiHAndoTUmemotoT; ALICE (All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence) Group. Worse late-phase survival after elective endovascular than open surgical repair for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm. Int J Cardiol. 2017;236:427–31.
40.
MajdPAhmadWGalasNBrunkwallJS. Patients older than 80 years can reach their normal life expectancy after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a comparison between endovascular aneurysm repair and open surgery. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25(2):247–51.
41.
TakayamaY. A cost-utility analysis of endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Dis. 2017;10(3):185–91.
42.
WeinkaufCGeorgeEZhouW. Open versus endovascular aneurysm repair trial review. Surgery. 2017;162(5):974–8.
43.
Budtz-LillyJVenermoMDebusSet al.Editor’s Choice—Assessment of international outcomes of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair over 9 years. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54(1):13–20.
44.
DeerySESodenPAZettervallSLet al.Sex differences in mortality and morbidity following repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(4):1006–13.
45.
LederleFAStroupeKTKyriakidesTCet al.Long-term cost-effectiveness in the veterans affairs open vs endovascular repair study of aortic abdominal aneurysm: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):1139–44.
46.
SpanosKKarathanosCAthanasoulasAet al.Renal function impairment in patients undergoing elective EVAR vs. elective open repair during follow up period: a systematic review of the literature. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2017;15(2):103–111.
47.
UlugPHinchliffeRJSweetingMJet al.Strategy of endovascular versus open repair for patients with clinical diagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: the IMPROVE RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2018;22(31):1–122.
48.
PatelRPowellJTSweetingMJEpstein DM BarrettJKGreenhalghRM. The UK EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) randomised controlled trials: long-term follow-up and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2018;22(5):1–132.
49.
McPheeJTHillJSEslamiMH. The impact of gender on presentation, therapy, and mortality of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States, 2001-2004. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(5):891–9.
50.
SuckowBDGoodneyPPColumboJAet al.National trends in open surgical, endovascular, and branched-fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare patients. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(6):1690–7.
51.
YinKLochamSSSchermerhornMLMalasMB. Trends of 30-day mortality and morbidities in endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm during the last decade. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(1):64–73.
52.
BermanLCurryLGoldbergCGusbergRFraenkelL. Pilot testing of a decision support tool for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(2):285–92.
53.
GoldbergCGBermanLGusbergRJ. Limitations of online information on abdominal aortic aneurysm. Int J Vasc Med. 2010;2010(6):789198.
54.
MarlowNEBarracloughBCollierNAet al.Effect of hospital and surgeon volume on patient outcomes following treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40(5):572–9.
55.
PhillipsPPokuEEssatMet al.Procedure volume and the association with short-term mortality following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in European populations: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(1):77–88.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
