Did Americans respond to the recent Great Recession by demanding that government provide policy solutions to rising income insecurity, an expectation of state-of-the-art theorizing on the dynamics of mass opinion? Or did the recession erode support for government activism, in line with alternative scholarship pointing to economic factors having the reverse effect? We find that public support for government social programs declined sharply between 2008 and 2010, yet both fixed-effects and repeated survey analyses suggest economic change had little impact on policy-attitude formation. What accounts for these surprising developments? We consider alternative microfoundations emphasizing the importance of prior beliefs and biases to the formation of policy attitudes. Analyzing the General Social Surveys panel, our results suggest political partisanship has been central. Gallup and Evaluations of Government and Society surveys provide further evidence against the potentially confounding scenario of government overreach, in which federal programs adopted during the recession and the Obama presidency propelled voters away from government. We note implications for theoretical models of opinion formation, as well as directions for partisanship scholarship and interdisciplinary research on the Great Recession.
AbramowitzAlan I.2013. The Polarized Public? Why American Government Is So Dysfunctional. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
2.
AbramsonPaul R.AldrichJohn H.RohdeDavid W. 2010. Change and Continuity in the 2008 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
3.
AldrichJohn H.2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
AlvarezMichael R.NaglerJonathan. 1998. “Economics, Entitlements, and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science42:1349–63.
5.
American National Election Studies. 2012. Evaluations of Government and Society Study [machine-readable codebooks and data files]. Ann Arbor: Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan (http://www.iscpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/32701).
6.
AndersonChristopher J.2007. “The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability.” Annual Review of Political Science10:271–96.
7.
BafumiJosephHerronMichael C. 2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress.” American Political Science Review104:519–42.
8.
BafumiJosephShapiroRobert Y.2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” Journal of Politics71:1–24.
9.
BaldassarriDeliaGelmanAndrew. 2008. “Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion.” American Journal of Sociology114:408–446.
10.
BaltagiBadi H. 2008. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 4th ed.New York: Wiley.
11.
BartelsLarry M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior24:117–50.
BoboLawrence D.1991. “Social Responsibility, Individualism, and Redistributive Policies.” Sociological Forum6:71–92.
14.
BoboLawrence D.HutchingsVincent. 1996. “Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer’s Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context.” American Sociological Review61:951–72.
15.
BrinkleyAlan. 2003. Liberalism and Its Discontents. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
BursteinPaul. 2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly56:29–40.
17.
CampbellAngusConversePhilip E.MillerWarren E.StokesDonald E.1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
18.
CampbellJames E.2005. “Why Bush Won the Presidential Election of 2004: Incumbency, Ideology, Terrorism, and Turnout.” Political Science Quarterly120:219–41.
19.
CampbellJames E.2008. “Editor’s Introduction: Forecasting the 2008 National Elections.” PS: Political Science & Politics61:679–82.
20.
Canes-WroneBrandice. 2006. Who Leads Whom? Presidents, Policy, and the Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Della FaveRichard L.1980. “The Meek Shall Not Inherit the Earth: Self-Evaluation and the Legitimation of Stratification.” American Sociological Review45:955–71.
22.
Delli CarpiniMichael X.KeeterScott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
DittoPeter H.LopezDavid F. 1992. “Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63:568–84.
24.
DruckmanJames N.FeinJordanLeeperThomas J.2012. “A Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability.” American Political Science Review106:430–54.
25.
DuchRaymond M.PalmerHarvey D.AndersonChristopher J. 2000. “Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions.” American Journal of Political Science44:635–52.
26.
DurrRobert H.1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?”American Political Science Review87:158–70.
27.
EdwardsGeorge C.2009. The Strategic President: Persuasion and Opportunity in Presidential Leadership. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
EnnsPeter K.KellstedtPaul M.McAvoyGreg E.2012. “The Consequences of Partisanship in Economic Perceptions.” Public Opinion Quarterly76:287–310.
29.
EriksonRobert S.MacKuenMichael B.StimsonJames A.2002a. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
EriksonRobert S.MacKuenMichael B.StimsonJames A.2002b. “Public Opinion and Policy: Causal Flow in a Macro System Model.” Pp. 33–53 in Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy, edited by ManzaJ.Lomax CookF.PageB.New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
FairRoy C.1978. “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President.” Review of Economics and Statistics60:159–72.
32.
FiorinaMorris P.AbramsSamuel J.2008. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review of Political Science11:563–88.
33.
FiorinaMorris P.AbramsSamuel J.PopeJeremy C.2011. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America, 3rd ed.Boston: Longman.
34.
FlacheAndreasMacyMichael W.2011. “Small Worlds and Cultural Polarization.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology34:146–76.
35.
GainesBrian J.KuklinskiJames H.QuirkPaul J.PeytonBuddyVerkuilenJay. 2007. “Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraq.” Journal of Politics69:957–74.
GelmanAndrewKingGary. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?” British Journal of Political Science23:409–451.
38.
GerberAlan S.HuberGregory A.WashingtonEbonya. 2010. “Party Affiliation, Partisanship, and Political Beliefs: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review104:720–44.
39.
GerberElisabeth R.LewisJeffrey B.2004. “Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation.” Journal of Political Economy112:1364–83.
40.
GilensMartin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
GilensMartin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.
42.
GilovichThomasGriffinDaleKahnemanDaniel. 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
GreenDonald P.PalmquistBradley L.SchicklerEric. 1998. “Macropartisanship: A Replication and Critique.” American Political Science Review93:883–99.
44.
GreenDonald P.PalmquistBradley L.SchicklerEric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45.
HalabyCharles N.2004. “Panel Models in Sociological Research: Theory into Practice.” Annual Review of Sociology30:507–544.
46.
HeerwigJennifer A.McCabeBrian J. 2009. “Education and Social Desirability Bias: The Case of a Black Presidential Candidate.” Social Science Quarterly90:674–86.
47.
HibbsDouglas H.2006. “Voting and the Macroeconomy.” Pp. 565–86 in Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, edited by WeingastB.WittmanD.New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
HitlinStevenVaiseyStephen. 2010. “Back to the Future: Reviving the Sociology of Morality.” Pp. 3–14 in Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, edited by HitlinS.VaiseyS.New York: Springer.
49.
HsiaoCheng. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
JacobsonGary C.2010. A Divider, Not a Uniter: George W. Bush and the American People. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
51.
JostJohn J.BanajiMahzarin R.NosekBrian A.2004. “A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo.” Political Psychology25:881–919.
52.
KahnemanDaniel. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.
53.
KahnemanDanielKnetschJack J.ThalerRichard H.1991. “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias.” Journal of Economic Perspectives5:193–206.
54.
KellyNathan J.EnnsPeter K.2010. “Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-Reinforcing Link between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science54:855–70.
55.
KenworthyLaneOwensLindsay A. 2011. “The Surprisingly Weak Effect of Recessions on Public Opinion.” Pp. 196–219 in The Great Recession, edited by GruskyD. B.WesternB.WimerC.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
56.
KinderDonald R.SandersLynn M. 1996. Divided By Color: Racialized Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
KluegelJames R.MasonDavid S.WegenerBernd, eds. 1995. Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
58.
KreidlMartin. 2000. “Perceptions of Poverty and Wealth in Western and Post-Communist Countries.” Social Justice Research13:151–76.
59.
KundaZiva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin108:480–98.
60.
LevenduskyMatthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
62.
LipsetSeymour Martin. 1996. American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
63.
LucasRobert E.JrSargentThomas J., eds. 1981. Rational Expectations and Econometric Practice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
64.
MacKuenMichael B.EriksonRobert S.StimsonJames A.1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” American Political Science Review86:597–611.
65.
ManzaJeffCookFay LomaxPageBenjamin I., eds. 2002. Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
66.
ManzaJeffHeerwigJennifer A.McCabeBrian J. 2012. “Political Trends 1972–2006: What Impact Did the Republican Resurgence Have on Mass Opinion?” Pp. 117–45 in Social Trends in the United States, 1972–2006, edited by MarsdenP.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67.
McCallLeslie. 2013. The Un/deserving Rich: Rising Inequality and American Beliefs about Income Inequality, Economic Opportunity, and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
McConnellAllen R.LeiboldJill M. 2001. “Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology37:435–42.
70.
NosekBrian A.GreenwaldAnthony G.BanajiMahzarin R.2007. “The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review.” Pp. 265–92 in Automatic Processes in Social Thinking and Behavior, edited by BarghJ.New York: Psychology Press.
71.
PageBenjamin I.ShapiroRobert Y. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72.
PanagopoulosCostasShapiroRobert Y. 2011. “Big Government and Public Opinion.” Pp. 639–56 in The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media, edited by EdwardsG.JacobsL.ShapiroR.New York: Oxford University Press.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
75.
RemmerKaren L.1993. “The Political Economy of Elections in Latin America, 1980–1991.” American Political Science Review87:393–407.
76.
SchlozmanKay LehmanPageBenjamin I.VerbaSidneyFiorinaMorris P.2005. “Inequalities of Political Voice.” Pp. 19–87 in Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn, edited by JacobsL.SkocpolT.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
77.
SearsDavid O.van LaarColleteCarrilloMaryKostermanRick. 1997. “Is It Really Racism? The Origins of White Americans’ Opposition to Race-Targeted Policies.” Public Opinion Quarterly61:16–53.
78.
SearsDavid O.SidaniusJamesBoboLawrence D., eds. 2000. Racialized Politics: The Debate About Racism in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79.
ShaferByron E.1999. “American Exceptionalism.” Annual Review of Political Science2:445–63.
80.
ShapiroRobert Y.2011. “Public Opinion and American Democracy.” Public Opinion Quarterly75:982–1017.
81.
ShapiroRobert Y.Bloch-ElkonYaeli. 2007. “Ideological Partisanship and American Public Opinion toward Foreign Policy.” Pp. 49–68 in Power and Superpower: Global Leadership and Exceptionalism in the 21st Century, edited by HalperinM. H.LaurentiJ.RundletP.BoyerS. P.New York: Century Foundation Press.
SnyderJackShapiroRobert Y.Bloch-ElkonYaeli. 2009. “Free Hand Abroad, Divide and Rule at Home.” World Politics61:155–87.
84.
SorokaStuart N.WlezienChristopher. 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
85.
SorokaStuart N.WlezienChristopher. 2012. “Public Reactions to the Economy and Economic Crisis in the UK.” Department of Political Science, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Unpublished manuscript.
86.
StarrPaul. 2007. Freedom’s Power: The True Force of Liberalism. New York: Basic Books.
87.
StevensonRandolph T.2001. “The Economy and Policy Mood: A Fundamental Dynamic of Democratic Politics?” American Journal of Political Science45:620–33.
88.
StimsonJames A.2004. Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
89.
StimsonJames A.2011. “The Issues in Representation.” Pp. 347–60 in Who Gets Represented?, edited by EnnsP.WlezienC.New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
90.
StimsonJames A.MacKuenMichael B.EriksonRobert S.1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review89:543–65.
91.
TaberCharles S.LodgeMilton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science50:755–69.
92.
TuckerJoshua A.2006. Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, 1990–1999. New York: Cambridge University Press.
93.
TverskyAmosKahnemanDaniel. 1971. “Belief in the Law of Small Numbers.” Psychological Bulletin76:105–110.
94.
VaiseyStephen. 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Action.” American Journal of Sociology114:1675–1715.
95.
WildavskyAaron. 1991. “Resolved, That Individualism and Egalitarianism Be Made Compatible in America: Political-Cultural Roots of Exceptionalism.” Pp. 187–221 in Is America Different? A New Look at American Exceptionalism, edited by ShaferB.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
96.
WlezienChristopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science39:981–1000.
97.
WlezienChristopherEriksonRobert S.2002. “The Time Line of Presidential Campaigns.” Journal of Politics64:969–93.
98.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
