In recent years, several international-comparative studies have analyzed the relationship between migration and native populations’ decreasing support for redistributive policies. However, these studies use cross-sectional designs and aggregate the number of foreign-born residents at the national level. Both aspects are theoretically and methodologically problematic. We address these shortcomings by investigating cross-sectional as well as longitudinal effects in the case of Germany, using a combination of individual- and regional-level data for several time points from 1994 to 2010. Our results suggest that native-born populations become more reluctant to support welfare programs when the proportion of foreigners at the regional level increases. This effect is particularly strong in the initial phase of immigration, and it is further moderated by the economic context: the higher the unemployment rate, the more negative is the effect of foreigners on natives’ attitude toward providing welfare.
AlesinaAlbertoFuchs-SchündelnNichola. 2005. “Good Bye Lenin (or Not?): The Effect of Communism on People’s Preferences.” American Economic Review97(4):1507–28.
2.
AlesinaAlbertoGlaeser.Edward L.2004. Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
AllportGordon W.1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, UK: Addison-Wesley.
5.
AndreßHans-JürgenGolschKatrinSchmidtAlexander W.2013. Applied Panel Data Analysis for Economic and Social Surveys. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
6.
ArtsWilGelissenJohn. 2001. “Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter?”Acta Sociologica44(4):283–99.
7.
BantingKeith. 2005. “The Multicultural Welfare State: International Experience and North American Narratives.” Social Policy & Administration39(2):98–115.
8.
BeanClivePapadakisElim. 1998. “A Comparison of Mass Attitudes towards the Welfare State in Different Institutional Regimes, 1985–1990.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research10(3):211–36.
9.
BlalockHubert M.1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
10.
BlekesauneMorten. 2007. “Economic Conditions and Public Attitudes to Welfare Policies.” European Sociological Review23(3):393–403.
11.
BlumerHerbert. 1958. “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position.” Pacific Sociological Review1(1):3–7.
12.
BoeriTitoHansonGordon H.McCormickBarry, eds. 2002. Immigration Policy and the Welfare System: A Report for the Fondazione Rodolfo Debenedetti. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
BradyDavidFinniganRyan. 2014. “Does Immigration Undermine Public Support for Social Policy?”American Sociological Review79(1):17–42.
14.
BrooksClemManzaJeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
BrownHana E.2013. “Race, Legality, and the Social Policy Consequences of Anti-Immigration Mobilization.” American Sociological Review78(2):290–314.
16.
BurgoonBrian. 2014. “Immigration, Integration and Support for Redistribution in Europe.” World Politics66(3):365–405.
17.
BurgoonBrianKosterFerryEgmondMarcel van. 2012. “Support for Redistribution and the Paradox of Immigration.” Journal of European Social Policy22(3):288–304.
18.
CastroVanessa S.2003. Acculturation and Psychological Adaptation. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
19.
CoendersMarcelLubbersMarcelScheepersPeer. 2005. Majorities’ Attitudes towards Minorities in Western and Eastern European Societies: Results from the European Social Survey 2002–2003. Nijmegen, Netherlands: University of Nijmegen.
20.
Commission of the European Communities. 1989. Racism and Xenophobia. Eurobarometer Special Issue. Brussels: Directorate-General Information, Communication, Culture.
21.
CrepazMarkus M. L.DamronRegan. 2009. “Constructing Tolerance: How the Welfare State Shapes Attitudes about Immigrants.” Comparative Political Studies42(3):437–63.
22.
EgerMaureen A.2010. “Even in Sweden: The Effect of Immigration on Support for Welfare State Spending.” European Sociological Review26(2):203–217.
23.
ErsanilliEvelynKoopmansRuud. 2011. “Do Immigrant Integration Policies Matter? A Three-Country Comparison among Turkish Immigrants.” West European Politics34(2):208–234.
24.
Esping-AndersenGøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
25.
EvansGeoffrey. 2006. “Is Multiculturalism Eroding Support For Welfare Provision? The British Case.” Pp. 152–76 in Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies, edited by BantingK.KymlickaW.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
FairbrotherMalcolm. 2014. “Two Multilevel Modeling Techniques for Analyzing Comparative Longitudinal Survey Datasets.” Political Science Research and Methods2(1):119–40.
FinseraasHenning. 2008. “Immigration and Preferences for Redistribution: An Empirical Analysis of European Survey Data.” Comparative European Politics6(4):407–431.
30.
ForbesHugh D.1997. Ethnic Conflict: Commerce, Culture, and the Contact Hypothesis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
FoxCybelle. 2004. “The Changing Color of Welfare? How Whites’ Attitudes toward Latinos Influence Support for Welfare.” American Journal of Sociology110(3):580–625.
32.
FreemanGary P.1986. “Migration and the Political Economy of the Welfare State.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science485(1):51–63.
33.
FriedbergRachel M.HuntJennifer. 1995. “The Impact of Immigrants on Host Country Wages, Employment and Growth.” Journal of Economic Perspectives9(2):23–44.
GilensMartin. 1995. “Racial Attitudes and Opposition to Welfare.” Journal of Politics57(4):994–1014.
40.
GilensMartin.1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
HopkinsDaniel J.2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review104(1):40–60.
42.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica47(2):263–91.
43.
KatznelsonIra. 2005. When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
44.
KaufmannEric. 2014. “‘It’s the Demography, Stupid’: Ethnic Change and Opposition to Immigration.” Political Quarterly85(3):267–76.
45.
KymlickaWillBantingKeith. 2006. “Immigration, Multiculturalism, and the Welfare State.” Ethics & International Affairs20(3):281–304.
46.
LarsenChristian A.2011. “Ethnic Heterogeneity and Public Support for Welfare: Is the American Experience Replicated in Britain, Sweden and Denmark?”Scandinavian Political Studies34(4):332–53.
47.
LuttmerErzo F. P.2001. “Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution.” Journal of Political Economy109(3):500–528.
48.
MauSteffenBurkhardtChristoph. 2009. “Migration and Welfare State Solidarity in Western Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy19(3):213–29.
49.
NewmanBenjamin J.2013. “Acculturating Contexts and Anglo Opposition to Immigration in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science57(2):374–90.
50.
QuadagnoJill. 1994. The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
QuillianLincoln. 1995. “Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe.” American Sociological Review60(4):586–611.
52.
SainsburyDiane. 2006. “Immigrants’ Social Rights in Comparative Perspective: Welfare Regimes, Forms in Immigration and Immigration Policy Regimes.” Journal of European Social Policy16(3):229–44.
53.
SchmidtAlexander W.Spies.Dennis C.2014. “Do Parties ‘Playing the Race Card’ Undermine Natives’ Support for Redistribution? Evidence from Europe.” Comparative Political Studies47(4):519–49.
54.
SchneiderJan. 2012. Die Organisation Der Asyl- und Zuwanderungspolitik in Deutschland. Working Paper No. 25 of the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees.
55.
SemyonovMosheRaijmanRebecaGorodzeiskyAnastasia. 2006. “The Rise of Anti-Foreigner Sentiment in European Societies, 1988–2000.” American Sociological Review71(3):426–49.
56.
SenikClaudiaStichnothHolgerStraetenKarine. 2008. “Immigration and Natives’ Attitudes towards the Welfare State: Evidence from the European Social Survey.” Social Indicators Research91(3):345–70.
57.
SigelmanLeeBledsoeTimothyWelchSusanCombsMichael W.1996. “Making Contact? Black-White Social Interaction in an Urban Setting.” American Journal of Sociology101(5):1306–32.
58.
SorokaStuartBantingKeithJohnstonRichard. 2003. “Immigration and the Welfare State: A Comparative Analysis.” Prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, May 29 – June 1, Dalhousie University, Halifax.
59.
TaylorMarylee C.1998. “How White Attitudes Vary with the Racial Composition of Local Populations: Numbers Count.” American Sociological Review63(4):512–35.
60.
Van OorschotWim. 2006. “Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States.” Journal of European Social Policy16(1):23–42.
61.
Van ParijsPhilippe. 2004. Cultural Diversity versus Economic Solidarity. Brussels: De Boeck & Larcier.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
