This study extends existing world society research on ideational diffusion by going beyond examinations of national policy change to investigate the spread of ideas among nonelite individuals. Specifically, I test whether recent trends in women’s attitudes about intimate partner violence are converging toward global cultural scripts. Results suggest that global norms regarding violence against women are reaching citizens worldwide, including in some of the least privileged parts of the globe. During the first decade of the 2000s, women in 23 of the 26 countries studied became more likely to reject intimate partner violence. Structural socioeconomic or demographic changes, such as urbanization, rising educational attainment, increasing media access, and cohort replacement, fail to explain the majority of the observed trend. Rather, women of all ages and social locations became less likely to accept justifications for intimate partner violence. The near uniformity of the trend and speed of the change in attitudes about intimate partner violence suggest that global cultural diffusion has played an important role.
AlwinDuane F.1990. “Cohort Replacement and Changes in Parental Socialization Values.” Journal of Marriage and Family52:347–60.
2.
BarrettDeborahTsuiAmy Ong. 1999. “Policy as Symbolic Statement: International Response to National Population Policies.” Social Forces78:213–34.
3.
BerkovitchNitza. 1999a. From Motherhood to Citizenship: Women’s Rights and International Organizations. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
4.
BerkovitchNitza. 1999b. “The Emergence and Transformation of the International Women’s Movement.” Pp. 100–126 in Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875, edited by BoliJ.ThomasG. M.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
BerkovitchNitzaBradleyKaren. 1999. “The Globalization of Women’s Status: Consensus/Dissensus in World Polity.” Sociological Perspectives42:481–98.
6.
BoliJohnThomasGeorge M.. 1997. “World Culture in the World Polity: A Century of International Non-Governmental Organization.” American Sociological Review62:171–90.
7.
BoyleElizabeth H.2002. Female Genital Cutting: Cultural Conflict in the Global Community. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
BoyleElizabeth H.Carbone-LopezKristin. 2006. “Movement Frames and African Women’s Explanations for Opposing Female Genital Cutting.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology47:435–65.
9.
BoyleElizabeth H.PrevesSharon E.. 2000. “National Politics as International Process: The Case of Anti-Female-Genital-Cutting Laws.” Law & Society Review34:703–737.
10.
ChimbweteChiweniWatkinsSusan CottsZuluEliya Msiyaphazi. 2005. “The Evolution of Population Policies in Kenya and Malawi.” Population Research and Policy Review24:85–106.
11.
ClelandJohnWilsonChristopher. 1987. “Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View.” Population Studies41:5–30.
12.
FilmerDeonPritchettLant H.. 2001. “Estimating Wealth Effects without Expenditure Data—Or Tears: An Application to Educational Enrollments in States of India.” Demography38:115–32.
13.
FirebaughGlenn. 1989. “Methods for Estimating Cohort Replacement Effects.” Sociological Methodology19:243–62.
14.
FirebaughGlenn. 1992. “Where Does Social Change Come From? Estimating the Relative Contributions of Individual Change and Population Turnover.” Population Research and Policy Review11:1–20.
15.
FrankDavid JohnCampBayliss J.BoutcherSteven A.. 2010. “Worldwide Trends in the Criminal Regulation of Sex, 1945 to 2005.” American Sociological Review75:867–93.
16.
FrankDavid JohnHardingeTaraWosick-CorreaKassia. 2009. “The Global Dimensions of Rape-Law Reform: A Cross-National Study of Policy Outcomes.” American Sociological Review74:272–90.
17.
FrankDavid JohnHironakaAnnSchoferEvan. 2000. “The Nation-State and the Natural Environment over the Twentieth Century.” American Sociological Review65:96–116.
18.
Hafner-BurtonEmilie M.TsutsuiKiyoteru. 2005. “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises.” American Journal of Sociology110:1373–1411.
19.
HeiseLori L.1998. “Violence against Women: An Integrated, Ecological Framework.” Violence against Women4:262–90.
20.
HeiseLori L.Garcia-MorenoClaudia. 2002. “Violence by Intimate Partners.” Pp. 87–121 in World Report on Violence and Health, edited by KrugE. G.DahlbergL. L.MercyJ. A.ZwiA. B.LozanoR.. Geneva: World Health Organization.
21.
HornikRobertMcAnanyEmile. 2001. “Mass Media and Fertility Change.” Pp. 208–229 in Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition: Selected Perspectives, edited by CasterlineJ. B.. National Research Council, Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22.
HtunMalaWeldonS. Laurel. 2012. “The Civic Origins of Progressive Policy Change: Combating Violence against Women in Global Perspective, 1975–2005.” American Political Science Review106:548–69.
23.
JayakodyRukmalieThorntonArlandAxinnWilliam G., eds. 2008. International Family Change: Ideational Perspectives. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
24.
KeckMargaret E.SikkinkKathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25.
KishorSunitaSubaiyaLekha. 2008. Understanding Women’s Empowerment: A Comparative Analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Data. DHS Comparative Reports No. 20. Calverton, MD: Macro International.
26.
KooJeong-WooRamirezFrancisco O.. 2009. “National Incorporation of Global Human Rights: Worldwide Expansion of National Human Rights Institutions, 1966–2004.” Social Forces87:1321–53.
27.
LesthaegheRon. 1983. “A Century of Demographic and Cultural Change in Western Europe: An Exploration of Underlying Dimensions.” Population and Development Review9:411–35.
28.
LesthaegheRonSurkynJohan. 1988. “Cultural Dynamics and Economic Theories of Fertility Change.” Population and Development Review14:1–45.
29.
LevittPeggyMerrySally Eagle. 2009. “Vernacularization on the Ground: Local Use of Global Women’s Rights in Peru, China, India and the United States.” Global Networks4:441–61.
30.
LonghoferWesleySchoferEvan. 2010. “National and Global Origins of Environmental Association.” American Sociological Review75:505–533.
31.
LukeNancyWatkinsSusan Cotts. 2002. “Reactions of Developing-Country Elites to International Population Policy.” Population and Development Review28:707–733.
MerrySally Engle. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
MeyerJohn W.2010. “World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor.” Annual Review of Sociology36:1–20.
35.
MeyerJohn W.BoliJohnThomasGeorge M.RamirezFrancisco O.. 1997. “World Society and the Nation State.” American Journal of Sociology103:144–81.
36.
MeyerJohn W.JeppersonRonald L.. 2000. “The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.” Sociological Theory18:100–120.
37.
MeyerJohn W.RamirezFrancisco O.SoysalYasemin N.. 1992. “World Expansion of Mass Education, 1870–1980.” Sociology of Education65:128–49.
38.
National Research Council. 2001. Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition: Selected Perspectives, edited by CasterlineJ. B.. Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
39.
NorrisPippaInglehartRonald. 2002. “Islamic Culture and Democracy: Testing the ‘Clash of Civilizations’ Thesis.” Comparative Sociology1:235–69.
40.
PaxtonPamelaHughesMelanie M.GreenJennifer L.. 2006. “The International Women’s Movement and Women’s Political Representation.” American Sociological Review71:898–920.
41.
RamirezFrancisco O.SoysalYaseminShanahanSuzanne. 1997. “The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women’s Suffrage Rights, 1890 to 1990.” American Sociological Review62:735–45.
RyderNorman B.1965. “The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change.” American Sociological Review30:843–61.
44.
ThompsonKaren Brown. 2002. “Women’s Rights Are Human Rights.” Pp. 96–122 in Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms, edited by KhagramS.RikerJ. V.SikkinkK.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
45.
ThorntonArland. 2001. “The Developmental Paradigm, Reading History Sideways, and Family Change.” Demography38:449–65.
46.
ThorntonArland. 2005. Reading History Sideways: The Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
TinkerIrene. 2004. “Introduction: Women Transforming International Development.” Pp. xiii–xxx in Developing Power: How Women Transformed International Development, edited by FraserA. S.TinkerI.. New York: The Feminist Press at the City University of New York.
48.
TorfasonMagnus ThorIngramPaul. 2010. “Intergovernmental Organization and the Global Rise of Democracy.” American Sociological Review75:355–77.
49.
TrueJacquiMintromMichael. 2001. “Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming.” International Studies Quarterly45:27–57.
50.
TsutsuiKiyoteruShinHwa-Ji. 2008. “Global Norms, Local Activism and Social Movement Outcomes: Global Human Rights and Resident Koreans in Japan.” Social Problems55:391–418.
United Nations. 2008. “Good Practices in Legislation on Violence against Women: Report of the Expert Group Meeting.” Vienna, Austria: United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women & United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
UthmanOlalekan A.LawokoStephenMoradiTahereh. 2009. “Factors Associated with Attitudes towards Intimate Partner Violence against Women: A Comparative Analysis of 17 Sub-Saharan Countries.” BMC International Health and Human Rights.
55.
VyasSeemaKumaranayakeLilani. 2006. “Constructing Socio-Economic Status Indices: How to Use Principal Components Analysis.” Health Policy and Planning21:459–68.
56.
YountKathryn M.2005. “Resources, Family Organization, and Domestic Violence against Married Women in Minya, Egypt.” Journal of Marriage and Family67:579–96.
57.
YountKathryn M.HalimNafisaHynesMichelleHillmanEmily R.. 2011. “Response Effects to Attitudinal Questions about Domestic Violence against Women: A Comparative Perspective.” Social Science Research40:873–84.
58.
YountKathryn M.LiLi. 2009. “Women’s ‘Justification’ of Domestic Violence in Egypt.” Journal of Marriage and Family71:1125–40.
59.
YountKathryn M.RashadHoda, eds. 2008. Family in the Middle East: Ideational Change in Egypt, Iran, and Tunisia. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
