That social capital matters is an established fact in the social sciences. Less clear, however, is how different forms of social capital affect gender disadvantages in career advancement. Focusing on a project-based type of labor market, namely the U.S. film industry, this study argues that women suffer a “closure penalty” and face severe career disadvantages when collaborating in cohesive teams. At the same time, gender disadvantages are reduced for women who build social capital in open networks with higher degrees of diversity and information flow. Using large-scale longitudinal data on career profiles of about one million performances by 97,657 film actors in 369,099 film productions between the years 1929 and 2010, I analyze career survival models and interaction effects between gender and different measures of social capital and information openness. Findings reveal that female actors have a higher risk of career failure than do their male colleagues when affiliated in cohesive networks, but women have better survival chances when embedded in open, diverse structures. This study contributes to the understanding of how and what type of social capital can be either a beneficial resource for otherwise disadvantaged groups or a constraining mechanism that intensifies gender differences in career advancement.
AccominottiFabien. 2009. “Creativity from Interaction: Artistic Movements and the Creativity Careers of Modern Painters.” Poetics37(3):267–94.
2.
AdlerPaul S.KwonSeok-Woo. 2002. “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept.” Academy of Management Review27(1):17–40.
3.
ArthurMichael B.RousseauDenise M., eds. 1996. The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4.
BakerWayne E.FaulknerRobert R.1991. “Role as Resource in the Hollywood Film Industry.” American Journal of Sociology97(2):279–309.
5.
BechkyBeth A.2006. “Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations.” Organization Science17(1):3–21.
6.
BeckerGary. 1975. Human Capital. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
BeckerHoward S.1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
BielbyDenise D.BielbyWilliam T.1996. “Women and Men in Film: Gender Inequality among Writers in a Culture Industry.” Gender and Society10(3):248–70.
9.
BielbyWilliam T.BaronJames N.1986. “Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination.” American Journal of Sociology91(4):759–99.
10.
BielbyWilliam T.BielbyDenise D.1992. “Cumulative versus Continuous Disadvantage in an Unstructured Labor Market: Gender Differences in the Careers of Television Writers.” Work and Occupations19(4):366–86.
11.
BielbyWilliam T.BielbyDenise D.1999. “Organizational Mediation of Project-Based Labor Markets: Talent Agencies and the Careers of Screenwriters.” American Sociological Review64(1):64–85.
12.
BlairHelen. 2009. “Active Networking: Action, Social Structure and the Process of Networking.” Pp. 116–34 in Creative Labour: Working in the Creative Industries, edited by McKinlayA.SmithC.Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
BoltanskiLucChiapelloEve. 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.
14.
BorgattiStephen P.HalginDaniel S.2011. “Analyzing Affiliation Networks.” Pp. 417–33 in The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, edited by CarringtonP. J.ScottJ. G.London: Sage.
15.
BourdieuPierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
BrassDaniel J.1985. “Men’s and Women’s Networks: A Study of Interaction Patterns and Influence in an Organization.” Academy of Management Journal28(2):327–43.
17.
BurtRonald S.1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
BurtRonald S.1997. “The Contingent Value of Social Capital.” Administrative Science Quarterly42(2):339–65.
19.
BurtRonald S.1998. “The Gender of Social Capital.” Rationality and Society10(1):5–46.
20.
BurtRonald S.2000. “The Network Structure of Social Capital.” Research in Organizational Behavior22:345–423.
21.
BurtRonald S.2004. “Structural Holes and Good Ideas.” American Journal of Sociology110(2):349–99.
22.
CabreraSusan F.Thomas-HuntMelissa C.2007. “‘Street Cred’ and the Executive Woman: The Effects of Gender Differences in Social Networks on Career Advancement.” Cornell University (http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles/371).
23.
CarterDavid B.SignorinoCurtis S.2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.” Political Analysis18(3):271–92.
24.
CastellsManuel. 1996. The Rise of Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
CattaniGinoFerrianiSimone. 2008. “A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry.” Organization Science19(6):824–44.
28.
CattaniGinoFerrianiSimoneAllisonPaul D.2014. “Insiders, Outsiders, and the Struggle for Consecration in Cultural Fields: A Core-Periphery Perspective.” American Sociological Review79(2):258–81.
29.
ChristophersonSusan. 2009. “Working in the Creative Economy: Risk, Adaption, and the Persistence of Exclusionary Networks.” Pp. 72–90 in Creative Labour: Working in the Creative Industries, edited by McKinlayA.SmithC.Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
ClevesMario A.GouldWilliam W.GutierrezRoberto G.2004. An Introduction To Survival Analysis Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
31.
ColemanJames S.1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology94:95–121.
32.
de VaanMathijsVedresBalázsStarkDavid. 2011. “Disruptive Diversity and Recurring Cohesion: Assembling Creative Teams in the Video Game Industry, 1979–2009.” Working Paper, Center on Organizational Innovation, Columbia University, New York.
33.
de VaanMathijsVedresBalázsStarkDavid. Forthcoming. “Game Changer: The Topology of Creativity.” American Journal of Sociology.
34.
DiMaggioPaulGaripFiliz. 2012. “Network Effects and Social Inequality.” Annual Review of Sociology38:93–118.
35.
DiPreteThomas A.EirichGregory M.2006. “Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments.” Annual Review of Sociology32:271–97.
36.
DobbinFrankKimSoohanKalevAlexandra. 2011. “You Can’t Always Get What You Need: Organizational Determinants of Diversity Programs.” American Sociological Review76(3):386–411.
37.
FaulknerRobert R.1983. Music on Demand: Composers and Careers in the Hollywood Film Industry. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
38.
FaulknerRobert R.AndersonAndy B.1987. “Short-Term Projects and Emergent Careers: Evidence from Hollywood.” American Journal of Sociology92(4):879–909.
39.
FernandezRoberto M.CastillaEmilioMoorePaul. 2000. “Social Capital at Work: Networks and Employment at a Phone Center.” American Journal of Sociology105(5):1288–1356.
40.
FernandezRoberto M.SosaLourdes. 2005. “Gendering the Job: Networks and Recruitment at a Call Center.” American Journal of Sociology111(3):859–904.
41.
Fernandez-MateoIsabel. 2009. “Cumulative Gender Disadvantage in Contract Employment.” American Journal of Sociology114(4):871–923.
42.
FerrianiSimoneCattaniGinoBaden-FullerCharles. 2009. “The Relational Antecedents of Project-Entrepreneurship: Network Centrality, Team Composition and Project Performance.” Research Policy38(10):1545–58.
43.
FreemanLinton C.1977. “A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness.” Sociometry40(1):35–41.
44.
GabbayShaul M.ZuckermanEzra W.1998. “Social Capital and Opportunity in Corporate R&D: The Contingent Effect of Contact Density on Mobility Expectations.” Social Science Research27(2):189–217.
45.
GargiuloMartinBenassiMario. 1999. “The Dark Side of Social Capital.” Pp. 298–322 in Corporate Social Capital and Liability, edited by LeendersR. T. A. J.GabbayS. M.Norwell, MA: Kluver.
46.
GiuffreKatherine. 1999. “Sandpiles of Opportunity: Success in the Art World.” Social Forces77(3):815–32.
47.
GiuffreKatherine. 2010. “Half the Right People: Network Density and Creativity.” Culture Unbound2:819–46.
48.
GodechotOlivierMariotNicolas. 2004. “Les Deux Formes du Capital Social: Structure Relationnelle des Jurys de Thèses et Recrutement en Science Politique.” Revue Française de Sociologie45(2):243–82.
49.
GoffmanErving. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Doubleday.
50.
GranovetterMark S.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology78(6):1360–80.
51.
GranovetterMark S.1995. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
GroysbergBoris. 2010. Chasing Stars: The Myth of Talent and the Portability of Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
GrugulisIrenaStoyanovaDimitrinka. 2012. “Social Capital and Networks in Film and TV: Jobs for the Boys?”Organization Studies33(10):1311–31.
54.
GrundThomas U.2012. “Network Structure and Team Performance: The Case of English Premier League Soccer Teams.” Social Networks34(4):682–90.
55.
HsuGreta. 2006. “Jacks of All Trades and Masters of None: Audiences’ Reactions to Spanning Genres in Feature Film Production.” Administrative Science Quarterly51(3):420–50.
56.
IbarraHerminia. 1992. “Homophily and Differential Returns: Sex Differences in Network Structure and Access in an Advertising Firm.” Administrative Science Quarterly37(3):422–47.
57.
IbarraHerminia. 1993. “Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework.” Academy of Management Review18(1):56–87.
58.
IbarraHerminia. 1997. “Paving an Alternative Route: Gender Differences in Managerial Networks.” Social Psychology Quarterly60(1):91–102.
59.
InkpenAndrew C.TsangEric W. K.2005. “Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer.” Academy of Management Review30(1):146–65.
60.
JaffeAdam B.1986. “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R & D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits, and Market Value.” American Economic Review76(5):984–1001.
61.
JonesCandace. 1996. “Careers in Project Networks: The Case of the Film Industry.” Pp. 58–75 in The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era, edited by ArthurM. B.RousseauD. M.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62.
KalevAlexandra. 2009. “Cracking the Glass Cages? Restructuring and Ascriptive Inequality at Work.” American Journal of Sociology114(6):1591–1643.
63.
LevyEmanuel. 1989. “The Democratic Elite: America’s Movie Stars.” Qualitative Sociology12(1):29–54.
64.
LinNan. 1999. “Social Networks and Status Attainment.” Annual Review of Sociology25:467–87.
65.
LinNan. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
66.
LincolnAnne E.AllenMichael Patrick. 2004. “Double Jeopardy in Hollywood: Age and Gender in the Careers of Film Actors, 1926–1999.” Sociological Forum19(4):611–31.
67.
LutterMark. 2014. “Creative Success and Network Embeddedness: Explaining Critical Recognition of Film Directors in Hollywood, 1900–2010.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/11. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
68.
MarchJames G.1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science2(1):71–87.
69.
McDonaldSteve. 2011. “What’s in the ‘Old Boys’ Network? Accessing Social Capital in Gendered and Racialized Networks.” Social Networks33(4):317–30.
70.
McGuireGail M.2002. “Gender, Race, and the Shadow Structure: A Study of Informal Networks and Inequality in a Work Organization.” Gender & Society16(3):303–322.
71.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M.2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology27:415–44.
72.
MouwTed. 2006. “Estimating the Causal Effect of Social Capital: A Review of Recent Research.” Annual Review of Sociology32:79–102.
73.
MunchAllisonMcPhersonJ. MillerSmith-LovinLynn. 1997. “Gender, Children, and Social Contact: The Effects of Childrearing for Men and Women.” American Sociological Review62(4):509–520.
74.
NewmanM. E. J.2001. “Scientific Collaboration Networks. II. Shortest Paths, Weighted Networks, and Centrality.” Physical Review E64(1):016132.
75.
ObstfeldDavid. 2005. “Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly50(1):100–130.
76.
PayneG. TygeMooreCurt B.GriffisStanley E.AutryChad W.2011. “Multilevel Challenges and Opportunities in Social Capital Research.” Journal of Management37(2):491–520.
77.
PerrettiFabrizioNegroGiacomo. 2006. “Filling Empty Seats: How Status and Organizational Hierarchies Affect Exploration versus Exploitation in Team Design.” Academy of Management Journal49(4):759–77.
78.
PerrettiFabrizioNegroGiacomo. 2007. “Mixing Genres and Matching People: A Study in Innovation and Team Composition in Hollywood.” Journal of Organizational Behavior28(5):563–86.
79.
PetersenTrondSaportaIshak. 2004. “The Opportunity Structure for Discrimination.” American Journal of Sociology109(4):852–901.
80.
PetersenTrondSaportaIshakSeidelMarc-David L.2000. “Offering a Job: Meritocracy and Social Networks.” American Journal of Sociology106(3):763–816.
81.
PhelpsCorey C.2010. “A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation.” Academy of Management Journal53(4):890–913.
82.
PhelpsCorey C.HeidlRalphWadhwaAnu. 2012. “Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks: A Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Management38(4):1115–66.
83.
PodolnyJoel M.2001. “Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market.” American Journal of Sociology107(1):33–60.
84.
PodolnyJoel M.BaronJames N.1997. “Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace.” American Sociological Review62(5):673–93.
85.
PortesAlejandro. 1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology24:1–24.
86.
PowellWalter W.KoputKenneth W.Smith-DoerrLaurel. 1996. “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.” Administrative Science Quarterly41(1):116–45.
87.
ReagansRayMcEvilyBill. 2003. “Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range.” Administrative Science Quarterly48(2):240–67.
88.
ReagansRayZuckermanEzra W.2001. “Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams.” Organization Science12(4):502–517.
89.
RodanSimonGalunicCharles. 2004. “More Than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness.” Strategic Management Journal25(6):541–62.
90.
RossmanGabrielEsparzaNicoleBonacichPhillip. 2010. “I’d Like to Thank the Academy, Team Spillovers, and Network Centrality.” American Sociological Review75(1):31–51.
91.
RossmanGabrielSchilkeOliver. 2014. “Close, But No Cigar: The Bimodal Rewards to Prize-Seeking.” American Sociological Review79(1):86–108.
92.
RostKatja. 2011. “The Strength of Strong Ties in the Creation of Innovation.” Research Policy40(4):588–604.
93.
Smith-DoerrLaurel. 2010. “Flexible Organizations, Innovation and Gender Equality: Writing for the US Film Industry, 1907–27.” Industry and Innovation17(1):5–22.
94.
SonJoonmoLinNan. 2012. “Network Diversity, Contact Diversity, and Status Attainment.” Social Networks34(4):601–613.
95.
StainbackKevin. 2008. “Social Contacts and Race/Ethnic Job Matching.” Social Forces87(2):857–86.
96.
StarkDavid. 2009. The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
97.
TortorielloMarcoReagansRayMcEvilyBill. 2012. “Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge between Organizational Units.” Organization Science23(4):1024–39.
98.
TsaiWenpinGhoshalSumantra. 1998. “Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks.” Academy of Management Journal41(4):464–76.
99.
UzziBrian. 1999. “Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing.” American Sociological Review64(4):481–505.
100.
UzziBrianSpiroJarrett. 2005. “Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem.” American Journal of Sociology111(2):447–504.
101.
van EmmerikI. J. Hetty. 2006. “Gender Differences in the Creation of Different Types of Social Capital: A Multilevel Study.” Social Networks28(1):24–37.
102.
VedresBalázsStarkDavid. 2010. “Structural Folds: Generative Disruption in Overlapping Groups.” American Journal of Sociology115(4):1150–90.
103.
WeiJunZhengWeiZhangMian. 2011. “Social Capital and Knowledge Transfer: A Multi-level Analysis.” Human Relations64(11):1401–1423.
104.
WhiteHarrison C.1993. Careers and Creativity: Social Forces in the Arts. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
105.
YangTiantianAldrichHoward E.2014. “Who’s the Boss? Explaining Gender Inequality in Entrepreneurial Teams.” American Sociological Review79(2):303–327.
106.
ZuckermanEzra W.KimTai-Young. 2003. “The Critical Trade-off: Identity Assignment and Box-Office Success in the Feature Film Industry.” Industrial and Corporate Change12(1):27–67.
107.
ZuckermanEzra W.KimTai-YoungUkanwaKalindaRittmannJames von. 2003. “Robust Identities or Nonentities? Typecasting in the Feature-Film Labor Market.” American Journal of Sociology108(5):1018–74.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
