This article uses Academy Award nominations for acting to explore how artistic achievement is situated within a collaborative context. Assessment of individual effort is particularly difficult in film because quality is not transparent, but the project-based nature of the field allows us to observe individuals in multiple collaborative contexts. We address these issues with analyses of the top-10 credited roles from films released in theaters between 1936 and 2005. Controlling for an actor's personal history and the basic traits of a film, we explore two predictions. First, we find that status, as measured by asymmetric centrality in the network of screen credits, is an efficient measure of star power and mediates the relationship between experience and formal artistic consecration. Second, we find that actors are most likely to be consecrated when working with elite collaborators. We conclude by arguing that selection into privileged work teams provides cumulative advantage.
Abrahamson, Mark.1973. ‘‘Talent Complementarity and Organizational Stratification.’’ Administrative Science Quarterly18:186-93.
2.
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.2009. ‘‘About the Academy Awards’’ (http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/about/).
3.
Adler, Moshe.1985. ‘‘Stardom and Talent.’’American Economic Review75:208-12.
4.
Alchian, Armen A. and Harold Demsetz.1972. ‘‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.’’American Economic Review62:777-95.
5.
Anand, N. and Mary R. Watson. 2004. ‘‘Tournament Rituals in the Evolution of Fields: The Case of the Grammy Awards.’’Academy of Management Journal47:59-80.
6.
Axelrod, Robert.1980. ‘‘Effective Choice in the Prisoner’s Dilemma.’’ The Journal of Conflict Resolution24:3-25.
7.
Baker, Wayne E. and Robert R. Faulkner.1991. ‘‘Role as Resource in the Hollywood Film Industry.’’American Journal of Sociology97:279-309.
8.
Bandiera, Oriana, Iwan Barankay, and Imran Rasul.2005. ‘‘Social Preferences and the Response to Incentives: Evidence from Personnel Data. ’’ Quarterly Journal of Economics120:917-62.
9.
Battu, Harminder, Clive R. Belfield, and Peter J. Sloane.2004. ‘‘Human Capital Spillovers in the Workplace: Evidence for the Service Sector in Britain.’’International Journal of Manpower25:123-38.
10.
Baumann, Shyon.2001. ‘‘Intellectualization and Art World Development: Film in the United States.’’ American Sociological Review66:404-26.
11.
---. 2007. Hollywood Highbrow: From Entertainment to Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
12.
Beck, E.M., Patrick M. Horan, and Charles M.Tolbert II1978. ‘‘Stratification in a Dual Economy: A Sectoral Model of Earnings Determination.’’American Sociological Review43:704-720.
13.
Becker, Gary S.1973. ‘‘A Theory of Marriage: Part I.’’Journal of Political Economy81:813-46.
14.
Becker, Howard S.1978. ‘‘Arts and Crafts.’’American Journal of Sociology83:862-89.
15.
Benjamin, Beth A. and Joel M. Podolny.1999. ‘‘Status, Quality and Social Order in the California Wine Industry.’’Administrative Science Quarterly44:563-89.
16.
Bielby, Denise and William T. Bielby.2002. ‘‘Hollywood Dreams, Harsh Realities: Writing for Film and Television.’’Contexts1:21-27.
17.
Bielby, William T. and Denise Bielby.1994. ‘‘‘All Hits Are Flukes’: Institutionalized Decision Making and the Rhetoric of Network Prime-Time Program Development.’’American Journal of Sociology99:1287-1313.
18.
---. 1999. ‘‘Organizational Mediation of Project-Based Labor Markets: Talent Agencies and the Careers of Screenwriters. ’’ American Sociological Review64:64-85.
19.
Bonacich, Phillip and Paulette Lloyd.2001. ‘‘Eigenvector-Like Measures of Centrality for Asymmetric Relations.’’ Social Networks23:191-201.
20.
Bourdieu, Pierre.1993. The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
Cardoso, Ana Rute.2000. ‘‘Wage Differentials Across Firms: An Application of Multilevel Modeling.’’Journal of Applied Econometrics15:343-54.
22.
Caves, Richard E.2000. Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Compaine, Benjamin M. and Douglas Gomery.2000. Who Owns the Media?3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
24.
Cowen, Tyler.2000. What Price Fame. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
DiMaggio, Paul.1981. ‘‘Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth-Century Boston. Part 1: The Creation of an Organizational Base for High Culture in America.’’ Media, Culture and Society4:33-50.
26.
English, James F.2005. The Economy of Prestige: Prizes, Awards, and the Circulation of Cultural Value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Faulkner, Robert R.1973. ‘‘Orchestra Interaction: Some Features of Communication and Authority in an Artistic Organization.’’The Sociological Quarterly14:147-57.
28.
Faulkner, Robert R. and Andy B. Anderson.1987. ‘‘Short-Term Projects and Emergent Careers: Evidence from Hollywood.’’American Journal of Sociology92:879-909.
29.
Gould, Roger V.2002. ‘‘The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test.’’American Journal of Sociology107:1143-78.
30.
Griliches, Zvi.1969. ‘‘Capital-Skill Complementarity.’’Review of Economics and Statistics51:465-68.
31.
Gumbel, Peter, John Lippman, Lisa Bannon, and Bruce Orwall.1998. ‘‘What’s an Oscar Worth?’’The Wall Street Journal, March 20, p. W1.
32.
Hamlen, William A.1991. ‘‘Superstardom in Popular Music: Empirical Evidence.’’Review of Economics and Statistics73:729-33.
33.
Hollister, Matissa N.2004. ‘‘Does Firm Size Matter Anymore? The New Economy and Firm Size Wage Effects.’’American Sociological Review69:659-76.
34.
Idson, Todd L. and Leo H. Kahane.2000. ‘‘Team Effects on Compensation: An Application to Salary Determination in the National Hockey League.’’Economic Inquiry38:345-57.
35.
Jacobs, David.1981. ‘‘Toward a Theory of Mobility and Behavior in Organizations: An Inquiry into the Consequences of Some Relationships between Individual Performance and Organizational Success.’’ American Journal of Sociology87:684- 707.
36.
Katz, Lawrence F., Lawrence H. Summers, Robert E. Hall, Charles L. Schultze, and Robert H. Topel.1989. ‘‘Industry Rents: Evidence and Implications.’’Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics1989:209-90.
37.
Kendall, Todd D.2003. ‘‘Spillovers, Complementarities, and Sorting in Labor Markets with an Application to Professional Sports.’’Southern Economic Journal70:389-402.
38.
Kremer, Michael.1993. ‘‘The O-Ring Theory of Economic Development .’’ Quarterly Journal of Economics108:551-75.
39.
Lazear, Edward P. and Kathryn L. Shaw.2007. ‘‘Personnel Economics: The Economist’s View of Human Resources.’’Journal of Economic Perspectives21:91-114.
40.
Levy, Emanuel.2003. All About Oscar: The History and Politics of the Academy Awards. New York: Continuum .
41.
Lincoln, Anne E.2007. ‘‘Cultural Honours and Career Promotions: Re-conceptualizing Prizes in the Field of Cultural Production.’’Cultural Trends16:3-15.
42.
Massey, Douglas S. and Nancy A. Denton.1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard .
43.
Merton, Robert K.1968. ‘‘The Matthew Effect in Science.’’Science159:56-63.
44.
Motti, Regev.1994. ‘‘Producing Artistic Value: The Case of Rock Music.’’ The Sociological Quarterly35:85-102.
45.
Nelson, Randy A., Michael R. Donihue, Donald M. Waldman, and Calbraith Wheaton .2001. ‘‘What’s an Oscar Worth.’’Economic Inquiry39:1-6.
46.
Petersen, Trond.1992. ‘‘Individual, Collective, and Systems Rationality in Work Groups: Dilemmas and Market-Type Solutions. ’’ American Journal of Sociology98:469-510.
47.
Podolny, Joel M.1993. ‘‘A Status-Based Model of Market Competition.’’American Journal of Sociology98:829-72.
48.
---. 2001. ‘‘Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market.’’ American Journal of Sociology107:33-60.
49.
Podolny, Joel M. and Damon J. Phillips.1996. ‘‘The Dynamics of Organizational Status.’’Industrial and Corporate Change5:453-71.
50.
Resnik, Gail and Scott Trost.1996. All You Need to Know About the Movie and TV Business . New York: Fireside.
51.
Rosen, Sherwin.1981. ‘‘The Economics of Superstars. ’’ American Economic Review71:845-58.
52.
---. 1982. ‘‘Authority, Control, and the Distribution of Earnings.’’ Bell Journal of Economics13:311-23.
53.
Saint-Paul, Gilles.2001. ‘‘On the Distribution of Income and Worker Assignment under Intrafirm Spillovers, with an Application to Ideas and Networks .’’ Journal of Political Economy109:1-37.
54.
Salganik, Matthew J., Peter Sheridan Dodds, and Duncan J. Watts.2006. ‘‘Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market.’’Science311:854-56.
55.
Sørensen, Jesper B. and Olav Sorenson.2007. ‘‘Corporate Demography and Income Inequality.’’American Sociological Review72:766-83.
56.
Stinchcombe, Arthur L.1963. ‘‘Some Empirical Consequences of the Davis-Moore Theory of Stratification.’’American Sociological Review28:805-808.
57.
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. and T. Robert Harris.1969. ‘‘Interdependence and Inequality: A Specification of the Davis-Moore Theory.’’Sociometry32:13-23.
58.
Tilly, Charles.1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
59.
Torgler, Benno.2007. ‘‘‘La Grande Boucle’: Determinants of Success at the Tour de France.’’ Journal of Sports Economics8:317-31.
60.
Torgler, Benno and Sascha L. Schmidt.2007. ‘‘What Shapes Player Performance in Soccer? Empirical Findings from a Panel Analysis.’’Applied Economics39:2355-69.
61.
Uzzi, Brian and Jarrett Spiro.2005. ‘‘Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem.’’ American Journal of Sociology11:447-504.
62.
Vogel, Harold L.2001. Entertainment Industry Economics: A Guide for Financial Analysis, 5th ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Watts, Duncan J. and Steven H. Strogatz.1998. ‘‘Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-World’ Networks.’’Nature393:440-42.
64.
Wilson, Robert.1985. ‘‘Reputations in Games and Markets.’’ Pp. 27-62 in Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining, edited by A. Roth.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65.
Zuckerman, Ezra W.2004. ‘‘Do Firms and Markets Look Different? Repeat Collaborations in the Feature Film Industry, 1935-1995.’’ Working Paper, Sloan School of Management, MIT.
66.
Zuckerman, Ezra W., Tai-Young Kim, Kalinda Ukanwa, and James von Rittmann.2003. ‘‘Robust Identities or Nonentities? Typecasting in the Feature-Film Labor Market.’’American Journal of Sociology108:1018-74.
67.
Zuckerman, Harriet.1996. Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States . 2nd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
