Despite widespread support for gender-egalitarianism, men’s and women’s household labor contributions remain strikingly unequal. This article extends prior research on barriers to equality by closely examining how couples negotiate contradictions between their egalitarian ideals and admittedly non-egalitarian practices. Data from 64 in-depth interviews with members of 32 different-sex, college-educated couples show that respondents distinguish between labor allocation processes and outcomes. When they understand the processes as gender-neutral, they can write off gendered outcomes as the incidental result of necessary compromises made among competing values. Respondents “de-gender” their allocation process, or decouple it from gender ideology and gendered social forces, by narrowing their temporal horizon to the present moment and deploying an adaptable understanding of constraint that obscures alternative paths. This de-gendering helps prevent spousal conflict, but it may also facilitate behavioral stasis by directing attention away from the inequalities that continue to shape domestic life.
AudSusanHussarWilliamPlantyMichaelSnyderThomasBiancoKevinFoxMary AnnFrohlichLaurenKempJanaDrakeLauren. 2010. The Condition of Education 2010. (NCES 2010-028) National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
2.
BassBrooke Conroy. 2015. “Preparing for Parenthood? Gender, Aspirations, and the Reproduction of Labor Market Inequality.” Gender and Society29(3):362–85.
3.
BeaganBrendaChapmanGwen E.D’SylvaAndreaBassettB. Raewyn. 2008. “‘It’s Just Easier for Me to Do It’: Rationalizing the Family Division of Foodwork.” Sociology42(4):653–71.
4.
BeckerGary. 1993. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BeckerPenny EdgellMoenPhyllis. 1999. “Scaling Back: Dual-Earner Couples’ Work-Family Strategies.” Journal of Marriage and Family61(4):995–1007.
6.
BernsNancy. 2001. “Degendering the Problem and Gendering the Blame: Political Discourse on Women and Violence.” Gender & Society15(2):262–81.
7.
BianchiSuzanne M.MilkieMelissa A.SayerLiana C.RobinsonJohn P.2000. “Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor.” Social Forces79(1):191–228.
8.
BianchiSuzanne M.SayerLiana C.MilkieMelissa A.RobinsonJohn P.2012. “Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter?” Social Forces91(1):55–63.
9.
BittmanMichaelWajcmanJudy. 2000. “The Rush Hour: The Character of Leisure Time and Gender Equity.” Social Forces79(1):165–89.
10.
Blair-LoyMary. 2005. Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M.2017. “The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations.” Journal of Economic Literature55(3):789–865.
12.
BolzendahlCatherine I.MyersDaniel J.2004. “Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974–1998.” Social Forces83(2):759–90.
13.
CechErin A.2013. “The Self-Expressive Edge of Occupational Sex Segregation.” American Journal of Sociology119(3):747–89.
14.
ChaYoungjoo. 2013. “Overwork and the Persistence of Gender Segregation in Occupations.” Gender and Society27(2):158–84.
15.
CharlesMariaBradleyKaren. 2009. “Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries.” American Journal of Sociology114(4):924–76.
16.
CharlesMariaGruskyDavid B.2004. Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
ColemanJames S.1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
ColtraneScott. 1996. Family Man: Fatherhood, Housework, and Gender Equality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
ColtraneScott. 2000. “Research on Household Labor: Modeling and Measuring the Social Embeddedness of Routine Family Work.” Journal of Marriage and Family62(4):1208–33.
20.
CooperMarianne. 2000. “Being the ‘Go-To Guy’: Fatherhood, Masculinity, and the Organization of Work in Silicon Valley.” Qualitative Sociology23(4):379–405.
21.
DamaskeSarah. 2011. For the Family? How Class and Gender Shape Women’s Work. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
DamingerAllison. 2019. “The Cognitive Dimension of Household Labor.” American Sociological Review84(4):609–33.
23.
DanielsArlene Kaplan. 1987. “Invisible Work.” Social Problems34(5):403–15.
24.
DavisShannon N.GreensteinTheodore N.2009. “Gender Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Sociology35(1):87–105.
25.
DeMarisAlfredLongmoreMonica A.1996. “Ideology, Power, and Equity: Testing Competing Explanations for the Perception of Fairness in Household Labor.” Social Forces74(3):1043–71.
26.
DeutschFrancine M.2000. Halving It All: How Equally Shared Parenting Works, revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
DeutschFrancine M.2007. “Undoing Gender.” Gender and Society21(1):106–27.
28.
DeVaultMarjorie L.1999. “Comfort and Struggle: Emotion Work in Family Life.” ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science561(1):52–63.
29.
EmensElizabeth F.2019. Life Admin: How I Learned to Do Less, Do Better, and Live More. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
30.
EnglandPaula. 2010. “The Gender Revolution.” Gender and Society24(2):149–66.
31.
EricksonRebecca J.1993. “Reconceptualizing Family Work: The Effect of Emotion Work on Perceptions of Marital Quality.” Journal of Marriage and Family55(4):888–900.
32.
FestingerLeon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
FuwaMakiko. 2004. “Macro-Level Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labor in 22 Countries.” American Sociological Review69(6):751–67.
34.
GagerConstance T.2008. “What’s Fair Is Fair? Role of Justice in Family Labor Allocation Decisions.” Marriage and Family Review44(4):511–45.
35.
GershunyJonathanGodwinMichaelJonesSally. 1994. “The Domestic Labour Revolution: A Process of Lagged Adaptation?” Pp. 151–97 in The Social and Political Economy of the Household, edited by AndersonM.BechhoferF.GershunyJ.Cambridge, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
GersonKathleen. 1985. Hard Choices: How Women Decide about Work, Career and Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
GersonKathleen. 2002. “Moral Dilemmas, Moral Strategies, and the Transformation of Gender: Lessons from Two Generations of Work and Family Change.” Gender and Society16(1):8–28.
38.
GersonKathleen. 2011. The Unfinished Revolution: Coming of Age in a New Era of Gender, Work, and Family. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
HallScott S.MacDermidShelley M.2009. “A Typology of Dual Earner Marriages Based on Work and Family Arrangements.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues30(3):215–25.
40.
HarmanVickiCappelliniBenedetta. 2014. “Mothers on Display: Lunchboxes, Social Class and Moral Accountability.” Sociology49(4):764–81.
41.
Harmon-JonesEddieHarmon-JonesCindyLevyNicholas. 2015. “An Action-Based Model of Cognitive-Dissonance Processes.” Current Directions in Psychological Science24(3):184–89.
42.
HaysSharon. 1998. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood, revised ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
HochschildArlieMachungAnne. 2012. The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home, revised ed. New York: Penguin Books.
44.
van HooffJenny H.2011. “Rationalising Inequality: Heterosexual Couples’ Explanations and Justifications for the Division of Housework along Traditionally Gendered Lines.” Journal of Gender Studies20(1):19–30.
45.
HorneRebecca M.JohnsonMatthew D.GalambosNancy L.KrahnHarvey J.2018. “Time, Money, or Gender? Predictors of the Division of Household Labour across Life Stages.” Sex Roles78:731–43.
46.
JuhnChinhuiPotterSimon. 2006. “Changes in Labor Force Participation in the United States.” Journal of Economic Perspectives20(3):27–46.
47.
Katz-WiseSabra L.PriessHeather A.HydeJanet S.2010. “Gender-Role Attitudes and Behavior across the Transition to Parenthood.” Developmental Psychology46(1):18–28.
48.
KillewaldAlexandraGarcía-ManglanoJavier. 2016. “Tethered Lives: A Couple-Based Perspective on the Consequences of Parenthood for Time Use, Occupation, and Wages.” Social Science Research60:266–82.
49.
KnightCarly R.BrintonMary C.2017. “One Egalitarianism or Several? Two Decades of Gender-Role Attitude Change in Europe.” American Journal of Sociology122(5):1485–532.
50.
Lachance-GrzelaMylèneBouchardGeneviève. 2010. “Why Do Women Do the Lion’s Share of Housework? A Decade of Research.” Sex Roles63(11–12):767–80.
51.
LamontEllen. 2014. “Negotiating Courtship: Reconciling Egalitarian Ideals with Traditional Gender Norms.” Gender and Society28(2):189–211.
52.
LamontEllen. 2020. The Mating Game: How Gender Still Shapes How We Date. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53.
LaRossaRalph. 1988. “Fatherhood and Social Change.” Family Relations37(4):451–57.
54.
LeeYun-SukWaiteLinda J.2005. “Husbands’ and Wives’ Time Spent on Housework: A Comparison of Measures.” Journal of Marriage and Family67(2):328–36.
55.
LorberJudith. 2000. “Using Gender to Undo Gender: A Feminist Degendering Movement.” Feminist Theory1(1):79–95.
56.
ManninoClelia AnnaDeutschFrancine M.2007. “Changing the Division of Household Labor: A Negotiated Process between Partners.” Sex Roles56(5–6):309–24.
57.
MartinPatricia Yancey. 2004. “Gender as Social Institution.” Social Forces82(4):1249–73.
58.
MilkieMelissa A.BianchiSuzanne M.MattinglyMarybeth J.RobinsonJohn P.2002. “Gendered Division of Childrearing: Ideals, Realities, and the Relationship to Parental Well-Being.” Sex Roles47(1–2):21–38.
59.
NymanCharlottReinikainenLasseErikssonKristina. 2018. “The Tension between Gender Equality and Doing Gender: Swedish Couples’ Talk about the Division of Housework.” Women’s Studies International Forum68:36–46.
60.
OfferShira. 2014. “The Costs of Thinking about Work and Family: Mental Labor, Work-Family Spillover, and Gender Inequality among Parents in Dual-Earner Families.” Sociological Forum29(4):916–36.
61.
PedullaDavid S.ThébaudSarah. 2015. “Can We Finish the Revolution? Gender, Work-Family Ideals, and Institutional Constraint.” American Sociological Review80(1):116–39.
62.
ReidErin. 2015. “Embracing, Passing, Revealing, and the Ideal Worker Image: How People Navigate Expected and Experienced Professional Identities.” Organization Science26(4):997–1017.
63.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender and Society18(4):510–31.
64.
RiggsJanet Morgan. 1997. “Mandates for Mothers and Fathers: Perceptions of Breadwinners and Care Givers.” Sex Roles37(7/8):565–80.
65.
RismanBarbara J.2004. “Gender as a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism.” Gender & Society18(4):429–50.
66.
RismanBarbara J.Johnson-SumerfordDanette. 1998. “Doing It Fairly: A Study of Postgender Marriages.” Journal of Marriage and Family60(1):23–40.
67.
SayerLiana C.2005. “Gender, Time and Inequality: Trends in Women’s and Men’s Paid Work, Unpaid Work and Free Time.” Social Forces84(1):285–303.
68.
ScarboroughWilliam J.SinRayRismanBarbara. 2019. “Attitudes and the Stalled Gender Revolution: Egalitarianism, Traditionalism, and Ambivalence from 1977 through 2016.” Gender and Society33(2):173–200.
69.
SmithHerbert L.GagerConstance T.MorganS. Philip. 1998. “Identifying Underlying Dimensions in Spouses’ Evaluations of Fairness in the Division of Household Labor.” Social Science Research27(3):305–27.
70.
SmithTom W.DavernMichaelFreeseJeremyMorganStephen. 2018. “General Social Surveys, 1972–2018 [Machine-Readable Data File].” National Science Foundation, NORC at the University of Chicago [producer and distributor].
71.
StonePamela. 2007. Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
72.
ThébaudSarahKornrichSabinoRuppannerLeah. 2019. “Good Housekeeping, Great Expectations: Gender and Housework Norms.” Sociological Methods & Research (https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119852395).
73.
TichenorVeronica Jaris. 2005. Earning More and Getting Less: Why Successful Wives Can’t Buy Equality. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
