This article explores the mechanisms by which corporate prestige produces distorted legal outcomes. Drawing on social psychological theories of status, we suggest that prestige influences audience evaluations by shaping expectations, and that its effect will differ depending on whether a firm’s blameworthiness has been firmly established. We empirically analyze a unique database of more than 500 employment discrimination suits brought between 1998 and 2008. We find that prestige is associated with a decreased likelihood of being found liable (suggesting a halo effect in assessments of blameworthiness), but with more severe punishments among organizations that are found liable (suggesting a halo tax in administrations of punishment). Our analysis allows us to reconcile two ostensibly contradictory bodies of work on how organizational prestige affects audience evaluations by showing that prestige can be both a benefit and a liability, depending on whether an organization’s blameworthiness has been firmly established.
AiChunrongNortonEdward C. 2003. “Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models.” Economics Letters80(1):123–29.
2.
AlbonettiCelesta A.1998. “Direct and Indirect Effects of Case Complexity, Guilty Pleas, and Offender Characteristics on Sentencing for Offenders Convicted of a White-Collar Offense Prior to Sentencing Guidelines.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology14(4):353–77.
3.
BalzerWilliam K.SulskyLorne M.1992. “Halo and Performance Appraisal Research: A Critical Examination.” Journal of Applied Psychology77(6):975–85.
4.
BartleyTimChildCurtis. 2014. “Shaming the Corporation: The Social Production of Targets and the Anti-Sweatshop Movement.” American Sociological Review79(4):653–79.
5.
BenjaminB. A.PodolnyJoel M.1999. “Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry.” Administrative Science Quarterly44(3):563–89.
6.
BensonMichael L.MadensenTamara D.EckJohn E.2009. “White-Collar Crime from an Opportunity Perspective.” Pp. 175–93 in The Criminology of White-Collar Crime, edited by SimpsonS. S.WeisburdD.New York: Springer.
7.
BergerJoseph M.FisekM. HamitNormanRobert Z.ZelditchMorrisJr.1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach. New York: Elsevier.
8.
BermissY. S.ZajacEdward J.KingBraydon G. 2014. “Under Construction: How Commensuration and Management Fashion Affect Corporate Reputation Rankings.” Organization Science25(2):591–608.
9.
BiesRobert J.1987. “The Predicament of Injustice: The Management of Moral Outrage.” Pp. 289–319 in Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, edited by CummingsL. L.Staw.B. M.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
10.
BitektineAlex2011. “Toward a Theory of Social Judgements of Organizations: The Case of Legitimacy, Reputation, and Status.” Academy of Management Review36(1):151–79.
11.
BothnerMatthew S.PodolnyJoel M.SmithEdward Bishop. 2011. “Organizing Contests for Status: The Matthew Effect vs. the Mark Effect.” Management Science57(3):439–57.
12.
BracePaulHallMelinda Gann. 2001. “‘Haves’ versus ‘Have Nots’ in State Supreme Courts: Allocating Docket Space and Wins in Power Asymmetric Cases.” Law and Society Review35(2):393–417.
13.
BraithwaiteJohn. 1984. Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14.
BriscoeForrestSaffordSean. 2008. “The Nixon-in-China Effect: Activism, Imitation and the Institutionalization of Contentious Practices.” Administrative Science Quarterly53(3):460–91.
15.
BrownBradPerrySusan. 1994. “Removing the Financial Performance Halo from Fortune’s ‘Most Admired’ Companies.” Academy of Management Journal37(5):1347–59.
16.
CampbellMargaret C.1999. “Perceptions of Price Unfairness: Antecedents and Consequences.” Journal of Marketing Research36(2):187–99.
17.
ChweMichael Suk-Young. 2013. Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
ClinardMarshallYeagerPeter. 1980. Corporate Crime. New York: The Free Press.
19.
CoombsW. Timothy. 1999. Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding. Los Angeles: Sage.
20.
CorrellShelley J.BenardStephenPaikIn. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?” American Journal of Sociology112(5):1297–1338.
21.
CorrellShelley J.RidgewayCecilia L. 2003. “Expectation States Theory.” Pp. 29–51 in Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by DeLamaterJ. D.New York: Kluwer-Plenam Press.
22.
CoxNicholas J.WarburtonJeffArmstrongAlonaHollidayVictoria J.2008. “Fitting Concentration and Load Rating Curves with Generalized Linear Models.” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms33(1):25–39.
23.
CurryTheodore R.LeeGangRodriguezS. Fernando. 2004. “Does Victim Gender Increase Sentence Severity? Further Explorations of Gender Dynamics and Sentencing Outcomes.” Crime and Delinquency50(3):319–43.
24.
DaviesGaryChunRosada SilvaRui VinhasRoperStuart. 2003. Corporate Reputation and Competitiveness. New York: Routledge.
25.
DittoPeter H.LopezDavid F. 1992. “Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63(4):568–84.
26.
DowlingGrahame. 2002. Creating Corporate Reputations: Identity, Image, and Performance. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
DunworthTerenceRogersJoel. 1996. “Corporations in Court: Big Business Litigation in US Federal Courts, 1971–1991.” Law & Social Inquiry21(3): 497–592.
28.
EdelmanLauren B.1992. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law.” American Journal of Sociology97(6):1531–76.
29.
EdelmanLauren B.2016. Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
EspelandWendy N.SauderMichael. 2007. “Ratings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds.” American Journal of Sociology113(1):1–40.
31.
FligsteinNeil. 2008. Euroclash: The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
FombrunCharles J.1996. Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
33.
FombrunCharles J.van RielCees B. M.2003. Fame & Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations. New York: Prentice-Hall Financial Times.
34.
FombrunCharles J.ShanleyMark. 1990. “What’s In a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy.” Academy of Management Journal33(2):233–58.
35.
GalanterMarc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review9(1):95–160.
36.
GarrettBrandon L.2016. Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise with Corporations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
GraffinScott D.BundyJonathanPoracJoseph F.WadeJames B.QuinnDennis P. 2013. “Falls from Grace and the Hazards of High Status: The 2009 British MP Expense Scandal and its Impacts on Parliamentary Elites.” Administrative Science Quarterly58(3):313–45.
38.
GreveHenrich R.PalmerDonaldPoznerJo-Ellen. 2010. “Organizations Gone Wild: The Causes, Processes, and Consequences of Organizational Misconduct.” Academy of Management Annals4(1):53–107.
39.
HadfieldGillian K.2005. “Exploring Economic and Democratic Theories of Civil Litigation: Differences between Individual and Organizational Litigants in the Disposition of Federal Civil Cases.” Stanford Law Review57(5):1275–1327.
40.
HahlOliverZuckermanEzra W. 2014. “The Denigration of Heroes? How the Status Attainment Process Shapes Attributions of Considerateness and Authenticity.” American Journal of Sociology120(2):504–554.
41.
HahlOliverZuckermanEzra W.KimMinjae. 2017. “Why Elites Love Authentic Lowbrow Culture: Overcoming High-Status Denigration with Outsider Art.” American Sociological Review82(4):828–56.
42.
HamdaniAssafKlementAlon. 2008. “Corporate Crime and Deterrence.” Stanford Law Review61(2):271–310.
43.
HarrisJaredBromileyPhilip. 2007. “Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation.” Organization Science18(3):350–67.
44.
HarrisonSpencer H.AshforthBlake E.CorleyKevin G.2009. “Organizational Sacralization and Sacrilege.” Research in Organizational Behavior29:225–54.
45.
HeinzJohn P.LaumannEdward O.1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
46.
HirshC. Elizabeth. 2009. “The Strength of Weak Enforcement: The Impact of Discrimination Charges, Legal Environments, and Organizational Conditions on Workplace Segregation.” American Sociological Review74(2):245–71.
47.
JensenMichael. 2006. “Should We Stay or Should We Go? Accountability, Status Anxiety, and Client Defections.” Administrative Science Quarterly51(1):97–128.
48.
JonssonStefanGreveHenrich R.Fujiwara-GreveTakako. 2009. “Undeserved Loss: The Spread of Legitimacy Loss to Innocent Organizations in Response to Reported Corporate Deviance.” Administrative Science Quarterly54(2):195–228.
49.
KahnemanDanielSchkadeDavidSunsteinCass R.1998. “Shared Outrage and Erratic Awards: The Psychology of Punitive Damages.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty16(1):49–86.
50.
KalevAlexandraDobbinFrank. 2006. “Enforcement of Civil Rights Law in Private Workplaces: The Effects of Compliance Reviews and Lawsuits Over Time.” Law & Social Inquiry31(4):855–903.
51.
KenworthyLaneMacaulayStewartRogersJoel. 1996. “‘The More Things Change…’ Business Litigation and Governance in the American Automobile Industry.” Law & Social Inquiry21(3):631–78.
52.
KimJerry W.2012. “Arbiter of Science: Institutionalization and Status Effects in FDA Drug Review 1990–2004.” Strategic Organization10(2):128–57.
53.
KimJerry W.KingBrayden G. 2014. “Seeing Stars: Matthew Effects and Status Bias in Major League Baseball Umpiring.” Management Science60(11):2619–44.
54.
KingBrayden G.2008. “A Political Mediation Model of Corporate Response to Social Movement Activism.” Administrative Science Quarterly53(3):395–421.
55.
KingBrayden G.2011. “The Tactical Disruptiveness of Social Movements: Sources of Market and Mediated Disruption in Corporate Boycotts.” Social Problems58(4):491–517.
56.
KingBrayden GMcDonnellMary-Hunter. 2015. “Good Firms, Good Targets: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility, Reputation, and Activist Targeting.” Pp. 430–54 in Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World, edited by TsutsuiK.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
KingBrayden GWhettenDavid A.2008. “Rethinking the Relationship between Reputation and Legitimacy: A Social Actor Conceptualization.” Corporate Reputation Review11(3):192–207.
58.
KleinJillDawarNiraj. 2004. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers’ Attributions and Brand Evaluations in a Product-Harm Crisis.” International Journal of Research in Marketing21(3):203–217.
59.
KoehlerJonathan J.GershoffAndrew D. 2003. “Betrayal Aversion: When Agents of Protection Become Agents of Harm.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes90(2):244–61.
60.
KovácsBalázsSharkeyAmanda J.2014. “The Paradox of Publicity: How Awards Can Negatively Affect the Evaluation of Quality.” Administrative Science Quarterly59(1):1–33.
61.
KundaZiva. 1987. “Motivated Inference: Self-Serving Generation and Evaluation of Causal Theories.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology53(4):636–47.
62.
LangGladys EngelLangKurt. 1988. “Recognition and Renown: The Survival of Artistic Reputation.” American Journal of Sociology94(1):79–109.
63.
LangeDonaldLeePeggy M.DaiYe. 2011. “Organizational Reputation: A Review.” Journal of Management37(1):153–84.
64.
LoveE. GeoffreyKraatzMatthew. 2009. “Character, Conformity, or the Bottom Line? How and Why Downsizing Affected Corporate Reputation.” Academy of Management Journal52(2):314–35.
65.
MalmendierUlrikeTateGeoffrey. 2009. “Superstar CEOs.” Quarterly Journal of Economics124(4): 1593–1638.
66.
McDonnellMary-HunterKingBrayden G. 2013. “Keeping Up Appearances: Reputational Threat and Impression Management after Social Movement Boycotts.” Administrative Science Quarterly58(3):387–419.
67.
McDonnellMary-HunterKingBrayden GSouleSarah A.2015. “A Dynamic Process Model of Private Politics: Activist Targeting and Corporate Receptivity to Social Challenges.” American Sociological Review80(3):654–78.
68.
McDonnellMary-HunterPontikesElizabeth. 2017. “Bad Company: The Reputational Implications of Cross-Sector Interactions with a Stigmatized Firm.” Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.
69.
McDonnellMary-HunterWernerTimothy. 2016. “Blacklisted Businesses: Social Activist Challenges and the Disruption of Corporate Political Activity.” Administrative Science Quarterly61(4):584–620.
70.
MertonRobert K.1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science159(3810):56–63.
71.
MishinaYuriDykesBernadine J.BlockEmily S.PollockTimothy G. 2010. “Why ‘Good’ Firms Do Bad Things: The Effects of High Aspirations, High Expectations, and Prominence on the Incidence of Corporate Illegality.” Academy of Management Journal53(4):701–722.
72.
MizruchiMark S.2004. “Berle and Means Revisited: The Governance and Power of Large US Corporations.” Theory and Society33(5):579–617.
73.
MizruchiMark S.2013. The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
MoodCarina. 2010. “Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It.” European Sociological Review26(1):67–82.
75.
NadlerJaniceMcDonnellMary-Hunter. 2011. “Moral Character, Motive, and the Psychology of Blame.” Cornell Law Review97(2):255–304.
76.
NelsonRobert L.BerreyEllen C.NielsenLaura Beth. 2008. “Divergent Paths: Conflicting Conceptions of Employment Discrimination in Law and the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science4:103–122.
77.
NielsenLaura BethNelsonRobert L.LancasterRyon. 2010. “Individual Justice or Collective Legal Mobilization? Employment Discrimination Litigation in the Post Civil Rights United States.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies7(2):175–201.
78.
NordgrenLoran F.McDonnellMary-Hunter. 2011. “The Scope-Severity Paradox: Why Doing More Harm Is Judged to Be Less Harmful.” Social Psychological and Personality Science2(1):97–102.
79.
O’DonnellEdSchultzJoseph J.Jr.2005. “The Halo Effect in Business Risk Audits: Can Strategic Risk Assessment Bias Auditor Judgment about Accounting Detail?” The Accounting Review80(3):921–39.
80.
PetersonRichard A.AnandNarasimhan. 2004. “The Production of Culture Perspective.” Annual Review of Sociology30:311–34.
81.
PodolnyJoel M.1994. “Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange.” Administrative Science Quarterly39(3):458–83.
82.
PodolnyJoel M.2001. “Networks as Pipes and Prisms of the Market.” American Journal of Sociology102(1):33–60.
83.
PollockTimothy G.RindovaViolina P.MaggittiPatrick G.2008. “Market Watch: Information and Availability Cascades among the Media and Investors in the U.S. IPO Market.” Academy of Management Journal51(2):335–58.
RaoHayagreeva. 1994. “The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry: 1895–1912.” Strategic Management Journal15(S1):29–44.
86.
RaubWernerWeesieJeroen. 1990. “Reputation and Efficiency in Social Interactions: An Example of Network Effects.” American Journal of Sociology96(3):626–54.
87.
RheeMooweonHaunschildPamela R.2006. “The Liability of a Good Reputation: A Study of Product Recalls in the U.S. Automobile Industry.” Organization Science17(1):101–117.
88.
RidgewayCecilia. 1991. “The Social Construction of Status Value: Gender and Other Nominal Characteristics.” Social Forces70(2):367–86.
89.
RindovaViolina P.PetkovaAntoaneta P.KothaSureth. 2007. “Standing Out: How New Firms in Emerging Markets Build Reputation.” Strategic Organization5(1):31–70.
90.
RindovaViolina P.WilliamsonIan O.PetkovaAntoaneta P.2010. “Reputation as an Intangible Asset: Reflections on Theory and Methods in Two Empirical Studies of Business School Reputations.” Journal of Management36(3):610–19.
91.
RindovaViolina P.WilliamsonIan O.PetkovaAntoaneta P.SeverJoy Marie. 2005. “Being Good or Being Known: An Empirical Examination of the Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences of Organizational Reputation.” Academy of Management Journal48(6):1033–49.
92.
RobertsPeter W.DowlingGrahame R. 2002. “Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance.” Strategic Management Journal23(12):1077–93.
93.
RosoffStephen M.1989. “Physicians as Criminal Defendants: Specialty, Sanctions, and Status Liability.” Law and Human Behavior13(2):231–36.
94.
SelmiMichael. 2000. “Why Are Employment Discrimination Cases So Hard to Win?” Louisiana Law Review61(3):555–75.
95.
ShafferGregory. 2009. “How Business Shapes Law: A Socio-Legal Framework.” Connecticut Law Review42(1):147–83.
96.
SharkeyAmanda J.2014. “Categories and Organizational Status: The Role of Industry Status in the Response to Organizational Deviance.” American Journal of Sociology119(5):1380–1433.
97.
SimpsonSally S.2002. Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
98.
SimpsonSally S.2013. “White-Collar Crime: A Review of Recent Developments and Promising Directions for Future Research.” Annual Review of Sociology39:309–331.
99.
SineWesley DavidShaneScottDi GregorioDante. 2003. “The Halo Effect and Technology Licensing: The Influence of Institutional Prestige on the Licensing of University Inventions.” Management Science49(4):478–96.
100.
SkolnickPaulShawJerry I.1994. “Is Defendant Status a Liability or a Shield? Crime Severity and Professional Relatedness.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology24(20):1827–36.
101.
SorensonOlav. 2014. “Status and Reputation: Synonyms or Separate Concepts?” Strategic Organization12(1):62–69.
102.
StawBarry M.EpsteinLisa D.2000. “What Bandwagons Bring: Effects of Popular Management Techniques on Corporate Performance, Reputation and CEO Pay.” Administrative Science Quarterly45(3):523–56.
103.
SteffensmeierDarellDemuthStephen. 2006. “Does Gender Modify the Effects of Race-Ethnicity on Criminal Sanctioning? Sentences for Male and Female White, Black, and Hispanic Defendants.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology22(3):241–61.
104.
SteffensmeierDarrellKramerJohnStreifelCathy. 1993. “Gender and Imprisonment Decisions.” Criminology31:411–46.
105.
SteffensmeierDarrellUlmerJ.KramerJ.1998. “The Interaction of Race, Gender, and Age in Criminal Sentencing: The Punishment Cost of Being Young, Black, and Male.” Criminology36(3):763–98.
106.
SternIthaiDukerichJanet M.ZajacEdward. 2014. “Unmixed Signals: How Reputation and Status Affect Alliance Formation.” Strategic Management Quarterly35(4):512–31.
107.
StuartToby E.HoangHaHybelsRalph C. 1999. “Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures.” Administrative Science Quarterly44(2):315–49.
108.
SullivanBilian N.HaunschildPamelaPageKaren. 2007. “Organizations Non Gratae? The Impact of Unethical Corporate Acts on Interorganizational Networks.” Organization Science18(1):55–70.
109.
SutherlandEdwin Hardin. 1949. White Collar Crime. New York: Dryden Press.
110.
SuttonJohn R.DobbinFrankMeyerJohn W.ScottW. Richard. 1994. “The Legalization of the Workplace.” American Journal of Sociology99(4):944–71.
111.
ThyeShane R.2000. “A Status Value Theory of Power in Exchange Relations.” American Sociological Review65(3):407–432.
112.
Traut-MattauschEvaSchulz-HardtStefanGreitemeyerTobiasFreyDieter. 2004. “Expectancy Confirmation in Spite of Disconfirming Evidence: The Case of Price Increases Due to the Introduction of the Euro.” European Journal of Social Psychology34(6):739–60.
113.
UlmerRobert R.2001. “Effective Crisis Management through Established Stakeholder Relations at Malden Mills as a Case Study.” Management Communication Quarterly14(4):590–615.
UseemMichael. 1984. The Inner Circle. New York: Oxford University Press.
116.
WagnerDavid G.BergerJoseph. 2002. “Expectation States Theory: An Evolving Research Program.” Pp. 41–77 in New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, edited by BergerJ.ZelditchM.Jr.New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
117.
WaguespackDavid M.SorensonOlav. 2011. “The Ratings Game: Asymmetry in Classification.” Organization Science22(3):541–53.
118.
WashingtonMarvinZajacEdward J.2005. “Status Evolution and Competition: Theory and Evidence.” Academy of Management Journal48(2):282–96.
WernerTimothy.2015. “Gaining Access by Doing Good: The Effect of Sociopolitical Reputation on Firm Participation in Public Policy Making.” Management Science61(8):1989–2011.
121.
WheelerStantonWeisburdDavidBodeNancy. 1982. “Sentencing the White-Collar Offender: Rhetoric and Reality.” American Sociological Review47(5):641–59.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
