We develop and test the idea that public appreciation for authentic lowbrow culture affords an effective way for certain elites to address feelings of authenticity-insecurity arising from “high status denigration” (Hahl and Zuckerman 2014). This argument, which builds on recent sociological research on the “search for authenticity” (e.g., Grazian 2005) and on Bourdieu’s (1993) notion of artistic “disinterestedness,” is validated through experiments with U.S. subjects in the context of “outsider” art (Fine 2004). The first study demonstrates that preference for lowbrow culture perceived to be authentic is higher when individuals feel insecure in their authenticity because they attained status in a context where extrinsic incentives are salient. The second study demonstrates that audiences perceive the members of erstwhile denigrated high-status categories to be more authentic if they consume lowbrow culture, but only if the cultural producer is perceived as authentic. We conclude by noting how this “authenticity-by-appreciation” effect might be complementary to distinction-seeking as a motivation for elite cultural omnivorousness, and we draw broader implications for when and why particular forms of culture are in demand.
AdutAri. 2008. On Scandal: Moral Disturbances in Society, Politics, and Art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BaughBruce. 1988. “Authenticity Revisited.”Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism46(4):477–87.
3.
BaumannShyon. 2007. Hollywood Highbrow: From Entertainment to Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BearmanPeter. 2005. Doormen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BellezzaSilviaBergerJonah A.2017. “When Low Status Becomes High.” Working Paper. Columbia Business School and The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
6.
BergerJonah A.WardMorgan K.2010. “Subtle Signals of Inconspicuous Consumption.”Journal of Consumer Research37(4):555–69.
7.
BerinskyAdam J.HuberGregory A.LenzGabriel S.2011. “Using Mechanical Turk as a Subject Recruitment Tool for Experimental Research.” Unpublished Manuscript. Retrieved February9, 2012 (http://huber.research.yale.edu/materials/26_paper.pdf).
8.
BourdieuPierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BourdieuPierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
10.
BrooksDavid. 1999. “Acquired Taste: A Fast-Growing Hardware Chain Sells Olive Picks, Crystal Radios, and Spiritual Redemption.”The New Yorker, January25, pp. 36–41.
11.
BrysonBethany. 1996. “‘Anything But Heavy Metal’: Symbolic Exclusion and Musical Dislikes.”American Sociological Review61(5):884–99.
12.
BuhrmesterMichaelKwangTracyGoslingSamuel D.2011. “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.”Perspectives on Psychological Science6(1):3–5.
13.
CarrollGlenn R.SwaminathanAnand. 2000. “Why the Microbrewery Movement? Organizational Dynamics of Resource Partitioning in the U.S. Brewing Industry.”American Journal of Sociology106(3):715–62.
14.
CarrollGlenn R.WheatonDennis Ray. 2009. “The Organizational Construction of Authenticity: An Examination of Contemporary Food and Dining in the U.S.”Research in Organizational Behavior29:255–82.
15.
CavesRichard E.2000. Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
ChanTak WingGoldthorpeJohn H.2007a. “Class and Status: The Conceptual Distinction and Its Empirical Relevance.”American Sociological Review72(4):512–32.
17.
ChanTak WingGoldthorpeJohn H.2007b. “Social Stratification and Cultural Consumption: The Visual Arts in England.”Poetics35(2–3):168–90.
18.
DauberKenneth. 1990. “Pueblo Pottery and the Politics of Regional Identity.”Journal of the Southwest32(4):576–96.
19.
DemetryDaphne. Forthcoming. “Pop-up to Professional: Emerging Entrepreneurial Identity and Evolving Vocabularies of Motive.”Academy of Management Discoveries. Special Issue: The Changing Nature of Work.
20.
DiMaggioPaul. 1982. “Cultural Capital and School Success: The Impact of Status Culture Participation on the Grades of U.S. High School Students.”American Sociological Review47(2):189–201.
21.
DiMaggioPaul. 1987. “Classification in Art.”American Sociological Review52(4):440–55.
22.
FayMichael P.ProschanMichael A.2010. “Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or T-Test? On Assumptions for Hypothesis Tests and Multiple Interpretations of Decision Rules.”Statistics Surveys4:1–39.
23.
FeltovichNickHarbaughRichmondToTed. 2002. “Too Cool for School? Signalling and Countersignalling.”RAND Journal of Economics33(4):630–49.
24.
FineGary Alan. 2003. “Crafting Authenticity: The Validation of Identity in Self-Taught Art.”Theory and Society32(2):153–80.
25.
FineGary Alan. 2004. Everyday Genius: Self-Taught Art and the Culture of Authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
FishmanRobert M.LizardoOmar. 2013. “How Macro-Historical Change Shapes Cultural Taste Legacies of Democratization in Spain and Portugal.”American Sociological Review78(2):213–39.
27.
FiskeSusan T.CuddyAmy J. C.GlickPeterXuJun. 2002. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82(6):878–902.
28.
GansHerbert. 1999. Popular Culture and High Culture: An Analysis and Evaluation of Taste, 2nd ed.New York: Basic Books.
29.
GoffmanErving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.
30.
GoodeWilliam J.1978. The Celebration of Heroes: Prestige as a Control System. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
GoldbergAmirHannanMichael T.KovácsBalázs. 2016. “What Does It Mean to Span Cultural Boundaries? Variety and Atypicality in Cultural Consumption.”American Sociological Review81(2):215–41.
32.
GraffinScott D.BundyJonathanPoracJoseph F.WadeJames B.QuinnDennis P.2013. “Falls from Grace and the Hazards of High Status: The 2009 British MP Expense Scandal and Its Impact on Parliamentary Elites.”Administrative Science Quarterly58(3):313–45.
33.
GrazianDavid. 2005. Blue Chicago: The Search for Authenticity in Urban Blues Clubs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
GrazianDavid. 2010. “Demystifying Authenticity in the Sociology of Culture.” Pp. 191–200 in Handbook of Cultural Sociology, edited by HallJ. R.GrindstaffL.LoM.-C.New York: Routledge.
35.
GroundsRichard A.2001. “Tallahassee, Osceola, and the Hermeneutics of American Place-Names.”Journal of the American Academy of Religion69(2):287–322.
36.
HahlOliver. 2016. “Turning Back the Clock in Baseball: Increased Prominence of Extrinsic Rewards and Demand for Authenticity.”Organization Science27(4):929–53.
37.
HahlOliverGoslineRenee Richardson. 2014. “Disclaiming Lowbrow Categorical Deviance: Status Effects on Anticipatory Impression Management.” Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
38.
HahlOliverHaJae Kyung. 2017. “Authentic Affiliation: The Effect of Outside Investors on Market Selection in the Behavioral Health Industry.” Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
39.
HahlOliverZuckermanEzra W.2014. “The Denigration of Heroes? How the Status Attainment Process Shapes Attributions of Considerateness and Authenticity.”American Journal of Sociology120(2):504–54.
40.
HalleDavid. 1996. Inside Culture: Art and Class in the American Home. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
HitchensChristopher. 1995. The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice. New York: Verso.
42.
HomansGeorge Caspar. 1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace.
43.
JohnstonJoséeBaumannShyon. 2007. “Democracy versus Distinction: A Study of Omnivorousness in Gourmet Food Writing.”American Journal of Sociology113(1):165–204.
44.
JuddCharles M.James-HawkinsLaurieYzerbytVincentKashimaYoshihisa. 2005. “Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment: Understanding the Relations between Judgments of Competence and Warmth.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(6):899–913.
45.
Katz-GerroTally. 2002. “Highbrow Cultural Consumption and Class Distinction in Italy, Israel, West Germany, Sweden, and the United States.”Social Forces81(1):207–229.
46.
Katz-GerroTally. 2006. “Comparative Evidence of Inequality in Cultural Preferences: Gender, Class, and Family Status.”Sociological Spectrum26(1):63–83.
47.
KaufmanJason. 2004. “Endogenous Explanation in the Sociology of Culture.”Annual Review of Sociology30:335–57.
48.
KimPeter H.MislinAlexandra A.TuncelEceFehrRyanCheshinArikvan KleefGerben A. Forthcoming. “Power as an Emotional Liability: The Role of Perceived Authenticity for Trust after a Violation.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
49.
KovácsBalázsCarrollGlenn R.LehmanDavid W.2013. “Authenticity and Consumer Value Ratings: Empirical Tests from the Restaurant Domain.”Organization Science25(2):458–78.
50.
LamontMichèle. 2000. The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
LangewiescheWilliam. 2010. Fly by Wire: The Geese, the Glide, the Miracle on the Hudson. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
52.
LenaJennifer C.2013. “Authenticity and Independence in Rap Music and Other Genre Communities.” Pp. 232–40 in Music Sociology: Examining the Role of Music in Social Life, edited by HorsfallS.MeijJ.-M.ProbstfieldM.Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishing.
53.
LevineLawrence. 1988. Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
LiebersonStanleyLynnFreda B.2003. “Popularity as Taste: An Application to the Naming Process.”Onoma38:235–76.
55.
LizardoOmarSkilesSara. 2015. “Musical Taste and Patterns of Symbolic Exclusion in the United States 1993–2012: Generational Dynamics of Differentiation and Continuity.”Poetics53:9–21.
56.
LopesPaul. 2002. The Rise of a Jazz Art World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
MannH. B.WhitneyD. R.1947. “On a Test of Whether One of Two Random Variables Is Stochastically Larger than the Other.”Annals of Mathematical Statistics18(1):50–60.
58.
MartinMatthew R.1998. “The Two-Faced New South: The Plantation Tales of Thomas Nelson Page and Charles W. Chesnutt.”Southern Literary Journal30(2):17–36.
59.
MasonWinterSuriSiddharth. 2013. “Conducting Behavioral Research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.”Behavior Research Methods44(1):1–23.
60.
MillerLaura J.2006. Reluctant Capitalists: Bookselling and the Culture of Consumption. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61.
MooreJames C.1968. “Status and Influence in Small Group Interactions.”Sociometry31(1):47–63.
62.
NewmanGeorge E.BloomPaul. 2012. “Art and Authenticity: The Importance of Originals in Judgments of Value.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General141(3):558–69.
63.
ObukhovaElenaZuckermanEzra W.ZhangJiayin. 2014. “When Politics Froze Fashion: The Effect of the Cultural Revolution on Naming in Beijing.”American Journal of Sociology120(2):555–83.
64.
OllivierMichèle. 2008. “Modes of Openness to Cultural Diversity: Humanist, Populist, Practical, and Indifferent.”Poetics36(2):120–47.
65.
PetersonRichard A.1997a. Creating Country Music: Fabricating Authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66.
PetersonRichard A.1997b. “The Rise and Fall of Highbrow Snobbery as a Status Marker.”Poetics25(2–3): 75–92.
67.
PetersonRichard A.2005. “In Search of Authenticity.”Journal of Management Studies42(5):1083–98.
68.
PetersonRichard A.AnandN.2004. “The Production of Culture Perspective.”Annual Review of Sociology30(1):311–34.
69.
PetersonRichard A.KernRoger M.1996. “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.”American Sociological Review61(5):900–907.
70.
PetersonRichard A.SimkusAlbert. 1992. “How Musical Taste Groups Mark Occupational Status Groups.” Pp. 152–68 in Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, edited by LamontM.FournierM.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
PhillipsDamon J.TurcoCatherine J.ZuckermanEzra W.2013. “Betrayal as Market Barrier: Identity-Based Limits to Diversification among High-Status Corporate Law Firms.”American Journal of Sociology118(4):1023–54.
72.
PhillipsDamon J.ZuckermanEzra W.2001. “Middle-Status Conformity: Theoretical Restatement and Empirical Demonstration in Two Markets.”American Journal of Sociology107(2):379–429.
73.
PodolnyJoel M.1993. “A Status-Based Model of Market Competition.”American Journal of Sociology98(4):829–72.
74.
PodolnyJoel M.2005. Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
75.
PontikesElizabethNegroGiacomoRaoHayagreeva. 2010. “Stained Red: A Study of Stigma by Association to Blacklisted Artists during the ‘Red Scare’ in Hollywood, 1945 to 1960.”American Sociological Review75(3):456–78.
76.
RanganathanAruna. Forthcoming. “The Artisan and His Audience: Identification with Work and Price-Setting in a Handicraft Cluster in Southern India.”Administrative Science Quarterly.
77.
RaoHayagreevaMoninPhilippeDurandRodolphe. 2003. “Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy.”American Journal of Sociology108(4): 795–843.
78.
RegevMotti. 2007. “Ethno-National Pop-Rock Music: Aesthetic Cosmopolitanism Made from Within.”Cultural Sociology1(3):317–41.
79.
RidgewayCecilia L.BoyleElizabeth HegerKuipersKathy J.RobinsonDawn T.1998. “How Do Status Beliefs Develop? The Role of Resources and Interactional Experience.”American Sociological Review63(3):331–50.
80.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.2006. “Consensus and the Creation of Status Beliefs.”Social Forces85(1):431–53.
81.
SagivTamar. 2014. “Reinvesting Dance with Meaning: Authenticity and Ingenuity in the Artistic Dance Field.” Pp. 155–81 in Handbook of Organizational and Entrepreneurial Ingenuity, edited by HonigB.LampelJ.DroriI.Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
82.
ScorseseMartin. 2014. The Wolf of Wall Street. Paramount.
83.
SgourevStoyan V.AlthuizenNiek. 2014. “‘Notable’ or ‘Not Able’: When Are Acts of Inconsistency Rewarded?”American Sociological Review79(2):282–302.
84.
SgourevStoyan V.AlthuizenNiek. 2016. “Is It a Masterpiece? Social Construction and Objective Constraint in the Evaluation of Excellence.” Working Paper, ESSEC Business School, Cergy, France.
85.
SimmelGeorg. 1965. “The Poor.”Social Problems13(2):118–40.
86.
SpenceMichael. 1974. Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87.
StoneOliver. 2000. Wall Street. 20th Century Fox.
88.
TajfelHenri, ed. 1979. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. New York: Academic Press.
89.
TajfelHenriBilligM. G.BundyR. P.FlamentClaude. 1971. “Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour.”European Journal of Social Psychology1(2):149–78.
TrillingLionel. 1972. Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
92.
VeblenThorstein. 1899. Conspicuous Consumption. New York: Penguin.
93.
WardeAlanWrightDavidGayo-CalModesto. 2008. “The Omnivorous Orientation in the UK.”Poetics36(2):148–65.
94.
WeberMax. 1952. Ancient Judaism. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
95.
WeberMax. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.
96.
WherryFrederick F.2006. “The Social Sources of Authenticity in Global Handicraft Markets: Evidence from Northern Thailand.”Journal of Consumer Culture6(1):5–32.
97.
WillerDavidWalkerHenry. 2007. Building Experiments: Testing Social Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
98.
WillerRobb. 2009. “Groups Reward Individual Sacrifice: The Status Solution to the Collective Action Problem.”American Sociological Review74(1):23–43.
99.
YamagishiToshioKiyonariToko. 2000. “The Group as the Container of Generalized Reciprocity.”Social Psychology Quarterly63(2):116–32.
100.
ZuckermanEzra W.2012. “Construction, Concentration, and (Dis)Continuities in Social Valuations.”Annual Review of Sociology38(1):223–45.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
