In this article, we use data on virtually all foreclosure events between 2005 and 2009 to calculate neighborhood foreclosure rates for nearly all block groups in the United States to assess the impact of housing foreclosures on neighborhood racial/ethnic change and on broader patterns of racial residential segregation. We find that the foreclosure crisis was patterned strongly along racial lines: black, Latino, and racially integrated neighborhoods had exceptionally high foreclosure rates. Multilevel models of racial/ethnic change reveal that foreclosure concentrations were linked to declining shares of whites and expanding shares of black and Latino residents. Results further suggest that these compositional shifts were driven by both white population loss and minority growth, especially from racially mixed settings with high foreclosure rates. To explore the impact of these racially selective migration streams on patterns of residential segregation, we simulate racial segregation assuming that foreclosure rates remained at their 2005 levels throughout the crisis period. Our simulations suggest that the foreclosure crisis increased racial segregation between blacks and whites by 1.1 dissimilarity points, and between Latinos and whites by 2.2 dissimilarity points.
BatsonChristie D.MonnatShannon. 2015. “Distress in the Desert: Neighborhood Disorder, Resident Satisfaction, and Quality of Life during the Las Vegas Foreclosure Crisis.” Urban Affairs Review51(2):205–238.
2.
BaumerEric P.WolffKevin T.ArnioAshley N.2012. “A Multicity Neighborhood Analysis of Foreclosure and Crime.” Social Science Quarterly93(3):577–601.
BayerPatrickFerreiraFernandoRossStephen L.2013. The Vulnerability of Minority Homeowners in the Housing Boom and Bust. National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
BeenVickiChanSewinEllenIngrid GouldMadarJosiah R.2011. “Decoding the Foreclosure Crisis: Causes, Responses, and Consequences.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management30(2):388–96.
6.
BeenVickiEllenIngridMadarJosiah. 2009. “The High Cost of Segregation: Exploring Racial Disparities in High-Cost Lending.” Fordham Urban Law Journal36(3):361–93.
7.
BocianDebbie GruensteinLiWeiErnstKeith S.2010. Foreclosures by Race and Ethnicity: The Demographics of a Crisis. Durham, NC, Washington, DC, and Oakland, CA: Center for Responsible Lending.
8.
BondCarolynWilliamsRichard. 2007. “Residential Segregation and the Transformation of Home Mortgage Lending.” Social Forces86(2):671–98.
9.
BosticRaphael W.EngelKathleen C.McCoyPatricia A.Pennington-CrossAnthonyWachterSusan M.2008. “State and Local Anti-Predatory Lending Laws: The Effect of Legal Enforcement Mechanisms.” Journal of Economics and Business60(1–2):47–66.
10.
BoustanLeah Platt. 2010. “Was Postwar Suburbanization ‘White Flight’? Evidence from the Black Migration.” Quarterly Journal of Economics125(1):417–43.
11.
CalemPaul S.GillenKevinWachterSusan. 2004. “The Neighborhood Distribution of Subprime Mortgage Lending.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics29(4):393–410.
12.
CannerGlenn B.PassmoreWayneLadermanElizabeth. 1999. “The Role of Specialized Lenders in Extending Mortgages to Lower-Income and Minority Homebuyers.” Federal Reserve Bulletin (November):709–726.
13.
CaponeCharlesMetzAlbert. 2003. Mortgage Default and Default Resolutions: Their Impact on Communities. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
14.
CarlsonSusan M.1992. “Trends in Race/Sex Occupational Inequality: Conceptual and Measurement Issues.” Social Problems39(3):268–90.
15.
CharlesCamille Zubrinsky. 2003. “The Dynamics of Racial Residential Segregation.” Annual Review of Sociology29:167–207.
16.
CollinsJ. MichaelLamKenHerbertChristopher E.2011. “State Mortgage Foreclosure Policies and Lender Interventions: Impacts on Borrower Behavior in Default.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management30(2):216–32.
17.
CollinsWilliam J.MargoRobert A.2006. “Historical Perspectives on Racial Differences in Schooling in the United States.” Pp. 107–154 in Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol. 1, edited by HanushekE.WelchF.Amsterdam: Elsevier.
18.
DaneshvaryNasserClauretieTerrence M.2012. “Toxic Neighbors: Foreclosures and Short-Sales Spillover Effects from the Current Housing-Market Crash.” Economic Inquiry50(1):217–31.
19.
Department of Housing and Urban Development, and U.S. Treasury Department. 2000. Curbing Predatory Home Mortgage Lending. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
20.
DingLeiQuerciaRoberto G.ReidCarolina K.WhiteAlan M.2012. “The Impact of Federal Preemption of State Antipredatory Lending Laws on the Foreclosure Crisis.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management31(2):367–87.
21.
EllenIngrid GouldLacoeJohannaSharyginClaudia Ayanna. 2013. “Do Foreclosures Cause Crime?”Journal of Urban Economics74:59–70.
22.
ElmagarmidAhmed K.IpeirotisPanagiotis G.VerykiosVassilios S.2007. “Duplicate Record Detection: A Survey.” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering19(1):1–16.
23.
EngelKathleen C.McCoyPatricia A.2011. The Subprime Virus: Reckless Credit, Regulatory Failure, and Next Steps. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
FarrellChad R.LeeBarrett A.2011. “Racial Diversity and Change in Metropolitan Neighborhoods.” Social Science Research40(4):1108–23.
25.
FischerMary J.2013. “Black and White Homebuyer, Homeowner, and Household Segregation in the United States, 1990–2010.” Social Science Research42(6):1726–36.
26.
FischerMary J.LoweTravis. 2014. “Homebuyer Neighborhood Attainment in Black and White: Housing Outcomes during the Housing Boom and Bust.” Working Paper, University of Connecticut.
27.
GeoLytics. 2008. “CensusCD: 1990 in 2000 Boundaries, Release 1.1.” Branchburg, NJ: GeoLytics, Inc.
28.
GeoLytics. 2012. “2010 Summary File (SF1) in 2000 Boundaries.” Branchburg, NJ: GeoLytics, Inc.
29.
EdwardGlaeserVigdorJacob. 2012. The End of the Segregated Century: Racial Separation in America’s Neighborhoods, 1890–2010. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
30.
GoodmanAllen C.SmithBrent C.2010. “Residential Mortgage Default: Theory Works and So Does Policy.” Journal of Housing Economics19(4):280–94.
31.
GoodsteinRyanHanounaPaulRamirezCarlos D.StahelChristof W.2011. “Are Foreclosures Contagious?” FDIC Center for Financial Research, Working Paper 2011-4.
32.
HallMatthew. 2013. “Residential Integration on the New Frontier: Immigrant Segregation in Established and New Destinations.” Demography50(5):1873–96.
33.
HallMatthewCrowderKyle. 2011. “Extended-Family Resources and Racial Inequality in the Transition to Homeownership.” Social Science Research40(6):1534–46.
34.
HallMatthewCrowderKyleSpringAmy. Forthcoming. “Variations in Housing Foreclosure by Race and Place, 2005–2012.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
35.
HeflinColleen M.PattilloMary. 2006. “Poverty in the Family: Race, Siblings, and Socioeconomic Heterogeneity.” Social Science Research35(4):804–822.
36.
HyraDerek S.SquiresGregory D.RennerRobert N.KirkDavid S.2013. “Metropolitan Segregation and the Subprime Lending Crisis.” Housing Policy Debate23(1):177–98.
37.
IcelandJohn. 2004. “Beyond Black and White: Metropolitan Residential Segregation in Multi-Ethnic America.” Social Science Research33(2):248–71.
38.
IcelandJohnSharpGregoryTimberlakeJeffrey M.2013. “Sun Belt Rising: Regional Population Change and the Decline in Black Residential Segregation, 1970–2009.” Demography50(1):97–123.
39.
ImmergluckDan. 2009. Foreclosed: High-Risk Lending, Deregulation, and the Undermining of America’s Mortgage Market. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
40.
ImmergluckDan. 2011. “The Local Wreckage of Global Capital: The Subprime Crisis, Federal Policy and High-Foreclosure Neighborhoods in the US.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35(1):130–46.
41.
ImmergluckDanSmithGeoff. 2006. “The External Costs of Foreclosure: The Impact of Single-family Mortgage Foreclosures on Property Values.” Housing Policy Debate17(1):57–79.
42.
ImmergluckDanWilesMarti. 1999. Two Steps Back: The Dual Mortgage Market, Predatory Lending, and the Undoing of Community Development. Chicago: The Woodstock Institute.
43.
LandryBartMarshKris. 2011. “The Evolution of the New Black Middle Class.” Annual Review of Sociology37:373–94.
44.
LichterDaniel T.2013. “Integration or Fragmentation? Racial Diversity and the American Future.” Demography50(2):359–91.
45.
LichterDaniel T.ParisiDomenicoTaquinoMichael C.GriceSteven Michael. 2010. “Residential Segregation in New Hispanic Destinations: Cities, Suburbs, and Rural Communities Compared.” Social Science Research39(2):215–30.
46.
LinZhenguoRosenblattEricYaoVincent W.2009. “Spillover Effects of Foreclosures on Neighborhood Property Values.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics38(4):387–407.
47.
LoganJohn R.2013. “The Persistence of Segregation in the 21st Century Metropolis.” City & Community12(2):160–68.
48.
LoganJohn R.StultsBrian. 2011. “The Persistence of Segregation in the Metropolis: New Findings from the 2010 Census.” Washington, DC: Project US2010 Census Brief.
49.
LoganJohn R.StultsBrian J.FarleyReynolds. 2004. “Segregation of Minorities in the Metropolis: Two Decades of Change.” Demography41(1):1–22.
50.
LoganJohn R.ZhangCharles. 2010. “Global Neighborhoods: New Pathways to Diversity and Separation.” American Journal of Sociology115(4):1069–1109.
51.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy A.1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
MolloyRavenShanHui. 2011. The Post-Foreclosure Experience of U.S. Households. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve.
53.
Pennington-CrossAnthonyYezerAnthonyNicholsJoseph. 2000. Credit Risk and Mortgage Lending: Who Uses Subprime and Why?Arlington, VA: Research Institute for Housing America.
54.
Pew Research. 2008. “Americans Say They Like Diverse Communities; Election, Census Trends Suggest Otherwise.” Washington, DC: Pew Social & Demographic Trends.
55.
QuillianLincoln. 2002. “Why Is Black–White Residential Segregation So Persistent? Evidence on Three Theories from Migration Data.” Social Science Research31(2):197–229.
56.
QuillianLincolnPagerDevah. 2001. “Black Neighbors, Higher Crime? The Role of Racial Stereotypes in Evaluations of Neighborhood Crime.” American Journal of Sociology107(3):717–67.
RughJacob S.2015. “Double Jeopardy: Why Latinos Were Hit Hardest by the US Foreclosure Crisis.” Social Forces93(3):1139–84.
59.
RughJacob S.MasseyDouglas S.2010. “Racial Segregation and the American Foreclosure Crisis.” American Sociological Review75(5):629–51.
60.
RughJacob S.MasseyDouglas S.2014. “Segregation in Post-Civil Rights America.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race11(2):205–232.
61.
SampsonRobert J.RaudenbushStephen W.2004. “Seeing Disorder: Neighborhood Stigma and the Social Construction of ‘Broken Windows.’”Social Psychology Quarterly67(4):319–42.
62.
SchumanHoward. 1997. Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
SmithJames P.WelchFinis R.1989. “Black Economic Progress after Myrdal.” Journal of Economic Literature27(2):519–64.
64.
SouthScott J.CrowderKyle D.1997. “Escaping Distressed Neighborhoods: Individual, Community, and Metropolitan Influences.” American Journal of Sociology102(4):1040–84.
65.
SouthScott J.CrowderKyle D.1998. “Leaving the ’Hood: Residential Mobility between Black, White, and Integrated Neighborhoods.” American Sociological Review63(1):17–26.
66.
SouthScott J.CrowderKyle D.ChavezErick. 2005. “Exiting and Entering High-Poverty Neighborhoods: Latinos, Blacks and Anglos Compared.” Social Forces84(2):873–900.
67.
SquiresGregory D.HyraDerek S.RennerRobert N.2009. “Segregation and the Subprime Lending Crisis.” Presented at the Federal Reserve System Community Affairs Research Conference, April 16, Washington, DC.
68.
StollMichael. 2014. “Residential Mobility in the United States and the Great Recession: A Shift to Local Moves.” Pp. 139–80 in Diversity and Disparities: America Enters a New Century, edited by LoganJ.New York: Russell Sage.
69.
SwaroopSapnaKrysanMaria. 2011. “The Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction: Racial Proxy Revisited.” Demography48(3):1203–1229.
70.
TeasdaleBrentClarkLynn M.HinkleJoshua C.2012. “Subprime Lending Foreclosures, Crime, and Neighborhood Disorganization: Beyond Internal Dynamics.” American Journal of Criminal Justice37(2):163–78.
71.
TiendaMartaFuentesNorma. 2014. “Hispanics in Metropolitan America: New Realities and Old Debates.” Annual Review of Sociology40:499–520.
72.
TolnayStewart E.2003. “The African American ‘Great Migration’ and Beyond.” Annual Review of Sociology29(1):209–232.
73.
ToweCharles A.LawleyChad. 2013. “The Contagion Effect of Neighboring Foreclosures.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy5(2):313–35.
74.
TurnerMargery AustinSantosRobLevyDiane K.WissokerDougArandaClaudiaPitingoloRob, and the Urban Institute. 2013. “Housing Discrimination against Racial and Ethnic Minorities 2012: Full Report.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
75.
U.S. Census Bureau. 1992. 1990 Summary Tape File 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
76.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. 2000 Census Summary File 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
77.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2011. 2010 Census Summary File 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
78.
WallaceDanielleHedbergE. C.KatzCharles M.2012. “The Impact of Foreclosures on Neighborhood Disorder before and during the Housing Crisis: Testing the Spiral of Decay.” Social Science Quarterly93(3):625–47.
79.
WassmerRobert W.2011. “The Recent Pervasive External Effects of Residential Home Foreclosure.” Housing Policy Debate21(2):247–65.
80.
WilkersonIsabel. 2010. The Warmth of Other Suns: The Epic Story of America’s Great Migration. New York: Random House.
81.
WilliamsRichard. 2012. “Using the Margins Command to Estimate and Interpret Adjusted Predictions and Marginal Effects.” Stata Journal12(2):308–331.
82.
WilliamsSonyaGalsterGeorgeVermaNandita. 2014. “Home Foreclosures and Neighborhood Crime Dynamics.” Housing Studies29(3):380–406.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
