There has been great interest in the relationship between immigration and the welfare state in recent years, and particularly since Alesina and Glaeser’s (2004) influential work. Following literatures on solidarity and fractionalization, race in the U.S. welfare state, and anti-immigrant sentiments, many contend that immigration undermines public support for social policy. This study analyzes three measures of immigration and six welfare attitudes using 1996 and 2006 International Social Survey Program (ISSP) data for 17 affluent democracies. Based on multi-level and two-way fixed-effects models, our results mostly fail to support the generic hypothesis that immigration undermines public support for social policy. The percent foreign born, net migration, and the 10-year change in the percent foreign born all fail to have robust significant negative effects on welfare attitudes. There is evidence that the percent foreign born significantly undermines the welfare attitude that government “should provide a job for everyone who wants one.” However, there is more robust evidence that net migration and change in percent foreign born have positive effects on welfare attitudes. We conclude that the compensation and chauvinism hypotheses provide greater potential for future research, and we critically consider other ways immigration could undermine the welfare state. Ultimately, this study demonstrates that factors other than immigration are far more important for public support of social policy.
AlesinaAlberto F.BaqirRezaEasterlyWilliam. 1999. “Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics114:1243–84.
2.
AlesinaAlberto F.GlaeserEdward L.2004. Fighting Poverty in the U.S. and Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
BailChristopher A.2008. “The Configuration of Symbolic Boundaries against Immigrants in Europe.” American Sociological Review73:37–59.
4.
BaldwinKateHuberJohn D.2010. “Economic Versus Cultural Differences: Forms of Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision.” American Political Science Review104:644–62.
5.
BantingKeithKymlickaWill. 2006. “Introduction: Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Setting the Context.” Pp. 1–45 in Multiculturalism and the Welfare State, edited by BantingK.KymlickaW.New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BlalockHubert M.Jr.1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
7.
BlekesauneMorten. 2007. “Economic Conditions and Public Attitudes to Welfare Policies.” European Sociological Review23:393–403.
8.
BlekesauneMortenQuadagnoJill. 2003. “Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies: A Comparative Analysis of 24 Nations.” European Sociological Review19:415–27.
9.
BlumerHerbert. 1958. “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position.” Pacific Sociological Review1:3–7.
10.
BoeriTitoHansonGordonMcCormickBarry. 2002. Immigration Policy and the Welfare System. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
BradyDavid. 2009. Rich Democracies, Poor People. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
BradyDavidBeckfieldJasonSeeleib-KaiserMartin. 2005. “Economic Globalization and the Welfare State in Affluent Democracies, 1975–2001.” American Sociological Review70:921–48.
13.
BradyDavidLeeHang Young. Forthcoming. “The Rise and Fall of Government Spending in Affluent Democracies, 1971–2008.” Journal of European Social Policy.
14.
BrooksClemBradyDavid. 1999. “Income, Economic Voting, and Long-Term Political Change, 1952–1996.” Social Forces77:1339–75.
15.
BrooksClemManzaJeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
BrownHana E.2013. “Race, Legality, and the Social Policy Consequences of Anti-Immigrant Mobilization.” American Sociological Review78:290–314.
17.
BurgoonBrianKosterFerryvan EgmondMarcel. 2012. “Support for Redistribution and the Paradox of Immigration.” Journal of European Social Policy22:288–304.
18.
CastlesStephenMillerMark J.2008. The Age of Migration, 4th ed.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
CeobanuAlin M.EscandellXavier. 2010. “Comparative Analyses of Public Attitudes toward Immigrants and Immigration Using Multinational Survey Data: A Review of Theories and Research.” Annual Review of Sociology36:309–328.
20.
CrepazMarkus M. L.2008. Trust Beyond Borders. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
21.
CusackThomasIversenTorbenRehmPhilipp. 2006. “Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy22:365–89.
22.
DeWaardJackKimKeutaeRaymerJames. 2012. “Migration Systems in Europe: Evidence from Harmonized Flow Data.” Demography49:1307–33.
23.
DeWaardJackRaymerJames. 2012. “The Temporal Dynamics of International Migration in Europe: Recent Trends.” Demographic Research26:543–92.
24.
DyckJoshua J.HusseyLaura S.2008. “The End of Welfare as We Know It? Durable Attitudes in a Changing Information Environment.” Public Opinion Quarterly72:589–618.
25.
EgerMaureen A.2010. “Even in Sweden: The Effect of Immigration on Support for Welfare State Spending.” European Sociological Review26:203–217.
26.
ErvastiHeikkiHjermMikael. 2012. “Immigration, Trust and Support for the Welfare State.” Pp. 153–71 in The Future of the Welfare State, edited by ErvastiH.FridbergT.Goul AndersenJ.RingdalK.Camberley, UK: Edward Elgar.
27.
FernandezJuan J.Jaime-CastilloAntonio M.2012. “Positive or Negative Policy Feedbacks? Explaining Popular Attitudes towards Pragmatic Pension Policy Reforms.” European Sociological Review29:803–815.
28.
FoxCybelle. 2004. “The Changing Color of Welfare? How Whites’ Attitudes toward Latinos Influence Support for the Welfare State.” American Journal of Sociology110:580–625.
29.
FoxCybelle. 2012. Three Worlds of Relief. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
FinseraasHenning. 2008. “Immigration and Preferences for Redistribution: An Empirical Analysis of European Social Survey Data.” Comparative European Politics6:407–431.
31.
FullertonAndrew S.DixonJeffrey C.2009. “Racialization, Asymmetry, and the Context of Welfare Attitudes in the American States.” Journal of Political and Military Sociology37:95–120.
32.
GilensMartin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
GilensMartin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power and America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
HabyarimanaJamesHumphreysMacartanPosnerDaniel L.WeinsteinJeremy M.2007. “Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision?”American Political Science Review101:709–725.
35.
HechterMichael. 2004. “From Class to Culture.” American Journal of Sociology110:400–445.
36.
HopkinsDaniel J.2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review104:40–60.
KayaYunusKarakocEkrem. 2012. “Civilizing vs. Destructive Globalization? A Multi-Level Analysis of Anti-Immigrant Prejudice.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology53:23–44.
39.
KitscheltHerbert. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
40.
KoopmansRuudMichalowskiInesWaibelStine. 2012. “Citizenship Rights for Immigrants: National Political Processes and Cross-National Convergence in Western Europe, 1980–2008.” American Journal of Sociology117:1202–1245.
41.
KunovichRobert M.2004. “Social Structural Position and Prejudice: An Exploration of Cross-National Differences in Regression Slopes.” Social Science Research33:20–44.
42.
KymlickaWillBantingKeith. 2006. “Immigration, Multiculturalism, and the Welfare State.” Ethics and International Affairs20:281–304.
43.
LipsetSeymour M.MarksGary W.2000. It Didn’t Happen Here. New York: Norton.
44.
LuttmerErzo F. P.2001. “Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution.” Journal of Political Economy109:500–528.
45.
ManzaJeffBrooksClem. 2012. “How Sociology Lost Public Opinion: A Genealogy of a Missing Concept in the Study of the Political.” Sociological Theory30:89–113.
46.
MauSteffenBurkhardtChristoph. 2009. “Migration and Welfare State Solidarity in Western Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy19:213–29.
47.
MewesJanMauSteffen. 2012. “Unraveling Working-Class Welfare Chauvinism.” Pp. 119–57 in Contested Welfare States, edited by SvallforsS.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48.
MisraJoyaMollerStephanieKaridesMarina. 2003. “Envisioning Dependency: Changing Media Depictions of Welfare in the Twentieth Century.” Social Problems50:482–504.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)a. Various Years. OECD Social Expenditures Database. Paris: OECD.
51.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)b. Various Years. OECD Labor Force Statistics. Paris: OECD.
52.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2008. A Profile of Immigrant Populations in the 21st Century. Paris: OECD.
53.
PatsiurkoNatalkaCampbellJohn L.HallJohn A.2012. “Measuring Cultural Diversity: Ethnic, Linguistic and Religious Fractionalization in the OECD.” Ethnic and Racial Studies35:195–217.
54.
PontussonJonas. 2006. “The American Welfare State in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on Alberto Alesina and Edward L. Glaeser, ‘Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe.’”Perspectives on Politics4:315–26.
55.
QuadagnoJill. 1994. The Color of Welfare. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
QuillianLincoln. 1995. “Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe.” American Sociological Review60:586–611.
RazinAssafSadkaEframSwagelPhillip. 2002. “Tax Burden and Migration: A Political Economy Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Public Economics85:167–90.
59.
RovnyJan. 2013. “Where Do Radical Right Parties Stand: Position Blurring in Multidimensional Competition.” European Political Science Review5:1–26.
60.
SachwehPatrickOlafsdottirSigrun. 2010. “The Welfare State and Equality? Stratification Realities and Aspirations in Three Welfare Regimes.” European Sociological Review28:149–68.
61.
SchramSanford F.SossJoeFordingRichard C.2003. Race and the Politics of Welfare Reform. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
62.
SemyonovMosheRaijmanRebeccaGorodzeiskyAnastasia. 2006. “The Rise of Anti-foreigner Sentiment in European Societies, 1988–2000.” American Sociological Review71:426–49.
63.
SossJoeSchramSanford F.2007. “A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback.” American Political Science Review101:111–27.
64.
SvallforsStefan. 1997. “Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations.” European Sociological Review13:283–304.
65.
SvallforsStefan. 2006. The Moral Economy of Class. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
66.
SvallforsStefan. 2007. The Political Sociology of the Welfare State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
67.
Taylor-GoobyPeter. 2005. “Is the Future American? Or, Can Left Politics Preserve European Welfare States from Erosion Through Growing ‘Racial’ Diversity.” Journal of Social Policy34:661–72.
68.
Van der WaalJeroenAchterbergPeterHoutmanDickde KosterWillemManevskaKaterina. 2010. “‘Some Are More Equal Than Others’: Economic Egalitarianism and Welfare Chauvinism in the Netherlands.” Journal of European Social Policy20:350–63.
69.
Van OorschotWim. 2006. “Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States.” Journal of European Social Policy16:23–42.
70.
Van OorschotWim. 2010. “Public Perceptions of the Economic, Moral, Social and Migration Consequences of the Welfare State: An Empirical Analysis of Welfare State Legitimacy.” Journal of European Social Policy20:19–31.
71.
WilenskyHarold L.2002. Rich Democracies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
