Rationing treatment of varicose veins (VVs) is of importance in countries with a public health service and limited funds. This study examines why and how the Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ) can be used in achieving rationing. Baseline assessments prior to endovenous treatment included the venous clinical severity score (VCSS), venous filling index (VFI), and the refluxing great saphenous vein (GSV) diameter. Absolute change in the AVVQ defined improvement. There was no significant correlation in AVVQ improvement compared to baseline VCSS, VFI, GSV diameter or when patients were divided into mild and severe disease (C2,3 vs C4-6) or laser ablation versus foam sclerotherapy. However, AVVQ improvement significantly correlated at 3 weeks (n = 84) and 3 months (n = 70) with their baseline values (r = .5 and r = .585), P < .0005 (Spearman). In conclusion, patients with an initial poor quality of life may benefit most from endovenous treatment, irrespective of other baseline severity assessments.
EvansCJFowkesFGRuckleyCVLeeAJ. Prevalence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in the general population: Edinburgh Vein Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(3):149–153.
EklofBRutherfordRBBerganJJ. Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(6):1248–1252.
6.
MichaelsJACampbellWBBrazierJE. Randomised clinical trial, observational study and assessment of cost-effectiveness of the treatment of varicose veins (REACTIV trial). Health Technol Assess. 2006;10(13):1–196: iii–iv.
7.
GarrattAMMacdonaldLMRutaDARussellITBuckinghamJKKrukowskiZH. Towards measurement of outcome for patients with varicose veins. Qual Health Care. 1993;2(1):5–10.
8.
SarvananthanTShepherdACDaviesAH. Who benefits the most from varicose vein intervention: can we predict treatment outcomes?Phlebology. 2010;25(1):1–2.
9.
LattimerCRAzzamMKalodikiEShawishETruemanPGeroulakosG.Cost and effectiveness of laser with phlebectomies compared with foam sclerotherapy in superficial venous insufficiency. Early results of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43(5):594–600.
10.
van BemmelenPSBedfordGBeachKStrandnessDE. Quantitative segmental evaluation of venous valvular reflux with duplex ultrasound scanning. J Vasc Surg. 1989;10(4):425–431.
RutherfordRBPadbergFTJrComerotaAJKistnerRLMeissnerMHMonetaGL. Venous severity scoring: An adjunct to venous outcome assessment. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31(6):1307–1312.
13.
VickersAJAltmanDG.Statistics notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ. 2001;323(7321):1123–1124.
14.
VickersAJ.The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001;1:6. [cited 2012 Dec 24]. Available at: http//www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/1/6
15.
NasrMKBuddJSHorrocksM. Uncomplicated varicose vein surgery in the UK--a postcode lottery?Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90(6):474–476.
16.
NesbittCWilsonWRLeesTAStansbyG. Interpretation of patient-reported outcome measures for varicose vein surgery. Phlebology. 2012;27(4):173–178.
17.
ShepherdACGohelMSLimCSDaviesAH. A study to compare disease-specific quality of life with clinical anatomical and hemodynamic assessments in patients with varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(2):374–82.
18.
KunduSLurieFMillwardSF. Recommended reporting standards for endovenous ablation for the treatment of venous insufficiency: joint statement of The American venous forum and the society of interventional radiology. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(3):582–589.
19.
KalodikiELattimerCRAzzamMShawishEBountouroglouDGeroulakosG. Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial on ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy combined with saphenofemoral ligation vs standard surgery for varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2011;55(2):451–457.
20.
KlemTMSybrandyJEWittensCH. Measurement of health-related quality of life with the Dutch translated aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire before and after treatment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37(4):470–476.
21.
KlemTMSybrandyJEWittensCHEssink BotML. Reliability and validity of the Dutch translated aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37(2):232–238.
22.
LattimerCRKalodikiEAzzamMGeroulakosG. Responsiveness of individual questions from the venous clinical severity score and the Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire[published online November 22, 2012]. Phlebology. 2012.
23.
DarvallKABateGRAdamDJBradburyAW.Generic health-related quality of life is significantly worse in varicose vein patients with lower limb symptoms independent of CEAP clinical grade. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44(3):341–344.
24.
RatcliffeJBrazierJECampbellWBPalfreymanSMacIntyreJBMichaelsJA. Cost-effectiveness analysis of surgery versus conservative treatment for uncomplicated varicose veins in a randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2006;93(2):182–186.
25.
BradburyAEvansCAllanPLeeARuckleyCVFowkesFG. What are the symptoms of varicose veins? Edinburgh vein study cross sectional population survey. BMJ. 1999;318(7180):353–356.
26.
CarradiceD.Treatment of varicose veins should not be rationed on the basis of complications alone [Letter]. BMJ. 2012;344:e1627; author reply e9.
27.
OldhamPD. A note on the analysis of repeated measurements of the same subjects. J Chronic Dis. 1962;15:969–977.
28.
BrowneJPvan der MeulenJHLewseyJDLampingDLBlackN. Mathematical coupling may account for the association between baseline severity and minimally important difference values. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;63(8):865–874.
29.
MackenzieRKLeeAJPaisleyA. Patient, operative, and surgeon factors that influence the effect of superficial venous surgery on disease-specific quality of life. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(5):896–902.
30.
O'LearyDPChesterJFJonesSM. Management of varicose veins according to reason for presentation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996;78(3 Pt 1):214–216.
31.
WardAAbisiSBraithwaiteBD. An online patient completed Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire can help to guide primary care referrals[published online December 20, 2012]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012.
