Assimilation is theorized as a multi-stage process where the structural mobility of immigrants and their descendants ultimately leads to established and immigrant-origin populations developing a subjective sense of social similarity with one another, an outcome I term symbolic belonging. Yet existing work offers little systematic evidence as to whether and how immigrants’ gains—in terms of language ability, socioeconomic status, neighborhood integration, or intermarriage—cause changes in the perceptions of the native-born U.S. population. I use a nationally representative conjoint survey experiment to explore whether and how immigrants’ mobility gains shape native-born white citizens’ perceptions of symbolic belonging. I find that white natives are generally open to structural relationships with immigrant-origin individuals (e.g., friends and neighbors), with the exception of black immigrants and natives, and undocumented immigrants. Yet, white Americans simultaneously view all non-white people, regardless of legal status, as dissimilar and far from achieving symbolic belonging in U.S. society. The results offer optimism about the potential structural mobility of legal immigrants and their descendants, yet simultaneously suggest that explicitly racialized lines of division remain just below the surface.
AlbaRichardKasinitzPhilipWatersMary C.2011. “The Kids are (Mostly) Alright: Second-Generation Assimilation: Comments on Haller, Portes and Lynch.” Social Forces89(3):763–74.
2.
AlbaRichardNeeVictor. 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BarthFredrik. 1965. Political Leadership among Swat Pathans. London: Athlone Press.
4.
BeanFrank D.BrownSusan K.BachmeierJames D.2015. Parents without Papers: The Progress and Pitfalls of Mexican American Integration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
BeanFrank D.LeachMark A.BrownSusan K.BachmeierJames D.HippJohn R.2011. “The Educational Legacy of Unauthorized Immigration.” International Migration Review45(2):348–85.
6.
BloemraadIreneKortewegAnnaYurdakulGökçe. 2008. “Citizenship and Immigration: Multiculturalism, Assimilation, and Challenges to the Nation-State.” Annual Review of Sociology34(1):153–79.
7.
BoboLawrenceKluegelJames R.SmithRyan A.1997. “Laissez-Faire Racism: The Crystallization of a Kinder, Gentler, Antiblack Ideology.” Pp. 93–120 in Racial Attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and Change, edited by TuchS.MartinJ.Greenwood, CT: Praeger.
8.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 2010. Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States; [new Chapter on the Obama Phenomenon]. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9.
CharlesCamille Zubrinsky. 2009. Won’t You Be My Neighbor? Race, Class and Residence in Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
10.
ChavezLeo R.2008. The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
ChouRosalind S.FeaginJoe R.2010. The Myth of the Model Minority: Asian Americans Facing Racism. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
12.
CrowderKyleHallMatthewTolnayStewart E.2011. “Neighborhood Immigration and Native Out-Migration.” American Sociological Review76(1):25–47.
13.
EspirituYen Le. 1992. Asian American Panethnicity: Bridging Institutions and Identities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14.
FischerClaude S.HoutMichael. 2006. Century of Difference: How America Changed in the Last One Hundred Years. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
FoxCybelleBloemraadIrene. 2015. “Beyond ‘White by Law’: Explaining the Gulf in Citizenship Acquisition between Mexican and European Immigrants, 1930.” Social Forces94(1):181–207.
16.
FussellElizabeth. 2014. “Warmth of the Welcome: Attitudes toward Immigrants and Immigration Policy in the United States.” Annual Review of Sociology40:479–98.
17.
GansHerbert J.1979. “Symbolic Ethnicity: The Future of Ethnic Groups and Cultures in America.” Ethnic and Racial Studies2(1):1–20.
18.
GansHerbert J.2007. “Acculturation, Assimilation and Mobility.” Ethnic and Racial Studies30(1):152–64.
19.
Golash-BozaTanya. 2006. “Dropping the Hyphen? Becoming Latino(a)-American through Racialized Assimilation.” Social Forces85(1):27–55.
20.
GonzalesRoberto G.2011. “Learning to Be Illegal: Undocumented Youth and Shifting Legal Contexts in the Transition to Adulthood.” American Sociological Review76(4):602–619.
21.
GonzalesRoberto G.ChavezLeo R.2012. “‘Awakening to a Nightmare’: Abjectivity and Illegality in the Lives of Undocumented 1.5-Generation Latino Immigrants in the United States.” Current Anthropology53(3):255–81.
22.
GordonMilton. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
HainmuellerJensHangartnerDominikYamamotoTeppei. 2015. “Validating Vignette and Conjoint Survey Experiments against Real-World Behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112(8):2395–2400.
24.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.2014. “Public Attitudes toward Immigration.” Annual Review of Political Science17:225–49.
25.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.2015. “The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes towards Immigrants.” American Journal of Political Science59(3):529–48.
26.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.YamamotoTeppei. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis22(1):1–30.
27.
HallMatthewCrowderKyle. 2014. “Native Out-Migration and Neighborhood Immigration in New Destinations.” Demography51(6):2179–2202.
28.
Haney-LópezIan. 2006. White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race. New York: New York University Press.
29.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanley. 2009. “On Assessing the Political Effects of Racial Prejudice.” Annual Review of Political Science12:423–47.
30.
IcelandJohn. 2009. Where We Live Now: Immigration and Race in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
InglehartRolandWelzelChristian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
JiménezTomás R.2010. Replenished Ethnicity: Mexican Americans, Immigration, and Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
JiménezTomás R.FieldsCorey D.SchachterAriela. 2015. “How Ethnoraciality Matters: The View Inside Ethnoracial ‘Groups.’” Social Currents2(2):107–115.
34.
JiménezTomás R.HorowitzAdam L.2013. “When White Is Just Alright: How Immigrants Redefine Achievement and Reconfigure the Ethnoracial Hierarchy.” American Sociological Review78(5):849–71.
35.
KasinitzPhilipMollenkopfJohn H.WatersMary C.HoldawayJennifer. 2008. Inheriting the City: The Children of Immigrants Come of Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
36.
KinderDonald R.KamCindy D.2009. Us against Them. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
LacyKaryn R.2007. Blue-Chip Black: Race, Class and Status in the New Black Middle Class. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
LamontMichèleMolnárVirág. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology28:167–95.
LeeJennifer. 2015. “From Undesirable to Marriageable: Hyper-Selectivity and the Racial Mobility of Asian Americans.” ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science662(1):79–93.
41.
LeeJenniferBeanFrank D.2010. The Diversity Paradox: Immigration and the Color Line in 21st Century America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
42.
LeeJenniferZhouMin. 2015. The Asian American Achievement Paradox. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
43.
LewisValerie A.EmersonMichael O.KlinebergStephen L.2011. “Who We’ll Live With: Neighborhood Racial Composition Preferences of Whites, Blacks and Latinos.” Social Forces89(4):1385–1407.
44.
LittlejohnKrystale E.2015. “Blurred Racial Boundaries or Shared Racial Identity? Race and Partnership among Multiracial and Monoracials.” Working Paper, Department of Sociology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA.
45.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy A.1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
MasseyDouglas S.Sánchez R.Magaly2010. Brokered Boundaries: Immigrant Identity in Anti-Immigrant Times. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
47.
Mayorga-GalloSarah. 2014. Behind the White Picket Fence: Power and Privilege in a Multiethnic Neighborhood. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
48.
MummuloJonathanNallClayton. Forthcoming. “Why Partisans Don’t Sort: The Constraints on Political Segregation.” Journal of Politics.
49.
NgaiMae M.2004. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
OmiMichaelWinantHoward. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge.
51.
PagerDevah. 2007. Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
ParkRobert E.BurgessErnest W.1921. Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
PasselJeffrey S.CohnD’Vera. 2014. “Unauthorized Immigrant Totals Rise in 7 States, Fall in 14: Decline in Those from Mexico Fuels Most State Decreases.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center Hispanic Trends Project.
54.
Patillo-McCoyMary. 1999. Black Picket Fences: Privilege and Peril among the Black Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRubén G.2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
PortesAlejandroZhouMin. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and its Variants.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science530(1):74–95.
57.
QuillianLincoln. 2005. “New Approaches to Understanding Racial Prejudice and Discrimination.” Annual Review of Sociology32:299–328.
58.
RiversDouglass. 2007. “Sampling for Web Surveys.” Prepared for the 2007 Joint Statistical Meetings, Salt Lake City, UT, August 1.
59.
RobnettBelindaFelicianoCynthia. 2011. “Patterns of Racial-Ethnic Exclusion by Internet Daters.” Social Forces89(3):807–828.
60.
SampsonRobert J.SharkeyPatrick. 2008. “Neighborhood Selection and the Social Reproduction of Concentrated Racial Inequality.” Demography45(1):1–29.
61.
SchildkrautDeborah J.2011. Americanism in the Twenty-First Century: Public Opinion in an Age of Immigration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SchumanHowardSteehCharlotteBoboLawrenceKrysanMaria. 1997. Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
SnidermanPaul. 2011. “The Logic and Design of the Survey Experiment: An Autobiography of a Methodological Innovation.” Pp. 102–114 in Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, edited by DruckmanJ.GreenD.KuklinskiJ.LupiaA.New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
SouthScott J.CrowderKyleChavezErick. 2005. “Migration and Spatial Assimilation among U.S. Latinos: Classical versus Segmented Trajectories.” Demography42(3):497–521.
65.
SwaroopSapnaKrysanMaria. 2011. “The Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction: Racial Proxy Revisited.” Demography48(3):1203–1229.
66.
TellesEdward E.OrtizVilma. 2008. Generations of Exclusion: Mexican Americans, Assimilation, and Race. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
67.
Theiss-MorseElizabeth. 2009. Who Counts as an American? The Boundaries of National Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
TiendaMartaFuentesNorma. 2014. “Hispanics in Metropolitan America: New Realities and Old Debates.” Annual Review of Sociology40:499–520.
69.
TimberlakeJeffrey M.WilliamsRhys H.2012. “Stereotypes of U.S. Immigrants from Four Global Regions.” Social Science Quarterly93(4):867–90.
70.
TuanMia. 1998. Forever Foreigners or Honorary Whites? The Asian Ethnic Experience Today. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
71.
VallejoJody Aguis. 2012. Barrios to Burbs: The Making of the Mexican American Middle Class. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
72.
VangZoua M.2012. “The Limits of Spatial Assimilation for Immigrants’ Full Integration: Emerging Evidence from African Immigrants in Boston and Dublin.” ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science641(1):220–46.
73.
VasquezJessica M.2011. Mexican Americans across Generations: Immigrant Families, Racial Realities. New York: NYU Press.
74.
VasquezJessica M.2014. “The Whitening Hypothesis Challenged: Biculturalism in Latino and Non-Hispanic White Intermarriage.” Sociological Forum29(2):386–407.
75.
VertovecSteven. 2007. “Super-Diversity and Its Implications.” Ethnic and Racial Studies30(6):1024–54.
76.
WaldingerRoger. 2003. “Foreigners Transformed: International Migration and the Remaking of a Divided People.” Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies12(2):247–72.
77.
WatersMary C.1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
78.
WatersMary C.1999. Black Identities: West Indian Immigrant Dreams and American Realities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79.
WatersMary C.JiménezTomás R.2005. “Assessing Immigrant Assimilation: New Empirical and Theoretical Challenges.” Annual Review of Sociology31:105–125.
80.
WatersMary C.KasinitzPhilip. 2015. “The War on Crime and the War on Immigrants: Racial and Legal Exclusion in 21st Century United States.” Pp. 115–43 in Fear, Anxiety and National Identity: Immigration and Belonging in North America in Europe, edited by FonerN.SimonP.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
81.
WellmanBarryWortleyScot. 1990. “Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support.” American Journal of Sociology96(3):558–88.
82.
WimmerAndreas. 2013. Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power and Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
83.
ZubrinskyCamille L.BoboLawrence. 1996. “Prismatic Metropolis: Race and Residential Segregation in the City of the Angels.” Social Science Research25(4):335–74.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
