This project explores whether and how corporations become more receptive to social activist challenges over time. Drawing from social movement theory, we suggest a dynamic process through which contentious interactions lead to increased receptivity. We argue that when firms are chronically targeted by social activists, they respond defensively by adopting strategic management devices that help them better manage social issues and demonstrate their normative appropriateness. These defensive devices have the incidental effect of empowering independent monitors and increasing corporate accountability, which in turn increase a firm’s receptivity to future activist challenges. We test our theory using a unique longitudinal dataset that tracks contentious attacks and the adoption of social management devices among a population of 300 large firms from 1993 to 2009.
AguileraRuth V.JacksonGregory. 2003. “The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants.” Academy of Management Review28(3):447–65.
2.
AlinskySaul D.1989. Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals. New York: Vintage Books.
3.
AndersonRonald C.ReebDavid M.2004. “Board Composition: Balancing Family Influence in S&P 500 Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly49(2):209–237.
4.
AshforthBlake E.GibbsBarrie W.1990. “The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation.” Organization Science1(2):177–94.
5.
BaronDavid P.DiermeierDaniel. 2007. “Strategic Activism and Nonmarket Strategy.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy16(3):599–634.
6.
BartleyTim. 2007. “Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions.” American Journal of Sociology113(2):297–351.
7.
BartleyTimChildCurtis. 2011. “Movements, Markets, and Fields: The Effects of Anti-sweatshop Campaigns on U.S. Firms, 1993–2000.” Social Forces90(2):425–51.
8.
BartleyTimChildCurtis. 2013. “Shaming the Corporation: The Social Production of Targets and the Anti-Sweatshop Movement.” American Sociological Review79(4):653–79.
BriscoeForestChinM. K.HambrickDonald C.2014. “CEO Ideology as an Element of the Corporate Opportunity Structure for Social Activists.” Academy of Management Journal57(6):1786–1809.
11.
BriscoeForestSaffordSean. 2008. “The Nixon-in-China Effect: Activism, Imitation, and the Institutionalization of Contentious Practices.” Administrative Science Quarterly53(3):460–91.
12.
CampbellJohn L.2007. “Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Academy of Management Review23(3):946–67.
13.
CostainAnne N.1992. Inviting Women’s Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women’s Movement. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
della PortaDonatella. 1996. “Social Movements and the State: Thought on the Policing of Protest.” Pp. 62–92 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, edited by McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
della PortaDonatellaReiterHerbert. 1998. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–31 in Policing Protest: The Control of Mass Demonstrations in Western Democracies, edited by PortaD. dellaReiterH.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
EdelmanLauren B.1992. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law.” American Journal of Sociology97(6):1531–76.
17.
FligsteinNeil. 1996. “Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market Institutions.” American Sociological Review61(4):656–73.
18.
FligsteinNeilMcAdamDoug. 2012. A Theory of Fields. Cambridge, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
FriedlandRogerAlfordRobert R.1991. “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” Pp. 232–63 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
FriedmanMonroe. 1985. “Consumer Boycotts in the United States, 1970–1980: Contemporary Events in Historical Perspective.” Journal of Consumer Affairs19(1):96–117.
21.
GamsonWilliam A.1990. The Strategy of Social Protest, 2nd ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
22.
GamsonWilliamMeyerDavid S.1996. “Framing Political Opportunity.” Pp. 275–90 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GoodwinJeffJasperJames M.1999. “Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory.” Sociological Forum14(1):27–54.
24.
HasselbackD.MortonP.1998. “Boycott Will Bring Backlash, B.C. Lumberman Says.” Financial Post, December9, p. C01.
25.
HavemanHeatherRaoHayagreevaParuchuriSrikanth. 2007. “The Winds of Change: The Progressive Movement and the Bureaucratization of Thrift.” American Sociological Review72(1):117–42.
26.
HeckelJ.2001. “Nike, Adidas Officials Discuss Sweatshop Issues at University of Illinois.” Knight Ridder/Tribune Business, November29.
27.
HeckmanJames J.IchimuraHidehikoToddPetra. 1997. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Program.” Review of Economic Studies64(4):605–654.
28.
HiattShon R.SineWesleyTolbertPamela. 2009. “From Pabst to Pepsi: The Deinstitutionalization of Social Practices and the Emergence of Entrepreneurial Opportunities.” Administrative Science Quarterly54(4):635–67.
29.
HuntScott A.BenfordRobert D.SnowDavid A.1994. “Identity Fields: Framing Processes and the Social Construction of Movement Identities.” Pp. 185–208 in New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, edited by LaranaE.JohnstonH.GusfieldJ. R.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
30.
JanisIrving L.FadnerRaymond H.1965. “The Coefficient of Imbalance.” Pp. 153–63 in Language of Politics, edited by LasswellH. D.LeitesN., and associates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
JasperJames M.PoulsenJane. 1993. “Fighting Back: Vulnerabilities, Blunders, and Countermobilization by the Targets in Three Animal Rights Campaigns.” Sociological Forum8(4):639–57.
32.
JohnsonRichard A.GreeningDaniel W.1999. “The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance.” Academy of Management Journal42(5):564–76.
33.
KeckMargaretSikkinkKathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34.
KingBrayden G.2008. “A Political Mediation Model of Corporate Response to Social Movement Activism.” Administrative Science Quarterly53(3):395–421.
35.
KingBrayden G.McDonnellMary-Hunter. Forthcoming. “Good Firms, Good Targets: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility, Reputation, and Activist Targeting.” In Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World: Toward Effective Global CSR Frameworks, edited by TsutsuiK.LimA.
36.
KingBrayden G.PearceNicholas. 2010. “The Contentiousness of Markets: Politics, Social Movements, and Institutional Change in Markets.” Annual Review of Sociology36:349–67.
37.
KingBrayden G.SouleSarah A.2013. “Social Movements as Extra-institutional Entrepreneurs: The Effect of Protests on Stock Price Returns.” Administrative Science Quarterly52(3):413–42.
38.
KingGaryZangLangche. 2001. “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data.” Political Analysis9:137–63.
39.
KLD Analytics. 2006. “Getting Started with KLD Stats and KLD’s Ratings Definitions.” KLD Research and Analytics Document accessed through Wharton Research Data Services.
40.
KriesiHanspeter. 1995. “The Political Opportunity Structure of New Social Movements: Its Impact on Their Mobilization.” Pp. 167–98 in The Politics of Protest, edited by JenkinsJ. C.KlandermansB.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
41.
LimAlwynTsutsuiKiyoteru. 2012. “Globalization and Commitment in Corporate Social Responsibility: Cross-National Analyses of Institutional and Political-Economy Effects.” American Sociological Review77(1):69–98.
42.
MaguireSteveHardyCynthia. 2009. “Discourse and Deinstitutionalization: The Decline of DDT.” Academy of Management Journal52(1):148–78.
43.
MargolisJoshua D.WalshJames P.2003. “Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business.” Administrative Science Quarterly48(2):268–305.
44.
MarquisChristopherGlynnMary AnnDavisGerald F.2007. “Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social Action.” Academy of Management Review32(3):925–45.
45.
MaxwellJohn W.LyonThomas PeytonHackettSteven C.2000. “Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism.” Journal of Law and Economics43(2):583–617.
46.
McDonnellMary-Hunter. 2015. “Radical Repertoires: The Incidence and Impact of Corporate Sponsored Social Activism.” Working paper, Georgetown University, McDonough School of Business.
47.
McDonnellMary-HunterKingBrayden G.2013. “Keeping Up Appearances: Reputation Threat and Impression Management after Social Movement Boycotts.” Administrative Science Quarterly58(3):387–419.
48.
MeyerDavid S.StaggenborgSuzanne. 1996. “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology101(6):1628–60.
49.
MeyerJohn W.RowanBrian. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology83(2):340–63.
50.
MillerDannyXuXiaoweiMehrotraVikas. Forthcoming. “When Is Human Capital a Valuable Resource? The Performance Effects of Ivy League Selection among Celebrated CEOs.” Strategic Management Journal.
51.
ModelJacobSouleSarah A.KingBrayden G. 2014. “A Processual Model of the Shareholder Resolution Process.” Working paper, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA.
52.
MonksRobert A. G.MinowNell. 2011. Corporate Governance, 5th ed.West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
53.
MustilloSarah. 2012. “The Effects of Auxiliary Variables on Coefficient Bias and Efficiency in Multiple Imputation.” Sociological Methods & Research41(2):335–61.
PfarrerMichael D.PollockTimothy G.RindovaViolina P.2010. “A Tale of Two Assets: The Effects of Firm Reputation and Celebrity on Earnings Surprises and Investors’ Reactions.” Academy of Management Journal53(5):1131–52.
57.
PollockTimothy G.RindovaViolina P.2003. “Media Legitimation Effects in the Market for Initial Public Offerings.” Academy of Management Journal46(5):631–42.
58.
RaeburnNicole. 2004. Lesbian and Gay Workplace Rights: Changing Corporate America from Inside Out. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
59.
RaoHayagreevaSivakumarKumar. 1999. “Institutional Sources of Boundary-Spanning Structures: The Establishment of Investor Relations Departments in the Fortune 500 Industrials.” Organization Science10(1):27–42.
60.
RojasFabio. 2006. “Social Movement Tactics, Organizational Change, and the Spread of African-American Studies.” Social Forces84(4):2147–66.
61.
SageGeorge H.1999. “Justice Do It! The Nike Transnational Advocacy Network: Organization, Collective Actions, and Outcomes.” Sociology of Sport Journal16(3):206–235.
62.
SelznickPhilip. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization, edited by Anonymous. New York: Harper and Row.
63.
SineWesley D.LeeBrandon H.2009. “Tilting at Windmills? The Environmental Movement and the Emergence of the U.S. Wind Energy Sector.” Administrative Science Quarterly54(1):123–55.
64.
SnowDavid A.SouleSarah A.2010. A Primer on Social Movements. New York: W.W. Norton.
65.
SouleSarah A.2009. Contention and Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.
66.
SouleSarah A.2012. “Social Movements and Markets, Industries, and Firms.” Organization Studies33(12):1715–33.
67.
SouleSarah A.McAdamDougMcCarthyJohnSuYang. 1999. “Protest Events: Cause or Consequence of State Action? The U.S. Women’s Movement and Federal Congressional Activities, 1956–1979.” Mobilization4(2):223–38.
68.
SouleSarah A.SwaminathanAnandTihanyiLaszlo. 2014. “The Diffusion of Firm Divestment in Burma, 1996–2002.” Strategic Management Journal35(7):1032–52.
69.
VasiIon BogdanKingBrayden. 2012. “Social Movements, Risk Perceptions, and Economic Outcomes: The Effect of Primary and Secondary Stakeholder Activism on Firms’ Perceived Environmental Risk and Financial Performance.” American Sociological Review77(4):573–96.
70.
WalkerEdward T.MartinAndrew W.McCarthyJohn D.2008. “Confronting the State, the Corporation, and the Academy: The Influence of Institutional Targets on Social Movement Repertoires.” American Journal of Sociology114(1):35–76.
71.
WalkerEdward T.ReaChristopher M.2014. “The Political Mobilization of Firms and Industries.” Annual Review of Sociology40(1):281–304.
72.
WeberKlausRaoHayagreevaThomasL. G.2009. “From Streets to Suites: How the Anti-biotech Movement Affected German Pharmaceutical Firms.” American Sociological Review74(1):106–127.
73.
WestphalJames D.ZajacEdward J.1994. “Substance and Symbolism in CEOs’ Long-Term Incentive Plans.” Administrative Science Quarterly39(3):367–90.
74.
YueQingyuanRaoHayagreevaIngramPaul. 2013. “Information Spillovers from Protests against Corporations: A Tale of Wal-Mart and Target.” Administrative Science Quarterly58(4):37–68.
75.
ZaldMayer N.MorrillCalvinRaoHayagreeva. 2005. “The Impact of Social Movements on Organizations: Environments and Responses.” Pp. 253–79 in Social Movements and Organization Theory, edited by DavisG. F.McAdamD.ScottW. R.ZaldM. N.New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
