Theories within organizational and economic sociology that center on market categories often equate taken-for-grantedness with increased constraint on category members’ features. In contrast, we develop a novel perspective that considers how market participants’ changing category-related attributions decrease the scrutiny of category offerings, opening up strategic opportunities for firms. We further argue that whether producers should be expected to take advantage of these opportunities depends on the extent to which they are incentivized to do so. We use the case of the light cigarette category to test this thesis. We argue and find evidence that increasing taken-for-grantedness of the light cigarette category created greater opportunity for tobacco firms to strategically manipulate category features.
AldrichHoward E.FiolC. Marlene. 1994. “Foods Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation.” Academy of Management Review19(4):645–70.
2.
Annual Maxwell Reports. 1964 to 1993. The Maxwell Report: A Statistical Survey of the Cigarette Industry. W. E. Hutton and Co.
3.
BarnettPaul G.KeelerTheodore E.HuTeh-Wei. 1995. “Oligopoly Structure and the Incidence of Cigarette Excise Taxes.” Journal of Public Economics57(3):457–70.
4.
BarsalouLawrence W.1983. “Ad Hoc Categories.” Memory and Cognition11(3):211–27.
Brand, Gruber, and Co. 1976. A Qualitative Study of the Low Tar Cigarette Milieu Including: A) Recommendation for Further Enhancement of Merit, B) Recommendations for New Brand Entries. Philip Morris document (http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/aes74e00).
8.
BrandtAllan M.2007. The Cigarette Century: The Rise, Fall and Deadly Persistence of the Product That Defined America. New York: Basic Books.
9.
BrecherRuthBrecherEdwardHerzogArthurGoodmanWalterWalkerGerald, and the Editors of Consumer Reports. 1963. The Consumers Union Report on Smoking and the Public Interest. Mount Vernon, NY: Consumers Union.
10.
BromleyPatriciaPowellWalter W.2012. “From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World.” Academy of Management Annals6(1):483–530.
BrykAnthony S.RaudenbushStephen W.1992. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 1st ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
CarrollGlennSwaminathanAnand. 2000. “Why the Microbrewery Movement? Organizational Dynamics of Resource Partitioning in the U.S. Brewing Industry.” American Journal of Sociology106(3):715–62.
14.
CarrollGlennWheatonDennis R.2009. “The Organizational Construction of Authenticity: An Examination of Contemporary Food and Dining in the U.S.” Research in Organizational Behavior29:255–82.
15.
CeruloKaren A.2010. “Mining the Intersections of Cognitive Sociology and Neuroscience.” Poetics38(2):115–32.
16.
CharlesDan. 2012. “High-Tech Shortcut to Greek Yogurt Leaves Purists Fuming.” National Public Radio (http://www.wbur.org/npr/156997600/).
17.
ClarkHerbert H.Wilkes-GibbsDeanna. 1986. “Referring as a Collaborative Process.” Cognition22:1–39.
18.
ColyvasJeannette A.PowellWalter W.2006. “Roads to Institutionalization: The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science.” Research in Organizational Behavior27:315–63.
19.
DavisGerald F.GreveHenrich R.1997. “Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s.” American Journal of Sociology103(1):1–37.
20.
DiMaggioPaul J.1997. “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology23:263–87.
21.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W.1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48(2):147–60.
22.
DobrevStanislav D.GotsopoulosAleksios. 2010. “Legitimacy Vacuum, Structural Imprinting, and the First Mover Disadvantage.” Academy of Management Journal53(5):1153–74.
23.
DouglasMary. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
DurandRudolphePaolellaLionel. 2012. “Category Stretching: Reorienting Research on Categories in Strategy, Entrepreneurship, and Organization Theory.” Journal of Management Studies50(6):1100–1123.
27.
DurkheimÉmile. [1912] 1965. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Translated by SwainJ. W.New York: Free Press.
28.
EhrichKristine R.IrwinJulie R.2005. “Willful Ignorance in the Request for Product Attribute Information.” Journal of Marketing Research42(3):266–77.
29.
EspelandWendy N.1998. The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality, and Identity in the American Southwest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
EspelandWendy N.SauderMichael. 2007. “Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds.” American Journal of Sociology113(1):1–40.
31.
EspelandWendy N.StevensMitchell L.1998. “Commensuration as a Social Process.” Annual Review of Sociology24:313–43.
FleischerAnne. 2009. “Ambiguity and the Equity of Rating Systems: United States Brokerage Firms, 1995–2000.” Administrative Science Quarterly54(4):555–74.
Gallup Organization, Inc. 1964. Trends in Public Attitudes on the Possibility of a Health Hazard in Cigarette Smoking. Lorillard document (http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/cvp81e00).
39.
GierynThomas E.1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
GlantzStanton A.SladeJohnBeroLisa A.HanauerPeterBarnesDeborah E.1996. The Cigarette Papers. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
GreenwoodRoystonHiningsC. R.1996. “Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism.” Academy of Management Review21(4):1022–54.
GriffithR. B.1963. Re: Information on Nicotine and Sugar in Tobacco for Neil Gilliam’s Presentation at Chelwood. Brown and Williamson document (http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/mrs76b00).
48.
GuoDennis F.BatarsehPaulineWongJeffRaphaelDebbie. 2012. Summary of Data and Findings from Testing of a Limited Number of Nail Products. California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control.
49.
GutierrezRobert G.2002. “Parametric Frailty and Shared Frailty Survival Models.” Stata Journal2(1):22–44.
50.
HallBronwyn H.JaffeAdam B.TrajtenbergManual. 2001. The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. NBER Working Paper 8498.
51.
HallBronwyn H.MairesseJacques. 1995. “Exploring the Relationship between R&D and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms.” Journal of Econometrics65:263–93.
52.
HallettTim. 2010. “The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School.” American Sociological Review75(1):52–74.
53.
HannanMichael T.PólosLaszloCarrollGlenn R.2007. Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes and Ecologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
HeaneyMichael T.RojasFabio. 2014. “Hybrid Activism: Social Movement Mobilization in a Multimovement Environment.” American Journal of Sociology119(4):1–57.
55.
HsuGreta. 2006. “Jacks of All Trades and Masters of None: Audiences’ Reactions to Spanning Genres in Feature Film Production.” Administrative Science Quarterly51(3):420–50.
56.
HsuGretaHannanMichael T.KoçakÖzgecan. 2009. “Multiple Category Memberships in Markets: An Integrative Theory and Two Empirical Tests.” American Sociological Review74(1):150–59.
57.
HsuGretaHannanMichael T.PólosLaszlo. 2011. “Typecasting, Legitimation, and Form Emergence: A Formal Theory.” Sociological Theory29(2):97–123.
58.
HsuGretaNegroGiacomoPerrettiFabrizio. 2012. “Hybrids in Hollywood: A Study of the Production and Performance of Genre-Spanning Films.” Industrial and Corporate Change21(6):1427–50.
59.
HurtRichard D.RobertsonChanning R.1998. “Prying Open the Door to the Tobacco Industry’s Secrets about Nicotine: The Minnesota Tobacco Trial.” Journal of the American Medical Association280(13):1173–81.
IppolitoRichard A.MurphyR. DennisSantDonald. 1979. Staff Report on Consumer Responses to Cigarette Health Information. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.
63.
JeppersonRonald L.1991. “Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
KennedyMark T.2008. “Getting Counted: Markets, Media and Reality.” American Sociological Review73(2):270–95.
65.
KhaireMuktiWadhwaniR. Daniel. 2010. “Changing Landscapes: The Construction of Meaning and Value in a New Market Category—Modern Indian Art.” Academy of Management Journal53(6):1281–1304.
66.
KingBrayden G.ClemensElisabeth S.FryMelissa. 2011. “Identity Realization and Organizational Forms: Differentiation and Consolidation of Identities among Arizona’s Charter Schools.” Organization Science22(3):554–72.
67.
KlugerRichard. 1997. Ashes to Ashes: America’s Hundred-Year Cigarette War, the Public Health, and the Unabashed Triumph of Philip Morris. New York: Vintage Books.
68.
KovácsBalazsHannanMichael T.2010. “The Consequences of Category Spanning Depend on Contrast.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations31:175–201
69.
LamontMichèleMolnárVirag. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology28:167–95.
70.
LeeBrandon H.2009. “The Infrastructure of Collective Action and Policy Content Diffusion in the Organic Food Industry.” Academy of Management Journal52(6):1247–69.
71.
LounsburyMichael. 2001. “Institutional Sources of Practice Variation: Staffing College and University Recycling Programs.” Administrative Science Quarterly46(1):29–56.
72.
LounsburyMichaelGlynnMary A.2001. “Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy, and the Acquisition of Resources.” Strategic Management Journal22(6–7):545–64.
73.
LounsburyMichaelRaoHayagreeva. 2004. “Sources of Durability and Change in Market Classifications: A Study of the Reconstitution of Product Categories in the American Mutual Fund Industry, 1944–1985.” Social Forces82(3):969–99.
74.
LurigioArthur J.CarrollJohn S.1985. “Probation Officers’ Schemata of Offenders: Content, Development, and Impact on Treatment Decisions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology48(5):1112–26.
75.
MarcialGene G.1977. “Analysts Favor Philip Morris, R. J. Reynolds as Firms Dominate Low Tar Cigarette Market.” Wall Street Journal, June27.
76.
McAuliffeRobert. 1988. “The FTC and the Effectiveness of Cigarette Advertising Regulations.” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing7(special issue):49-64.
MurphyGregory L.2002. The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80.
National Cancer Institute. 2008. The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. Tobacco Control Monograph No. 19. Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. NIH Pub. No. 07-6242.
81.
NavisChadGlynnMary A.2010. “How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Legitimacy, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990–2005.” Administrative Science Quarterly55(3):439–71.
82.
NegroGiacomoHannanMichael T.RaoHayagreeva. 2010. “Categorical Contrast and Audience Appeal: Niche Width and Critical Success in Winemaking.” Industrial and Corporate Change19(5):1397–1425.
83.
NegroGiacomoKoçakÖzgecanHsuGreta. 2010. “Research on Categories in the Sociology of Organizations.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations31:3–35.
OliverChristine. 1991. “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes.” Academy of Management Review16(1):145–79.
86.
PhillipsDamon J.KimYoung-Kyu. 2009. “Why Pseudonyms? Deception as Identity Preservation among Jazz Record Companies, 1920–1929.” Organization Science20(3):481–99.
87.
PollayRichael W.DewhirstTimothy. 2001. Marketing Cigarettes with Low Machine-Measured Yields. Pp. 199–235 in Smoking and Tobacco Control, Monograph No. 13. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute.
88.
PollayRichael W.DewhirstTimothy. 2002. “The Dark Side of Marketing Seemingly ‘Light’ Cigarettes: Successful Images and Failed Fact.” Tobacco Control11(Suppl. I):i18–i31.
89.
PontikesElizabeth G.2012. “Two Sides of the Same Coin: How Ambiguous Classification Affects Multiple Audiences’ Evaluations.” Administrative Science Quarterly57(1):81–118.
90.
PontikesElizabeth G.2013. “Fitting In or Starting New? Invention, Leniency, and Category Emergence in the Software Industry, 1990–2012.” Working Paper, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
91.
PoracJoseph F.WadeJames B.PollockTimothy G.1999. “Industry Categories and the Politics of the Comparable Firm in CEO Compensation.” Administrative Science Quarterly44(1):112–44.
92.
RaoHayagreevaMoninPhilippeDurandRudolphe. 2005. “Border Crossing: Bricolage and the Erosion of Categorical Boundaries in French Gastronomy.” American Sociological Review70(6):968–91.
93.
RehderBob. 2003. “Categorization as Causal Reasoning.” Cognitive Science27:709–748.
94.
RosaJosé A.PoracJoseph F.Runser-SpanjolJelenaSaxonMichael. 1999. “Sociocognitive Dynamics in a Product Market.” Journal of Marketing63(special issue):64–77.
95.
RuefMartinPattersonKelly. 2009. “Credit and Classification: The Impact of Industry Boundaries in Nineteenth-Century America.” Administrative Science Quarterly54(3):486–520.
SantosFilipe M.EisenhardtKathleen M.2009. “Constructing Markets and Shaping Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Power in Nascent Fields.” Academy of Management Journal52(4):643–71.
98.
SmithEdward B.2011. “Identities as Lenses: How Organizational Identity Affects Audiences’ Evaluation of Organizational Performance.” Administrative Science Quarterly56(1):61–94.
99.
SnijdersTom A. B.BoskerRoel J.1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage Publishers.
TilcsikAndrás. 2010. “From Ritual to Reality: Demography, Ideology and Decoupling in a Post-Communist Government Agency.” Academy of Management Journal53(6):1474–98.
TindallJohn E.DanielHarry G.RoweColon H.1981a. Tar Perception and Perceptual Mapping of Low-Tar Brands, 1980. Philip Morris document (http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/jpk95e00/).
Tobacco Merchants Association (TMA) of the United States, Inc. 2000. Tobacco Merchants Association Directory of Cigarette Brands 1864-1999, 4th ed.Princeton, NJ: TMA.
109.
TolbertPamela S.ZuckerLynne G.1983. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly28(1):22–39.
VygotskyLev S.1987. Thought and Language. New York: Plenum Press.
112.
WaguespackDavid M.SorensonOlav. 2011. “The Ratings Game: Asymmetry in Classification.” Organization Science22(3):541–53.
113.
WakefieldMelanieMorleyChristopherHoranJudith K.CummingsK. Michael. 2002. “The Cigarette Pack as Image: New Evidence from Tobacco Industry Documents.” Tobacco Control11:i73–i80.
WeickKarl E.1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. California: Sage.
116.
WeickKarl E.SutcliffeKathleen M.ObstfeldDavid. 2005. “Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking.” Organization Science16(4):409–421.
117.
WellsJ. KendrickIII. 1982. What Are the Obstacles/Enemies of a Swing to Low ‘Tar’ and What Action Should We Take? Brown & Williamson document (http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/mom66b00).
118.
WestphalJames D.GulatiRanjayShortellStephen M.1997. “Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption.” Administrative Science Quarterly42(2):366–94.
WryTylerLounsburyMichaelJenningsP. Devereaou. 2013. “Hybrid Vigor: Securing Venture Capital by Spanning Categories in Nanotechnology.” Academy of Management Journal57(5):1309–33.
121.
ZerubavelEviatar. 1991. The Fine Line: Making Distinctions in Everyday Life. New York: Free Press.
122.
ZerubavelEviatar. 1997. Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
123.
ZhaoEric Y.IshiharaMasakazuLounsburyMichael. 2013. “Overcoming the Illegitimacy Discount: Cultural Entrepreneurship in the US Feature Film Industry.” Organization Studies34(12):1747–76.
124.
ZuckermanEzra W.1999. “The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount.” American Journal of Sociology104(5):1398–1438.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
