Adolescent societies—whether arising from weak, short-term classroom friendships or from close, long-term friendships—exhibit various levels of network clustering, segregation, and hierarchy. Some are rank-ordered caste systems and others are flat, cliquish worlds. Explaining the source of such structural variation remains a challenge, however, because global network features are generally treated as the agglomeration of micro-level tie-formation mechanisms, namely balance, homophily, and dominance. How do the same micro-mechanisms generate significant variation in global network structures? To answer this question we propose and test a network ecological theory that specifies the ways features of organizational environments moderate the expression of tie-formation processes, thereby generating variability in global network structures across settings. We develop this argument using longitudinal friendship data on schools (Add Health study) and classrooms (Classroom Engagement study), and by extending exponential random graph models to the study of multiple societies over time.
AbbottAndrew. 2005. “Linked Ecologies: States and Universities as Environments for Professions.” Sociological Theory23(3):245–74.
2.
AdlerPatricia A.AdlerPeter. 2003. Peer Power. London: Rutgers University Press.
3.
AllenJoseph P.LandDeborah. 1999. “Attachment in Adolescence.” Pp. 319–35 in Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical Applications, edited by CassidyJ.ShaverP. R.New York: Guilford Press.
4.
BarabásiAlbert-LászlóAlbertRéka. 1999. “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.” Science286(5439):509–512.
5.
BearmanPeter S.JonesJoUdryJ. Richard. 1997. “The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research Design.” Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
6.
BlauPeter M.1960. “Structural Effects.” American Sociological Review25(2):178–93.
7.
BlauPeter M.1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
8.
BrintSteven. 2001. “Gemeinschaft Revisited: A Critique and Reconstruction of the Community Concept.” Sociological Theory19(1):1–23.
9.
BrykAnthony S.LeeValerieHollandPeter. 1993. Catholic Schools and the Common Good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
ByrneDonn E.1971. The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
11.
CairnsRobert B.LeungMan-ChiBuchananLisaCairnsBeverley D.1995. “Friendships and Social Networks in Childhood and Adolescence: Fluidity, Reliability, and Interrelations.” Child Development66(5):1330–45.
12.
CartwrightDorwinHararyFrank. 1956. “Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider’s Theory.” Psychological Review63(5):277–93.
13.
ColemanJames S.1961. The Adolescent Society: The Social Life of the Teenager and Its Impact on Education. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
14.
ColemanJames S.1994. “A Vision for Sociology.” Society32(1):29–34.
15.
CotterellJohn. 2007. Social Networks and Social Influences in Adolescence. New York: Routledge Press.
16.
CrosnoeRobertJohnsonMonica K.2011. “Research on Adolescence in the Twenty-First Century.” Annual Review of Sociology37(1):439–60.
17.
CrosnoeRobertJohnsonMonica K.ElderGlenn H.Jr.2004. “School Size and the Interpersonal Side of Education: An Examination of Race/Ethnicity and Organizational Context.” Social Science Quarterly85(5):1259–74.
18.
CrosnoeRobertMistryRashmita S.ElderGlen H.Jr.2002. “Economic Disadvantage, Family Dynamics, and Adolescent Enrollment in Higher Education.” Journal of Marriage and Family64(3):690–702.
19.
CrosnoeRobertMullerChandra. 2004. “Body Mass Index, Academic Achievement, and School Context.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior45(4):393–407.
20.
CrosnoeRobertMullerChandraFrankKenneth. 2004. “Peer Contexts and Consequences of Adolescent Drinking.” Social Problems51(2):288–304.
21.
DavisJames A.LeinhardtSamuel. 1972. “The Structure of Positive Interpersonal Relations in Small Groups.” Pp. 218–51 in Sociological Theories in Progress, edited by BergerJ.ZelditchM. J.AndersonB.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
22.
DoyleWalter. 2006. “Ecological Approaches to Classroom Management.” Pp. 97–125 in Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues, edited by EvertsonC. M.WeinsteinC. Simon. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
23.
DunphyDexter C.1963. “The Social Structure of Urban Adolescent Peer Groups.” Sociometry26(2):230–46.
24.
EcclesJacquelynneRoeserRobert. 2010. “An Ecological View of Schools and Development.” Pp. 6–22 in Handbook of Research on Schools, Schooling and Human Development, edited by MeeceJ.EcclesJ.New York: Routledge.
25.
EckertPenelope. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
EderDonna. 1985. “The Cycle of Popularity: Interpersonal Relations among Female Adolescents.” Sociology of Education58(3):154–65.
27.
EderDonnaEnkeJanet. 1991. “The Structure of Gossip: Opportunities and Constraints on Collective Expression among Adolescents.” American Sociological Review56(4):495–508.
28.
EntwisleBarbaraFaustKatherineRindfussRonald R.KanedaToshiko. 2007. “Networks and Contexts: Variation in the Structure of Social Ties.” American Journal of Sociology112(5):1495–1533.
29.
EpsteinJoyce. 1983. Friends in School: Patterns of Selection and Influence in Secondary Schools. New York: Academic Press.
30.
ErwinPhil. 1998. Friendship in Childhood and Adolescence. New York: Routledge.
31.
FeldScott L.1981. “Focused Organization of Social Ties.” American Journal of Sociology86(5):1015–35.
32.
FeldScottCarterWilliam. 1998. “Foci of Activity as Changing Contexts for Friendship.” Pp. 136–52 in Placing Friendship in Context, edited by AdamsR.AllanG.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
FrankKenneth A.MullerChandraSchillerKathrynRiegle-CrumbCatherineMuellerAnna S.CrosnoeRobertPearsonJennifer. 2008. “The Social Dynamics of Mathematics Coursetaking in High School.” American Journal of Sociology113(6):1645–96.
34.
GestScott D.DavidsonAlice J.RulisonKelly L.MoodyJamesWelshJanet A.2007. “Features of Groups and Status Hierarchies in Girls’ and Boys’ Early Adolescent Peer Networks.” Pp. 43–60 in New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, Special Issue: Social Network Analysis and Children’s Peer Relationships, edited by RodkinP.HanishL.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
GiordanoPeggy. 1995. “The Wider Circle of Friends in Adolescence.” American Journal of Sociology101(3):661–97.
36.
GoodreauStevenKittsJamesMorrisMartina. 2009. “Birds of a Feather, or Friend of a Friend? Using Exponential Random Graph Models to Investigate Adolescent Social Networks.” Demography46(1):103–125.
37.
GordonC. Wayne. 1957. The Social System of the High School. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
38.
GouldRoger V.2002. “The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test.” American Journal of Sociology107(5):1143–78.
39.
GouldnerAlvin W.1960. “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement.” American Sociological Review25(2):161–78.
40.
HaasSteven A.SchaeferDavidKornienkoOlga. 2010. “Health and the Structure of Adolescent Networks.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior51(4):424–39.
41.
HallinanMaureen T.1978. “The Process of Friendship Formation.” Social Networks1(2):193–210.
42.
HallinanMaureen T.1982. “Classroom Racial Composition and Children’s Friendships.” Social Forces61(1):56–72.
43.
HandcockMark S.2003. “Assessing Degeneracy in Statistical Models of Social Networks.” Working Paper no. 39, Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington (http://www.csss.washington.edu/Papers/wp39.pdf).
44.
HandcockMark S.HunterDavid R.2006. “Inference in Curved Exponential Family Models for Networks.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics15(3):565–83.
45.
HandcockMark S.HunterDavid R.ButtsCarter T.GoodreauSteven M.MorrisMartina. 2008. “Statnet: Software Tools for the Representation, Visualization, Analysis and Simulation of Network Data.” Journal of Statistical Software24(1).
46.
HeiderFritz. 1946. “Attitudes and Cognitive Organization.” Journal of Psychology21(1):107–112.
47.
HomansGeorge. 1950. The Human Group. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
48.
HunterDavid R.HandcockMark S.ButtsCarter T.GoodreauSteven M.MorrisMartina. 2008. “Ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks.” Journal of Statistical Software24(3).
49.
JohnsenEugene C.1985. “Network Macrostructure Models for the Davis-Leinhardt Set of Empirical Sociomatrices.” Social Networks7(3):203–224.
50.
JohnsonMonica KilpatrickCrosnoeRobertElderGlen H.Jr.2001. “Students’ Attachment and Academic Engagement: The Role of Race and Ethnicity.” Sociology of Education74(4):318–40.
51.
KrackhardtDavid A.1994. “Graph Theoretical Dimensions of Informal Organizations.” Pp. 89–111 in Computational Organization Theory, edited by CarleyK. M.PrietulaM. J.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
52.
KrauseJensCroftD. P.JamesRichard. 2007. “Social Network Theory in the Behavioural Sciences: Potential Applications.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology62(1):15–27.
53.
LaFontanaKathryn M.CillessenAntonius H. N.2010. “Developmental Changes in the Priority of Perceived Status in Childhood and Adolescence.” Social Development19(1):130–47.
54.
LeithwoodKennethJantziDoris. 2009. “A Review of Empirical Evidence about School Size Effects: A Policy Perspective.” Review of Educational Research79(1):464–90.
55.
LittellRamon C.MillikenGeorgeStroupWalterWolfingerRussellSchabenbergerOliver. 2006. SAS for Mixed Models, 2nd ed.Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
56.
LubbersMiranda J.SnijdersTom A. B.2007. “A Comparison of Various Approaches to the Exponential Random Graph Model: A Reanalysis of 102 Student Networks in School Classes.” Social Networks29(4):489–507.
57.
MartinJohn Levi. 2009. Social Structures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
MastenAnn S.CoatsworthJ. DouglasNeemannJenniferGestScott D.TellegenAukeGarmezyNorman. 1995. “The Structure and Coherence of Competence from Childhood through Adolescence.” Child Development66(6):1635–59.
59.
MayhewBruce H.LevingerRoger L.1976. “Size and the Density of Interaction in Human Aggregates.” American Journal of Sociology82(1):86–110.
60.
McFarlandDaniel A.2001. “Student Resistance: How the Formal and Informal Organization of Classrooms Facilitate Everyday Forms of Student Defiance.” American Journal of Sociology107(3):612–78.
61.
McNeelyClea A.NonnemakerJames M.BlumRobert W.2002. “Promoting School Connectedness: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.” Journal of School Health72(4):138–46.
62.
McPhersonMiller. 1983. “An Ecology of Affiliation.” American Sociological Review48(4):519–32.
63.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M.2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology27(1):415–44.
64.
MilnerMurray. 2004. Freaks, Geeks, and Cool Kids: American Teenagers, Schools, and the Culture of Consumption. New York: Routledge.
65.
MoodyJames. 2001. “Race, School Integration, and Friendship Segregation in America.” American Journal of Sociology107(3):679–716.
66.
MoodyJamesBrynildsenWendy D.OsgoodD. WayneFeinbergMark E.GestScott. 2011. “Popularity Trajectories and Substance Use in Early Adolescence.” Social Networks33(2):101–112.
67.
MouwTedEntwisleBarbara. 2006. “Residential Segregation and Interracial Friendship in Schools.” American Journal of Sociology112(2):394–441.
68.
OakesJeannieGamoranAdamPageReba N.1992. “Curriculum Differentiation: Opportunities, Consequences, and Meaning.” Pp. 570–608 in Handbook of Research on Curriculum, edited by JacksonP. W.New York: Macmillan.
69.
OishiShigehiro. 2014. “Socioecological Psychology.” Annual Review of Psychology65(1):581–609.
70.
OishiShigehiroGrahamJesse. 2010. “Social Ecology: Lost and Found in Psychological Science.” Perspectives on Psychological Science5(4):356–77.
71.
PattisonPhilippaRobinsGarry. 2002. “Neighborhood-Based Models for Social Networks.” Sociological Methodology32(1):301–337.
72.
PhelanPatriciaDavidsonAnnCaoHanh. 1991. “Students’ Multiple Worlds: Negotiating the Boundaries of Family, Peer, and School Cultures.” Anthropology and Education Quarterly22(3):224–50.
73.
PlankStephen. 2000. Finding One’s Place: Teaching Styles and Peer Relations in Diverse Classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
74.
PowellArthur G.FarrarEleanorCohenDavid. 1985. The Shopping Mall High School: Winners and Losers in the Educational Marketplace. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Company.
75.
PrisbellMarshallAndersenJanis F.1980. “The Importance of Perceived Homophily, Level of Uncertainty, Feeling Good, Safety, and Self-Disclosure in Interpersonal Relationships.” Communication Quarterly28(3):22–33.
76.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
77.
RidgewayCeciliaDiekemaDavid. 1989. “Dominance and Collective Hierarchy Formation in Male and Female Task Groups.” American Sociological Review54(1):79–93.
78.
RobinsGarryPattisonPhilippa. 2001. “Random Graph Models for Temporal Processes in Social Networks.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology25(1):5–41.
79.
RobinsGarryPattisonPhilippaKalishYuvalLusherDean. 2007. “An Introduction to Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models for Social Networks.” Social Networks29(2):173–91.
80.
RogersEverett M.BhowmikDilip K.1970. “Homophily-Heterophily: Relational Concepts for Communication Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly34(4):523–38.
81.
RytinaSteveMorganDavid L.1982. “The Arithmetic of Social Relations: The Interplay of Category and Network.” American Journal of Sociology88(1):88–113.
82.
SampsonRobert J.MorenoffJeffrey D.Gannon-RowleyThomas. 2002. “Assessing ‘Neighborhood Effects’: Social Processes and New Directions in Research.” Annual Review of Sociology28(1):443–78.
83.
SimmelGeorg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited by WolffK. H.New York: The Free Press.
84.
SmetanaJudithCampione-BarrNicoleMetzgerAaron. 2006. “Adolescent Development in Interpersonal and Societal Contexts.” Annual Review of Psychology57(1):255–84.
85.
SnijdersTom A. B.van de BuntGerhard G.SteglichChristian E. G.2010. “Introduction to Stochastic Actor-Based Models for Network Dynamics.” Social Networks32(1):44–60.
86.
SørensenAage B.1970. “Organizational Differentiation of Students and Educational Opportunity.” Sociology of Education43(4):355–76.
87.
StarkTobias H.2011. “Integration in Schools: A Process Perspective on Students’ Interethnic Attitudes and Interpersonal Relationships.” ICS Dissertation, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
88.
SteinbergLaurenceMorrisAmanda Sheffield. 2001. “Adolescent Development.” Annual Review of Psychology52(1):83–110.
89.
StodolskySusan S.1988. The Subject Matters: Classroom Activity in Math and Social Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
90.
StolleDietlindSorokaStuartJohnstonRichard. 2008. “When Does Diversity Erode Trust? Neighbourhood Diversity, Interpersonal Trust, and the Mediating Effect of Social Interactions.” Political Studies56(1):57–75.
91.
WassermanStanleyFaustKatherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
92.
WassermanStanleyPattisonPhilippa. 1996. “Logit Models and Logistic Regressions for Social Networks: An Introduction to Markov Graphs and p*.” Psychometrika61(3):401–425.
93.
WattToni T.2003. “Are Small Schools and Private Schools Better for Adolescents’ Emotional Adjustment?” Sociology of Education76(4):344–67.
94.
WimmerAndreasLewisKevin. 2010. “Beyond and Below Racial Homophily: ERG Models of a Friendship Network Documented on Facebook.” American Journal of Sociology116(2):583–642.
95.
WobmannLudgerWestMartin. 2006. “Class-Size Effects in School Systems around the World: Evidence from Between-Grade Variation in TIMSS.” European Economic Review50(3):695–736.
96.
ZijlstraBonne J. H.van DuijnMarijtje A. J.SnijdersTom A. B.2006. “The Multilevel p2 Model: A Random Effects Model for the Analysis of Multiple Social Networks.” Methodology2(1):42–47.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
